Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Scientology Indoctrination Cruise docks in Melbourne.

July 1st 2009 12:10
Tom Cruise along with his wife Katie Holmes and their daughter Suri have arrived in Australia where Katie is to shoot for a new movie.

The family arrived at Melbourne's Essendon Airport in their private jet and is staying in a private suite at Crown Casino, reports Herald Sun.

Australian billionaire James Packer flew to Melbourne yesterday, reportedly to prepare the suite for their arrival.

The Cruise clan and the Packers are close friends, with a shared interest in Scientology.

Crown increased its security in readiness for the power couple's arrival.


Holmes and her daughter Suri were offered the billionaire's top-floor Crown Towers suite after being unable to find a home with enough security to accommodate their needs.

Holmes will star alongside Australian actor Guy Pearce in the movie.

What is unclear however is why Tom needed to accompany Holmes, who one imagines will be tied up with production commitments on this trip. Australia's economy as faired far better than the States in what is reportedly the worst economic crisis since the great depression - perhaps Tom has been sent on a mission to find new investors believers for his Pseudo-Religious Church of Scientology.



All I can say at this point folks is that if you're looking to invest your life's savings, you'd earn a higher return investing your money with convicted fraudster Bernie Madoff than with the salacious, money hungry, Scientology mob!
146
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Comments
68 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2009 12:19
A friend of mine has a daughter in Scientology, Aimee. The daughter turned her children over to a Scientology school so she'd be free to attend "conferences" and training sessions all over the world. She's a regular jet-setter while her two sons are being indoctrinated. Her husband is very wealthy and pays for everything.

My friend sees nothing wrong with the situation. I do!

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 1st 2009 12:25
Oh S.L. that is terrible! It's one thing to join a cult when you're a fully grown adult, but to FORCE it upon your children - there is just no excuse for that.

I pray that her kids will be able to escape, I don't know how - I just pray.

Aimee

Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2009 12:34
They've been in the Scientology boarding school for two or three years now, Aimee. Very little contact is allowed with the family, sort of like the indoctrination schools in communist countries. The parents hand them over and that's the end of it. Keep praying, it's all anyone can do.

Comment by Damo

July 2nd 2009 00:51
When was this dated?

I have not heard anything about this.
I live near Essendon Airport. Just a few km's

The Thetans told me nothing. Nothing!


Comment by Aimee Dent

July 2nd 2009 01:16
Just in the last couple of days Damo.

Aimee

Comment by Damo

July 2nd 2009 05:00
Actually I am surprised they haven't come down to Orble to say hello.

It is a nut case magnet.
Tom will fit right in.

Comment by RubySoho

July 2nd 2009 09:08
In a world full of whacky religions, why does everyone pick on Scientology?

Comment by Damo

July 2nd 2009 09:42
If people know nothing about Scientology then they will try to excuse them.

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 3rd 2009 12:36
i take it your not a Scientologist then, Aimee?

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 3rd 2009 12:50
Sorry for the slow reply folks - was called in to an emergency at work.

Damo I am starting to think that half the people on this site are strong adherents to the "church" of Scientology. They seem to eager to defend their 'god' Dawkins.

Aimee

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 3rd 2009 13:20
no need to be rude, Aimee, i was just trying to understand where you are coming from with this post . . . i was under the impression you were a religious person?

do you think freedom of religion only applies to some churches and not others?

Comment by Damo

July 3rd 2009 13:34
Thank Aimee

This post got me thinking and so I posted something about oppressive cults and how they are very different from movement that do not set out to deceive or oppress people.

If you want I will link it back to this post.

There seems to be a lot of people who have idea that there is a difference.

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 3rd 2009 13:44
I'm sorry Morgan, I don't believe I was being 'rude' though perhaps on your end the subtext reads differently. If you're an honest person then there is no need to be on the defensive and thus the subtext might read a little rosier.

My religion is of little concern to you - perhaps I would be more inclined to disclose my faith if you we're less incline to ridicule me about it.

Aimee

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 3rd 2009 13:46
Damo that would be great - how do you do that exactly? The linking I mean...

