Orble - Living Today in the U.S.A

Living Today in the U.S.A

follow this blog

2 daily readers

rank of 4743

E-mail Subscription

Receive an e-mail notification of new posts on this site:

Why is the U.S. at War? PART 8

April 9th 2010 17:06

The September, 11 attacks:

We may never r know what really happened on September, 11, 2001 when supposedly 19 al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners. we are told that they intentionally crashed two of the airliners into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, killing everyone on board and many others working in the buildings. crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, just outside Washington, D.C. The fourth plane crashed into a field near Shanksville in rural Pennsylvania after some of its passengers and flight crew attempted to retake control of the plane, which the hijackers had redirected toward Washington, D.C. There were no survivors from any of the flights, therefore there were no eye witnesses of who really perpetrated these attacks.

The blame has been placed on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda terrorists by the U.S, Government but there are several factors that makes this incident suspect of just another false flag operation by our Government in order to inflame public opinion against the nations of Islam, fueled by "That special interest group" that controls the Government from behind the lines.

The people of the United States who have not been fully indoctrinated and who still have common sense should take a look at the facts and make their own conclusions.

The date of the incident is suspect on itself, September, 11 equals 9.1.1. a symbol that has little meaning to the nations of Islam but as everyone knows here in the U.S it represents "Emergency". Could it be that drastic "Emergency" measures had to be taken in order to continue the war effort.

Then there is the question of what the air traffic controllers were doing while they were supposed to be monitoring American Airlines flight 11, United Airlines flight 175, American Airlines flight 77, and United Airlines flight 93, were they all asleep at the controls or were they all ordered to look away.

Then there is the failure of the US Air Force to halt the 9/11 attacks. “F-16s don’t scramble in time, though they had 18 minutes after the first plane hit the World Trade Center.… A flight to Los Angeles turns to Washington and is in the air for 45 minutes, and the world’s most sophisticated air defense doesn’t go into action, or were they ordered not to take action.

OnSeptember 12, 2001: Russian Air Force Commander Says It Is Generally Impossible to Carry Out Attack like 9/11,General Anatoly Kornukov, the commander in chief of the Russian air force, says that “Generally it is impossible to carry out an act of terror on the scenario which was used in the USA yesterday.” He recently complained that, due to underfunding and cutbacks, his own air force was so run-down that it was no longer effective as a fighting force. Yet, he says, “The notification and control system for the air transport in Russia does not allow uncontrolled flights and leads to immediate reaction of the anti-missile defense. As soon as something like that happens here, I am reported about that right away and in a minute we are all up.

The there is the case of the five Israelis that were seen rejoicing atop of a van a few blocks from the World Trade Center as the first plane crashed into the twin towers. A picture is worth a thousand words an there are several videos available on this incident.

Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link
Really Long Link

Watch these videos and make your own conclusions

Why is the U.S. so intent in this Casus belli, false flag operations against some of this Islamic nations?

As mentioned before the U.S. Government is under great pressure from the Zionists, "That special interest group" that by controlling most of the capital in the U.S, also controls the Government from behind the lines.

It is no coincidence that there has never been a Jewish President in the U.S.
it is because a Jewish President could not openly show favor to Israel and it's causes. Why be the puppet when you can be the puppeteer.

Another reason is oil and the need for the U.S and Great Britain to have control in the Middle East.

Here is a little history of why Osama bin Laden became the escape goat for the 9.11 attacks

The origins of al-Qaeda can be traced back to 1979 when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. Soon after the invasion, Osama bin Laden traveled to Afghanistan where he helped organize Arab mujahideen and established the Maktab al-Khidamat (MAK) organization to resist the Soviets. During the war with the Soviet Union, Bin Laden and his fighters received American and Saudi funding.

The U.S funding of this war had a dual purpose, it would stop the Soviets from gaining control in the Middle East and it would establish a U.S position in and around Saudi Arabia.

In 1989, as the Soviets withdrew, MAK was transformed into a "rapid reaction force" and Osama bin Laden realized that the U.S had no intention of allowing Islamic independence, they had only switched masters, from the Soviets to the U.S.

Osama bin Laden became more radical. In 1996, bin Laden issued his first fatwā, which called for American soldiers to leave Saudi Arabia.and In a second fatwā issued in 1998, bin Laden outlined his objections to American foreign policy towards Israel, as well as the continued presence of American troops in Saudi Arabia after the Gulf War.

