Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Opinions - by youranter

Opinions - December 2006

HE'S DEAD

December 31st 2006 14:36
HE'S DEAD
Last night, Dec. 29th, 2006, Saddam Hussein was hanged and sent to meet his maker. He tried to make himself out as a martyr. I question this. He seemed to have no feelings for his sons when they met their deaths. He was found hiding like the coward that he was in a ‘spider-hole' some 3 years ago. He, like all killers, suddenly ‘found Jesus' and asked that all Iraqis forgive the US for those ‘trespassing against those who trespass against us'. Who was he trying to kid?
He was right up there with Hitler and Stalin but at least they had the decency to destroy themselves rather than have the world do it for them. Saddam didn't kill as many people as the former did. But he did kill more people in a more brutal way. Hitler experimented with gassing. Saddam perfected it. Stalin thought sending people to gas chambers was a waste of time. He sent them to gulags instead. He was closer to the truth. He got cheap labour and if you happened to die in the process, so what? There were always more people to arrest to keep up the labour end of the supply and demand chain.

Saddam was despicable, to say the least. And now, thank God and Allah, he's out of our hair. Human rights groups are wringing their hands in false sympathy saying he was tried unfairly and unjustly. I fail to see how this is so. He had the best defensive team on the planet working to keep him from swinging. They lost, plain and simple. And in true Muslim style, he was granted one appeal, which he also lost, and ended up being done away with without all the endless appeals we give our convicts. I think we should take a page from our Muslim brothers on this one and apply it to some of our inmates over here. Rather than feeding, clothing and sheltering them for 20 or more years as they try to convince us of their innocence, they get one appeal, say within a year, and if still found guilty, they hang. I still can't believe that it is cheaper to keep a convict in prison at a cost of $84,000 per year for 20 years than it is to buy $10.00 worth of rope and dispose of him.

The liberal left claims this execution will result in more turmoil in Iraq. As Omar Fadhil in Baghdad confided on his weblog (IraqTheModel.com) on hearing the Iraqi court delivering last weekend's verdict of death by hanging for Saddam Hussein: "I was overwhelmed with joy and relief as I watched the criminals being read their verdicts. For the first time in our region, tyrants are being punished for their crimes through a court of law... "I'm still receiving words of congratulations in emails, phone calls and text messages from friends inside and outside the country. These were our only means to share our happiness because of the curfew that limits our movement... This is a day not only for Iraqis but a historic day for the whole region; today new bases for dealing between rulers and peoples are found."
As Salim Mansur said, "I recently read the words of a Gulf Arab cited by Fouad Ajami in The Foreigner's Gift, a priceless account of Iraq's deliverance into freedom by American and allied soldiers. Following the June 28, 2004 ceremony of handing power to Iraqi representatives by Paul Bremer, head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, this Arab wrote: "History will record how a superpower went to free a people only to slip out in grace without fanfare. Only America can do that: put its might and spill the blood of its sons and daughters to save a nation from its own evil, without asking for anything in return."
Interesting to note is that Saddam asked to be shot as if he deserved a soldiers death. His neck was stretched instead, like the criminal he was.
57
Vote
   


ALL QUIET

December 29th 2006 15:03
ALL QUIET
I just finished re-reading All Quiet On The Western Front. I had read it years ago, in public school I think, and though I didn't pay much attention to it then, I read it through different eyes today. It really should be required reading for anyone remotely interested in what's happening in the war torn spots of the globe today.
Written in 1929 and told through the eyes of a German soldier serving in WW I, it could well be written as seen through the eyes of an Allied soldier. Neither pro nor anti war, it gives us a view of what soldiers face when they go into battle and when they are at rest. The underlying theme being that the soldier does not want to be where he is.
Erich Maria Remarque, the author, gives us a good clue when he writes that the politicos who sent him into battle should be put in an arena and let them duke it out, best man wins, winner takes all. Not necessarily bloodless, but a lot fewer men would die.
Having met many veterans of WW II and Korea, I now know why they don't want to talk about the wars they fought. Only another soldier would understand. Never having been a soldier, I don't understand, but I have gained some insight. I can understand why they would be the first to advocate peace. True soldiers are not peaceniks. They go where they are told, when they are told. They don't flee to another country to escape their honour bound duty. But they'd really rather not have to go.
Remarque, telling the story through the eyes of a 20 year old soldier, describes the horrors and fear of being in battle. Though tactics may have changed since WW I and today, it is easy to envision that that horror and fear still permeates the young lads we send into battle to free an oppressed people and, by association, keep our own land strong and free. The boys we send to war today are just as dumbfounded by seeing their comrades in arms die or see their legs torn off by a mine or grenade as was that youngster back in 1914.
It doesn't matter what side of the coin you are on. Pro-Israel, pro-Palestine, for or against the war in Iraq, supportive or not of the efforts in Afghanistan, one has to remember that the other side doesn't want a war either. That Muslim mother worries as much about her baby boy going off to fight the same as any American or Canadian mother worries about her baby boy.
In a perfect world, there would never be any wars. That will, unfortunately, never happen. Human beings are naturally competitive in everything from car racing to building a better mouse trap. So it is with religion where one side wants the other to kneel and pray to Allah 5 times a day and the other fights for God and democracy.
To my knowledge, no democracy has ever started a war. But they have fought back when attacked. Sad to say, but this will always be with us. We could all learn a lot from Remarque's book.
45
Vote
   


