Plagman

Atlanta, Georgia, UNITED STATES


Joined May 31st 2007

Number of Posts:
43

Number of Comments:
44

Karma:
1



Tags & Posts

Bookmark Tags



Popular Tags

Popular Posts

I mentor these bloggers

Learn more about the Orble Mentoring Program.


I do not mentor any bloggers.

Recent Posts

The people of America love two things: stories of perseverance, and being offended… and over-eating. But while the latter of the two may be quite common, never, since the beginning of time, have both been intertwined in the same story. At least, that was the case before the beginning of time met The Regular Guys.

The Regular Guys show, referred to by Wikipedia as “the most important four hours of your day,” first brought happiness to Atlanta in 1998 after moving from Los Angeles. Hosts Larry Wachs and Eric Von Haessler insisted that they made the change purely due to their altruistic nature; given the lack of decent morning shows in Atlanta, and their history of charitable behavior, this line of reasoning seemed highly logical. However, to the educated listener, it was obvious that more than anything else, the move was made due to their desire to re-locate to an area without such a heavy Hispanic population.

In April of 2004, The Regular Guys suffered their first minor setback when a sexually explicit interview with porn-star Devin Lane, which they had intended to play backwards to mock the FCC’s indecency crackdown, was accidentally aired over a Honda commercial. Although sales of Honda’s new “Rough-Rider” CR-V with rear-entry went through the roof, the station’s owners, Clear Channel, were forced to terminate The Regular Guys after Al Sharpton claimed that pornography was racist and demanded Larry and Eric be fired.

During their sabbatical, Larry made a small fortune after creating and starring in the “Watch Wachs Eat Club,” tickets for which typically sold for more than $200. Wachs brought in extra income by selling his used napkins, which went for $12-15 apiece, and up to $20 on all-you-can-eat ribs night. Eric, who was slightly less willing to exploit his audience’s stupidity, got a job as a food-runner at The Cheesecake Factory.

After the loss of The Regular Guys, the station’s ratings went from 4.2 million listeners to 28, most of whom were family members of the station’s employees who had agreed to leave their radios on at home all day with the volume turned down. In light of this harsh reality, Clear Channel brought The Regular Guys back to the air in March of 2005. As a result, Georgia Governor Sonny Purdue gave Clear Channel the “Georgia Humanitarian of the Year” award for the joy they had brought to millions of Atlantans. At the time, however, Purdue was unaware that The Regular Guys were going to be on an AM Newsradio station.

Not surprisingly, a show that spent very little to no time at all discussing the news fit perfectly with the format of news radio. It worked so well, in fact, that less than two months later Clear Channel decided it was criminal to have The Regular Guys on such a weak signal, and thus moved them back to their original time-slot on 96.1 FM; businesses in Atlanta were handicapped for weeks as employees throughout the city constantly called in sick, only to come to work feeling better at 10:01.

By mid-2006, The Regular Guys had recovered approximately 75% of their previous audience. Of the remaining 25%, 13% had chosen to move to a state in which it was legal to buy beer on Sunday, 5% had passed away due to obesity-related diseases, 4% held a grudge against Larry for overcharging for his used napkins, 3% had been arrested for dog-fighting, and 0.000000001% had become avid listeners of The Bert Show on Q100.

But their return was not without incident. Despite never in the past being willing to discuss controversial or offensive topics, especially those concerning race or mooching illegals, in March of 2006, The Regular Guys had little choice but to address the national Hispanic illegal alien employee boycotts that were ongoing given that the hosts of Viva 105.7, who were Hispanic and thus urging their people to boycott so as not to lose street-cred from their illegal listening public, were also Clear Channel employees and were situated right down the hall from The Regular Guys.

The purpose of the boycott was to show Americans how vital the illegal population is to the economy; thus, every unemployed illegal alien refused to do any work for an entire day. Fortunately for them, this required very little deviation from their normal routine. The impact was profound.

On the roads, traffic was 55% lighter, with uninsured motorist-accidents and hit-and-runs down 211%; employees throughout the metro-Atlanta area arrived to work 30-40 minutes early- bored out of their minds, the majority of them decided to do more work to pass the time.

