Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
‘We have a couple of hours, access to the United States military, a legion of graphic animators and more computer hardware than you can shake a Devastator at, what will we do with it?’

I imagine this question was asked at some point during the initial stages of developing Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen. The answer ended up being a 150-minute demonstration of how to blow up lots of stuff, and bring to life a greater assortment of the Autobots and Decepticons than in the original film.

The first thought I had once the movie finished was that some sort of explosions record had occurred. If not, then the number of fireballs, detonations, and moments of transformer carnage definitely surpassed the number of words spoken by the human characters in the film. I leave it to you to determine if you are happy with that or not.

I am torn, I really liked most of the film for what it was (an explosion-fest with seemingly endless scenes of transformer mayhem and destruction) but I wanted to like it more, to feel closer to the human characters and their plight. Maybe I was looking for too much. Of course, no one is watching Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen looking for some sort cinematic purity, but it would have been good if the humans were somewhere near as interesting as the transformers.

However, it is hard to get past the fact that it just isn’t as good as the first one. It’s the classic scenario of the sequel overdoing the special effects and action to outdo the first and to cover limited character development and confusing/non-existant plot. Again, do I really care? Should any action or transformer fan care? Probably not, but while it is easy to forgive the human characters in the film, it would have been a better experience if there wasn’t quite so much to forgive.

So, for some movies, I like my explosions plentiful, my robots transformable and my dialog limited (and preferably spoken by the previously mentioned transformable robots).

On the subject, there was more dialog for the various transformers this time around. The Autobot twins (Skids and Mudflap) provided some comic relief in amongst the mayhem, with Optimus Prime and others expounding on the history of the robots in disguise.

For Bumblebee’s legion of fans, you won’t be disappointed. Just as there was more penguin time in Madagascar 2, there is more Bumblebee time in the sequel and he spends much of it ripping into the Decepticons with a touch of the ninja about him too.

See it for the transformers, the explosions, the US military on loan, the explosions, the Autobots, the pyramids, the explosions and the Decepticons. Don’t expect too much by way of plot or character development and you will have a great time.

Oh and Megan Fox is in it…
53
Vote
   


Film Review – Star Trek

July 7th 2009 16:03
Here is one of those times where you should stop reading this and go and see the movie, immediately! You can come back afterwards, I’ll wait.

The crew of the USS Enterprise have been reprised, but not for a boring rehash of an existing formula. It is a fresh reimagining of the characters, within origin events that grab you tightly for the entire 127 minute running time. Genuine care is taken with the legacy of the original series, which becomes a strong foundation for the events that unfold during the film.

While some things do change, there is a feeling that it is done with great care and respect for the story to date.

It is an origin story, showing a number of characters during their time at Starfleet Academy, including the infamous Kobayashi Maru test. It is also a thrilling adventure that features incredible special effects, a dash of time travel and a showdown with renegade Romulan.

The actors should be commended for their performances. You will find endless parallels between the portrayals of the key characters now and during the 60’s TV series. Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto and Carl Urban all give us new versions of James T. Kirk, Spock and Dr. McCoy respectively that are true to the essence of the originals but not just copies either. The other actors all give life and energy to their characters. Fans of the original series will be pleased to see that Captain Christopher Pike makes a significant appearance throughout the movie, portrayed by Bruce Greenwood.

For those who haven’t seen Star Trek yet (and are still here reading this), you might be wondering how the film could possibly fit into the whole pantheon of TV series, movies, books and graphic novels. I will resist the urge to tell you outright, but suffice it to say that there are a few key differences, which allows the movie to follow its own path. The differences will be stark, but they make sense too.

Eric Bana is excellent (and unrecognisable) as the Romulan antagonist Nero. He and his crew of former miners are aboard a massive and technologically superior ship, which has a number of conflicts with the Federation.

One of the key reasons for the success of the original series was the camaraderie amongst the characters, along with their conflict and friction. These elements are preserved in the new film and it provides a link back to the TV series and characters we care for.

Apart from some of the key plot developments that separate this story from the path taken in the original TV series, what struck me most was the ‘realistic’ depictions of things like the shuttle craft and engineering section on the Enterprise. Here you will see battered panels, exposed pipework, criss-crossing catwalks and a general sense of raw functionality in place of clean panels and neat construction. Everything is in use and shows the appropriate wear and tear.