Why Israel Can't Win

December 29th 2006 05:06
WHY ISRAEL CAN'T WIN
I've stated before that Peter Worthington is a veteran and respected journalist. I will quote him extensively here and hope some of our more liberal friends will get the message. His main topic was why the west won't win the war on terrorism, but I'd like to back it up a notch.
I've been criticized for being pro-Israeli and anti-Palestinian. So be it. I can live with that. Let me say that I am pro-democracy, be it Israel, the USA, Canada or the UK. Let me also say that I don't believe a majority of Muslims are terrorists. It's the rabid fanatics who get the headlines.
Many people have complained to me and others that Israel is ‘illegally' occupying lands that aren't theirs. That may be. They claim international law does not allow them to do this. They use words like ‘balkustan' when speaking of the Camp David Accords. Others throw in the term ‘straw man' for arguments which, in my view, have no basis. Why these words are used is beyond me. I call a spade a spade and I wish other people would too, instead of trying to inflate their own egos.
As far as I know, Israel has never launched an unprovoked attack. That seems to be how democracies work. Go away and have your little war, but leave me out of it. However, if you do attack me, I will fight back.
"Israel is arguably the toughest, least compromising of the democracies when it comes to combating terrorism. It has been fighting terrorism from the day it became a sovereign state, thanks to the UN." writes Mr. W.
Israel became a nation in 1948 under the international law that all these nay-sayers keep quoting. Yet even today, they don't occupy all the land that was given to them back then. The Gaza Strip and West Bank seem to be favourites among the pro-Palestinian crowd. You can't win land in a war, they will tell you. Perhaps not. The Gaza is a perfect example.
Mr. W. says, "Israel is having to defend itself against rockets from Gaza, where Hamas rules when it isn't feuding with the Palestinian Authority." More shocking is the news that Israel gives its targeted areas 30 minutes warning before an attack. Wouldn't it be lovely if the homicide-bombers of Palestine did the same? "Recently, after a rocket attack, Israel announced it was attacking the home of a suspected terrorist leader where explosives were stored. It gave the occupants 30 minutes warning to evacuate before war planes obliterated the house. So what did the residents do? Well, not only did they not evacuate, but neighbours formed a human shield at the targeted house and, guess what? The Israel war planes were called off." says Mr. W.
This is rather disgusting. "Now, every time the Israelis give the 30-minute warning which, apparently, is policy, the "human shields" of women and children head for the targeted house, secure in the knowledge that the Israelis won't attack." Is this any way to fight a war? The pro-Palestinian mob would have you think so. Let the other guy warn us and then chicken out while we send in women with bombs to blow up innocents unannounced.
Israel has, and still is, turning the other cheek at every opportunity. The pro-Palestinian group wants you to ignore that and concentrate on their ‘illegal' occupation of land that is not theirs.
Sorry, but the Jews don't subscribe to what Jesus said about turning the other cheek. They have turned the other cheek enough and if holding on to land which may or may not be theirs to get the world's attention, more power to them.
57
Vote
   


Israel Against The World

December 28th 2006 07:06
ISRAEL AGAINST THE WORLD
Let's back the truck up a bit here. I've been reading quite a bit lately about how the Palestinian terrorists are the good guys and the Israelis deserve whatever they have had to suffer in the past and no doubt will suffer in the future.
The pro Arab group wants us to believe that Israel is illegally occupying land not ceded to it way back in 1948. As Lorrie Goldstein says, "Gee. I wonder who started those wars, who threatened to drive whom into the sea and which nation was attacked for the first time by its "Arab neighbours" the day after it was created in 1948?" The pro active group conveniently ignores the fact that Israel today occupies only 77% of the land originally given it in 1948. It seems to be too big a leap for them to make that perhaps if Israel were given back the land given to them back then, maybe they would give back some of their "illegally" occupied territory. By the way, just who is occupying that other 23%? Are they there legally? Food for thought


[ Click here to read more ]
33
Vote
   


More Posts
7 Posts
4 Posts
11 Posts dating from December 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

youranter's Blogs

50 Vote(s)
4 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
46 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
699 Vote(s)
43 Comment(s)
11 Post(s)
Moderated by youranter
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]