Pawan

INDIA


Joined June 10th 2008

Number of Posts:
10

Number of Comments:
0

Karma:
6



Blogs

Pawan's Blogs

550 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
10 Post(s)

Blogs I Follow

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

Phase Separator - Design Improvement

February 16th 2009 08:10
Phase Separator Design Based on My Experience

BackGround

Recently when I was working on some problem of a phase separator in which Toluene water system is handled with some amount of acetic acid, I had some great experience which I thought I should share with all of you. The Idea was to reduce the acetic acid in the water phase, which anyway cannot be reduced by separation becasue its inherent solubility in water is very high or practically unlimited. Therefore, even though plant people were trying to reduce it by changing the locaion of Interface layer, My focus was on the better separation for water & toluene and increasing its capacity.

Are you convinced that by changing the location of interface layer you can reduce the loss of a completely miscible component???????????????????

Introduction

Phase separators are basically horizontal or vertical vessels, can be used for separation of two or more liquids (generally industry uses only two due to lack of knowledge for better design in general). Separation is based on the gravity difference principle, so greater the diffeerence in densities better & faster is the separation.

Here is simple drawing representing general design.

You can read the theory & design in Coulson & Richardson for better understanding of above.

Discussion

Now the capacity in terms of better & faster separation depends on the settling velocity of dispersed phase (Water) in the continuous phase (Toluene in this case). If the actual velocity coming from the pipe (as shown above) is more than the settling velocity which is generally of the order of 0.01 or less m/sec than naturally the toluene will also go to bottom phase. This is usually the case where actual velocities are much higher than the required one in actual plant operation & design both. Therefore, we generally operate a phase separator at much lower capacity than what it is capable of.

WHAT IS THE SOLUTION??????

I have found that it is better to provide a nozzle plate at the end of inlet pipe in order to reduce the velocity. this plate should be in the horizontal plane & its width can be based on separator diameter or size. For my case I can accomodate a 4-6" wide plate with a length of ~800 mm minimum. This with an hole dia of 0.5" on each side i.e width and length can have ~128 holes.

Compared to an inlet pipe of 4" in size it can have double cross sectional area reducing the inlet velocity to half of the original design value.

Imagingly I can increase the capacity of this separator by 100% to double.

Here is a picture of what it will look like.

Enjoy using this Idea for increasing the capacity of your phase separator. Send me your comments if any.
29
Vote
   


Condensate Pumping - Save Cost

February 16th 2009 08:06
Conventionally we use centrifugal pumps for condensate transfer from any system which requires lot of pumping energy mainly due to -

Mismatched pump selection as usual.

Intermittent operation based on varying condensate load.

Part load operation.

Continuous drop in pumping efficiency due to higher temperature of fluid (Condensate).

Frequent mechanical failures also contribute to point no 4 above.

Overall LCC is very costly for any condensate transfer systems.

NEW PAP SYSTEM

Now we have totally different static system for condensate transfer i.e. Pressure actuated Pump. This is nothing but a mechanical device which recieves condensate in the reciever. This is having a float valve such that once it goes upto certain level the float opeans a steam inlet nozzle which is usually at 20 psi higher pressure than the back pressure of the condensate transfer system.

So if you need to transfer the condensate to 10 m elevation & at 3 Kg system than the motive steam pressure required is 30 10 15 = 55 meter Or 5.5 Kg/cm2 steam is sufficient.

The consumption of this motive steam is also usually very very low compared to conventional pumping. It consumes only 3-4 Kg of steam for each 1000 Kg of condensate transfer.

Here is a cost comparison for this PAP & conventional centrifugal pumping system. No Dear........just now I dont have sufficient time --------Its Easy you can do it on your own.

Happy Mathematics??????????? - I may provide it later on as comment on this topic....So keep watching it.
27
Vote
   


