Matthew Pejkovic

Sydney, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA


Joined May 12th 2008

Number of Posts:
6

Number of Comments:
9

Karma:
2



Matthew Pejkovic
I am a freelance film critic from Sydney, Australia and passionate fan of all types of film.
My love of cinema led me to pursue a carer in film criticism, and to create my own website (www.mattsmoviereviews.net). I also contribute and have contributed reviews and articles on a regular basis to a number of internet publications. My aim is to write and publish the most informative, well researched, and honest articles to the best of my ability. So please enjoy my blog!

Tags & Posts

Popular Tags

I mentor these bloggers

Learn more about the Orble Mentoring Program.


I do not mentor any bloggers.

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

Elvis Presley


With Ray Charles (Ray), Johnny Cash (Walk The Line), and Bob Dylan (I’m Not There) in the bag, and with Martin Scorsese taking on a film based on the life of Frank Sinatra, here are a few more legendary musicians who are ripe for the big screen treatment.

ELVIS PRESLEY

While their have been a plethora of straight to TV productions dedicated to the King of Rock and Roll, there has yet to be a big budget Hollywood production devoted to telling Elvis’ life story, and what a story it is: Poor southern boy turned cultural icon, Hollywood movie star, Las Vegas Showman, and bloated drug addict. If placed in the right hands, and if cast right, an Elvis Presley biopic could be a huge commercial and critical success.

KURT COBAIN
Never has a star shun so bright only to succumb to the darkness of depression and drug addiction.
Kurt Cobain was a champion to a generation of music fans who had become wary of the glam rock excess from the 1980s, yet his music also had a dark undercurrent that would not be felt thoroughly until after his suicide in 1994.
Gus Van Sant had filmed a biopic of sorts in 2005 with Last Days, which starred Michael Pitt as a rock star with a striking resemblance to Cobain. However, word around the camp fire is that Ewen McGregor has been tapped to play Cobain in a big budget movie based on the biography Heavier Than Heaven.

JIMI HENDRIX
There have been various attempts at making a big budget film upon the life of Jimi Hendrix. Hell, only last year it was rumoured that Quentin Tarantino had the project in the bag, with Terrence Howard set to star.
However, all attempts have been nixed by the Hendrix estate’s refusal to allow his music to be used in any film production, and what good is a Jimi Hendrix film without Purple Haze. Or Voodoo Chile. Or Red House…
Still, there is hope that this charismatic stage personality would be given the proper big screen treatment.
90
Vote
   


SCREEN LEGENDS: ELLEN BURSTYN

May 27th 2008 02:54
Ellen Burstyn


When compiling a list of the greatest film actresses of all time, it is hard to deny the sterling work actress Ellen Burstyn has compiled over the last 30 years.
While not reaching the same level of success as Meryl Streep or Jane Fonda, Burstyn never the less has created a name for herself as an actor’s actor, providing stunning performances in film, TV, and the theatre.

PERSONAL LIFE
Ellen Burstyn (real name Edna Rae Gillooly) was born on the 7th of December, 1932, in Detroit, Michigan. Her parents were Correine Marie and John Austin Gillooly, a building contractor. They divorced when Burstyn was very young.
Before becoming an actress, Burstyn worked an assortment of jobs. At the age of 14 she was a short order cook at a lunch counter. After her graduation from Detriot’s Cass Technical High School, she travelled to Texas to become a model. This was followed by a stint as a showgirl on the Jackie Gleeson Show, and then as a nightclub dancer in Montreal.
Burstyn studied acting with Lee Strasberg at the famed Actors Studio, which she is now a co-president alongside Harvey Keitel and Al Pacino.
She has been married a total of three times. Her first marriage was to William Alexander (1950-1957), and was followed by marriages to Paul Roberts (1958-1962), and Neil Burstyn (1964-1972), which ended tragically when Neil committed suicide after succumbing to schizophrenia.
According to Burstyn in her biography “Lessons in Becoming Myself”, she was stalked by Neil for over a period of 10 years. This included a violent incident of rape which lead to no charges being laid, since Ellen and Neil were technically married at the time and the place were unable to charge him for rape.
She has an adopted son named Jefferson, and a granddaughter named Emily.
As well as being an award winning actress during the 1970’s, Burstyn was also active in the movement to free convicted boxer Rubin “Hurricane” Carter from jail.
Burstyn practices the mystical Islamic religion Sufism, and is an ordained minister.
She is a vegetarian, does not drink alcohol or coffee, and practices yoga.