Aimee

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 3rd 2009 14:05
i have not ridiculed your religion, Aimee, could you point to what comments you are referring to?

it is quite clear i dont even know which church you are affiliated with, in order to target you with ridicule i would have to be privy to that knowledge, otherwise i would just be stabbing in the dark

but your reaction is ironic given this is a post ridiculing Scientologists

maybe you could answer the question more generally with no specifics to your own personal life:

1) how is Scientology different to any other church?

2) why are Scientologists open to ridicule and not other religions?

3) why should the beliefs and customs of Scientologists not be protected under the standards of "freedom of religion" as the more major or established religious institutions? eg: the Catholic Church

ps: likening someone to a monkey is generally considered rude, just ask Andrew Symonds how he feels about it

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 3rd 2009 14:12
I have not at any point compared you to a monkey Morgan - I would never do monkey's the injustice.

Perhaps if you glanced over your vitriolic blog with an un-biased eye you would see where you have ridiculed the Christian faith, and Christians.

If you cannot see the difference between Scientology and Catholicism then I see know need to waste my time trying to educate you.

I am not attacking Scientology's followers, rather the masterminds behind it - the profiteers.

Aimee

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 3rd 2009 14:22
let me refresh your memory:

I'm sure even a monkey could provide a more substantive contribution to my post.

your inability to articulate the differences between the two churches tell me you either dont know what youre talking about, or there is no difference

which "vitriolic blog post" are you referring to? im sure this cryptic to-and-fro is keeping you entertained, but it would be much easier to address your concerns if you provided a link or quoted a title

show me a church that is not using the premise of faith to blackmail people out of money in the form of donations?

direct answer, no bluff or bluster

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 3rd 2009 14:30
I'm sure even a monkey could provide a more substantive contribution to my post.
- I would now consider this to be a fact considering your persistent hostility.

If you are dissatisfied that you weren't taught the difference between a Cult and a Church at School then I suggest that is a matter for the education department.

Aimee

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 3rd 2009 14:44
so you deny you called me a monkey, and then you say its ok to call me a monkey because i am one

wheres the consistency?

and no i didnt take Cult 101 at school, but then again im not the one claiming they are a cult

if you are going to make accusations and assign labels you should be able to explain your reasoning and back up your claims with fact

name one thing the Church of Scientology is doing that the Catholic Church is not

accumulating assets and riches, taking money from the faithful, setting up exclusive schools to teach the faith to children, the censorship, the cover-ups, the closing ranks when criticised . . . what is the difference?

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 3rd 2009 14:53
I've really little interest in debating the differences between a Cult and the Catholic Church Morgan. But for a start, the Catholic Church isn't brain washing people, or forcing them to fork out hundreds of thousands of dollars to learn the 'truth'.

The Catholic Church also have many schools in Australia, Schools that provide a top-class education that follows a state based curriculum along with religious studies.

Once again, I did not call you a Monkey Morgan - you gave yourself that title with your childish behaviour and anti-catholic rhetoric.

Where is your consistancy Morgan - I would expect a Journalist to be able to handle a little more heat than this. As the saying goes, if you can't handle the heat get out of the Kitchen.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to get some rest.

Aimee

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 3rd 2009 15:34
But for a start, the Catholic Church isn't brain washing people, or forcing them to fork out hundreds of thousands of dollars to learn the 'truth'.

That is a very tall statement to make. Are you sure that you want to use those words on a public record?

I just want to be sure that it is you who is willing to stake your reputation on that conclusion.

Once again, I did not call you a Monkey Morgan - you gave yourself that title with your childish behaviour and anti-catholic rhetoric.

I'm sure even a monkey could provide a more substantive contribution to my post.
- I would now consider this to be a fact considering your persistent hostility.

You should have no trouble finding that the comment did not come from me.

Incidentally I have come to the conclusion that this post is in itself a smear against monkeys. Or as I said at the time a forum of bold faced lies. I just had the last statement examined and sure enough you admit that monkeys are being purged from Orble. I will be emailing it to a particular destination as a permanent record forthwith.

Duty of care, Aimee.

Comment by S.L.

