Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Random Musings on Life, Love and Everything - by Someone

The US Presidential Election: Some Questions.

October 30th 2008 07:11
This isn't a usual rant, more some open questions for American voters. I am neither American or knowledgeable about American politics, so some of this may be obvious, but please humor me.

1. How much does party affiliation matter? Do you guys vote for parties or candidates? If you vote Democrat, would you continue to do so if the candidate was a total douche? Likewise for republicans?

2. What matters more? Candidates or Policy? Everyone knows this campaign has mainly been each party trying to discredit their opponent, so does this indicate that the candidate is far more important than the policies they are planning?


The answer to number 2 really interests me, so any responses would be welcome. Personally I vote for whatever party I feel will best serve the country, and that has nothing to do with who is leading it... If the party has very sound policy ideas, I would vote for them even if they were led by a complete twat.

3. Does it really matter who Obama has associated with in the past? I mean, come on. I have hung out with thieves, hard-core drug dealers, drug addicts, strippers and prostitutes, but that doesn't mean I am an awful person (that's just a coincidence). I mean.... only Jesus (if you buy into the Book) was perfect, right? So why do you expect a presidential candidate to be perfect? They are, after all, just people.

4. How can you call Democrats greedy when Sarah Pallin spent 150k on clothes?

5. Why is it such a big deal if Obama was born in the States or not? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's still ok to be born outside the states its because a parent is stationed overseas in the military, right? So my question is... Why is the child of a liutenant stationed overseas more American than the child of, say, an accountant working overseas?


I'm sorry if these questions seem a little slanted towards the Obama camp... these are just things that have been running through my head.
33
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Comments
1 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Two Guys Sports

October 30th 2008 08:25
1) Unfortunately some stick strictly to their own party. Mainly because the basic ideals usually stay in place no matter who the candidate is, just on a different level. For example let's say 95% of Republicans are against abortion. In that 95% there are the Palin's that think even if their own youngest daughter was raped and became pregnant abortion is a no-no, but also in there somewhere you will probably find some that favor abortion in cases of rape or incest.

2) I am going to point you to my answerfor #1 and #3 to answer this one.

3) In some cases the past matters. Although in many cases what is put out there is a load of crap. A good example would be in 2004 and John Kerry. There was a long elaborate pack of lies made up to try and assure he didn't win. (The Swift-Boaters..which if you search my site you can find more info on, if you want.)

More on those two actually answering your #2 question - In 2004 the candidate obviously didn't matter, nor did the policies, since Bush had been in charge for four years already and it was clear he was umm, an idiot and still won. It was mainly due to the lies, and lack of charisma shown by Kerry. Add in the fear still lingering from 9/11 and the Republican that wanted to blow things up won out.

4) They only call Democrats greedy because of the incredible amounts of money raised. Some of which I am sure people are going to comment is illegal. The thing is, even if the Republicans could have raised the same amount of money it would have all been wasted. It would have been $300K on her wardrobe, and twice as many negative ads.

5) The Constitution of the U.S. clearly stated that anyone who was not alive at the time of the writing of the document MUST have been born in the U.S.

Thing is, as you said if a person is born say on an army base overseas, or even while a parent is working somewhere else(temporarily) they are still U.S. citizens, and thus eligible.

The ironic part of all of that is - Barack Obama was actually born in Hawaii. John McCain however was born in Panama where his father was stationed.

Gene

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
85 Posts dating from February 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Someone's Blogs

2542 Vote(s)
82 Comment(s)
47 Post(s)
266 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
5 Post(s)
Moderated by Someone
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]