I felt a genuine sense of joy and satisfaction at the end of the movie. I have seen Star Trek four times so far, and a couple of those viewings included people who also watched the original TV series during its run in the late-60s. These life-long fans of the series expressed an equal sense of wonder at the film and the care taken with these beloved characters.

Now go, go now. That was an example of a palindromic sentence. Not a very long one, but its early in the morning. I don’t want any complaints about the actual individual letters not being in palindomic sequence. I looked it up. It’s a palindrome.
74
Vote
   


Film Review – Iron Man

June 15th 2009 17:25
I have a confession to make – I have seen Iron Man eleven times. While this might not be the greatest number of times anyone has seen a particular film, it is certainly enough for one’s family, friends and girlfriend to question your life priorities and overall sanity.

Well, those 22 hours were very well spent, dammit! Almost an entire day watching Iron Man surely enriches one’s life. In fact, I think I had better watch it again to get the whole day covered…

The film is a Marvel Studios production that gathers elements from the vibrant history of the comic character and pieces these together into a stunning origin film. We follow Tony Stark from alcoholic industrialist living the kind of bachelor existence most of us guys have probably imagined at some point, through the depths of despair where death is just around the corner, and on to redemption and a renewed desire to leave a positive legacy.

While the film is more about the man than the advanced powered armour he creates and wears, the armour really is spectacular. From the initial crude Mark 1, built by Tony to escape his captors, followed by a test model Mark 2, for flight control development, before the classic gold and red Mark 3 armour makes its appearance, the armour progresses and improves as Tony himself turns himself from selfless war profiteer to hero.

Robert Downey Jr. is exceptionally well-cast as the billionaire industrialist, inventor and womaniser Tony Stark. While he is well known for roles in movies such as Kiss Kiss Bang Bang and Chaplin, at no stage do you watch RDJ and think anything other than Tony Stark. Elements of RDJ’s own excesses just seem to add gravity to Stark’s own alcoholism and ultimate their renewals run in parallel too.

You might recall some fairly optimistic comments after the film’s release in 2008 (and before The Dark Knight appeared in cinemas), suggesting that Robert Downey Jr. could win an Oscar and other awards for his portrayal of Tony Stark. Even an eleven-view veteran like me knows that was beyond optimistic, but it does highlight once again what an exceptional character actor RDJ is and what an impressive film Iron Man is.

Interestingly, the success of Iron Man movie brought out a number of articles related to how someone might create such a suit in real life, and where the development currently is. One interesting product is being developed by Sarcos-Raytheon and you can read more about their XOS Exoskeleton here.

So, the sequel is being filmed right now and there is a lot of speculation around what will be included - War Machine for one, and Samuel L. Jackson having a greater impact with Nick Fury for another. One thing that is certain is that Terrence Howard will not be reprising his role as James Rhodes. Don Cheadle will be continuing the evolution of the Colonel as we (hopefully) see how he comes to wear either the Iron Man armour and/or becomes War Machine.

Ultimately, Iron Man is a great action piece, but also contains enough character depth to make it an enjoyable experience for most movie-goers.

Go and see it eleven or twelve times…
51
Vote
   


Cinema Releases at IMAX

June 8th 2009 15:11
IMAX Sydney provides an extraordinary film experience for the few cinematic releases that are shown there. Possessing a cinema screen 29.42m high by 35.73m wide, along with a 15,000 watt digital surround sound system, it really boggles the mind.

It is not without its limitations, though and you need to consider a few things prior to heading there. Keep in mind that I am only discussing cinema releases at IMAX, not their excellent documentaries


[ Click here to read more ]
51
Vote
   


You might be familiar with Christian Bale's raging outburst on the set of Termination Salvation, along with the excellent Family Guy ‘enhancement’ where Peter Griffin does his best (worst?) to placate the howling actor.

Peter asked a timely question during the tirade; do we really need another Terminator movie


[ Click here to read more ]
46
Vote
   


...and so it begins...

June 4th 2009 22:57
My Welcome Post; I feel the warm spotlight on me, or is it the headlights from an oncoming car driving along a dark and isolated back-road? Time will tell, I guess...

Either way, this should be a lot of fun and I look forward to sharing the ride with you.
32
Vote
   


More Posts
2 Posts
4 Posts
6 Posts dating from June 2009
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Christopher Cowan's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Christopher Cowan
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]