July 3rd 2009 15:48
Careful, Aimee, you never know who might start stamping her dainty feet and pitching a tantrum. You might want to remind people that religions, by definition, have some form of deity and cults only pretend to. (Or revere things that have nothing to do with a deity.) You could also point out that the Catholic Church has been around for more than 2000 years, while most of the cults are recent and don't last. Also, offerings that are given to a church are done by free will while cults intimidate and brainwash their followers to collect their money.

Comment by S.L.

July 3rd 2009 16:20
According to the Scientologists that I know, they have to pay out the wazoo for information and attend lots of expensive training sessions all over the world.

Buddhists revere Buddha, don't they? They follow his teachings and again Buddhism has been around for a little longer than Scientology. Even a religion as ugly as Islam has the claim of lasting over time.

Cults tend to be brief in nature, trying to get as much as they can before being found out. Scientology is banned in lots of places because of its cultish nature.

Also, Someone, most religions weren't started by a sci-fi writer that wasn't making enough money and bragged about planning to start his own religion to get rich. Damo just did a very detailed post about it. You might want to check it out.

Comment by S.L.

July 3rd 2009 16:49
Good points, Someone. Everything starts with a first day. I do know some Scientologists and they make me very nervous. They hand their children over for indoctrination at an early age (not to just schools, but far enough away they seldom get to see their families). The mother of one family didn't have time to "waste" on her two sons because she was jet setting all over the world for special training sessions. If her husband had less money, she would have stayed home with her kids, maybe...?

Call it a religion if you like, but the behavior patterns are disturbing, at best.

Comment by S.L.

July 3rd 2009 16:54
It's illegal in some places, I hear, Someone. I wonder if they have a tax exempt status?

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 3rd 2009 18:12
Buddhism has no deity.

good point, Someone

Scientologists believe in reincarnation, just like Hindus (the worlds third largest religion), and there are schools of Hindu which also have no deity

Raelians do not have a supernatural deity, they believe extra terrestrials are our "creator"

how young does your church have to be, and how much money do they have to extract from their followers to be considered a cult?

The Church of England is only 400 years old, does that make it a cult?

Assemblies of God (evangelical pentecostal) only started up in 1914 . . . The Church of Scientology has been around since 1953

where is the cut-off line?

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 3rd 2009 18:21
It's illegal in some places, I hear,

yes and christianity is illegal in many places too

christianity illegal

Comment by Damo

July 3rd 2009 22:29
Someone

Just out of curiosity.
Are still trying to play games with people.
Because it looks dead obvious.

You a conspicuous bias toward defending certain people when they make deliberate sarcastic remarks.

Comment by Damo

July 3rd 2009 22:35
Also whilst we are on the factual correction bandwagon:
There is more than one version of Buddhism:

Some major ones do worship deities.
I have seen it myself.
They decorate their temples with gods and demons;
They show that terrible sinners do go to Buddhist Hell and the use the term "May Gods Bless you."

Why do people make claims that they obviously no nothing about?

Sophism or ignorance are incredibly painful to watch.

Comment by Damo

July 3rd 2009 22:42
As for strange logic of trying to play semantics with the word cult.

The so called Church of Scientology is a dangerous oppressive cult. Not every cult is harmful dangerous or oppressive.

Arguing along lines of comparison like this just shows an incredible desire to be irrational just for the sake of it.

The only reason someone would drag the Question of The Catholic Church into this post is to live out the own irrational hatred of that religion. There is a word for people who have an irrational hatred of a particular religion. However that name escapes me for now.

This is precisely the same absurdities that all people that have irrational hate engage in. The straw man argument.

Comment by RubySoho

July 3rd 2009 23:21
The only reason someone would drag the Question of The Catholic Church into this post is to live out the own irrational hatred of that religion. There is a word for people who have an irrational hatred of a particular religion. However that name escapes me for now.

Damo, it appears that you have an irrational hatred of Scientology. Whatever you like to call it, it is recognised as a religion. And it brings comfort to many of its followers. Why? Only they can say. What Catholocism is to you, Scientology is to thousands of other people.Personally, I think every religion is as mad and dangerous as the next one. That's why I criticise all of them. But when I do it, you call me a bigot. When you do it, you are speaking out against "oppressive cults".

