Robert Kidd

UNITED KINGDOM


Joined April 30th 2008

Number of Posts:
3

Number of Comments:
2

Karma:
7



Blogs

Robert Kidd's Blogs

333 Vote(s)
8 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)

Blogs I Follow

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

Euro 2008 - an initial impression

June 9th 2008 12:27
So, with John Terry's tears barely dried on his face after one of the most exciting champions league finals for a while, Euro 2008 is now upon us. But, with many of the favourites yet to play, have we learnt anything from the first couple of days?

Group A
We have had a look at all 4 teams in Group A, and Portugal must be the over whelming favourites to win the group. They had little problem overcoming Turkey, and considering the highly rated Quaresma was not even brought on, Portugal's attacking options look particularly impressive. Of course it always helps to have one of the best players in the world in your team, and in Cristiano Ronaldo, the Portuguese certainly have that. To be fair to Turkey though, they did not look a bad side, and perhaps their biggest mistake was being too adventurous against a side that can quickly punish teams on the counter attack. The Turks biggest problems seemed to be at the back, where their towering centre backs lacked pace. Their midfield looked neat and tidy, and in Nihat, they have a striker who will take chances if given the service.

The opening match of the tournament was a bit of a hard luck story for the joint hosts Switzerland, who were unlucky to lose 1-0 to the Czech Republic. The Swiss were particularly unfortunate to hit the bar, but the biggest disappointment may well be the loss of captain and star player Alexander Frei. Without Frei, Switzerland's slim chances of escaping the group stage may well have evaporated. As for the Czechs, they are struggling to be the team of old without the injured Tomas Rosicky and the retired Pavel Nedved. They are still a decent side, and they will be battling Turkey for 2nd place.

Group B
Croatia were one of 2 teams I felt might win the whole competition, but on yesterday's showing an each-way bet may have been more sensible. Aside from an impressive opening 20 minutes when the Croatians looked like they would blow away Austria, the game was finely balanced, and Austria may feel unlucky to have not grabbed a point. After this result it is hard to see a mediocre Austria side going through, especially with Germany still to play. Croatia is a harder team to judge. They have a wonderfully talented midfield, with Modric, Kranjacer and Nico Kovac pulling the strings, a solid if slow defence, and a hugely hard working attacker in Olic. The real test for Croatia will come against Germany, and if they can get through the group they will fancy their chances, having proved they can beat some of the best teams in Europe.

Germany are many people's favourites for the Euros, but I thought yesterday's 2-0 win against Poland flattered them. The Germans will always have a solid spine to their team, and Ballack and Frings make a formidable midfield partnership. They do look like a decent side, but I can see them falling just short this year, as they did in the World Cup. Poland looked a reasonable team, but some kamikaze defending made things easy for Germany in the 1st half. They improved after the break, but never really looked like scoring before Germany's fortuitous 2nd goal. Still, any team managed by the wily Dutchman Leo Beenhakker, a man with over 40 years coaching experience, will be hard to beat, so Croatia and the Austrians should not underestimate Poland.

Group C
The 'Group of Death' kicks off tonight, and will probably make up a lot of people's minds about who will get through. I think France and Holland will just about scrape through, with World Champions Italy in 3rd. The reason for this is that I can't see Italy's make shift defence coping with the attacking power of the Dutch or French. Fabio Cannavaro (injured) and Allesandro Nesta (retired) are both missing, and I'm not sure Metarrazzi and Barzagli can be as effective. The French look strong in every department, but I'm not sure they can win the whole thing, whilst the Dutch may have to rely on their attacking players scoring more than their shaky defence concedes. A word for Romania, who are not a poor side, but have been desperately unlucky to be put in this group. They could still spring a minor surprise, after all they topped their qualifying group ahead of Holland.

Group D
For me, Spain are the strongest team at the Euros, and I can see them lifting the trophy. Yes they are perennial under-achievers, but their team is strong in virtually every position. Spain have one of the best keepers in the world, pacy full backs, a technically sound midfield, and mobile, effective strikers. The one area where they could come undone is in central defence. Puyol is commanding but slow, and Pablo or Marchena both rely on strength rather than pace. Looking at the other sides in Group D, I actually fancy Sweden to finish 2nd in the group. The Swedes always seem to qualify, and they invariably have a solid if unspectacular side. Bringing Henrik Larsson out of retirement for a second time may prove to be a shrewd move. Russia did not convince in qualifying, and I think they can be ruled out after losing the suspended influential playmaker Andrei Arshavin for the first 2 matches. Combine this with an injury to striker Pogrebnyak, and Russia's hopes look bleak. But with Hiddink in charge, they will not be a walk over for anyone. So finally, what about Greece? The reigning champions, but overlooked by most when it comes to picking a winner. Well, Greece have retained their brilliant tactician Otto Rehagel, but the team is ageing, and I cannot see them advancing. For Greece to win the European Championship was an extraordinary upset, so to retain it would be a miracle. However, like Sweden and Russia, they will be solid and difficult to beat.