Osama's position did not sit well with Israel and with "That special interest group" in the U.S. therefore our Government was pressured into doing something against those who were once our allies against the Soviets.

If you need more information about the discrepancies regarding the September, 11 attacks, you should contact the 9/11 Truth Movement.

9/11 Truth movement is the collective name of loosely affiliated organizations and individuals who question the mainstream account of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Adherents of the movement advocate and discuss different hypotheses about how the attacks happened and call for a new investigation into the attacks.

Adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement come from diverse social backgrounds. The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians.

Prominent adherents of the movement include, among others, theologian David Ray Griffin, physicist Steven E. Jones, software engineer Jim Hoffman, architect Richard Gage, film producer Dylan Avery, former Governor of Minnesota Jesse Ventura, former member of the U.S. House of Representatives Cynthia McKinney, actors Daniel Sunjata, Ed Asner, and Charlie Sheen, political science professor Joseph Diaferia and journalists Thierry Meyssan and Robert Fisk.

To conclude this series of blogs on "Why is the U.S. at War" I will say that it is up to you the people of the United States to stop the madness, it is up to you to stop our Government from having our children and grandchildren be sent to die for a cause that it is not ours to begin with, the war between Zion and Islam si a family feud that will never end, it was started by the two sons of Abraham when one started Judaism and the other Islam.

And a final warning, Israel is only one nation and I wonder if it is wise for the U.S to continue backing them. The only reason that Israel is still standing is because the nations of Islam fight amongst themselves, the day that the nations of Islam unite and follow the teachings of the Koran, that will be the end of Israel and all of their allied nations.

The End.

Tony More

115

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Why is the U.S. at War? PART 7

March 31st 2010 17:37

The present conflict with Iraq.

The Iraq War, also known as the Occupation of Iraq, The Second Gulf War[ Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation New Dawn is an ongoing military campaign which began on March 20, 2003, with the invasion of Iraq by a multinational force led by troops from the United States and the United Kingdom. and backed by " That Special Interest Group" and the Rothschild Dynasty of Great Britain.

What was the False Flag operation used at this time to convince the people of the United States that we should go to war?, the United States and the United Kingdom claimed that Iraq's alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction posed a threat to their security and that of their coalition/regional allies, when in fact, this was not true,In 2002, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1441 which called for Iraq to completely cooperate with UN weapon inspectors to verify that Iraq was not in possession of WMD and cruise missiles. The United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) found no evidence of Weapons of mass destruction.

After investigation following the invasion, the U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group concluded that Iraq had ended its nuclear, chemical, and biological programs in 1991 and had no active programs at the time of the invasion, in fact Saddam Hussein was keeping his word according to the secret pact agreed upon after the first Gulf War between the United States and Iraq, a pact that kept Saddam Hussein in power in Iraq after Desert Storm, why do you think a conquering force would leave the leader of a conquered nation in power, if not for it's own lucrative purposes.

The people who shed their blood in these useless wars are the last to know
that the leaders who send them out to die, are most of the time in bed together while making a show of bravado and antipathy in front of the masses, this type of relationship has been in place for decades between the United States and Cuba's dictator Fidel Castro.

Although some degraded remnants of misplaced or abandoned chemical weapons from before 1991 were found in Iraq, they were not the weapons which had been the main argument to justify the invasion.] Some US officials also accused Iraqi President Saddam Hussein of harboring and supporting al-Qaeda, but no evidence of a meaningful connection was ever found.

The invasion of Iraq led to an occupation and the eventual capture of President Hussein, who was later tried in an Iraqi court of law and allegedly executed by the new Iraqi government. but it is speculated that the man captured and executed was nothing but a double, a look alike, and that the real Saddam Hussein is alive and well somewhere under the protection of the United States because of the secret pact between them.

The United States claims that they are helping the Iraqi people with this occupation when in fact the are being hurt.

Violence against coalition forces and among various sectarian groups soon led to the Iraqi insurgency, strife between many Sunni and Shia Iraqi groups, and the emergence of a new faction of Al-Qaeda in Iraq. In October 2006, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the Iraqi government estimated that more than 365,000 Iraqis had been displaced since the 2006 bombing of the al-Askari Mosque, bringing the total number of Iraqi refugees to more than 1.6 million. By 2008, the UNHCR raised the estimate of refugees to a total of about 4.7 million (~16% of the population). The number of refugees estimated abroad was 2 million (a number close to CIA projections) and the number of internally displaced people was 2.7 million. In 2007, Iraq's anti-corruption board reported that 35% of Iraqi children, or about five million children, were orphans. The Red Cross stated in March 2008 that Iraq's humanitarian situation remained among the most critical in the world, with millions of Iraqis forced to rely on insufficient and poor-quality water sources, all this brought about by the so called " Humanitarian efforts" of the United States.

