Seth Rosenman

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES


Joined September 5th 2008

Number of Posts:
3

Number of Comments:
0

Karma:
3



Blogs

Seth Rosenman's Blogs

235 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)

Blogs I Follow

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

"Grand Illusion" (Film Review)

September 5th 2008 15:28
Grand Illusion is one of the best anti-war films because it makes its statement not by clichéd speeches as the rising action nears a bloody climax, but through the characters’ very real relationships with each other; in other words, this black-and-white French film about World War One, shot a few years before World War Two started in Europe, is far from “preachy.” At this point in the paragraph, some readers may be turned off by the facts in the last sentence: French language, black-and-white, not “preachy” (am I wrong in assuming that peoples’ positive response to propaganda explains its ubiquity?); however, the film’s acting and direction are so good that those who usually fear subtitles and shades of grey won’t have a problem appreciating the film’s fresh vision. This is not just one of those films that is silly today, but is “great considering when and where it comes from;” Grand Illusion is not dated.

As in many great war movies, Grand Illusion points out the absurdity of war. When the Germans shoot down a French plane, they invite the two survivors to lunch—complete with a special punch that is rushed into production for the occasion. While the absurdities of war are displayed, respect is still given to the reality of patriotism and attraction associated with the martial side of life. The movie follows the two downed Frenchmen through prison-of-war camps as they themselves try to get though these prisoner-of-war camps—boiled down to its blurby essence, it’s an escape movie. But it’s so much more. One of the unlucky French fliers is an aristocrat in an age where aristocrats are as endangered as the Czar’s grip on power; there are times when he has more in common with the aristocratic German commandant of the escape-proof prison he lands in than his fellow POW’s. His fellow POW’s are an interesting assortment of individuals, representing the in-group vs. out-group dynamic that leads to violence both between nations and within them; the film is a brilliant examination of violence and defense based on both the things that keep us apart and the things that bring us together—such as religion, language, class, nationality, and the possession of bread, circuses, and trenches.

$$$$ = You need to own the DVD.

Grand Illusion
French, Germans, War, Peace, etc., etc.
77
Vote
   


Remember the scene in Stripes when Bill Murray’s character asks his fellow recruits if they cried at the end of Old Yeller, and many admit that they did? I’ve asked people the same question about the Civil War movie Glory, and many people admit that they cried during it. Glory is based on the true story of an African-American combat unit that fought for the Union during the Civil War. (The oppressed and wronged showing their mettle and getting revenge can suck an audience in, right?) Glory is a moving war movie for many reasons: it shows the racist historical climate of the time, the officers’ and recruits’ reactions to training are varied and believable (unlike in Stripes!), and the character development and battle scenes are such that one (paradoxically?) feels both a disgust for the stupidity of combat and a respect for the glory that can exist on a battlefield.

The connection between Glory and Munich is, however, much deeper than the films’ exhibitions of “the oppressed and wronged showing their mettle and getting revenge.” Indeed, Munich is ultimately skeptical of the very notion of revenge (you’ve “seen” the proverb, yes?). The most interesting connection between the films exists in each film’s use of a character to represent a certain existential stance toward the historical violence he is placed in (sorry ladies, a very GI Joe centered duo here, but the Golda Mier character in Munich —kind of a Prime Minister Grandma role—is dear to my heart). In Glory, the characters range from the assimilated anything-is-possible-in-Ameri ca optimist, to the beaten and battered cynic who just wants . . . In Munich the characters range from the killing-is-wrong idealist, to the ultra-nationalist-us-versus-t hem killer. Munich should also be noted for its skillful use of the motif of home throughout the movie—seamless symbolism that works.

$$$$ = You need to own the Munich DVD.
$$$$ = You need to own the Glory DVD.

Glory
African-American Recruits
75
Vote
   


A "Star Wars" Clone (Film Review)

September 5th 2008 13:40
The pre-viewing questions about Star Wars—The Clone Wars that kept buzzing around my mind like laser-blasts being deflected off light-sabers included many skeptical ones: Would an animated Star Wars movie be good? Knowing how the saga left off, would the plot of this early puzzle-piece matter—and therefore hold my attention? Is Lucas really going to make a final trilogy (a trilogy of trilogies)—and, if so, will it be fully animated?

The animation doesn’t bother me. Perhaps this is due to the recent Star Wars movies being full of animation, or perhaps this is due to the entire enterprise (no, this isn’t a Trek reference) being a little cartoony. There are times in the movie—blaster fights on land and in space, alien creatures driving futuristic tanks (or tanks from a long time ago and a galaxy far, far away), and a diverse array of invented structures, vehicles, and landscapes—when it feels similar to watching the episodes that have actors in them doing more than voices. The only problem I have with the animation—or perhaps just with the animators’ style—is that the lines of the “living” characters often resemble the angles of the droids (this could lead to some confusion: do battle-droids dream of electric Sandmen?).

The story itself is entertaining, for it has most of the ingredients of a good Star Wars movie. The basic plot involves Obi-Wan Kenobi and Anakin Skywalker trying to rescue Jaba’s son from kidnappers. The dynamic Jedi duo hops from battle to battle and planet to planet turning the droid army into “scrap-metal.” Anakin takes the point—along with his new pupil, Ahsoka—in trying to rescue Jaba’s son, and General Kenobi follows, cleaning up the mess Anakin has left or bailing him out of trouble; if General Kenobi is late, then R2D2’s proboscis, the droids’ stupidity, or the force ex-machina saves the day. The annoying my-disgust-really-hides-my-lo ve dynamic—formerly represented best by Han Solo and Princess Leia—is present between Anakin Skywalker and his pupil (those Skywalkers are messed up). Indeed, the film is about Anakin’s struggles with his dark-side—being a teacher can bring out the worst in one. He not only has to figure out his own dark-side, but he also has to figure out many other dark mysteries: Why are the Jedi fighting to rescue a criminal’s son? Could there be forces (forgive the pun) working behind the scenes? What really fuels the war between the Republic and the Separatists? Why does Jaba’s uncle speak like an effeminate southerner?

$$ = Save this movie for rental.

Ahsoka
Baptism by blaster.


74
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

I've not commented on anything yet :(