Schoolteachers also had to venture into uncharted territory. Not having to dumb down their lesson plans, they were able to cover a week’s worth of material before lunch; the students were thus given an extended recess, during which the teachers were able to do their Sudoku given that they didn’t have to make sure none of the kids pulled out a knife after getting hit in dodgeball.

Gas stations had security guards with nothing to do, liquor stores ran out of tequila and Dos Equis by 10:30am; out of its daily routine, the city didn’t know what to do with itself.

Yogi and Panda, named after the cartoon bear and the official bear of Mexico, respectively, agreed to come onto The Regular Guys show to discuss illegal matters and defend their illegal brethren. Unfortunately for the bears, their writers were also boycotting and they had to “wing-it” and “think on the spot,” which, like broadcasting to legal residents, was not their forté.

In an effort to salvage their pride, along with the pride of millions of illegals who love their homeland but fear nothing more than to be sent back to it, Yoshi and Panda complained to Clear Channel management, arguing that there was nothing in the U.S. Constitution that permits The Regular Guys to have their own opinions and state them on the air. Clear Channel went out on a limb and defended The Regular Guys, but likely sided with the Mexicans, and only defended them because The Regular Guys station speaks the same language as those in Atlanta who can afford to buy from their advertisers.

In October of that same year, Larry Wachs was making his weekly trip to the restroom after a meeting; it would later be reported that he was going number one. During this time, Yogi and Paco came into the restroom and entered adjacent stalls; it would later be reported that they had just eaten some Mexican food.

Immediately, the two Hispanic broadcasters began to hurl insults at Wachs; although they were speaking Mexican at the time (given that they wanted to both insult and annoy Wachs), Larry knew enough of their language from having been to the DMV several times to know that what they were saying was unpleasant and directed at him.

Wanting to practice how to curse in Mexican, Wachs pulled out the tape recorder he had on him and recorded what the pair were saying amidst their giggling and whatever else Hispanics do in bathroom stalls.

Hoping to get assurances from his listeners that the mean things Yoshi and Pablo were saying weren’t true, Larry played the tape on the air. Although the bit had been approved by Clear Channel management, and what was said on the tape was impossible to make out for the listeners, the Latinos complained that, like America, their privacy had been invaded.

Insisting that their being made fun offended the “honor of their culture,” the same culture that their Latin-listeners floated across the Rio Grande to get away from, the two stall-mates filed criminal and civil charges against Wachs, on the grounds that as an American, Larry had no right to make fun of people that didn’t speak English. Despite the company offering “reasonable solutions to satisfy their ongoing and baseless grievances,” and Wachs’ willingness to agree to never again talk about the duo on the air, as well as to never again use the bathroom within an hour of two Mexicans having gone number two in there, Clear Channel had no choice but to once again terminate The Regular Guys.

In March, 2007, the aforementioned lawsuit was immediately thrown out by the judge on the grounds that it was retarded. But the damage had already been done.

The number of radios being sold on eBay had gone from six radios to 1.4 million overnight. Best Buy and Circuit City cancelled all of their orders for any piece of stereo equipment that possessed an AM/FM tuner, Apple discontinued their line of FM-ready iPods, and throughout the metro-Atlanta area, millions of men and women suffered through their morning commutes.

Sixteen months later, on the morning of January 28th, 2008, as people tuned into 100.5 to hear The Bert Show, instead of hearing a voice-disguised phone call from a woman who thought her boyfriend was cheating, listeners heard the most beautiful sound one can ever hear: the voice of a middle-aged, bald-headed Jew, probably playing that God-awful “My Name is Larry” song, because, like my Athlete’s Foot, The Regular Guys are back!

77
Vote
Shared on
   


Should a convicted killer serving a life sentence in jail be given a sex-change operation at the expense of taxpayers? Although the answer to this question seems obvious, some people actually disagree and think that no; he/she/whatever should not get the operation.

Convicted murderer Robert Kosilek, or “Michelle” as it is now called, has been part of an ongoing trial for over a year to determine whether or not the taxpayers should pay for it to become a woman. A U.S. District Judge ruled that Kosilek deserved treatment for gender identity disorder, but could not justify ordering the state to pay for a sex-change operation. Since then, Kosilek has been receiving laser hair removal and hormone supplements, and as a result “has developed larger breasts” since starting the treatment. A source inside the prison has confirmed that Kosilek was the most popular inmate at last year’s prison prom.

