Tracey Frink

Stockbridge, Vermont, UNITED STATES


Joined May 27th 2009

Number of Posts:
11

Number of Comments:
0

Karma:
9



Tags & Posts

Bookmark Tags



Popular Tags

Blogs

Tracey Frink's Blogs

2208 Vote(s)
30 Comment(s)
27 Post(s)
28 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)

I mentor these bloggers

Learn more about the Orble Mentoring Program.


I do not mentor any bloggers.

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

I had to post this in honor of Michael J. Fox's 48th birthday, today. Aside from the Back To The Future trilogy, it's one of my faves from his movie career.

This movie is just wrong on so many levels. Of course, its director, Peter Jackson, is not a normal guy (look for his cameo in this film and you'll see what I mean). It opens on a darkly humored, yet weird, note where you are introduced to town outcast Frank Bannister (Fox) soliciting business for his psychic investigation business at a funeral in progress (the latest in a series of apparent heart attack victims). Having no luck there, he throws a bunch of business cards at the mourners and drives off like a bat out of Hell and crashes into the fence owned by Ray Linskey, played by Peter Dobson.

Of course, Ray and his wife, Lucy (Trini Alvarado) become Frank's next business targets. When their home later erupts into chaos with flying furniture and other household items, Lucy calls Frank to come get rid of the spirits. Fox plays this to a hilt and you can see it is absolute bullshit (Dobson's character is far from impressed). However, when Frank is "finished" at the house (more like thrown out), he notices something strange and possibly sinister number carved into Ray Linskey's forehead.

And he's the only who can see it.

No one believes him, of course, and he goes home, empty handed. He promptly rats out his two ghostly associates, Cyrus (Chi McBride) and Stuart (Jim Fyfe) for their ineptitude. "You didn't even bang the toilet seat lid? You made me look like an asshole!"

When he tries to rat them out for the number, neither one knows what he'stalking about. And this is where things start to get interesting. The film continues at this darkly humored pace for a while longer, but takes a dramatic turn at Frank and Lucy's retaurant dinner where Frank first encounters the specter that is really responsible for the series of heart attack deaths that have been haunting the town, deaths that continue to occur during this movie

Poor Frank. As he is the only one who can see the specter and is conveniently around when the latest victims die, he becomes accused of their deaths. It doesn't help his case when it comes to light that his late wife died in a similar fashion after they had a nasty argument that resulted in a car crash. At this point, Frank has no memory of the crash or how his wife died, but FBI special investigator, Milton Dammers (Jeffrey Combs) is convinced that Frank is killing all these people with his mind. Yeah, this guy is special, all right. The kind of special that should be strapped to a gurney and heavily sedated.

I won't tell you any of the plot from this point. That wouldn't be fair to those who haven't seen it.

THis movie, though, has the strangest endorsement that I have ever heard. The critics panned this film, of course, and it didn't do well in theaters. However, in a later interview with Michael J. Fox, it was revealed that it was favored among the Heaven's Gate cult members (it was on their approved movie list).

Gives new meaning to the term, "cult classic," doesn't it.
45
Vote
   


Hey, I am a female, after all. My video and DVD collection houses more than its fair share of "fluffy" movies, including the source of today's review, The Majestic (2001).

I don't know if this movie was panned more for the formulaic story line or for the fact that Jim Carrey tried his hand in a dramatic role. Maybe it was both. However, I hate to see actors pigeon-holed in one movie genre when it's perfectly clear that their talents transcend into others. (I can' rant about this subject for days, I tell you.)

Jim Carrey plays Peter Appleton, a 1950s B-movie screenwriter who finds himself on the Communist party's blacklist. Suddenly ostracized by those around him, he decides to get drunk and just take a drive. As he tells his bartender with the straightest of faces, "I'm leaving and taking the monkey with me." (No, he wasn't being perverted. He really carried a toy monkey with him to the bar.)

But, he ends up driving his car off a bridge and waking up on the beach in a small town with complete amnesia of who he is and where he came from. However, he bears an uncanny resemblance to the town's favorite son, presumably killed in World War II. It turns out that most of that town's young men had died in the war, almost completely obliterating an entire generation. The town embraces Carrey with open arms, thinking he is their precious "Luke" having come back from the dead. He is reacquainted with his elderly father and his old grilfriend and helps his father reopen the family business, a movie theater.

Of course, when things begin looking too idyllic, all Hell breaks loose. The Feds start catching up with Carrey after his car washes up on the beach. And some of the town's locals (including the girlfriend) start to suspect that their "Luke" isn't who he says he is. Some of his mannerisms are just a bit off. Eventually, Peter Appleton's memory catches up to him, but that is quickly overshadowed by a dramatic turning point in the plot. Sorry, I won't divulge details. If you want to know, you'll have to watch.

After this, the movie is fairly predictable. But, so was the rest of the movie. Even so, the predictability doesn't overshadow the movie's charm. This was not a movie for the 21st century, but a throwback to an earlier era. I've said this before, but I'll say it again. Don't go in with a lot of expectations and you won't be heavily disappointed. Not every movie has to have a complicated plot to be worthy. Sometimes, all you want is a nice piece of fluff with plenty of sap.
34
Vote
   


This isn't as much a movie review as it is an all-out opinionated rant. I will write one from time to time to shake things up around here and to invite some reader feedback. Hey, isn't that what a blog is really all about?