CAREER
In 1957, Burstyn made her Broadway debut in Fair Game. The 1960’s would see her appear in a variety of television shows such as The Doctors, Perry Mason, Maverick, 77 Sunset Strip, and Gunsmoke.
After studying at the Actors Studio, she got her big break in Peter Bogdanovich’s The Last Picture Show (1971), which garnered her Golden Globe and Oscar nominations for best supporting actress.
This would be followed by another supporting role next to Jack Nicholson in The King of Marvin Gardens (1972), and a second Oscar nomination, this time as Best Lead Actress, in the ground breaking horror classic The Exorcist (1973).
Burstyn would go on to finally snag the Oscar for her role as a single mother in Martin Scorsese’s Alice Doesn’t Live Here Aymore (1974). That same year, she would also win a Tony Award for Same Time, Next Year, a role she would reprise for the big screen 1978, and would once again be nominated for an Oscar. Another nomination would follow for Resurrection (1980).
Despite her success in the 1970’s, Burstyn would find it hard to find work in Hollywood during the 1980’s, and opted to for roles in TV productions instead, receiving Emmy nominations for The People VS Jean Harris (1981) and Pack of Lies (1987), and also starring in her own sitcom titled The Ellen Burstyn Show. It would only last one season.
The 1990’s and onwards would see Burstyn play supporting roles – usually as a maternal figure – in films such as How to Make an American Quilt, The Spitfire Grill, and The Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood.
However, Burstyn would prove to have one more powerful performance left in her, with a startling portrayal of a speed addicted elderly widow in Darren Aronofsky’s potent anti-drug film Requiem for a Dream.
Other notable role around this time: the voice of Grandma Dolarhyde in Red Dragon (2002), a Pagan cult leader in the 2006 re-make of The Wicker Man, and a minor turn in HBO’s Mrs. Harris, where she was nominated for a supporting actress Emmy award despite being on screen for only 14 seconds!
Upcoming films include an adaptation of Tennessee Williams’ The Loss of a Teardrop, and as Barbara Bush in the upcoming Oliver Stone George W. Bush biography, W.

Top 3 Ellen Burstyn Performances


3) Chris MacNeil, The Exorcist (1973)
Burstyn plows through a gauntlet of emotions in her portrayal of a distressed Hollywood actress and single mother who watches on as her seemingly possessed daughter (Linda Blair) turns into a monster.

2) Alice Hyatt, Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore (1974)
Burstyn who would go on to win an Oscar for her performance as Alice, a woman who desires to live life on her terms after years of catering to the wishes of men, providing sass and vulnerability to the role while also proving to be an adequate singer and pianist.

1) Sara Goldfarb, Requiem for a Dream (2000)
In her single greatest performance of her storied 30 plus year career, Burstyn is remarkable as a lonely widower who – after given the news that she will appear in a future episode of her favourite TV show – decides to lose weight in order to fit into her favourite red dress. She would be robbed at the Oscars by Julia Roberts in her role as Erin Brokovich.

…and the worst?

Sister Summersisle, The Wicker Man (2006)
Burstyn tries to lend gravitas in Neil LaBute’s shaky re-make of the British horror classic The Wicker Man, playing the spiritual leader of a feminist Pagan community who is something of a cross between Germaine Greer and Jeffrey Jones.

QUOTES

"Acting feels like a congenial condition to me - it's in my genes."

"It's unfortunate but our society is such that, for women in Hollywood, you get to a certain age and just fall off a cliff. But in my case, I refuse to die. I will hang on, by a little finger if necessary."

