Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

youranter - by youranter

TEACHING AN OLD DOG NEW TRICKS

January 22nd 2007 12:45
It seems us old farts can still learn a lot from the younger generation. An article written by Michele Mandel in the Toronto Sun brought this to my attention and I thought I'd share it with you.
The younger generation has perfected the art of avoiding responsibility. I don't know if it's the same where you live, but here we are inundated almost daily with news reports of young thugs being hauled into court and walking away with nothing more than a slap on the wrist. "Gee, Your Honour, it wasn't my fault. I thought true life was the very same as the video games I play. Don't blame me. Blame the producers of these games who make me play them." "I tried my best all my life, Your Honour, but my parents tried to put a curfew on me and I just snapped. Don't blame me, blame those monsters." "It's not my fault, Your Honour, that my folks didn't give me enough time outs when I was younger." "My parents spanked me when I was a kid, Your Honour, and as you know, violence begets violence. They called it spanking when all it really is is outright, violent abuse. Blame them, not me." And on it goes.

Evidently, at least one of us has gotten the message and taken a page from these stalwart, misunderstood citizens.
Daniel Rouleau is a 55-year-old millwright who will spend this "horrendous weekend" worried about what awaits him come Tuesday morning. You see, Danny boy is cooling his heels in jail awaiting a judge's sentencing upon him after the hit-and-run that killed 72-year-old Laurie Landry. He has waited for this moment for 3 years. No doubt the judge will take that into consideration and give him 2 ½ to 3 times credit for time served. The judge has a choice to sentence him to house arrest for two years less a day, as his lawyer has requested, or send him directly to jail, perhaps for as long as five years as the Crown wants. If the judge goes for the defense request, this slug will spend no time in prison. And that sucks, big time.

You see, Laurie Landry was a deaf senior who had just got off the bus after volunteering at the Knights of Columbus bingo and was trying to cross a virtually traffic-free Bloor St. But Danny wants to shift the blame on him. "He wasn't where he should have been," says Rouleau. Danny says that he never saw him. "He was invisible in the dark in the rain." Nor did he know he hit him -- a claim the victim's daughter finds preposterous. "He weighed 252 pounds," says Ruth Patenaude, 44. "How can you not know you've hit something that heavy?"
To get around that little argument, Rouleau has the perfect come back. The witnesses were the ones who actually caused the accident, that they had stopped in the lane in front of him and he had to swerve into the next just as Landry was crossing.
Rouleau would have you believe that he was "completely horrified" at seeing himself vilified on the Sun's front page with his photo and the headline, Deadly Drunk's Legacy of Pain. He insists that he wasn't really drunk. "In nine hours I'd only consumed 80 beers," he says, "I left a beer and a half on the bar to stay within the guidelines of one drink per hour." Where did this jackass learn his math? But it wasn't his fault, you understand.
Michele writes, "I was totally in control," he says. "I don't drive drunk." He learned his lesson after losing his licence 16 years ago for drunk driving. But his estranged daughter, Mindy Parker, says her dad always drove drunk -- even when she was a pregnant passenger in his car. "I don't think he's gotten the message. He doesn't care about anybody but himself." Peel Police charged him with exceeding twice the legal alcohol limit, but he says that must have been a mistake. "There's no way I could have that kind of reading." In his mind, everyone conspired against him: the police, "lying" witnesses, even Landry's anguished relatives. "It's been twisted," he says. "It's only one side from a bitter family." I think I might be just a little bitter myself. The man he killed was a senior, deaf and a great-grandfather. Yet Rouleau has no sympathy for anyone but himself.
Michele goes on to write, "That is not the impression he gave on Wednesday, as he sat there stone-faced while Landry's relatives delivered heart-wrenching victim impact statements. He has an explanation for that as well. "Boys don't cry. My heart was going out to them. I was doing everything I could not to cry." Yet there has never been a word of apology, of regret. Even after the civil suit brought against him by the family was settled, there has been silence. He says he just hasn't had the opportunity. So why did he plead guilty? He claims he was tricked into it in return for the promise of a lighter sentence. Instead, he now faces the possibility of doing real jail time. "It will destroy the rest of my life."
Clearly, after explaining it to us, Rouleau deserves our sympathy. NOT!!
Contempt might be closer to the truth.
60
Vote
   


