Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Perez Hilton... could he be more arrogant?

April 26th 2009 13:42
I recently saw a video on YouTube of the Miss USA 2009 pageant, in which Perez Hilton (Mario Armando Lavandeira, Jr.) asked Miss California representative, Carrie Prejean:

“Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit? Why or why not?”

Prejean responded:

“Well I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that’s how I was raised and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman. Thank you.”

Now I certainly don't agree with Prejean's answer, but I do respect her for answering honestly, and I don't believe there was any malice within her sentiment. So what gives with Perez Hilton launching a full-blown attack on the starlet?

Personally I find Hilton to be of questionable character at the best of times. Hilton remarked to ABC News that; "She lost not because she doesn’t believe in gay marriage, she lost because she’s a dumb bitch!" Later he apologised for his comments, however, in a subsequent interview with MSNBC he retracted saying "I called her the b-word but hey I was thinking the c-word but I didn't say it".

This is not the first time Hilton has come under fire for what many view as intolerance, for some time now Hilton has been highlighted by some blogs and radio talk shows for what they view as Hilton's own expression of intolerance.

"Outing" celebrities

On his blog, Lavandeira is open about his homosexuality and about his desire to "out" those who he claims are closeted gay celebrities. When former 'N Sync member Lance Bass officially came out as gay on July 26, 2006, Lavandeira received criticism for having been partially responsible in the outing. "It upsets me that people think what I'm doing is a bad thing," Lavandeira told Access Hollywood. "I don't think it's a bad thing. If you know something to be a fact, why not report it? Why is that still taboo?"[42] On November 2, 2006, another celebrity often questioned by Lavandeira for remaining closeted, actor Neil Patrick Harris, revealed that he is gay.[43] After Harris came out, Lavendeira wrote, "Today is a victory....We are throwing down the gauntlet and issue a challenge to all the closeted celebrities out there: Come out. Come out NOW! Come out in droves!!....We are talking to you Anderson Cooper, Jodie Foster...Queen Latifah...and the rest of you! NOW is the time!!!!!!!!"[44] These celebrities either maintain they are heterosexual or do not discuss their sexual orientation.

Prominent members of the gay community who have criticized Lavandeira's outing tactics include Arts & Entertainment Editor of The Advocate Corey Scholibo, AfterElton.com editor Michael Jensen, and Damon Romine, spokesperson for the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.[3] Kim Ficera, contributing writer for AfterEllen.com, wrote,

"I have to question the character of a man who attacks others on such deeply personal levels, without provocation and for self-benefit, monetary or otherwise....If he's emotionally incapable of exhibiting even the tiniest bit of compassion for closeted people, if he can't be sensitive to the fact that coming out is a very personal decision and that the process can be difficult for some — especially celebrities — I feel sorry for him. If his juvenile behavior is his shtick, I think it makes him a much more pathetic figure, and one the gay and lesbian community should not support...If we support behavior like Hilton's, we applaud shallowness, arrogance, rage and invasion of privacy, and risk becoming what we despise."[45]

Some of Lavandeira's fellow gossip bloggers have also objected to his approach. Trent Vanegas, who runs "Pink Is the New Blog," told Salon, "I do not outright call people gay. I do not feel it is my place, or anyone else's place, to make people come out of the closet. Being shockingly hurtful just to get attention is not my style." David Hauslaib of gossip blog Jossip.com stated, "The rationale that he's doing this for the good of that gay community is tantamount to saying that there is a gay agenda. Is this a positive for the gay community? I'd say, 'No.'"[3] Author, screenwriter, and former friend Japhy Grant has also questioned his motives, writing in online magazine Salon, "Spreading gossip is just your average pedestrian variety of immorality. Claiming that you're doing it to further civil rights is an outright sham."[3]

When questioned on Midweek Politics about whether reporting on celebrities' sexual orientation incites homophobia by making it news, Lavandeira indicated that he did not believe so.[46] He sees that coming out in Hollywood is not necessarily a bad thing, citing Ellen DeGeneres and Rosie O'Donnell as examples: "I know there is some controversy about outing people, but I also believe the only way we're gonna have change is with visibility. And if I have to drag some people screaming out of the closet, then I will. I think that lots of celebrities have an archaic fear that being gay will hurt their career but look at Rosie. Look at Ellen."[47]

Some prominent gay rights advocates disagree. GLAAD spokesperson Damon Romine told Salon, "Media speculation about a celebrity's orientation is not something we support. This kind of gossip can lead some people to the decision to come out, as we've seen recently, or it may drive others further into the closet. People are going to become more guarded and secretive and not less, because they don't want to create any opportunities [for anyone to out them]." Actor Bruce Vilanch said, "What purpose does it serve? These [people like Perez] are professional homosexuals. They are gay people for a living. They have to respect the rights of homosexuals who aren't professional."[3] In an article entitled "Just How Dangerous is Perez Hilton?", AfterElton.com suggested that Lavandeira's actions put people's careers at risk, because anti-gay bias is still a prominent part of American culture. He continued, "Both as a gay man and a journalist, I question whether the gay community should approve of Hilton's actions....Being associated with someone who publishes photos of panty-less starlets and scribbles dirty notes....makes us look infantile and ridiculous."[48]
- Wikipedia


I don't know what's sadder, Perez Hilton and his belligerence... or the society that has welcomed him and his pursuit of celebrity status.

84
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
14 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by moonglow

April 26th 2009 15:20
I don't see why everyone got upset with that lovely lady. She spoke her mind, and not in any mean fashion.

