Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

World Times - by Phillip York

World Times - December 2006

The London Times reports that some scientists now believe the great Pyramids were constructed by workers pouring concrete into blocks high up on site, rather than hauling the giant stones all the way from the quarry.

The new theory is the ancient Egyptians had the technology to create a "limestone paste" which could be carried up the Pyramid in small batches and poured into a mould to set.
The old theory was that the blocks which can way up to 80 tons each, were hauled up ramps to the top. What do you believe?



Great Pyramid of Giza
Great Pyramid of Giza




*This image is licenced under the GNU Free Documentation License. It came from the Wikipedia page for Great Pyramid of Giza.
58
Vote
   


CNN reports archaeologists have unearthed a limestone Roman sarcophagus containing a headless skeleton, believed to be from 410 AD.

The coffin was unearthed near Trafalgar Square 10 feet below St. Martin-in-the-Fields.
The find is significant as it's located outside the established boundaries of the Roman city walls and opens up a new section of London for study.
49
Vote
   


More Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
5 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Phillip York's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Phillip York
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]