You really can't see yourself, can you?

Comment by Damo

July 4th 2009 00:14
Ruby

You obviously know nothing about Scientology. I suggest you come prepared with knowledge rather than cheap barbs.

I have no hatred of Scientologist's at all.

I have an issue with their method of recruitment and the treatment of their members.

I have an issue with their policies of 'Fair Game.'

I have an issue with their brainwashing techniques.

I also have an issue with all people who engage in deceptive and unscrupulous practices to further their own warped agenda's and deep seated prejudices.

All these have been documented and recorded in court cases from around the world.

Their deceptive tactics were highlighted in a Royal Commission in Victoria some years ago which resulted in them being banned.

Of course I did cover all these points in a post that I linked to this one.

I also have an issue with yellow journalism and willful ignorance.


However I will leave that for another occasion.



Comment by Damo

July 4th 2009 01:31
Someone

Thanks.

Comment by RubySoho

July 4th 2009 01:34
Just because I disagree with you does not mean, I "know nothing". For someone who espouses their love of reasonable discourse you appear to have a remarkable capacity for dismissing and denegrating any opinion wich conflicts with your own. I'll have you know that my 'barbs' actually cost me a pretty penny!

I have no hatred of Scientologist's at all.
I have an issue with their method of recruitment and the treatment of their members

Actually, that's how I feel about religion in general. For the most part religions recruit children before those children have developed the capacity to analyse and the opportunity to seek out alternative viewpoints. I also have a problem with the way the Vatican treats its members in Africa when it forbids them to use condoms, thereby condemning many more to fall victim to AIDS. I have a problem with the way the Church treats women when it doesn't allow them control over their bodies. I have a problem with the way Islam treats its members when it decrees that the punishment for heresy and/or apostasy is death. I have a problem with the fact that many Muslim women are not allowed to leave their homes without an accompanying male, if at all. I have a problem with....should I go on?

I also have an issue with all people who engage in deceptive and unscrupulous practices to further their own warped agenda's and deep seated prejudices
.

That's a rather cryptic answer. I much prefer a direct response. What exactly is it that you are trying to say here?

Their deceptive tactics were highlighted in a Royal Commission in Victoria some years ago which resulted in them being banned.

What religion hasn't been banned at some point in its history? If there is one thing that all religions have in common its their tendency to wear a 'persecuted underdog' status like a badge of honour.

Of course I did cover all these points in a post that I linked to this one.

Really? And here I thought you were just rambling as usual.

I also have an issue with yellow journalism and willful ignorance.

Again with the cryptic comments. I have no time for crypticism. I really wish people would just be more direct. Don't you?


Comment by RubySoho

July 4th 2009 03:22
And that ladies and gentlemen, is Nevar's idea of no longer instigating/participating in flame wars.

Comment by Nevar

July 4th 2009 03:27
And you're the expert Ruby?

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 4th 2009 03:39
I'm dumbfounded! I went to bed thinking it was the best thing to do - giving Morgan and myself some time to cool down and compose ourselves.

Well looks like that plan failed monumentally - and why? As I see it Morgan and her cohorts saw an opportunity and ran with it. "Aimee's gone to bed, let's attack her blog and her kind readers with deceptive tactics and school yard taunts."

Sorry folks, but if I'd known when I signed-up for my Orble account that I'd be hounded by a bunch of cyber terrorist's then I would have seriously considered not signing up at all.

Aimee


P.s. My heartfelt thanks goes out to the those of the Orble community who have shown nothing but respect for me - even when we may disagree. xox

Comment by Damo

July 4th 2009 03:51
Aimee

Do not leave because people want to push you out.

There are some very good people here and it may take some time for them to come forward.

Unfortunately it seems that some self appointed gatekeepers want to decide who gets to stay and who does not.

Comment by hazius

July 4th 2009 08:57
When I saw Tom behind his new wife coming out of the plane, it reminded me so much of a little rooster guarding his hen when coming out from the coop.

Ever watchful - always on alert for another rooster or the hawk in the sky!

But to vitiate that, he then makes an appearance at a footy game or whatever it was - smiling, being a bloody nice bloke and all that.