“I do like to work with young directors because it's such a difficult business that I think after directors have been around a while sometimes, not always, but sometimes their passion gets siphoned off because they get hurt.”
100
Vote
   


Hollywood Hills


I love the internet. While many an editor refuses to even acknowledge I exist in the print media world (several months of query letters can attain to that fact), the ‘net has opened its arms to me (and many others like me), and allows me to express my passion for film, whether as a film critic or a writer for a blog such as Orble.
However, like everything else is our world, there also lies a dark side to the web: Hate speech, hardcore pornography (adult or otherwise), illegal downloading, and online gambling are just some of the evils I refer to.
But what I dislike the most about the internet is its ability to ruin the element of surprise found in today’s films thanks to the use of the spoiler.
Think about that word. Spoiler.
Now imagine it is 1980. You have been planning to watch The Empire Strikes Back for a week now. You wait in line to purchase your ticket. You have almost reached the ticket booth, then some jerk off carelessly reveals the explosive ending during a conversation with his friend as they leave the cinema, ala The Simpson’s.
He spoiled the movie. He revealed the clincher to a film you have been eagerly anticipating since you were blown away after the first Star Wars film (screw the prequels). And now the rest of your evening is tainted. The element of surprise is gone.
Now, apply that scenario to The Usual Suspects. Or The Sixth Sense. Or Se7en. Or any other film acclaimed for its twist conclusion.
Such is the situation many are faced with today. Modern day and future classics have and will forever be tainted by the hand of numerous websites and industry insiders who reveal way too much information on the internet before a film even hits the cinema.
Take Ben Stiller’s up coming comedy Tropic Thunder for example. The film – which is directed and stars Stiller along with Jack Black and Robert Downey Jr. – tells the story of three actors shooting a war picture only to become embroiled in a real life war.
Unbeknownst at the time, Tom Cruise had been cast in a minor role as a fat, balding film studio executive. That was until some slime ball let the cat out of the bag, to the furious reaction of the films cast, Cruise, and its studio.
Thankfully, a few filmmakers have gotten wise to the growing trend and have taken steps to try and rectify the situation.
Hugely successful yet equally despised director Michael Bay has let it be known that he will intentionally release false information in regards to the in pre-production Transformers sequel, in a bid to keep the fanboys on their toes and stick it to those websites who love to reveal secret information prior to a films release.
However, such a strategy – as Garth Franklin at Dark Horizons pointed out – will lead websites to stop promoting the film altogether.
The there is Steven Spielberg and George Lucas, who kept such a tight ship on the just released Indiana Jones and The Crystal Skull, that the films stars – such as Harrison Ford and Shia Lebouf – were steadfastly hesitant in revealing any information to the press after signing a confidentiality agreement.
The same cannot be said about actor Tyler Nelson, who was fired from the film after spilling critical plot details to his hometown newspaper. Call it an extreme reaction, but let there be no doubt that it was a necessary one which I totally approve of.

Final Note: Perhaps one of the finest on screen mysterious of our lifetime has been ruined over at Youtube, where a bloodless individual has revealed the words Bill Murray whispered to Scarlett Johanson in the final scene of Lost in Translation. As a staunch advocate of the power of the imagination and the strength of mystery, I refuse to find out what those words were. And I feel sorry for anyone who has.
93
Vote
   


SCREEN LEGENDS: HARVEY KEITEL

May 20th 2008 11:42
Harvey Keitel
Harvey Keitel


Harvey Keitel is one of the most prominent yet undervalued actors of the last 40 years. Whilst people tend to throw around names such as Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, and Jack Nicholson in regards to who is the greatest living actor, Keitel is usually left without praise


[ Click here to read more ]
154
Vote
   


Under increasing pressure and facing bankruptcy due to his production company American Zoetrope’s inability to create a hit, acclaimed director Francis Ford Coppola took on the difficult task of creating a follow up to perhaps the greatest two films of all time.
The film I am referring to, of course, is the Godfather Pt III, which was released in 1990 to mostly positive reviews and several Academy Award Nominations, including best picture.
The plot had an aged and remorseful Michael Corleone (played extremely well by Al Pacino) trying to legitimize the Corleone family by investing money into a broke and corrupt Catholic Church. Meanwhile, his daughter Mary (Sofia Coppola) enters into an incestuous affair with the late Sonny Corleone’s (played in the first Godfather film by James Caan) illegitimate son Vincent Mancini (a superb Andy Garcia


[ Click here to read more ]
114
Vote
   


In the past year, a vast number of high profile productions have featured villains with strong Christian leanings. The majority of these films feature said Christian villains as fundamentalist whackos, who often stand in the way of reason and progress, and often use (or encourage) violent means whilst doing so.
And while it is true that some Christians do fall in line with this stereotype, what is often ignored is that said individuals do not represent the Christian faith, and are extreme in nature and ideology.