Kosilek was convicted of strangling his wife in 1990; according to him, he killed her in self-defense after she spilled boiling tea on his genitals (100% true). “She tripped on my foot and spilled hot tea on my nads,” explained Kosilek, “so I did what every man does when his boys are in trouble, I ran upstairs, found my best strangling wire, put on my strangling gloves, stretched my forearms and wrists like you should always do before any strangling, ran back downstairs and defended myself. Had I not reacted, who knows how long she could’ve poured tea on my crotch. Any man who claims he wouldn’t have done what I did is a liar and a racist!”

Thus far, there have been hundreds of hours of testimony from expert witnesses, among whom have been 10 medical specialists receiving tens of thousands of dollars. The judge even hired an expert to help him make sense of it all (again, true!).

The case of the she-male is of particular interest to other transgender inmates who want to undergo a sex change, most likely to deter their cellmates’ advances. Other transgenders have sued prison officials in the past, none of whom have been successful in finding a judge dumb enough to rule in their favor.

The Massachusetts Correction Department is vigorously fighting the request for surgery, given that it would create a security nightmare and make the she-male a target of sexual assault.

“Believe it or not,” said a Correction Department spokesman, “prisoners can get a little rough around the edges. Many of them don’t even know how to properly court a lady. Not to mention, I can’t even imagine how many jealous inmates would end up getting stabbed by their **tches.”

According to the Associated Press, the Correction Department and its outside health care provider have spent over $52,000 on expert witnesses to testify with regards to an operation that would cost about $20,000. “That’s not the point,” said a spokesman for the ACLU, “it’s the principle of the thing. If a woman feels trapped because she’s in a man’s body, and the state is going to hold, um, her prisoner, they have to take responsibility for her, or him, um… for it’s well-being.”

The time and money that has gone into this case is beginning to outrage certain lawmakers who insist that taxpayers should not have to pay for inmates to have surgery that most private insurers reject as elective. (AP)

Said Republican state Sen. Scott Brown, “They are prisoners. They are there because they’ve broken the law. Other folks, people who want to get these types of surgeries, they have to go through their insurance carrier or save up for it and do it independently. Yet if you are in prison, you can do it for nothing? That doesn’t make a lot of sense.” Sen. Brown was unsuccessful in his attempt to introduce a bill banning sex change surgeries for inmates.

“No one supported Brown’s bill,” said a member of the Massachusetts House, “next thing you know, we won’t be able to equip each jail cell with a 42” inch HD plasma TV or a Playstation 3. And what happens when the iPhone comes out, are we just going to refuse our inmates an iPhone just because they made a mistake? I, for one, believe in second chances.”

Advocates have a different line of reasoning, however, arguing that in some cases, such as Kosilek’s given that he has attempted suicide twice, sex-change operations are as much a medical necessity as are treatments for diabetes or high blood pressure, both of which can be cured by removal of the penis.

“The duty belongs to the prison to figure out how to fulfill its constitutional obligations to both provide adequate medical care and provide a fundamental security for all inmates, regardless of their body count,” said Cole Thaler, an attorney with Lambda Legal, a gay- and transgender- rights group, who are completely unbiased and care only for the well-being of every inmate in America, even the ones in jail for hate crimes against homosexuals.

“It’s like I’m a prisoner in my own body,” said Kosilek, “so I’m a prisoner inside the body of a person who’s in prison, that means I have it twice as bad as any other prisoner. That’s cruel and unusual punishment.”

[Yes, this is a true story, here’s the link: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8HUCP0G1&show_article=1 ]
84
Vote
Shared on
   


The Deal with New Years' Resolutions

January 6th 2008 21:08
People keep asking me if I’ve made any New Years’ Resolutions this year. For the most part, this is a lame attempt by girls to strike up a conversation with me, but it really got me thinking about the whole idea of making a resolution for New Years’ in the first place. But to answer their question, yes I made resolutions. The first, which I made ten minutes ago (yes, I know its January 6th) was to not procrastinate. My second was to start writing articles in which I refrain from insinuating that girls throw themselves at me. So far I’m 0-for-2, but then again, making it to the 6h of January without breaking my resolutions is about 4 days longer than most people can go.

