Mvsevm of Skin

Townsville, New Jersey, UNITED STATES


Joined September 11th 2007

Number of Posts:
0

Number of Comments:
17

Karma:
1



About Me
Heh.

Tags & Posts

Bookmark Tags



Popular Tags

Popular Posts

I mentor these bloggers

Learn more about the Orble Mentoring Program.


I do not mentor any bloggers.

Recent Posts

I've not posted anything yet :(
 

Recent Comments

And here I am thinking it was a goiter.

Hey D. Like anything, the chemical castration is a controversial topic, with conflicting reports, studies, methods, etc. While it's probably not the best solution right now (or ever), it's still a method to consider for future studies.

And there's nothing wrong with a tiny, reptilian brain, as long as it's being used to full capacity. Plus, who wouldn't want to be Lizardman for a day.




Cheryl, you make a perfect point. While it's easy to label pedophiles and other child sex offenders as "those who think with their penis," the truth of the matter is that there are many reasons for this condition, some of which are completely stand alone (female offenders are still considered somewhat of a mystery).

And I agree with not using chemical castrations, pretty much for the very reasons you stated. Personally, I say off with their heads. But we have to remember; like anything, there are degrees involved with child sex offenders. Some people do in fact deserve the Fist. Others, however, have issues that run far deeper, yet which are far more innocent than those of the sadist. These are the people who live in that gray area, the one that begs us to ask, "just what the heck do we do with these people?"

[Child sex offenders'] motives vary. For some offenders, it's about control; for others, an opportunity was simply present; while quite a few develop a sexual deviance that compels them to seek a specific type of victim. Sex offenders with adult victims generally have one of three motives - anger, power and sadism - but child sex offenders present four basic types:

Regressed - usually a one-time offender who feels inadequate
Naïve - an offender who does view their act in terms of right and wrong
Fixated - offenders stuck in adolescence who claim to "love" children
Mysopeds - offenders who seek to hurt someone


Click here to see how Crime Library further breaks down the Child Sex Offender

I'm sure I can speak for all when I say thank you for your honesty. It really sheds some light on a very sensitive issue.

And I agree. Chemical castrations and other methods are completely outside the boundaries of what one would consider cruel and unusual punishment (though some people truly deserve the Fist). When pedophiles themselves are requesting castrations, well, it only shows how deep the river runs, and how we can't treat it with anything but the damming of the source, even if it needs to be of the surgical kind.

Sometimes you need a little inhumanity when dealing with certain humans.

But I completely respect your viewpoint, Ruby; a head like yours helps keep my own in check.

Not to get off-topic, but there is an important documentary on the numerous rapes that occur in the Congo, and how the effects of these rapes can be used as the ultimate weapon of war.

As desensitized as I am to most things, the horrors that occur in-film (and off) is absolutely revolting. Not only do females, both old and young, get repeatedly gang raped by both militants and non-militants alike. They are later mutilated and tortured at the hands of their attackers, sometimes via way of sticks and gun butts. Torn insides, destroyed bladders, the burning of anuses, etc. There was even one instance where a mother was forced to eat her dead child.

Luckily, the U.N. is there to keep things safe and sound. :-/

I'm glad you could siphon up and spit out the controversial details that surround such a whacky article, Winston. When I first read it, I had no idea how a person could address these points without thinking from a strictly biased point of view. But you've shown me the light, as always.

Personally, though, I don't have a real opinion on this topic. For me, when it comes to crime and punishment, I'm a huge proponent of Hammurabi's Code.

I mean, just look at it. The things you could do to a bastard.



And introducing, 'Hammurabi's Fist' - For when they haven't been punished enough.

Well, that's quite the loaded question. Are you asking, how did the newt get into the river, or rather, where did they originally originate, ancestry-wise?

Because really, it doesn't matter. I have the same answer for both questions. My theory is this: everything came from magic. Yes, that's right. Magic. Wizardry to the nth degree, if you will.

Think about it. You walk down the street. The Sun drops below the horizon, and all of a sudden, these so called "lights" start glowing. They say it's caused by the harnessing of electricity, but no, that's not the case. I'm no scientist, and in no way will I trust one.

So why did I come to this magical conclusion? Well, my faith rides on Zerlark, the Great Mystic of Milford.

He came to me in a dream one night, and said this: "Do not take that which you take for granted, for granted... those lights you see? The microwave you use? Those movies you watch? That car you drive? The Sun that heats? The water that cools? The air you breathe? The telescopes that seek? The newts you chase? The medicines you take? The clothes you wear? The DNA you trust? You do not know how these work. And yet you believe in their power. These things are not proven by science! Why, scientists are nothing but hoaxers! The very people you trust to bring you light and heat and knowledge are LYING TO YOU! Because they know it is I, Great Zerlark! These are my doings! Now write me a book."

And thus begun my theory, that which berates and spits upon science like the stupid hole that she is. F**k you, Ben Franklin. F**k you, Dr. Kaku. This is Zerlark's house.

And I should add, as a lover of all animals both great and small, I care about how the newt got here. I used to catch them as a kid. Such beautifully colored creatures, they are.