Cooling Towers - Part II

February 8th 2009 09:45
This is the next one as I promised earlier in my first one "Cooling Towers: Not the Coolest One". This time I was motivated by the search of someone on cooling towers capacity assessment. I have already mentoned many factors & procedure to find out the capacity of cooling towers under the title Performance Monitoring - Item 9 to find out NTU. However, this search from some student led me to re-write it in simple way.
Let us understand how CT (cooling towers) capacity is fixed for design. (I am including this to give you an overview).
1. Assessment of all process loads. (e.g. Coolers, Condensers, etc.)
2. These process loads are then added with safety margins of 20-30% depedning on the confidence of design engineer either in terms of process temperature or in terms of flow approximation and then finally in terms of circulation pump capacity & head.
3. Thus, before hand we have ~20-30% margin in the CT flow rate compared to actual requirement.
4. Then CT is deisgned for worst case of WBT (Wet Bulb Temperature) which prevails only for 2-3 months in a year anywhere in the world in general. This in general gives you ~10% extra capacity in terms of heat load on CT.
Let us assume that these are the major prevailing factors which are contributing to the load on CT and no design or operating issue which we have discussed in the previous article is not there.
Now we can divide the loading of CT in two parts - One is flow loading & Second is heat Loading.
In General it is not advisable to increase flow loading beyond 10% or so of design value due to mechanical reasons for tower stablity & safety.
Thus the recommended way is to increase the heat load on CT utilizing the design margins available due to several reasons as discussed above & in my previous post.
Now the Mathematics is easier to find out the capacity of CT.
Case Study
Recently I need to increase the CW flow rate from a tower of 1050 M3/hr whcih was having a 3 cells of 350 M3/hr each. My requirement was 80-100 M3/hr.
When I estimated the total load on tower it was running with 1050 M3/hr flow rate but with 8°C range against design of 10°C range.
By simple maths, you can estimate that the
Heat load capacity was 1050 x 10 = 10.500 Gcal/Hr.
Actual load 1050 x 8 = 8.400 Gcal/Hr.
Additional Load 100 x 10 = 1.0 Gcal/Hr
Obviously there is margin in the CT & is possible to load it even the flow rate is running at design value of 1050 M3/Hr.
So total New load = 8.4 1.0 = 9.4 Gcal/Hr
With Design Flow = 1050 M3/hr
Delta T (Range required) = 8.95 ~ 9°C.
So I need to reduce the CW flow rate in other consumers such that the range of colling becomes 9°C from 8°C this will reduce the flow rate by ~100 M3/hr in other users giving me the flexibility or cushion to accomodate new load.
The purpose is to explain that CT should not be viewed as a stand alone flow machine it should always be treated as a combined entity for flow & temperature which is its heat removal capacity.
I have written it to help the users /students who are not clear in the concepts of CT. If you have any questio kindly post them in comments section & I will be happy to answer them as soon as possible for me.
41
Vote
   


Surface Tension

February 4th 2009 05:48
In the literature surface tensions of liquids are usually given at one temperature only (often 15 or 20 °C). As the temperature is raised, the surface tension decreases and becomes zero at the critical point. Based on this observation the surface tension at temperature T2 can be estimated for most liquids from the following simple equation if surface tension at another temperature T1 and critical temperature Tc of the liquid are known


[ Click here to read more ]
29
Vote
   


Compressed Air - Compressing Hard

February 2nd 2009 16:25
Introduction

Compressed air is an essential part of any manufacturing / processing setup. It is treated as a simple air system without much attention to it, which finally appears as a slow eater of your profit & bottomline


[ Click here to read more ]
28
Vote
   


Understanding Boiler Efficiency

February 1st 2009 18:05
Energy Savings do not always mean efficiency improvement for Boilers.

This is with reference to my previous post long back on How much do you know your boiler efficiency


[ Click here to read more ]
30
Vote
   


INTRODUCTION
Cooling tower is basically a heat exchanging device in which heat exchange takes place by virtue of mass transfer potential between process fluid (cooling water) and utility fluid (ambient air). Hence, it performs evaporative cooling of water.

[ Click here to read more ]
100
Vote
   


CO2: Bone of contention

June 10th 2008 05:30
Interest in recovery of carbon dioxide (CO2) from flue gases / any other gas is being propelled by multiple factors, which may vary from merchant CO2 market, Enhanced oil recovery (EOR), and pressure of GHG emissions. In fact, it has always been a problem to all.
Issues

[ Click here to read more ]
91
Vote
   


Ammonia: Counting Energy

June 10th 2008 05:23
The actual performance of any chemical process plant can be measured by only two terms, energy consumption level and on-stream/reliability factor. These are the two overall indicators of the plant performance out of which reliability factor also contributes to the energy consumption level. Hence, it becomes inevitable in an energy intensive unit like fertilizer industry, to keep a close look on this aspect of plant performance. This in turn will affect the productivity and profitability.

For all figures & Tables Click Here
[ Click here to read more ]
45
Vote
   


Ammonia: Steps Ahead

June 10th 2008 05:10
Steam reforming of hydrocarbons for ammonia production was introduced in 1930. Since then, the technology has experienced revolutionary changes in its energy consumption patterns. Ranging from an early level of 20 Gcal/tonne (79.4 MBtu/tonne) to about 7 Gcal/tonne (27.8 MBtu/tonne) in the last decade of the 20th century. The energy intensive nature of the process is the key driving force for improving the technology and reducing the overall cost of manufacturing.

Looking further ahead, we'll review some potentially significant developments and concepts that may impact the manner in which ammonia is produced. Some of these manufacturing routes are being tested or employed at a few plants around the world, but have yet to be fully developed into commercial processes. We'll also review more traditional approaches to ammonia manufacturing along the way


[ Click here to read more ]
70
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

I've not commented on anything yet :(