Oblivion
No Where, Oklahoma, UNITED STATES
Joined December 20th 2006
Number of Posts:
0
Number of Comments:
27
Karma:
2
I'm done blogging. Not enough Time.
Blogs I Follow
Recent PostsI've not posted anything yet :( |
Recent CommentsComment by Oblivion
|

Comment by Oblivion
on Some of the Questions
Let A be 'we have all the answers' and Let B be 'we'd have no reason to strive, dream, or pursue'.
IF "A", then "B" -- is true and valid. It follows that IF "Not B", then "Not A" is true and valid. But...look at this Pegasus: IF 'Not A', then 'Not B' is considered not logically valid.
So let's type this out.
1.If we had all the answers, then we'd have no reason to strive, dream or pursue.
If 1 is valid, then it is valid to conclude 2.
2.If we have a reason to strive, dream or pursue, then we don't have all the answers. -- If not b, then not a. Valid
3.If we don't have all the answers, then we have a reason to strive, dream, or pursue. -- If not a, then not b. NOT-valid
The second sentence is what I was trying to point out from what you highlighted. I was questioning the fact that 'who are we to say that we will have found all the answers, even after striving, dreaming, pursuing '?
I am just being facetious and difficult. No disrespect to you. I actually liked your answer. It's much more optimistic in the long run to have that sort of view.