WHAT A JOB

January 21st 2007 14:05
Word today from the Associated Press in Australia gives us this little ditty:
"Sydney municipal officials have paid private detectives thousands of dollars to have sex with prostitutes to gather evidence needed to shut down illegal brothels, an Australian newspaper reported Sunday. Nine local councils have paid private investigators the equivalent of C$23,150 over the last three years to go undercover and root out the illicit trade, the Sunday Telegraph newspaper reported. Nick Ebbeck, the mayor of Kuringai council, which is reported to have spent C$6,440 in the last month employing detectives to have sex with prostitutes, said extreme measures were necessary. "We have to employ private investigators to actually go through with the act and come up with reports that will suffice in a court process," he was quoted saying "On numerous occasions over numerous days and times they had to fulfil the act." He said the evidence given by the investigators was successful in closing two illegal brothels this month. Licensed brothels are legal and relatively common in Sydney but a number of unlicensed premises operate throughout the city. Some councillors have complained the burden of proof for shutting down illegal brothels is too high."
I read this and thought what a great way to make a living. You don't have to buy anyone a dinner, take them out to the movies and there's no promise of a phone call the next day. Walk into a massage parlour or spa, chat up the girl, get it on and pat her on the backside when you leave. When you look at what the councils paid for this service, the private dicks (no pun intended) probably made more than the girls they shagged.
Of course, every silver cloud has a dark lining. Like how do you explain to the wife when you come home from a hard days (again, no pun intended) (well, maybe just a bit) work just what the heck it was that you did. "Hon, it's not my fault. The boss made me do it. And let's face it, we need the money." "Oh, now I understand, George. You're right, we are behind on the car payment. Thank you for doing this dangerous work."
Yeah, right. My wife would kill me. And if she happened to die before I did, she'd come back from the grave. I know that as surely as I know the sun rises in the East.
And what about little Tommy at school? The teacher asks, "So, tell us what your Daddy does for a living and why you might want to follow in his footsteps." "He gets to boink hookers and gets paid big bucks to do it. As for if I might want to follow in his footsteps, we'll file that under stupid questions, Teach."
Ah, Australia has come a long way since the days of dwarf tossing.
45
Vote
   