The great thing about the New Years’ resolution is that it allows us to acknowledge that we have something about us we should be attempting to fix, while simultaneously giving us an irrefutable reason to put off making that change. And even though we never expect anyone to keep up with their resolutions for more than a week, it still serves as a perfectly acceptable postponement of a commitment to improve one’s self. Take this classic example:

“Honey, you know I love you, but I can’t take it anymore, either you quit smoking or I’m leaving you.”
I’m going to, I promise. See, look, it’s on my list of New Years’ resolutions…
“It’s the middle of August… I’m so proud of you!”

Clearly, there is little that is more American than the list of New Years’ resolutions.

So now the question is, why do New Years’ resolutions wield this incredible perception of power and influence? Two phenomena can explain the aforementioned phenomenon (I lost my thesaurus).

The first, and this is not in order of importance, is hope, or as it is more accurately referred to by myself and other people of ridiculously high intelligence: delusion. By putting off the change until the New Years’, the individual is allowed to maintain the delusion that he may actually accomplish the feat, or at least maintain an apathetic attempt for a few days.

But who can blame imperfect individuals for wanting to hold on to a glimmer of hope that they can overcome their inadequacies? Hope is a beautiful thing. If you think you may have HIV, would you want to get tested, find out you’re positive, and no longer be able to hope that you’re negative? I’d take hope over life-saving anti-viral medications any day.

Would you want to know that you had Huntington’s disease, which causes death at middle-age, so that you could avoid having children because there would be a 50% chance they would suffer the same fate, and in doing so no longer be able to hope that you’re going to live long enough to die of an obesity-related illness like a normal American? I’d rather hope for heart disease, and so would you. Besides, without hope, instead of occupying my Saturday afternoon by coming up with excuses as to why she hasn’t called me back, I’d be wallowing in self-pity and thus unable to write this article, or do my laundry (and now you know why we call it “delusion”).

But the main reason these resolutions are so popular isn’t because it allows us to be dreamers, it’s because it gives us what every American uses as a basis for every tough decision they will ever make: justification. Should I drive home after drinking four pitchers? Well, it’s only five miles… Should I take the $40 on my dad’s nightstand? Well, he does owe me for that Father’s Day gift I bought him that he never uses… Should I use the tape of our wedding to record the season premiere of the new American Gladiators? I mean, it’s not like she wasn’t there when our wedding was filmed… Clearly, having justification for any action is invaluable, and this is exactly the service that the New Years’ resolution provides.

As we saw earlier, the resolution to quit smoking justified the activity’s continuation for an extended period of time. Sure, the man could have quit in August, but by resolving to do so with the new year, it’s okay that he’s going to keep smoking, and thus he has now bought himself an extra five months of unimpeded carcinogenic enjoyment. Not to mention, research by the Marlboro Institute for Health has shown that New Years’ resolutions are 37% more effective than nicotine patches, and 64% more effective than ultimatums from spouses. The Institute thus recommends that in lieu of costly nicotine-replacement therapies, smokers wishing to quit should make a resolution to do so.

The other form of self-induced health deterioration in America, obesity, also benefits from the New Years’ pledge to resolve by justifying the voracious eating habits that individuals have a tendency to establish at the onset of the holiday season. During this season, the average American gains approximately eight pounds, or if they live in the south, eighteen pounds. But keep in mind, that number can vary depending on which fitness center’s commercial you’re watching.

Many scholars believe that the New Years’ resolution first appeared during the administration of President William Taft, given his penchant for weighing 330 pounds. In truth, it was Taft’s successor, Woodrow Wilson, who was the architect of the list, which he created in order to persuade his wife that he was going to resolve to stop looking at porn on the internet. However, given that Taft was the largest president in US history, and Wilson was president during World War I, this hallmark achievement of Wilson’s presidency is often overlooked.