The Euros have started brightly, and it looks like being a decent tournament. However, just to end on a slightly negative note, we must look at the changed format for the knock out stages. The draw has been split in 2, meaning that teams from Group A and B will play each other until the final, and the same with Groups C and D. Many believe this move has hugely favoured teams like Germany and Portugal, who will fancy their chances of reaching the final without having to play the likes of Holland, Italy, France or Spain. Let's hope Uefa's latest scheme does not overshadow what promises to be a great tournament.
119
Vote
   


Grant the unsung hero

April 30th 2008 23:58

Isn’t it wonderful when something comes along and restores your faith in football? After enduring 180 minutes of Manchester United and Barcelona playing chess with each other, the second leg of Chelsea V Liverpool was a breath of fresh air.

It’s fair to say it wasn’t pretty. There wasn’t a great deal of slick passing moves or solo runs, and there wasn’t a stepover in sight. But this game had excitement. Both teams really played like they wanted to win, and a rainy night at Stamford Bridge was illuminated by a thrilling match.

The result was just about right. Chelsea did shade it, and their place in the final on May 21st will be well deserved. Yet rather than focusing on the exciting prospect of an all English final in the Champions League, I found myself feeling pleased for Chelsea’s manager, Avram Grant.

Grant is a hugely interesting figure. After moderate success with several clubs in his native Israel, he became Director of Football at Portsmouth in 2006. But just a year later, with then Portsmouth manager Harry Redknapp still scratching his head to explain what Grant’s job actually involved, the Israeli was recruited by Chelsea, again with that delightfully ambiguous title, Director of Football. Then in September 2007, Jose Mourinho was sacked. Enter Grant.

There was a backlash from fans, no doubt aggrieved at swapping the suave ‘special one’ for the hangdog features of Avram, an unproven manager in England, and certainly not as comfortable in front of the cameras as his predecessor. His cause wasn’t helped by losing his first match against title rivals Manchester United. The backlash became nasty. Grant received anti-Semitic letters, and even death threats.

The ship was steadying until the loss to Tottenham in the Carling Cup final, but recently Chelsea have really stepped it up. Chelsea have lost only four matches under Grant, and within the space of a few days, they have gone level with Utd at the top of the premier league, and are through to the first Champions League final in their history. The calls for Jose were strangely absent during the standing ovation Grant received at the end of the semi final.

Seemingly, Avram Grant has turned things around spectacularly. It is possible his team could record a historic double, and the fans love him for it. And yet there may well still be a nagging feeling of doubt in his mind. Chelsea will probably not win the league. Even the most ardent Chelsea fan will find it hard to imagine Manchester United taking anything less than 6 points from matches against West Ham and Wigan, and their vastly superior goal difference will not be overcome. The Champions League final is of course a one off game where anything can happen, but Utd will be slight favourites for that too.

Roman Abramovich is the sort of man that expects his projects to be successful, and why not? After all, the hundreds of millions he has ploughed into Chelsea doesn’t grow on trees. So if Chelsea finish runners-up to Utd in the league and Champions League, not to mention runners-up to Spurs in the Carling Cup, will this be considered a successful season? I doubt it.

A lot is yet to be decided this season, but if Chelsea end it empty handed don’t be surprised to see the unsung Grant out of a job. It could be worse of course, he could be in Rafa Benitez’s position.
98
Vote
   


Every so often a game is hyped up so much that one cannot fail to be enticed by its promise. Manchester United versus Barcelona was that game. The stage was perfectly set. The biggest and currently best team in England, against one of the giants of the Spanish game. The Camp Nou and Old Trafford. Ronaldo, Messi, Tevez, Eto’o and co, all on display. And the semi-final stage of Europe’s most glamorous competition, the champions league.