Further proof of the zeal of the United States and Great Britain to go to war with Iraq by orders of "That Special Interest Group" in the U.S and the Rothschild Dynasty in the U.K was the fact that a meeting between George W. Bush and Tony Blair took place on January 31, 2003 in the White House. A secret memo of this meeting purportedly showed that the Bush administration had already decided on the invasion of Iraq at that point. Bush was allegedly floating the idea of painting a U-2 spy plane in UN colors and letting it fly low over Iraq to provoke Iraqi forces into shooting it down, thereby providing a pretext for the U.S. and Britain to invade. Bush and Blair made a secret deal to carry out the invasion regardless of whether WMD were discovered by UN weapons inspectors, in direct contradiction with statements Blair made to the British House of Commons afterward that the Iraqi regime would be given a final chance to disarm. In the memo, Bush is paraphrased as saying:
“ The start date for the military campaign was now penciled in for 10 March. This was when the bombing would begin. ”

There were serious legal questions surrounding the launching of the war against Iraq and the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war in general. On September 16, 2004 Kofi Annan, the Secretary General of the United Nations, said of the invasion, "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN Charter. From our point of view, from the Charter point of view, it was illegal."

In a January 10, 2007 televised address to the US public, Bush proposed 21,500 more troops for Iraq, a job program for Iraqis, more reconstruction proposals, and $1.2 billion for these programs. On January 23, 2007 in the 2007 State of the Union Address, Bush announced "deploying reinforcements of more than 20,000 additional soldiers and Marines to Iraq.

In November 2008 Lord Bingham, the former British Law Lord, described the war a serious violation of international law, and accused Britain and the U.S. of acting like a "world vigilante". He also criticized the post-invasion record of Britain as "an occupying power in Iraq". Regarding the treatment of Iraqi detainees in Abu Ghraib, Bingham said: "Particularly disturbing to proponents of the rule of law is the cynical lack of concern for international legality among some top officials in the Bush administration."

In late February 2009, new U.S. President Barack Obama announced an 18-month withdrawal window for combat forces, with approximately 50,000 troops remaining in the country "to advise and train Iraqi security forces and to provide intelligence and surveillance". General Ray Odierno, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, said he believes all U.S. troops will be out of the country by the end of 2011, while UK forces ended combat operations on April 30, 2009. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has said he supports the accelerated pullout of US forces. On February 17, 2010 Secretary Of Defense Robert Gates announced that as of September 1, 2010 the name "Operation Iraqi Freedom" would be replaced by "Operation New Dawn, it seems that President Obama is trying to shed the puppet strings that held our government for so many decades, strings held by "That Special interest Group" within the United States and by the State of Israel. we hope he succeeds are our boys come home, no more American blood should be shed in the conflicts between the nations of Islam and the State of Israel.

Tony More

To be continued
The September, 11, attack

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Why is the U.S. at War? PART 6

March 20th 2010 16:00

The Persian Gulf War:
No matter what you call it, "The Persian Gulf War,"The Gulf War", "Desert Storm" or as Saddam Hussein called it " The Mother of all Battles" the reasons for the U.S involvement were clear.

The reasons why the United States got involved in a war that was mainly between Iraq and the Emirate of Kuwait were two, and it clearly states the fact that the United States remains friendly to it's allies only when it is profitable and convenient.

Reason number one: Kuwait is rich with Oil, The country has the world's fifth largest oil reserves and petroleum and petroleum products account for nearly 95% of export revenues, and 80% of government income. Kuwait is the eleventh richest country in the world.

Reason number two: The U.S. was concerned with Iraq's position on Israeli–Palestinian politics, and its disapproval of the nature of the peace between Israel and Egypt. and that of course did not seat right with "That special interest group" that governs the United States from behind the scenes, an enemy of Israel is an enemy of the United States.

The reason that it was mentioned before that the United States betrays it's allies when it is profitable and convenient is because not long before the gulf war the U.S was very friendly with Iraq and Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq conflict.

