Ok - I get this conspiracy - it does make a lot of sense. Think about it. Katie is the youngest child - her parents would want to be there when she delivered, right? But somehow they were on vacation when she was set to pop Suri out? Not possible. That's because Katie had given birth earlier - so her parents figured why not go on a cruise? Remeber when Tom was asked if her parents were with Katie waiting for the birth? Also Tom went on a whirwind promotion of MI-3 - he's jetting all over the world??? Katie just gave birth to his "only natural child" and he's out promoting some crappy movie??? That's because Katie had already given birth a month prior. And again - Tom's married to Nicole Kidman for 10 years and never has one natural child??? What virile man adopts two children when he can pop out his own??? Then as soon has he hooks up with Katie (at age 43 in April 2005 - she's pregnant right away? Not likely. Katie was indeed pregnant when she came into this relationship (if that's what you can call it). This baby looks exactly like Katie and Chris Klein - look at the shape of her eyes - they belong to Chris not Tom. Now there are rumors that Nicole is pregnant too.... Remember when Tom divorced Nic and everyone was shocked because there had been talk that she had recently lost a baby? Well, that baby wasn't his. And if anyone remembers Tom had talked about being sterile much earlier in his career. But now Nic had outed him severely by getting pregnant - so he had to dump her. He always said Nic knows why we got divorced. She was stunned, remember? Sorry Tom everyone knows you are shooting blanks or better yet you can't even shoot at all.
Comment by Pig Whistle
on Is Tom Cruise the Real Father of Suri???