As you can see, the use of resolutions to justify “pigging out” has deep-seeded roots in American history, and thus cannot be supplanted, not even by the ACLU. Fortunately it’s not that big of a deal, since every American who chooses to “pig out” during the holidays has also made a New Years’ resolution to go on a diet and start working out every day. I mean, come on, otherwise gaining 10 pounds over the holidays from overeating would just be irresponsible.
96
Vote
Shared on
   


A woman in Atlanta, Georgia has filed a lawsuit against the father of her child for neglecting to pay child support. Le’Shaniqua-isha Jones, who before her most recent child had given birth to three other children in as many years, each from a different baby’s daddy, decided that her next child would be on her own terms. What Jones didn’t know was that the most recent baby’s daddy would refuse to pay child support. Upon being reached for comment, the man told the New York Times that he “never agreed to pay child support” when he donated sperm twelve years ago. Jones claims that was not made clear to her by the clinic, and is considering a suit against them, as well.

Jones, 23, had not counted on being in this situation. “It seemed like as soon as I had a baby, a few months later I’d be knocked up again,” Le’Shaniqua-isha told a reporter for Fox’s local affiliate in Atlanta, “I would get me my body back and head to da club every night and all dat, but I just figured, you know, that there’s like a delay or somethin’ ‘fore you can get pregnant again, know wha I’m sayin


[ Click here to read more ]
97
Vote
Shared on
   


A school district in Newark, New Jersey, which ordered that a picture of a male student kissing his boyfriend be blacked out of the East Side High School’s yearbook, is now saying they regret doing so and have apologized to the student, saying, “yeah, we’re sorry… sorry you’re so gay!!” But because the superintendent did not deliver the apology in public, face-to-face, while standing on his head and balancing a dinner plate on a thin stick with his left hand, kisser Andre Jackson refuses to accept the apology as sincere. In a related story, Kevin Miller is awaiting an apology from Mrs. Kleinman who walked in on him and his girlfriend in a stall in the ladies’ room. At the very least, Miller wants back the video recording she made.

“I would accept an apology – a public apology,” said Jackson, the youngest student in New Jersey to formally give up trying to get a girl to go out with him


[ Click here to read more ]
106
Vote
Shared on
   


Sorry for the sabbatical, everyone; I know your days have been filled with slightly less joviality (thank you Word thesaurus) since I stopped posting everyday, but know that it’s been for a very good reason.

You see, my normal routine used to involve going to work, curing AIDS, insulting the foreigners in adjacent labs, and going to the university library to stare at the 18-22 year old girls who are either anorexically hot or need to stop going to the Pizza Hut in the school cafeteria. Since I had no intention of making any moves, given that I don’t hit on girls in settings in which they are not expecting to get hit on (i.e., that’s my excuse for being a pansy), I had to do something to pass the time; that’s when I usually wrote. Recently I’ve been getting play left and right thanks to my dual subscriptions to match.com and eharmony.com. But now that I’ve hooked up with everyone on my “favorites” list, or at least send them a message and never got a response, I’m back to my old routine


[ Click here to read more ]
51
Vote
   


Virginia Gives $3,550 Speeding Ticket

August 23rd 2007 23:29
The drivers most bothered by speeders tend to be old people, the same old people who make the laws. In Virginia, speeders now face additional taxes that are tacked on to the initial fine that can make a speeding ticket cost in excess of $3,500. (MSN)

As of the beginning of July, dozens of traffic offenses in Virginia now come attached with “civil remedial fees,” which should not be confused with the remedial courses taken in high school by those enacting this law. According to the new penalties, a driver convicted of reckless driving, which for unknown reasons includes going 75mph in a 55mph zone, faces a $350 per year tax in addition to the fine, which on its own can be up to $2,500. The law also forbids judges from waiving or reducing the fine or from using any judgment whatsoever


[ Click here to read more ]
64
Vote
   


Aggravated that CNN would dare to objectively critique his latest film, which is a critique of America’s healthcare system, obese filmmaker Michael Moore has sent an open letter to the news network outlining his complaints. “I went on their show out of the goodness of my heart to talk about my movie before it was released in theaters,” said Moore in between bites of his stick of butter, “and what do they do? They objectively review the movie. Talk about ungrateful.”