What hypocrasy, Tom!

Your beliefs and practices label 'open society' as a threat and yet you ingratiate yourself in that 'open society' to earn an income from it.

----------------------------- ------------------

Aimee, I don't know you or Morgan but to say the following:

"Was there a purpose to your comment Morgan - I'm sure even a monkey could provide a more substantive contribution to my post."

...... is rude - in any context.

You obviously meant it that way - so why deny it?

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 4th 2009 09:58
so i guess noone knows the difference between Catholicism and Scientology . . . is that because there is no difference?


hi Ruby,

You really can't see yourself, can you?

no he cant, none of them can, they have no self-awareness . . . they could not even recognise a parody of themselves if it was staring them right in the face like a reflection in the mirror

Duty of care, Ruby

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 4th 2009 11:46
hazius show me where I have denied making the comment? What I denied was calling Morgan a monkey - as I did not.

To make my comment clear I will pose it in two parts -

Was there a purpose to your comment Morgan
and
I'm sure even a monkey could provide a more substantive contribution to my post.


As you can see, in the first section I posed a question to Morgan - which she is yet to answer. Following this in the second part I simply stated my opinion. Now can you show me where I have called Morgan a monkey?

It's quite astounding really to think that a Dawkinite would take offence to being likened to a monkey (should it happen) - after all their supreme leader Dick Dawkins says we're all apes does he not?

Aimee

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 4th 2009 12:11
It's quite astounding really to think that a Dawkinite would take offence to being likened to a monkey (should it happen) - after all their supreme leader Dick Dawkins says we're all apes does he not?

cheeky

Was there a purpose to your comment Morgan

the purpose is, assuming you are a person of faith, and ruling out Scientology as your chosen religion, why do you think some churches deserve respect and others deserve ridicule?

do you ridicule every church that is not your own?

or is there something specific that Scientology is doing that all the other religions are not?

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 4th 2009 13:40
No Morgan, I don't like to make a habit out of ridiculing anyone - I leave that to the experts, such as yourself.

Would you be so eager to defend Scientology Morgan is one of your siblings was sucked in and you were never allowed any further contact with them? When was the last time the catholic church prevented you from socialising with one of your friends or relatives...

Scientology is little more than a means for the uber wealthy to launder there finances without interference from the government.

Aimee

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 4th 2009 14:18
When was the last time the catholic church prevented you from socialising with one of your friends or relatives...

the same amount of times as the Church of Scientology: never

however the Jehovahs Witnesses and the Bretheren prevent their followers from socialising with outsiders . . . i have known people with experience with both of those religions

how may Scientologists do you know, Aimee?

Comment by Nevar

July 4th 2009 15:00
Badgering Aimee as you are doing Morgan, goes beyond the pale of debate and begins creeping into the realm of bullying.

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 4th 2009 15:09
Nevar, is answering a direct question considered "badgering" now, is it?

i think you are losing your grasp on the english language, you clearly do not know what an "olive branch" is, nor do you know what a "direct email communication" is, or an "attack on your family"

you are wrongly identifying these things willy nilly

i thought you were not going to be stirring up internet disputes anymore?

perhaps you did not realise the meaning of that statement when you made it either . . . the english language can be tricky

feel free to not address me at all on third party blogs, Nevar, i was not speaking to you, i was speaking to Aimee

Comment by Nevar

July 4th 2009 15:20
Bullying tactics are what they are Morgan, and you have begun to act like a stalker.

Asking the same question over, and over and over is badgering.


Main Entry:
2badger
Function:
transitive verb
Etymology:
from the sport of baiting badgers
Date:
1794

: to harass or annoy persistently
synonyms see bait




Comment by Morgan Bell

July 4th 2009 15:35
how is engaging in a discussion badgering?

i have only responded where addressed

if you dont want me to response dont address me

if you dont want a question to be answered dont pose one

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 4th 2009 15:38
And just what 'Bretheren' are you referring to Morgan? Can I just presume you mean the Exclusive Bretheren - they are quite different to the Jehovahs Witnesses... My grandmother is a Jehovahs Witness and I have never been prevented from socialising with her.