GOVERNMENT HYPOCRISY

January 20th 2007 14:10
Well the chickens are coming home to roost. As I've written before, Ontario passed a draconian no smoking law, caving in to the ‘Smoking Nazis' as a friend of mine puts it. The following is a letter to the editor of the Toronto Sun. I'd like to share it with you.
Re "Casino smoke room flap" (Jan. 17): Once again we see the spectacle of the big tobacco industry trying desperately to undermine Ontario's tough anti-smoking legislation in concert with the opposition parties at Queen's Park. As minister of health promotion I will not succumb to the ongoing antics of the tobacco companies as they try to push for a weaker and less effective law in this province. The Smoke Free Ontario Act is the most comprehensive law of its kind in North America and we have no intention of watering down the law or scrapping it as the pro-tobacco lobby demands on a weekly basis. The law was put in place to help protect all citizens from the harm and danger of both smoking and exposure to second-hand smoke. Last year in Ontario, 16,000 people died prematurely as a result of smoking, and the cost to our health care system to treat these people and others was $1.7 billion. Unlike Conservative critic Tim Hudak and the big tobacco lobby, I will not agree to exemptions for indoor smoking rooms at casinos or any other facility because I do not believe employees of these facilities should be treated as second class citizens and have their lives put at risk as a result of exposure to second hand smoke. Furthermore, I will not support the Conservative party's plans to water down the legislation and allow a whole series of exemptions to the act. I know the big tobacco companies are in panic mode as they see their customer base shrink. In fact, since the McGuinty government was elected tobacco consumption has fallen by 18.7%, that's 2.6 billion fewer cigarettes and this is great news for the health of Ontarians.
Jim Watson
Minister of Health Promotion
Pretty tough talk. Our town used to allow DSR's and everyone got along. Then a neighbouring town outlawed smoking everywhere. Bars, restaurants, bingo halls, Legion halls, etc. Our Liberal government thought they'd be doing us all a favour by making a level playing field and banned smoking in all buildings across the province. But wait, it now gets interesting.
Casino Windsor and Casino Niagara have seen a drop in revenue of 30% and have laid off staff because the Americans they depend upon for 80% of their business aren't coming over anymore. Meanwhile, Detroit casinos have seen an increase of 6% in their business and are busy planning expansions. Seems Michigan is learning from us just how far to push a smoking ban.
Back to the all wise government, what did they do about this? They allowed the casinos to install smoking rooms (albeit outside) to lure gamblers back. Why? Because the government oversees and makes a ton of money from gambling. No one else is allowed to do this. If you go to a restaurant and want a smoke, you'll have to go outside stand in the rain or cold without any shelter.
Nancy Daigneault, president of MyChoice responded to Mr. Watson's letter thusly, "Let's see if we have this right. The Health Promotion Minister and his government have blatantly abused, if not outright broken, the very law they passed and forced everyone else to obey. They are spending millions of dollars to give its casinos a break in order to retain smokers as customers while denying anyone else the same choice. But he expects to get away with all this by claiming those who are pointing this out are part of a tobacco plot or an anti-Liberal campaign by the government's political rivals. Excuse me -- who has bent the rules to allow these shelters? Why, it is Watson, his government -- and the local anti smoking authorities who have been given the power and funding to enforce the smoke-free law. For the record, it is true the casino issue was first exposed this week by mychoice.ca, and yes we do exist on funding from the tobacco industry. But as Watson knows full well, we are a non-profit group with 41,000 individual citizens. If outdoor shelters for smokers are deemed necessary and acceptable at casinos, they should be acceptable everywhere. The desperate accusatory tone to Watson's letter is a sure sign he knows he is wrong, and the public knows it."
As much as this government, Mr. Watson and Mr. George Smitherman, Minister of Health, want you to believe it is all an issue of health, they seem to miss some fundamental points. First, why are they breaking the very law they enacted? Because they have lost millions in revenue that casinos bring in. Why not allow bingo parlours that also bring in money for the government and give upwards of 40% of their take to charity to have smoking shelters? Second, if as the government says smoking has dropped by more than 18% since this law was put into effect, thus theoretically saving the health care system billions, why have health care costs increased by some 25 to 30%? Third, no one ever said smoking was healthy for you. The battle is about the freedom of choice to smoke where you want. The DSR's worked well here in our town. Both smokers and non smokers could enjoy an evening out at the local pub or restaurant without bothering one another.
In summation, I leave you with another letter written by Doug LeBlanc.
"Re "Won't give in to big tobacco" (Jim Watson, letter of the day, Jan 18): Good on you, Jimmy! It's good to see you stand up for health matters like that! But considering the amount of fumes coming out of motor vehicles, what are you doing to protect workers against that version of second-hand smoke? The oil and gas companies, though, are a different matter, not to mention automobile manufacturers. They are a huge market force, are they not? Yet they are responsible for a massive amount of air pollution that makes second-hand smoke pale to insignificant by comparison. If you are truly concerned about workers not having to inhale second-hand smoke, what about garage workers? What about auto mechanics? Do these people not deserve the same type of protection? But after all, this is only another attempt at government control, isn't it?" And with that, he has hit the nail on the head. Government control. It seems to me that our vets fought against government control when they went to Europe twice, and the brave men and women in today's fighting force are doing the same thing.
We are not living under a Liberal leadership. We are living in what's quickly becoming a dictatorship.
48
Vote
   


IT GIVES ME GAS

January 19th 2007 13:35
It seems everyone is ticked off about it. The price of a barrel of oil is dropping and we're still paying through the nose at the pumps. Yesterday, for the first time since May 2005, crude futures slipped below the $50 US a barrel barrier, to trade as low as $49.90 US a barrel. And yet prices at the pump remain as high as they were when a barrel sold for $80 US. Why are we paying so much?
A local news program the other day tried to delve into this problem, but as usual, they had no answers. They did interview an ‘expert' who started off by saying you hear all sorts of conspiracy theories, which in his view is nonsense. I say he is full of nonsense. His argument was that oil companies buy their futures at whatever price the market sets and this is reflected at the pumps. When they pay a ton of money for crude, the pump price will go up. Fair enough. He says that the oil companies buy just that, futures, and so if you bought some crude futures 3 months ago and the price has gone up between buying and delivery, you're going to get nailed at the pumps. Seems to make sense so far, they are just trying to recoup their losses..
Some years ago, I heard on the news that there is a 90 day supply of oil in the pipeline at any given time. Stay with me, because from here it gets a bit complicated. So, let's say I bought crude futures at 50 cents per litre and by the time it hits the pipeline, the price is up to 55 cents per litre. What I thought I could sell to you at 60 cents will now go up to 65 cents. Still with me? This should happen for the next 90 days according to what the ‘experts' would want you to believe