In response to the letter, which CNN initially threw away but came across later on the internet, a spokesman released the following statement: “It’s ironic that someone who has made a career out of holding powerful interests accountable is so sensitive to having his own work held up to the light by impartial journalists, as we did in our examination of ‘SiCKO.’ It’s not like we pointed out the irony of a morbidly obese individual criticizing the very same healthcare system he’s going to need in the very near future


[ Click here to read more ]
103
Vote
   


The quality of Chinese products has been providing the major news networks with punchline after punchline for over a week. CNN, MSNBC, The Daily Show, and even fake news shows such as Fox News have had no choice but to present the condemning truth. So much material is available that despite the high probability that they will be executed for doing so, China Central Television (CCT) joined in on the fun, presenting a report about a restaurant in Beijing that was using cardboard to make their food.

Countless mom-and-pop restaurants across China attempt to maximize profits by using inexpensive ingredients or objectionable substitutes. Granted, the situation is still better than it was two years ago when asbestos was the nation’s most commonly-used seasoning. Nevertheless, outfits such as these are nearly impossible to regulate, making it understandable why the Chinese government doesn’t even bother


[ Click here to read more ]
40
Vote
   


A $660 million settlement between the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles and over 500 alleged victims of clergy abuse has now been approved. Within ten minutes of the announcement, an additional 18,540 people came forward claiming that they had also been victims of clergy abuse.

Some of the plaintiffs cried what were probably tears of sadness as their $660 million settlement was approved, praying to God that their share might just be enough to make the pain go away. “You think, ‘I can never escape this’,” said one of the plaintiffs in between tears, “and then suddenly the whole world knows that you weren’t just milking this sexual abuse thing for attention, and suddenly you feel better


[ Click here to read more ]
72
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

Comment by Plagman
on Re: Another American shooting

February 19th 2008 01:01
[sigh] Dana, I was going to say that this has got to be the least funny thing you've ever written, but I'm sure that would offend someone, so I won't.

btw, you know that radio show I wrote about in my last post? I'm interviewing there tomorrow morning for an internship!!!!!

Comment by Plagman
on What is Rockabilly music?

January 27th 2008 18:22
I know, that's why I mentioned it

Comment by Plagman
on What is Rockabilly music?

January 26th 2008 02:16
How come you always get so many comments, you don't even offend anyone! I'm j./k. I only have one thing to say, the Psychobilly Freakout on Guitar Hero 2 is f-ing impossible!

I usually forget what I write about 10 minutes after I write it, and I wrote this one in June, and the last sentence of the 3rd to last paragraph had me laughing out loud uncontrollaby in the library. Damn that's funny!!

Michaelie, this is a true story, the link's at the bottom.

Comment by Plagman
on The Deal with New Years' Resolutions

January 8th 2008 20:33
okay, that was my comment (#5) but this site is retarded with log-ins

Comment by Plagman
on The Deal with New Years' Resolutions

January 7th 2008 20:45
well, I'd texted her last Friday about dinner and she never got back to me, but technically there wouldn't be much point after Friday. I just called and left a message, we'll see what happens...

Comment by Plagman
on Shariah Law Killings

January 6th 2008 21:23
Why does D. Armenta's post about whether or not she was in the wrong have twice as many votes as this article?

Comment by Plagman
on Shariah Law Killings

January 6th 2008 21:22
Wow, she even used the word "vitriol" in one of her comments, that's just impressive.

Comment by Plagman
on Shariah Law Killings

January 6th 2008 21:21
First off, anyone bashing D. Armenta is retarded; I read some of the comments out of curiosity but I could've told you that beforehand. Second, you're all retarded cause I wrote about this last June, and even though I didn't read this tool's article because I'm sure it would annoy the crap out of me, mine's much, much better.

Father Kills Daughter in Honor Killing

And you know what, I even cited my source on this one, and if you've never read my stuff, which I would highly recommend you do so, you know that happens about as often as a girl I like actually returning my call. (for the record, that article only has a few jokes, and thus is an exception to everything else I've ever written)

Comment by Plagman
on POST OF THE YEAR 2007

November 30th 2007 19:12
Aww, thanks guys, now I feel bad for having not posted much recently. I'll make it up to you, I have some stuff left over from before I took 3 weeks to write my 85,000 word book. I'm jk, it took like 4 weeks.

Question, if I win funniest blogger will it help me pick up chicks?