As for the number of scientologist I know, well I have had several friends sucked into that cult - friends that I worry about each day. Friends that I can not contact due to the cults strict rules.

Aimee

Oh and on a side note, would you mind not badgering my readers Morgan. I am happy for you to have a civilised debate with me, but please leave your school yard taunts attacking others for your own blog.

Comment by Morgan Bell

July 4th 2009 15:51
Oh and on a side note, would you mind not badgering my readers Morgan. I am happy for you to have a civilised debate with me, but please leave your school yard taunts attacking others for your own blog.

nice parroting

maybe you should check who began addressing whom first and direct your instructions towards the instigator of the personal comments

And just what 'Bretheren' are you referring to Morgan?

yes the Exclusive Bretheren, and no i did not claim they were the same as Jehovahs, they are two separate institutions

in Tasmania many members of the Bretheren picked their children up from school at lunch time to prevent them socialising with non-Bretheren children

i have had many friends who went through periods of being part of the Jehovahs, in Kempsey a female friend of mine was told she could not continue seeing her husband or parents unless they converted to the church, a male friend was told he could not date any women that were not Jehovahs . . . their strictness may vary from church to church, as i would imagine is the case with Scientology also

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 4th 2009 17:28
Morgan, I don't think there would be much variation at all to be frank - to me it sounds like your fabricating stories to support your Atheist Agenda.

Have you ever even stepped foot in a church? Or is that like asking a vampire to eat garlic...

Aimee

Comment by Damo

July 4th 2009 22:40
Aimee

I have watch this 'discussion' with disbelief.

If people are going to draw comparisons why aren't they doing their homework. Fancy coming to a post about Scientology with no knowledge of them and trying to desperately fish for answers in the wrong direction.

There is no doubt in my mind that some people here are being deliberately evasive and nagging to push their single minded agenda.

These are tactics that oppressive cults use to quash open and reasonable discourse. They are both dishonest and intimidation designed to scare anyone who does not toe the line on their narrow ideological agenda.

Now they wish to debate other groups like the Exclusive Brethren as another diversion. This a lame tactic because they know less about them than they do about Scientology.

People who want to follow the teachings of Scientology can always join Freezone. It has all the same material and beliefs of Scientology but they give it away free. They do not charge thousands of dollars for Auditing;
They do not hide their key doctrines and charge thousands to learn the next one;
They are up front about what you are getting into before you start. Everything is on the table.

Scientology does the opposite:
They also engage in Fair Game
Family disconnect
Alienation from friends
Create an internal jargon to further alienate people from society.
They charge thousands for auditing
They charge thousands for learning their doctrines
People are unable to know what they are signing up for when they join.
They also go out of their way to bleed people of every penny that they make.

This well documented.

What this collection of badgering google experts are doing just painful to watch because it is so low IQ. It is bleedingly obvious that they have an agenda in their line of deliberate cyber bullying.

For people who claim to oppose oppression it seems odd that they have chosen the methods that oppressive cults and political fanatics use to crush their enemies.

That is the true irony of what we are witness Aimee. They are using the same tactics that Scientology use.

Comment by RubySoho

July 5th 2009 08:57
That is the true irony of what we are witness (sic) Aimee.

Oh believe me Damo, it is not.




Comment by Damo

July 5th 2009 09:30
Someone

"I have done a little research into Scientology,"

Good for you.

However I just noticed that Nevar has written a post that is more relevant to the questions you are posing here. Perhaps you should think about the correct forum for such superior questions that you seek.
Here you are:
Really Long Link

Go nuts.
I really don't like pecking parties.





Comment by hazius

July 5th 2009 11:20
Aimee,

I didn't say you called her a monkey.

I said, the comment was rude - in any context.

Then I said, "you obviously meant it - why deny it?"

...which you did a few posts down:

"I 'm sorry Morgan, I don't believe I was being 'rude' though perhaps ......"

That was my Q - how can u say it's not rude?

Or to turn it around, is there a context where adjudging someone's post to be inferior to a monkey's is not rude?


Comment by RubySoho

July 5th 2009 11:46
I swear to god, the irony. It burns.