[ Click here to read more ]
194
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

Comment by Matthew Pejkovic
on Why Is The 'Is Homosexuality Normal?' Argument Homophobic?

June 2nd 2008 04:19
Sorry, don't know what happened there.

"And there are plenty of straight men that i know that enjoy their girlfriends pleasuring them with strap-ons and vibrators and a whole host of anal play."

I am not going to touch that with a ten foot pole.

Also, this is not a subject that I am obsessed with. I just thought it was an essential point to bring up concerning the themes of this post.

So, on that note, I will leave the anal play (and the filthy consequnecs it brings) in your hands.

Have fun kids.

Comment by Matthew Pejkovic
on Why Is The 'Is Homosexuality Normal?' Argument Homophobic?

June 2nd 2008 03:24
Hi Mountain Fog,

In answer to your question, I do not find oral sex to be suitable either, and speaking from my heterosexual point of view, having a woman go down on a guy is rather misogonystic.

Hi Cibbuano,

Thank you for the link. It was an interesting read. But I still stand by my evaluations.




Comment by Matthew Pejkovic
on Why Is The 'Is Homosexuality Normal?' Argument Homophobic?

June 2nd 2008 01:13
Norm,

Funny answer!

Seriously though, I think you have missed the point. If there is to be debate about what drives hetereosexuals to react aggresively towards homosexuals (males especially), then the differences between our sexual behaviour surely must be a main catalyst.

If I am to assume correctly, your tongue in check answer was used to point out that heterosexuals also practice sodomy, which is undeniably true.

However, I believe it is safe to assume that the ratio of sodomy being used as a main sexual practice between homosexual males compared to heterosexual couples would be much higher in the former, rather than the latter.

Also, I also believe that the practice of sodomy within a heterosexual relationship is used by couples who are much more "adventerous" in their sexual activtites, and is driven by the popular use of it in heterosexual pornography, whose lewd actions have slowly taken over what was once considered to be normal sexual behaviour in heterosexual couples.

So, the aveage joe woud view sodomy in any realtionship to be perverted and unnatural, hence would act aggresively towards male homosexuals who would use sodomy as a main-or the main - sexual practice.

Personally, I believe sodomy to be quite disguting and degrading.

So, while I apprecaite your wit - and who cannot beneift from a good laugh? - please understand where I am coming from.

Note: If anyone out there does not agree with my conclusions, please feel free to counter them in a rational manner. Besides what some may think, I am always open to discussion.

Comment by Matthew Pejkovic
on Why Is The 'Is Homosexuality Normal?' Argument Homophobic?

June 1st 2008 21:48
I believe that a lot of ill will towards homosexuals has a lot to do with certain homosexual behaviour which irks many heterosexuals the wrong way. Namely among heterosexual males: sodomy.

Not meant to offend, just trying to tell it like it is.

Comment by Matthew Pejkovic
on Why Is The 'Is Homosexuality Normal?' Argument Homophobic?

June 1st 2008 01:48
"I also mentioned that overpopulation is already a problem, so homosexuality serves a productive role by keeping the number of progeny in the world down."

This is an interesting point, and one I have thought about quite a bit lately.

A question: If homosexuality does serve a productive role by keeping the number of progeny in the world down, should Gay IVF be discouraged?

A thought provoking post, by the way.

Comment by Matthew Pejkovic
on It's Official: The Human Race Has Finally Lost The Plot

May 29th 2008 07:46
Hi Ruby

I totally agree with your conclusions on the whole semi-naked baby diaper fiasco.

I also agree that the sexualisation of young children and teenagers should be stopped.

However, there is something genuinly creepy about a grown man - despite his reputation as a photographer - taking pictures of 12/13 year old girls, who have been told to strip down for his artistic vision.

Furthermore, it begs the question: just what responsibility should an artist adhere to? Where is the line drawn when in comes to artistic expression? Is it anything goes? In that case, should an artist allow his racist, sexist, homophobic, or anti-religious views to be framed and hung up on the walls of our nations art galleries?