[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
   


EASY JUSTICE

January 18th 2007 21:42
A friend of mine recently wrote about a judge in Vermont giving a child molester a pass when it came to sentencing. It's gratifying to see that Canada is not the only one to be saddled with left wing liberal nuts.
We recently had a case where a Roman Catholic priest was convicted of child molestation. He went through 47 girls between the ages of eight and 15 over a period of 30 years in five parishes across Southwestern Ontario. Since he has been convicted 10 more women have come forward alleging his abuse. The man is now 84 years old, and I believe that's why the judge was easy on him. Rev. Charles Sylvestre was sentenced in October to three years in a penitentiary for sexually abuse.
Sylvestre was quite contrite when he was on the front pages during his trial. Now that he's had some time to think the whole thing over, he seems to have changed his mind. He's blaming everyone but himself. He blames his victims, other clergy and a school principal for the abuse he caused the more than 50 young girls, Chatham-Kent Crown Attorney Paul Bailey said Wednesday. "What we have here is a man who minimized his own involvement, blamed others, showed no (remorse) whatsoever to the psychological carnage that he caused," Bailey said. "According to him, these eight-year-old girls planned the destruction of their own lives," he said. Apparently, these girls conspired to let him molest them. "These girls that came over there every day, they planned it," Sylvestre told Bailey. "I could hear them talking and they'd come in and sit on a chair and their skirt would be up to their crotch.... Well, it was kind of attracting." Yeah, I can see myself saying that I'd let myself be abused so that 30 years down the road I might make some money or at the least get an apology from him. Far fetched? It only gets better


[ Click here to read more ]
47
Vote
   


CANADIANS IN AFGHANISTAN

January 18th 2007 11:48
Well, for all the people who want to cut and run from our duty in Afghanistan, I've written before that maybe they should speak to some of the soldiers who are there right now. ‘Taliban' Jack Layton, leader of our federal NDP party comes to mind.
With the end of this rotation of duty coming up in February, a number of soldiers are already talking about going back for another tour of duty. People like Cpl. Mark Ejdrygiewicz, 22, of Lethbridge, Alta., believe a six-month tour isn't long enough to get the job done. "On this six month tour we did a lot. There was a lot of progress made: Op Medusa and down in Panjwaii and the districts there opening up the schools and building highways," said Ejdrygiewicz, known as "Edge". And the peaceniks wonder what we are doing there. One has to keep in mind that we have lost 44 troops there since 2002, but they're probably safer in Afghanistan than in Toronto, where 45 people succumbed to SARS within 5 months.
"We're doing what we can but we know the Taliban are going to come back. Winter's here and they've gone back to Pakistan," he told a reporter. And people want us to get out and leave the Afghans to their fate. Sorry, I don't buy it. The Afghans are extremely grateful for what the Canadians have done for them and don't want us to leave, contrary to what ‘Taliban' Jack and his ilk would have you believe. Ejdrygiewicz takes his job seriously. Written in felt pen on the cover of his helmet in Pashtu is "Taliban Relocation Service," a tribute to fallen comrade Master Cpl. Jeffrey Walsh, who was killed by an accidental rifle discharge last summer