Comment by Aimee Dent

July 5th 2009 12:08
Well I'm sorry, I don't agree hazius. I've not written anything that compares with anything Morgan has written in terms of rudeness - she's like a spoilt child running wild on red cordial and sherbet.

Aimee

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 5th 2009 12:10
RubySoho - I didn't know you were a woman of faith?
I swear to god

Aimee

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 5th 2009 12:51
All comments by Someone have been removed due to there hostile and threatening content.

Aimee

Comment by Damo

July 5th 2009 12:52
Someone

It becomes harder and harder to see you as an honest person. Your bias is as incredible as the dead horse you keep flogging.

Do you get some innate thrill out of bullying people or are you so self centered that you unaware of what you are doing? Then again you have a history of bias and pecking parties.


Aimee

Here what I suggest that you do.

You give people fair warning to play nice and if they don't then delete their comments.

You do not have to take this kind of punishment.
This is precisely the tactics that extremists and cults use to attack their enemies.

As I said I do not like pecking parties.
They are just so cowardly.
And I do mean cowardly.

Incidentally I have had to ban two of this pecking party from my site because of this kind of cheap gutter tactics. Best thing I did. They cannot be reasoned with at a mature adult level.

Comment by Nevar

July 5th 2009 15:33
What a sorry introduction into the Orble family you've received Aimee, I'm sure Jon will help you solve the mystery about the message, but to be set upon like you have been, is wrong.

Proper etiquette demands that you don't get savaged until your 2nd or 3rd posting.

Most writers on this site are great folks, and would prefer to banter playfully than to get so rough on a new writer: but, on a positive note ~ they now know that you came with fang and claw to defend yourself.

Comment by S.L.

July 5th 2009 17:40
Aimee, you're doing fine. I warned you about a few of the denizens of Orble the Deep, and you have done well. Stick to your guns and keep speaking your mind! Good job!

Comment by Aimee Dent

July 6th 2009 05:08
I received the following email from Orble Support today - I am utterly disgusted to think that I have been punished merely for stating my opinion!

The following comment does not conform to the rules of civil debate on
Orble.

This is your first official warning. Try to argue the point rather than
insulting the writer.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Charles.

There is no doubt in my mind as to whom has made this complaint - I won't mention their name however for fear that I might be wiped of the site for good!

AImee

Comment by S.L.

July 6th 2009 11:05
It's amazing, Aimee, how some people can get away with everything and others get in trouble for almost nothing.

Someone (not the Someone, just someone) once used dirty words on my blog and I fired back that his/her mother must be very proud that they spelled the bad words correctly. I was immediately accused of insulting their family. LOL

Sometimes it's like walking a tightrope. But once you get your balance, it's worth the effort.

Comment by Damo

July 6th 2009 11:13
Aimee

I also received such a little peck on my head.

My comment did NOT mention anyone's name and only drew attention an absurd line of reasoning.

The [report] button has become the tool of the anonymous back stab instead of a protection from harassment.

This is exactly what I predicted would happen.

I could say plenty but if people will not listen I will not speak.

Comment by Someone

July 7th 2009 00:21
Hi Aimee,

Feel free to delete this, but I was just wondering if you had heard from the Orble gods regarding that threatening message I supposedly sent you? You said you would contact them, and I have tried to as well, but I haven't had any response, have you?

Comment by Abu Mateen

October 10th 2009 10:05
I have learned a lot in the last hour reading this post. After a few searches i found out that the Church of Scientology is banned in Germany because it has a lot in common with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi movement. Hitler was an auther, leader, visionary, mastermind and a cult leader just like L. Ron Hubberd. The diffrance is L Ron and the Scientologests want you to give them all you have including your childern, give up your family and if you are still not good enough kill your self because you will be reincarnated.
Hitler took all that you had if you were not of the super race. Then put you in a concentration camp before he sent you to the gas chamber.

A question to all of you Quakoligists. L Ron died in 1986 has he reincarnated? If yes then where is he and what has he come back as? If NO then when will he be back and will he come back as Jesus?

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
5 Posts
7 Posts dating from June 2009
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Aimee Dent
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]