The U.S. remained officially neutral after the invasion of Iran, which became the Iran–Iraq War, although it assisted Iraq covertly. In March 1982, however, Iran began a successful counteroffensive - Operation Undeniable Victory, and the United States increased its support for Iraq to prevent Iran from forcing a surrender.

In a U.S. bid to open full diplomatic relations with Iraq, the country was removed from the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism. Ostensibly this was because of improvement in the regime’s record, The real reason was to help them succeed in the war against Iran.

U.S arms sales to Iraq reached a record spike in 1982. An obstacle, however, remained to any potential U.S.-Iraqi relationship - Abu Nidal {an alleged terrorist group} continued to operate with official support in Baghdad. When Iraqi President Saddam Hussein expelled the group to Syria at the United States' request in November 1983, the Reagan administration sent Donald Rumsfeld to meet President Hussein as a special envoy and to cultivate ties.

In 1982 with Iranian success on the battlefield, the U.S. made its backing of Iraq more pronounced, supplying it with intelligence, economic aid, normalizing relations with the government (broken during the 1967 Six-Day War), and also supplying "dual-use" equipment and vehicles. Dual use items are civilian items such as heavy trucks, armored ambulances and communications gear as well as industrial technology that can have a military application. President Ronald Reagan decided that the United States "could not afford to allow Iraq to lose the war to Iran", and that the United States "would do whatever was necessary to prevent Iraq from losing the war with Iran." President Reagan formalized this policy by issuing a National Security Decision Directive ("NSDD") to this effect in June, 1982.

U.S. attention was focused on isolating Iran as well as freedom of navigation, criticizing Iran's mining of international waters, and sponsored UN Security Council Resolution 598, which passed unanimously on 20 July, under which it skirmished with Iranian forces. During the Operation Nimble Archer in October 1987, the U.S. attacked Iranian oil platforms in retaliation for an Iranian attack on the U.S.-flagged Kuwaiti tanker Sea Isle City.

On 14 April 1988, the frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts was badly damaged by an Iranian mine, suffering 10 wounded but no dead. U.S. forces responded with Operation Praying Mantis on 18 April, the United States Navy's largest engagement of surface warships since World War II. Two Iranian oil platforms, two Iranian ships and six Iranian gunboats were destroyed. An American helicopter also crashed.

In the course of these escorts by the U.S. Navy, the cruiser USS Vincennes shot down Iran Air Flight 655 with the loss of all 290 passengers and crew on 3 July 1988. The American government claimed that the airliner had been mistaken for an Iranian F-14 Tomcat, and that the Vincennes was operating in international waters at the time and feared that it was under attack, which later appeared to be untrue. The Iranians, however, maintain that the Vincennes was in fact in Iranian territorial waters, and that the Iranian passenger jet was turning away and increasing altitude after take-off. U.S. Admiral William J. Crowe also admitted on Nightline that the Vincennes was inside Iranian territorial waters when it launched the missiles. At the time, the captain of the Vincennes claimed that the Iranian plane did not identify itself and sent no response to warning signals from the Vincennes. Apart from Iran, other independent sources, for example the airport of Dubai, have confirmed that the plane did indeed identify itself to the American naval ship and also confirmed that "the civilian aircraft was ascending and therefore could not have posed a threat," agreeing with Iranian officials.

According to an investigation conducted by ABC News' Nightline, decoys were set during the war by the US Navy inside the Persian Gulf to lure out the Iranian gunboats and destroy them, and at the time USS Vincennes shot down the Iranian airliner, it was performing such an operation.

According to Kenneth R. Timmerman, the "Islamic revolution in Iran upset the entire strategic equation in the region. America's principle ally in the Gulf, the Shah, was swept aside overnight, and no one else on the horizon could replace him as the guarantor of U.S. interests in the region, the leader of the "Islamic revolution" became an enemy of the United States, the Ayatollah Khomeimi was depicted to the American public as a monster and Saddam Hussein was a hero.

By the time the ceasefire with Iran was signed in August 1988, Iraq was virtually bankrupt, with most of its debt owed to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Iraq pressured both nations to forgive the debts, but they refused. Kuwait was also accused by Iraq of exceeding its OPEC quotas and driving down the price of oil, thus further hurting the Iraqi economy.

The collapse in oil prices had a catastrophic impact on the Iraqi economy. The Iraqi Government described it as a form of economic warfare, which it claimed was aggravated by Kuwait slant-drilling across the border into Iraq's Rumaila oil field.

