Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
This blog takes a hard look at the Steelers. I'm not one to shy away from criticism when it's warranted, and will give plenty of accolades when earned. Read on, and enjoy!

Steelers reload via draft

April 28th 2012 19:14
Each year, all the NFL teams are "graded" by various experts and non-experts alike. I am a non-expert, by the way, in case you were wondering. But I am a Steeler fan, and therefore my vested interest in the draft is considerable. I want them to have a good draft, which they usually do, because I want them to have a good football team. I cannot relate how many times you read during the course of a regular season how this team built by the draft or that team built by the draft. If you look at current AFC powerhouse teams, which in my opinion consists of New England, Baltimore and Pittsburgh, they are all built through the draft. Each and every year the Ravens, Steelers and Patriots all receive high grades by various people for their drafts. So, judging by the success of these three franchises, it's obvious to me that overall team success begins with building the team through the draft. DUH.

Which leads me to the 2012 NFL draft. When I think of a draft, I look at positions of need and positions of depth. When you get the combination of player filling a need position, generally you immediately receive a good draft grade. Take Indy or Washington - unless they so totally butcher rounds 2 through whatever, they will be seen as having a successful draft by slotting a huge need with a tremendous talent. Again: DUH!

Now, Pittsburgh has needs. Unfortunately, in my opinion, they have more needs than they have rounds and talent available. They are aging on the defense and lacking depth. Their offensive line has been generally terrible. So what is the team supposed to do?

The pick of the #1 OG (on various including Kiper's Draft Boards) DeCastro is exactly the kind of pick that Pittsburgh makes annually to have a "good" draft. It's not sexy - an offensive guard is never a sexy pick. But if he works out as advertised, and we now have a masher guard to go along with a masher, already elite center (after 2 years) then our offensive line went from liability to...not a liability. Not an asset, though. Not yet.

Leading me to pick #2. The Pittsburgh papers are full of this story, that Ohio State OL Mike Adams was yanked from a lot of boards, and was told to his face by the Steelers that he was "off their board" completely because of his marijuana problem. Adams drove to Pittsburgh and got a face to face meeting with the brain trust - Rooney, Colbert and Tomlin - and probably got to meet Todd Haley and OL coach Sean Kruger - and whatever he said got the Steelers to not only put him back on the board but take him with their 2nd pick.

Now, Pittsburgh has a long, solid history with their #1s. Their history with #2 is feast or famine. For every Limas Sweed there is a Dermonotti Dawson. Adams has 1st-round talent. It's already obvious from the Pittsburgh papers that Mr. Adams' leash is not even as long as his arm. The message is loud and clear. "You have made your first, and only, mistake." If he works out, and now this is a huge IF, Pittsburgh's offensive line goes from neither an asset nor liability to an asset. There are potentially two first rounders and two second rounders starting on that line, and if it works out the four 1/2 round guys are rookies, 1st year or 2nd year players. They are young. Are they ready?

Round 3 has Pittsburgh taking their usual. Sean Spence is an OLB from the University of Miami. I can't speak for other teams; I don't know their draft history at all. But Pittsburgh has a VERY LONG history of taking guys like this in middle rounds. They sit and learn Dick LeBeau's complicated defense and then when the time is right they are inserted into the starting role and nary a beat is missed. It's uncanny how they do this - they've been doing this since the latter years of Chuck Noll's coaching career. We won't know about Mr. Spence until the start of the 2014 season - that's when we'll know if the 3rd round pick was a winner or not.

The last pick made thus far is Alameda Ta'amu, a NT project from Washington. This is interesting - earlier, as the Steelers discussed the 2nd round pick Adams, Ta'amu's name was tossed about. So obviously this man has been on the Steelers radar screen this year. Do I know whether he's a 2nd, 3rd, or 4th round talent? Nope. No clue. But here's one of those middle-round guys that we just have to sit and watch to see how he develops.

On a completely tangential note, I love it when Steelers pick Polynesian or Samoan guys. Ta'amu. Polamalu. Anyone remember Fu? (Chris Muafatu Ma'afala?).

Anyway, rounds 1 through 4 picked. I wonder how other fans are viewing their teams' success or failure this year?
18
Vote
   


AFC North Race

November 28th 2011 18:03
1. Baltimore: @CLE, IND, @SD, CLE, @CIN
2. Pittsburgh: CIN, CLE, @SF, STL, @CLE
3. Cincinnati: @PIT, HOU, @STL, ARI, BAL

Strength of schedule:
1. Bal .364 (20-35)
2. Pit .473 (26-29)
3. Cin .545 (30-25)

All three teams have 3 home games left. Both PIttsburgh and Baltimore have to travel to the west coast.