But it didn’t quite happen. At least not in the way that millions of viewers the world over would have hoped. The first leg in Spain was a thoroughly dull affair. The one chance of note was Cristiano Ronaldo’s second minute penalty, which he calmly placed the wrong side of the post. The rest of the match featured a Barca side that prodded and probed Utd’s defence, but rarely threatened. At the final whistle neither side looked overly disheartened with a draw.

The word coming out of Spain was that Barca had been there for the taking in the first leg, and that Utd could live to regret not beating a team so low on confidence when they had the chance. The watching world licked its lips in anticipation of the second game. This time it would be the match we were all hoping for, surely...

No. Once again it failed to deliver. Yes, it was better than the first game. And yes, the only goal by Paul Scholes, a swerving strike into the top corner, was a worthy match winner. But no, it wasn’t a superb spectacle. In many ways, the game followed the blue print of the first leg. Barca played in pretty triangles, and kept hold of the ball expertly. But, as previously, they failed to find a way through a stubborn Utd defence. Not even the impish genius Lionel Messi could create a goal (though he did come close after one particularly mesmerising run). To think that Messi is still only 20 years old is both frightening, and hugely exciting in equal measure. But he is another story entirely.

So why did this game fail to live up to the hype? Well, there are several possible explanations. Barca manager Frank Rijkaard chose to point the finger at English teams and their ‘defensive’ attitudes. But in truth, this looks like the action of a man who must realise he is on the brink of losing his job. It’s true that Barca had the baulk of possession, but it would be unfair to accuse Utd of being overly defensive.

A more likely explanation is that both teams were too scared to lose. This ‘fear factor’ has become an epidemic of football at the highest level. One needs only to look at the world cup in 2006, when a workmanlike side based on a solid defence, albeit fantastically organised, lifted international football’s biggest prize. The days of thrilling high scoring games in the biggest competitions are getting rarer.

But is it really fair to blame teams for not adopting a gung-ho attitude on the pitch? It almost seems a cliché to harp on about the vast amount of money in the game these days, but this cannot be ignored. The difference between success and failure can be calculated in obscene amounts of cash. Of course teams should play in a way in which they are likely to get results. Despite what Pepsi and Nike will have us believe, football is not all about stepovers, flicks and tricks, the performance and style is now secondary to results. Losing cannot be tolerated, because losing is more costly than ever.

It will be interesting to see what approach Barca adopt next season. This proud club have not won a thing for the past 2 seasons, and in Catalonia that is unacceptable. Players, and probably managers, will come and go, but whether or not Barca persist with pretty possession football remains to be seen. Arsenal are in a similar predicament in England, where wonderful flowing football has brought plenty of plaudits, but no silverware this season.

As for Utd, they go marching on to Moscow with their eyes on European club football’s most coveted prize. And, whilst millions will tune in to watch the final, the football purists among them may well be left disappointed.
95
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

Interesting article. I'd go along with what you said about Man Utd and Chelsea. For my money, Utd have been the best team in Europe this year, and will be deserving winners if they lift the champions league trophy. I'm surprised that you name Roma as the most likely to beat the 2 English sides. Whilst it's true they were missing Totti, I thought Utd were comfortably better than them in both legs of the Quarter Final. I'd be interested to see Real Madrid face Chelsea or Utd. Granted they had a poor showing in the CL, but their league form has been dominant, and they are on the brink of yet another title. Maybe they will be a bigger threat in the CL next year...

Delete ] [ Ignore ]
Thanks for the comments guys, you both make good points. Kevin, I completely agree about the Liverpool Milan final a few years back, that was probably the best Champions League match I have ever seen. In the first half of that game Milan played what I would describe as "purists" football. They passed and moved crisply and tore Liverpool apart. It was a joy to watch. But I take your point that the second half, although much of the football was scrappy, was utterly enthralling.

Ann, I think that Arsenal Milan match you refer to was an interesting game to watch, but I'm not sure I would describe it as exciting. You're right about Man Utd, a slightly more cautious approach has taken them to the final, so obviously it was a smart move.

As an avid football fan I appreciate all kinds of styles of play whether they are defensive, attacking or mixed. The point I was trying to make is that pass and move football is rarely as effective in today's game as it was in the past. The top teams in the world (possibly excluding Barca and Arsenal), often do not play an overly attacking game and I think that's a shame. But you're both right, it doesn't always mean the team loses out or the games are less exciting, one just needs to look at last night's game to see that! Thanks again.

Delete ] [ Ignore ]