These are questions which must be addressed not only by the average punter and the Government, but also by the artistic community.


Comment by Matthew Pejkovic
on The Catholic Church

May 28th 2008 11:46
Ruby

The links should work now.

Your text goes here

Your text goes here

My ending my post with God Bless You was not meant to be condescending at all. It came straight from the heart of a believer of God to a non-believer, and meant in the best possible terms. Your extreme reaction to it speaks volumes about your character and attitude towards theists.

Your accusations against Mother Theresa sound like they have been lifted straight out of the pages of Christopher Hitchens "Missionary Position".

For those who don't know, Christopher Hitchens is something of a poster boy for atheists, and "Missionary Position" is highly regarded in anti-theist circles.

However it is also a poorly sourced book, and is fueled by Hitchens highly publicised hatred for organized religion. In fact, his hatred runs so deep that his relationship with his brother Peter Hitchens has been in tatters for some time because of it.

Hitchens is also a stern advocate for the invasion of Iraq, as well as other dubious actvities:

Your text goes here

Or, perhaps you have seen Hitchen's on Penn and Teller's B*lls**t!.

For those who don't know, Penn and Teller are atheist magicians who host their own TV show "debunking" popular myths usually via one sided rants.This Includes their belief that their is no such thing as Global Warming.

So, with such flawed character references as prime sources for the case against Mother Theresa, forgive me if I take their word as a bunch of bull.

But then again, maybe your sources come from else where. I don't know, there was no mention in your posts.

Dare I say it (with no offense intended),

God Bless You,
Matthew Pejkovic

Comment by Matthew Pejkovic
on SCREEN LEGENDS: ELLEN BURSTYN

May 28th 2008 08:10
Hi David,

Thank you for your comment.

Comment by Matthew Pejkovic
on The Catholic Church

May 28th 2008 00:33
Ruby,

In the short amount of time I have been apart of the Orble community, I have always been taken back by the extremely offensive and insensitive attidude you have taken towards Christianity, and the Catholic Church in general.

While some of your posts do give pause for thought - as you no doubt intended - your decree that Mother Theresa was a fraud in spite of the decades of servtitude to the people of Calcutta -which garnered her the Nobel Peace Prize - brings forth the underlying truth found in many of your rants, namely: that you are an anti-Catholic bigot who holds such contempt for the Church -and religion in general - that it has clouded your supposedly "rational" inquiry into matters of faith (and its place in our world) to a point of no return.

You seem to have taken a position where you believe the Catholic Church and Cathoics in general view themselves as infailable creatures of divine heritage, yet this is completely untrue.

Catholics - just like everyone else - are extremely flawed people. Mistakes have - and will - be made during the Church's lifetime.

I view it as a process of evolution. As the Earth grows older, and knowledge and wisdom is taken on, so to does the church become older and wiser, taking on knowledge whilst also asking questions and providing its own decree on matters such as abortion, stem cell research and homosexuality, as it is there right to do so.

In the process the Church has evolved with numerous reformations over the years, whilst always paying penance and asking for forgiveness for its past sins brought on in its infancy (Crusades, Inquisition).

Yes, Bill Gates does give away millions of dollars to charities, and there are a number of non-religious charities. Yet you seem to forget that the concept of Charity is a Christian one, spoke highly of in a book which you comdemn for being out dated and dangerous.

Also, I find it slightly humorous that you view Christianity as highly misogynistic, while overlooking the fact that women such as Mary Magdalene and the Holy Mother Mary are two of the most revered figures within the religion.

Here are some links for you:
Really Long Link

Really Long Link
The above is an intersting site, and has my full support as well as the support of many Catholics.

The Church has a long way to go. The arradictaion of Pedophile priests and the ordination of women priests are two prominent sticking points which the Church must adhere to.

But just as it has done many times before, the Church will evolve to an even greater position.

Perhaps it is time you looked at these issues in a much more open matter, and become less offensive in your rants and more subjective to what the Church is about.

Labelling people as frauds, misogynists, superstitious fools, child abusers, and the scum of the Earth based upon their beliefs is not intelligent nor rational.

In your own words: Think. Think again. And Think Some More.

God Bless you,
Matthew Pejkovic