Baltimore leads the division and holds the tie-breaker over Pittsburgh by virtue of their season sweep. The Bengals are a game back of Pittsburgh and are 2-2 in the division. The Steelers are 1-2 in the division with 3 to play, and Baltimore is 3-0 in the division.

Baltimore's schedule is the easiest. There is no reason this team should not go 13-3. To be blunt, they will have to win out; the Patriots are sitting at 8-3 as well and both teams have light schedules to end the year. I think that if the Ravens go 13-3, they'll be the number one seed by virtual of their win directly over Houston (assuming the Texans win out) and new England (because presumably they'll have a better divisional record). So the Ravens have a TON to play for, bad teams or not. They want - need, perhaps - the road to the Super Bowl to go through Baltimore. Plus, Pittsburgh is experienced at playoff-style football, and will presumably be playing very well down the stretch. The Ravens have to keep at least the same record as Pittsburgh to win the division.

Pittsburgh's schedule is middling, but that Monday Nighter against San Francisco looms HUGE. For one thing, Pittsburgh needs to win out if they want to have any hope at all at unseating division-leading Baltimore. The Steelers need help to win the division, so it's doubly important that they keep pace with Baltimore. It is not out of the question - if the Steelers win out - that Week 17 will be a huge week for Pittsburgh. Beat Cleveland and then hope like hell Cincinnati can beat Baltimore, and the AFC North is theirs. However, one loss ends any hope that the Steelers will win the North. If Baltimore loses 2 down the stretch given the schedule they have, they don't deserve the North title!

For Cincinnati, things are downright ugly. However, to their credit, the Bengals have a full game lead in the wild card. But if they don't win Sunday, they will fall back into the pack. Three teams are sitting at 6-5 with a chance to catch the Bengals. And unfortunately, the Bengals have a tough schedule with games in Pittsburgh, home against Houston and ending the season home against Baltimore. To get into the playoffs, the Bengals are probably going to need to win at least 2 of those games. I don't know if 10-6 will win a wild card seed.

If I had to guess, I'd say that Baltimore will win out and secure the division. I think Pittsburgh will lose one - either to Cincy or San Fran - and end up locking down the 5th wild card seed. The Bengals I think will end up finding a way to secure the 6th wild card. I think the Broncos will be beaten at some point, and I am confident that both the Jets and Titans will lose at least one, possibly two more games each. Forget the rest of the AFC - no one else can do a thing.
29
Vote
   


Penn State, Paterno and Sandusky

November 7th 2011 17:22
Saturday afternoon I watched in stunned surprise as the announcement hit the wire that two high-ranking Penn State administrators, AD Tim Curley and VP of Finance Gary Schultz, were charged with one count each of perjury. That was bad enough, but when it was linked to a 40-charge indictment against long-time Penn State defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky alleging long-term and systematic sexual assaults against minor boys, I think I wanted to puke.

The first thought that I have is that no matter how bad it sounds - and when a very high-profile and highly esteemed man is accused of such a horrid action it's as bad as it gets - covering it up is always worse. I can imagine the ripples of fear, hatred and disgust that went through the stomachs of the men involved, from Mike McCreay to Joe Paterno to Tim Curley. "Him? You're saying he did *what?*" Easy to imagine, isn't it? Yet no one ever learns, and time and time again people fail to get it through their heads that accepting the huge fallout from the bad acts of one person is far easier to manage than that same fallout coupled with the disgrace and fury over the cover-up. And no matter how this turns out, you and me both know the same thing, that the *public perception* is that this was a cover-up. How can it not be? How could it have taken 15 days for Curley to interview McCreary after Paterno advised him to report it? How was the police action buried? How? Why? How? Why?

My second thought is that in one day the reputation of the school, it's long-time football coach, and every single alumni has been ruined by association. I never met Jerry Sandusky. Yet the fact that I went to Penn State is suddenly a black mark. "Oh you went there? Your coaches like to abuse little boys?" Nice, huh? The fact remains - alluding to my previous note about cover ups - that no matter what would have or could have happened if the proper steps were taken in 2002 - that the school would have been decimated by these accusations. There's no question in my mind that Penn State's reputation would be tarnished. And today it stands tarnished. Yet at the same time, I can imagine the response of every single major college coach of hearing those accusations: fury and disgust at the acts of a man, but concern for the coach of Penn State. No coach would or ever could condone such acts, yet every single major coach understands perfectly what Paterno is going through. Think that this isn't the topic of conversation among the staffs today?

