wild-rose2009 and yet another Arab Nation!!
January 11th 2009 10:24
Over the past number years I have seen the word terrorism thrown around very casually. Most prominent or memorable words are either “Muslim Terrorists” or “Islamic Terrorists”. After September 11, it seemed as though the entire world focused on Muslims and they were labeled as outcasts as terrorists, if you were Muslim you concealed your face and averted your gaze. There was freedom of speech, yet you couldn’t just say that you were Muslim out right without feeling as though you were being judged… and much is still the same today. The past eight years have seen a revolutionary change in people’s attitude. It’s not the colour of your skin, communists or Jews anymore we overcame those issues. We have a new race to hate and in the last eight years we have decided on Islam. However, when did Terrorism have a religion? Oklahoma bombings of 1995 with the two main two main conspirators, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols along with others were Christian however I have yet to hear the words “Christian Terrorists”. Terrorists do not have a religion, their religion is Terror and their purpose is to spread terror. They do not belong to any religion, they do not believe in any thing and although they throw around words like holy war… there is no war that is holy. It is simply a cold blooded masscre of people who do not deserve to be slaughtered down like animals.
During 9/11 the whole world stood still with wide eyes while innoncent people lost their lives and thousands had to cope with that loss. That was just the beginning, the anthrax scare followed soon, war in Afghanistan, Strikes on Lebenon, war in Iraq, … the world slowly became desensitized to innocent people loosing their lives. People still die, people are still being killed but no one seems to care anymore. We are now in 2009 and its brought upon the holocaust of yet another Arab nation. It’s Phalestine this time. Innocent civilians are still loosing their lives everyday but the world has’nt stood still… the world has’nt done anything at all. Over 800 civilians have been killed so far, more then 300 were children. 800 may seem like just a number to us but that 800 effects the lives of thousands that are linked with it. Gaza has become the living graveyard of a nation. What excuse do we have this time? Weopons of Mass destruction? Unlikley since the location of Phalestine makes it impossible for any weapons or aid to enter without the permission of Israel. So Israel is attacking a poor defenceless nation without a proper miltary and without any proper means to defend it self. The ratio of people killed are something like 10 Israeli “soliders” to 800 Phalestinian “civilians”. Where is the fairness in that?
[ Click here to read more ]
During 9/11 the whole world stood still with wide eyes while innoncent people lost their lives and thousands had to cope with that loss. That was just the beginning, the anthrax scare followed soon, war in Afghanistan, Strikes on Lebenon, war in Iraq, … the world slowly became desensitized to innocent people loosing their lives. People still die, people are still being killed but no one seems to care anymore. We are now in 2009 and its brought upon the holocaust of yet another Arab nation. It’s Phalestine this time. Innocent civilians are still loosing their lives everyday but the world has’nt stood still… the world has’nt done anything at all. Over 800 civilians have been killed so far, more then 300 were children. 800 may seem like just a number to us but that 800 effects the lives of thousands that are linked with it. Gaza has become the living graveyard of a nation. What excuse do we have this time? Weopons of Mass destruction? Unlikley since the location of Phalestine makes it impossible for any weapons or aid to enter without the permission of Israel. So Israel is attacking a poor defenceless nation without a proper miltary and without any proper means to defend it self. The ratio of people killed are something like 10 Israeli “soliders” to 800 Phalestinian “civilians”. Where is the fairness in that?
| 53 |
| Vote |
Read More
Add Comments
Comments (1)