[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
   


ISRAEL vs PALESTINE

January 17th 2007 22:00
Jonathan Kay recently wrote an article that caught my eye. He says, "I have never encountered an issue that divides people so radically as the Middle East conflict. What passes for debate consists of pundits flinging memorized mantras back and forth." And he's right. It's too easy to get caught up in meaningless rhetoric and forget just how this conflict started in the first place.
Mr. Kay makes no bones about the fact he is on the side of Israel. I don't know him and neither have I read a great deal of his work. But he has taken an in depth look at the problem using a book written by Columbia professor Rashid Khalidi titled ‘The Iron Cage: The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood.'
For those who support the Palestinian point of view, Israel is a terrorist state and a practices apartheid. To those who support Israel, the Jewish state is the Middle East's only true democracy, an ally in the fight against Islamist terrorism, and an island of civilization seeking to survive among Arab hatemongers fired up by anti-Semitic bloodlust. Mr. Kay writes, "The basic vocabulary each side uses -- "martyr" vs. "terrorist," "act of resistance" vs. "suicide bombing," "apartheid wall" vs. "security fence" -- is instantly toxic to the other camp." He says that, " It is a book all Israeli supporters should read -- not because it will change their minds or because it reveals anything shocking, but because it lucidly explains what the last century has looked like from the point of view of Arabs living in the area we now call Israel


[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
   


DEATH SENTENCE

January 15th 2007 14:18
From the Associated Press, we get this little nugget: "A convicted killer facing lethal injection committed suicide by slitting his throat and arm with a blade and leaving a message written in his own blood 15 hours before his scheduled execution. Michael Dewayne Johnson, 29, was found Thursday in a pool of blood by officers making routine checks on him every 15 minutes, authorities said. He was pronounced dead at a hospital." My question is, why is this a big deal?
Here in Canada, it costs over $85,000 a year to feed, clothe and shelter a convict. A ridiculous sum. Perhaps that's why over 75% of the population wants to see a return of the death penalty. But back to the point, the guy's going to die anyway. Didn't he just save the state a ton of money?
I'm not sure of the figures, but it seems to me that I read somewhere that it costs $100,000 to execute an inmate. That's just the execution. Add to that sum whatever it costs to keep him/her cosy while they deal with all their endless appeals. What rubbish


[ Click here to read more ]
65
Vote
   


THE KID

January 14th 2007 11:03
My wife has been looking after a 9 year old for some weeks now. I think this is sort of neat as when she applied for the job, the Little One wasn't sure about how it would turn out. My wife said, ‘Let's give it a try for a week and if it works fine. If not, we can go our own separate ways with no hurt feelings on either side.' Well, it seems to have worked out.
This little girl is the product of a divorced mother who loves her to death but needs help when it comes to looking after her. The girl's grandmother used to look after her, but that meant getting her up at 6 AM each morning and delivering her to grandma's so that Mom could go to work. Now, she can sleep in until 8 AM before having to be roused to get ready for school. It's a win situation for her and a win situation for my wife.
The Little One recently came down with a touch of the flu. It meant we were saddled with her all day for the whole week. My wife has the patience of Job and did all she could to make her comfortable. I can only stand so much. My wife and I are past our child rearing days and this little intrusion gets to me once in a while


[ Click here to read more ]
50
Vote
   


IRAQ cont'd

January 12th 2007 15:30
Continuing in my supposedly misbegotten praise for George ‘Dubya', let's delve a little deeper into the problems that confront us in the mid-East.
We here in Canada are well aware of the protectionist stance taken by the USA in terms of free trade. I will be the first to say that it should be fair trade instead of free trade. But I have a hard time taking the US to task over this. After all, it seems to be working for China, Korea, Japan and India. They can all send us thousands of things in the way of consumer goods, yet deny us access to their markets with restrictive duties and taxes. It blew me away to find out that if you wanted to make an airline reservation with someone who spoke English, you'd pay extra to have an American speak to you rather than have the call routed through India. How sad is that?
In any case, history seems to be on the Americans side. Consider that as fascists and militarists took to their barbaric posturing in the 1930's, a majority of Americans turned inward, wanting to ignore the world beyond its oceans. American isolationism was read in Berlin and Tokyo as a permanent condition of a decadent American democracy. German Nazis and Japanese militarists saw this as a signal for launching their wars for world domination. America entered the war when Pearl Harbour was attacked. The day that will ‘live in infamy' changed the course of the war and we are all better off for it. It seems some people don't realize that what is happening in Iraq or Afghanistan today falls under the same banner


[ Click here to read more ]
56
Vote
   


More Posts
11 Posts
11 Posts dating from January 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

youranter's Blogs

584 Vote(s)
52 Comment(s)
11 Post(s)
47 Vote(s)
4 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
42 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
Moderated by youranter
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]