Sequels and remakes have always been a part of the movie mainstream, but they have infiltrated the genre like never before. It doesn't seem trendy to have a fresh idea anymore, does it? I mean, just look what's coming back this summer! Terminator, Transformers, Star Trek are all in theaters now and all have ideas rooted in the past. I'm not saying this is necessariliy a bad thing, but there doesn't seem to be a cap on this well at all. And that has me more than a tiny bit scared.

In an earlier post, I wrote about my Back To The Future fandom. On the Internet, I have trolled message boards and even have one of my own and one question just refuses to die.

Will there ever be a Back To The Future Part 4?

I seriously hope that will never happen. I'm in the fandom camp that is vehemently against the idea strictly because the original cast either can't or won't be there. Michael J. Fox refuses to reprise his character, not because of his Parkinson's, but because he got sick of being typecast and you really can't blame him. I mean, he's almost 48 years old and he wants to take on different roles and ideas.

Christopher Lloyd has stated that he will not reprise his character if Michael isn't interested, so he's out. Wendie Jo Sperber (Linda McFly) passed away in 2005. Tom Wilson (Biff) does stand-up comedy now and acts in various things. He's obviously put his BTTF character behind him. I mean, there's a huge chunk of teh cast missing right there.

Now, the other fandom camp (mostly made up of newer fans who have only seen the movies on TV or DVD) argues that the Bobs (Zemeckis and Gale) can simply recast these roles with today's top actors. I must say that this would be a devastating mistake to make and would completely tarnish the trilogy's reputation. Such an idea would never have the charm of the orginal movies and would be seen as nothing more than a waste of money and film.

Of course, that is just my opinion. The opinion of a purist who grew up on these films and would not like to see the idea recycled into a 21st century hunk of crap (even if the special effects would be cool).

So, I turn this long established debate over to you, loyal readers. What do you think?
46
Vote
   


I've moved, y'all!

June 2nd 2009 18:08
Please check out www.dimemovie.com for my new posts. Thank you for your loyal patronage.

19
Vote
   


So, you may ask why I even bothered to see the film if I had no vested interest in its plot. Well, the answer is simple: I tagged along with my fiancee and his friend armed with the promise that I could pick the next flick. (And, yes, I plan to cash in.)

Now, don't take that to mean I hated the movie, because I didn't. I wouldn't mind adding this one to my DVD library, actually. It was well cast. Each actor fit nicely into their selected role and this showed that the casting director took time and care during the auditions to find the best possible fit. You can tell when some movies cast actors haphazardly, because of lack of budget or time. And the cameo by Leonard Nimoy was a nice touch, which added real authenticity to the movie


[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
   


No, I really don't hate this movie. This was one of my acquisitions when I was on a quest to find all of Michael J. Fox's movies and this one was a needle in a haystack. It wasn't a popular realease and sank into movie moratorium long before I had ever heard of it. In 1999, it was brought back on home video and is now on DVD.

Midnight Madness was released by Disney in 1980, Its plot is simple. A graduate student/gaming nerd (who obviously has no other life), Leon, invents the penultimate scavenger hunt called "The Great All-Nighter." Other students pair up into four teams and scour the city of Los Angeles for clues that lead them to various locations (like, the Pabst brewery and LAX), each vying to be the team that hits the final location first


[ Click here to read more ]
28
Vote
   


Allow me to introduce myself.

May 30th 2009 05:29
Hello, everyone!

Some of you may have noticed a cluster of new posts on this blog. I have officially taken over Dime Movie, formerly moderated by Tucker Warner. All content from my old blog, The good, the bad and the wtf!, now resides here


[ Click here to read more ]
28
Vote
   


This movie has long faded into 80s obscurity, but it still has a place in my video library. Yes, some of us still have those, even if mine is scattered among many boxes. I'm talking about the 1986 movie The Money Pit, starring Shelley Long and Tom Hanks (before Big).

The beginning of the movie is pretty slow. Actually, it's almost dead. There are a few chuckles, but it could have been about fifteen minutes shorter, in my opinion. The movie really picks up when Shelley and Tom's house literally starts falling down around them. Moral of the story: When something seems too good to be true (like the sweet old lady selling the huge, beautiful home at a steal), it usually is. Buyer beware! Especially when it comes to sweet, little old ladies


[ Click here to read more ]
27
Vote
   


I guess this could fall under WTF. I have never been a big fan of comic books, unless they were, like, Get Along Gang or something cheesy like that. (Am I showing my age, now?) However, I've been drawn into some of the Marvel movies (X-Men, Spiderman 1-3) and I recently saw the latest X-Men movie, Wolverine.

I have to admit, he isn't my favorite character. IN fact, I've always thought he was a bit of an arrogant ass, but I actually liked him in this movie. I don't know. Maybe it was because his film brother was even more of an arrogant ass


[ Click here to read more ]
37
Vote
   


I am a self-described Backie. I have all the movies on video and DVD (in case one format wears out), I have a cache of movie script drafts and I scoured Ebay for the books and other merchandise. I even have my Solar Shades, acquired from Pizza Hut back in 1989.

However, has the trilogy weathered the true test of time? Nearly twenty-five years after the release of the first movie, it is easy to see that the core concept of the movie has survived. The trilogy is still an engaging story and one that is definitely still worth multiple viewings, because half the fun is finding all the in-jokes that the movies provide. A true test of fandom is seeing how many you know. That is, if you're old enough to get some of the references. I mean, how many of today's kids know that Huey Lewis made a cameo appearance at the band tryouts in Part 1? (Huey Lewis? Who's that


[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

I've not commented on anything yet :(