My third thought is that Paterno is done. He cannot escape this mess, and it's a damned shame that he's being pulled down by someone he worked with and presumably trusted for 32 years. Sandusky and Paterno are linked as tightly as two men can be. No, it's not fair to Paterno but it's life. The general public will demand that someone pay - someone besides Sandusky. Paterno will have to be sacrificed for the good of the school's reputation, and to begin the healing process. It's a tragic end to the coach of our lifetime. "JoePa" will no longer have quite the same connotation. Paterno must play out this season. Stepping down now would only fuel the fire of the conspiracy theorists who are already actively wonder what Paterno really knew. It will strengthen the convictions of those who have already convicted Paterno of moral crimes - because he didn't immediately go to the police or follow up on his own suspicions. So Paterno has to ride out this season, and quietly retire at the end of it. The remaining years of his life will be spent asking bitter questions I think; I am so terribly sorry to write that and yet I think it is the truth. He will ask himself a million times over why he didn't do anything more. Yet this furor will probably have been the same if he had done the thing that the moralists wanted him to do. How sad.

Fourth, my own personal feelings are that primarily I understand that prosecutors don't bring charges unless they believe that they have a good chance of winning. Certainly bringing these charges besmirched Sandusky's name; presumably the prosecution has powerful evidence linking Sandusky to the acts and that means that he's probably going to be found guilty one day in a court of law. And that will mean that we Penn Staters can unleash all the invective we have at the son of a bitch. But I will go on to say this. Many people will be angry at Paterno and Sandusky for the damage done to the university. I am thinking now that people should be more worried about the damage Sandusky did to the alleged victims. In the cruelest way possible he ruined their childhoods. Speaking as a father, I would go far out of my way to seek retribution if some ...thing... did those things to my kids. I feel most for the parents of those children, who have had to pass time while hearing about what a great man Sandusky was when he was at Penn State, and about Paterno and the school in general. It was probably enough to infuriate them. I can imagine their pain, only I don't want to. I'm afraid to.

I wish that mere words could fix this. But they can't. They won't. It will take actions - painful actions that will do great harm. Yet the harm done to a university's football program should pale in comparison to the harm done to the alleged victims. They should get their victory and see a monster put away.
29
Vote
   


Terrell Suggs is great!

November 2nd 2011 20:32
This article in the Baltimore Sun shows the best of Ravens LB Terrell Suggs.

Of the quotes: "Heinz Field is his Madison Square Garden." The Ravens are "the Enemy of the State." He says that he "loves the welcoming [he gets] with the No 1's." The best: "Like I said, there is the Super Bowl, and then there is Ravens-Steelers


[ Click here to read more ]
27
Vote
   


Eyes turning to Heinz Field

November 1st 2011 16:24
On Sunday Night, NBC broadcasts the Ravens visiting Pittsburgh to take on the Steelers. Oh, the things that will be written and said this week. And usually, the hype this game generates is warranted, and sometimes the game is actually better than the hype.

The one storyline that will get a TON of attention this week, but in the grand scheme of things probably doesn't matter one damn bit, is that the Ravens ran up the score on Pittsburgh, scoring a late TD through the air, in their 35-7 beatdown of the Steelers in week 1. Much will be made of going for 2 and making it when they could have easily kicked the PAT. Truthfully, I think that both sides understand what it was. The Ravens were venting years of pent-up frustrations, at finally unleashing hell on the Steelers. They had an opponent down and out, and figuring (rightly, perhaps) that delivering a well-placed kick to the ribs might derail their entire season. The Steelers had to absorb those blows, and they did. They didn't exactly learn from it, but they absorbed them, learned from them, and got better from them. Mike Tomlin doesn't always play the "us-against-the-world" card, and certainly has to do nothing to get his team up for this game, but I would imagine that he is pointing to the late-game antics of the Ravens as a reminder to his team about the nature of their opponent. He will remind his team that kicking an opponent when its down is fundamentally sound yet inherently dangerous. The thing is, bad blood doesn't win or lose games. Good fundamental football does. Being over-hyped for a game doesn't help in that department. So, fundamentally, cool your jets and focus on the game at hand


[ Click here to read more ]
18
Vote
   


PIT 25 NE 17

October 31st 2011 00:41
How easy is it to say that "I was going to write about how the Steelers were going to win?" And yeah, my point was that the same old crap about Brady torching the Steelers has a basis in reality, but that each game is different. Lo and behold, for the first time since Brady joined the league, the Steelers played man-to-man against his offense. It's the only antidote to the Brady offense, and not many teams have the ability to do it. For years I said that the Steelers didn't, but I guess the coaching brain trust decided they had seen enough Brady nightmares and went after him the only way that has worked in the past.