Of course, it IS hard to appear intelligent when answering questions in a bikini.

Comment by Mau-Medellin

April 26th 2009 15:30
Hi Moonglow,

As I said, I thought she was polite and I'd much rather have her answering a question honestly (even if I don't agree with her response) than have her lie.

Of course I cannot blame Perez Hilton for Prejean's answer, but I do believe it's exactly what he hoped for; he's a man that'll milk any situation for his own gain!!

Thanks for stopping by, Mau-Medellin

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 26th 2009 23:24
my mum was raving on and on about this, i dont respect Perez Hilton, and i dont understand why anyone would ask him to be on a beauty pagent panel

i dont understand why the producers approved such a question, and i think even if she had of said "yes i think it should be legalised in every state" she would still be at a disadvantage with half the people in the room, as it is an issue people generally only 50/50 approved, and some religious people would frown on her approval

it would be stupid as asking her what she thinks of abortion, or stem cell research, or the death penalty, or gun ownership, or defining child pornography, those kind of questions are divisive traps

although saying all that, i think Prejean could have phrased her responses better and said the typical "i think same-sex defactos should have equal legal rights, and civil ceremonies should be permitted, but marriages should be up to individual churches" . . . you know, the kind of thing a politician like Obama would say

but maybe she couldnt say even that, because she doesnt agree with equal rights and civil cermonies?

Comment by RubySoho

April 27th 2009 00:31
Yeah, i think Morgan is right- these sorts of questions are traps. I'm actually getting tired of all these videos showing beauty queens saying 'stupid' things. You know what? From a young age these women have been taught that it is the way they look that is important- how shiny their hair is, how long their legs are, how tight their arse looks in a bikini. So they play the game and what happens? One question, one single question that is thrown in there to make it seem that these women are judged on more than their looks. The only reason its there is to make them look bad. It's that old catch 22. Women are either allowed to have beauty or brains. Not both. never both. And contests such as this just reinofrce that tired old stereotype.

As much as I disagree with her answer, I say good on her for not just saying what she knew Perez wanted to hear. Poor girl is just another pawn in the world's never ending quest to keep women in their place.

Sorry. Rant over.

Comment by Kelly Wand

April 27th 2009 01:37
In California, it's now okay for the gay to pick on the retarded on national television. The measure won by a landslide last November.

Comment by Mau-Medellin

April 27th 2009 03:23
Hi Morgan, Ruby,

I'm just happy that she spoke honestly. Like I have said above, I don't agree with her view, but I'd much rather here her speak her mind that just regurgitate something she'd been fed by a publicist.

I just can't stand Perez!! He's just such a vulgar person, and really like the photo; WHAT IS HE FAMOUS FOR???



Hi Kelly Wand,

Sorry I'm not 100% sure what you're talking about (I'm in Australia). But thanks for stopping by; feel free to post some more info if you like.

Mau-Medellin

Comment by Natalina

April 27th 2009 06:26
Ohhhh, Perez Hilton gets me all riled up.

I agree with what everyone has said about divisive questioning etc. I'd like to further add that Perez is the LAST person that should be leading the charge for equal rights for homosexuals. My reason for saying that is because he is all about attention.

I don't doubt that he believes what he says, but you know that the moment she answered the question the way that she did, Perez saw dollar signs. He knew he'd be able to milk this scenario for all that it was worth, and he has. Yet another means to get his name in the spotlight.

You may be interested in a few of my posts about Perez:
Really Long Link

Really Long Link

Comment by Norm

April 27th 2009 11:34

Comment by Mau-Medellin

April 27th 2009 11:39
Hi Natalina,

He's just sickening! I'm not one to say "Our generation's gone to crap" or things like that, but having people like Perez in the public spotlight certainly doesn't look good for us Gen Y'ers (I'm assuming your Gen Y lol).

I'll have to check out your posts... I'm very glad though I've found someone with an equal revolution when it comes to Perez Hilton



Norm(an)

The day I leave you be is the day you return my Cat.

Mau-Medellin

Comment by Norm

April 27th 2009 12:09

Comment by Mau-Medellin

April 27th 2009 12:18
Give her back then!!

Comment by Natalina

April 27th 2009 19:54
I'll date myself a bit here, but I'm actually more of a Gen X-er!

I quit visiting Perez Hilton's site when he started to get very mean and malicious. Especially when he would attack innocent people who didn't deserve the negative spotlight he would shine on them. That, and the fact that he's been caught in so many lies it is hard to keep track! He's a publicity whore, which I guess is how he stays relevant.

But, interestingly, it was recently revealed that he no longer writes on his own site anymore! He has a staff of 3 writers that do all of his posts. He just pops in a vlogs occasionally, but he takes all the credit. I know plenty of writers that become so popular that they need to hire people to help carry the load. But, they always give credit to their staff writers. Not Perez! He still wants people to think he's the one writing. It is pretty disgusting.

Comment by Mau-Medellin

April 28th 2009 07:07
But, interestingly, it was recently revealed that he no longer writes on his own site anymore! He has a staff of 3 writers that do all of his posts.

I wouldn't want to admit to writing for his site lol! How shameful would it be; to support such a W*&^%#$!

Mau-Medellin

Comment by Natalina

April 28th 2009 10:56
That's true. Perhaps they are withholding their own identities! Like, "Ok Perez, we'll write for you on one condition...total anonymity!"

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
6 Posts
2 Posts
8 Posts
16 Posts dating from April 2009
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Mau-Medellin's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Mau-Medellin
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]