Look, it's not brain science. Brady is easily one of the most accurate and brilliant QBs to ever play the position. Where Manning mesmerizes, Brady assassinates. He's so smart and gifted at reading defenses and knowing where the open man will be. The problem is that Brady does his best work when facing zone coverages. When he faces man-to-man defenses, he's not quite as effective. The key here is the QB pressure. Usually, when a team goes man-to-man against Brady's offense, they can exert QB pressure *up the middle.* That's what Pittsburgh did, and it made him uncomfortable. First, he clearly didn't expect it. Second, the Steelers played good defense, which made it tough on him


[ Click here to read more ]
28
Vote
   


PIT 10 HOU 17

October 3rd 2011 00:51
What should be painfully obvious to anyone - including normally over-the-top Steeler fans - is that this year's team is simply not very good. It's clear that both lines are suffering. Take your pick - poor players, age or something else - these two lines are almost woeful. It's going to be a long season.

From the opening snaps, the Houston offensive line was taking the game to the Steelers line. Casey Hampton has not been able to get off blocks all year. Worse, he's being driven backwards. Aaron Smith does not have any burst to speak of. I can't evaluate Ziggy Hood, except to say that he's not standing out. And if that's damning with faint praise, then so be it. The linebackers, for all their hype, have not been able to play with their same intensity because the line is failing so badly. That said, James Farrior looks done to me. Just...done. That's also too bad since he's a popular player and has been such a stalwart on the inside. But he's missing tackles, looking slow and out of position and generally has not looked very solid. The only player who I can't criticize is Ike Taylor. But then, that could be perhaps because no one is throwing his way because they don't have to. Defensively, this unit can't stop the run and can't pressure the passer. That's a very bad combination


[ Click here to read more ]
29
Vote
   


Pit 23 Indy 20

September 26th 2011 10:05
The only thing that salvaged this game from being a debacle was earning the late win. Otherwise, there's nothing from my perspective to celebrate.

The offensive line, when players aren't dropping like flies, can't run block, can't pass block, and can't pick up blitzes. Not good. This is a bad bunch, maybe the worst our fans have seen in recent years, and spells nothing good. Not only is the injury bug again striking the Steeler's weakest unit, but again it's hitting the tackles - the one position they can't afford


[ Click here to read more ]
38
Vote
   


Pitt, Syracuse to ACC

September 19th 2011 16:28
What do I think of this move?

Well, an opinion writer this morning blasted the move of Big East-founding Syracuse, and Big East-heavyweight Pittsburgh, saying that it was done out of greed. That loyalty was trumped by the basest of motives. Others, here in Pittsburgh and elsewhere, are not only questioning the timing, but wondering what happens next, given the instability in the Big 12. It also seems, given the rumors floating in the media, that the Big East as a football conference is on the verge of complete death. UConn is said to be lobbying the ACC hard to join, and now there is some talk that WVU may also follow suit, although WVU is also talking to the SEC


[ Click here to read more ]
9
Vote
   


What to say?

September 12th 2011 20:37
The Baltimore Ravens beat the snot out of the Pittsburgh Steelers. There is nothing else to say. No silver linings. Just an old-fashioned beatdown. The Steelers were outcoached, out played, out hit, out worked, and outclassed in every single phase of the game. They had no answer to Ray Rice. To answer to the swarming defense. Ben went into "Ben mode" and basically started throwing the ball up for anyone's grabs; he's lucky he didn't throw 6 picks.

This one is on the coaches. How a team is that unready to play is nearly unforgiveable. I know that the Ravens are a good team, but Pittsburgh made them look unstoppable. I know the Steelers are better than they showed but the Ravens took advantage of them


[ Click here to read more ]
18
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
4 Posts
2 Posts
83 Posts dating from August 2009
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Michael Wasco's Blogs

6377 Vote(s)
31 Comment(s)
128 Post(s)
3273 Vote(s)
8 Comment(s)
48 Post(s)
Moderated by Michael Wasco
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]