The Iraq-Kuwait dispute also involved Iraqi claims to Kuwait as a territory of Iraq. After gaining independence in 1932, the Iraqi government immediately declared that Kuwait was rightfully a territory of Iraq, as it had been an Iraqi territory for centuries until the British creation of Kuwait after World War I and thus stated that Kuwait was a British imperialist invention{.backed by the international involvement of "That special interest group"} Iraq claimed Kuwait had been a part of the Ottoman Empire's province of Basra. Its ruling dynasty, the al-Sabah family, had concluded a protectorate agreement in 1899 that assigned responsibility for its foreign affairs to Britain. Britain drew the border between the two countries, and deliberately tried to limit Iraq's access to the ocean so that any future Iraqi government would be in no position to threaten Britain's domination of the Persian Gulf. Iraq refused to accept the border, and did not recognize the Kuwaiti government until 1963.

In early July, Iraq complained about Kuwait's behavior, such as not respecting their quota, and openly threatened to take military action. On the 23rd, the CIA reported that Iraq had moved 30,000 troops to the Iraq-Kuwait border, and the U.S. naval fleet in the Persian Gulf was placed on alert. On the 25th, Saddam Hussein met with April Glaspie, an American ambassador, in Baghdad. At that meeting, Glaspie told the Iraqi delegation, "We have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts." On the 31st, negotiations between Iraq and Kuwait in Jeddah failed violently.On 2 August 1990 Iraq launched the invasion by bombing Kuwait City, the Kuwaiti capital. The main thrust was conducted by commandos deployed by helicopters and boats to attack the city, while other divisions seized the airports and two airbases.

One of the main concerns of the United States was the significant threat Iraq posed to Saudi Arabia. Following the conquest of Kuwait, the Iraqi army was within easy striking distance of Saudi oil fields. Control of these fields, along with Kuwaiti and Iraqi reserves, would have given Hussein control over the majority of the world's oil reserves. Iraq also had a number of grievances with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis had lent Iraq some 26 billion dollars during its war with Iran. The Saudis backed Iraq, as they feared the influence of Shia Iran's Islamic revolution on its own Shia minority (most of the Saudi oil fields are in territory populated by Shias). After the war, Saddam felt he should not have to repay the loans due to the help he had given the Saudis by stopping Iran.

Acting on the policy of the Carter Doctrine, and out of fear the Iraqi army could launch an invasion of Saudi Arabia, U.S. President George H. W. Bush quickly announced that the U.S. would launch a "wholly defensive" mission to prevent Iraq from invading Saudi Arabia under the codename Operation Desert Shield. "Operation Desert Shield" began on 7 August 1990 when U.S. troops were sent to Saudi Arabia due also to the request of its monarch, King Fahd who had earlier called for U.S. military assistance. This "wholly defensive" doctrine was quickly abandoned when, on 8 August, Iraq declared Kuwait to be the 19th province of Iraq and Saddam Hussein named his cousin, Ali Hassan Al-Majid as its military-governor.

The United States Navy mobilized two naval battle groups, the aircraft carriers USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, USS Independence and their escorts, to the area, where they were ready by 8 August. A total of 48 U.S. Air Force F-15s from the 1st Fighter Wing at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, landed in Saudi Arabia, and immediately commenced round the clock air patrols of the Saudi–Kuwait–Iraq border areas to discourage further Iraqi military advances. The U.S. also sent the battleships USS Missouri and USS Wisconsin to the region. Military buildup continued from there, eventually reaching 543,000 troops, twice the number used in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Much of the material was airlifted or carried to the staging areas via fast sealift ships, allowing a quick buildup.

The United States assembled a coalition of forces to join it in opposing Iraq's aggression, consisting of forces from 34 countries: Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, France, Greece, Italy, Kuwait, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Portugal, Qatar, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Spain, Syria, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States itself.

Although they did not contribute any forces, Japan and Germany made financial contributions totaling $10 billion and $6.6 billion respectively. U.S. troops represented 73% of the coalition’s 956,600 troops in Iraq.

Many of the coalition forces were reluctant to join. Some felt that the war was an internal Arab affair, or did not want to increase U.S. influence in the Middle East.

On 12 January 1991 the United States Congress authorized the use of military force to drive Iraq out of Kuwait.

The United States gave several public justifications for involvement in the conflict, the most prominent being the Iraqi violation of Kuwaiti territorial integrity. In addition, the United States moved to support its ally Saudi Arabia, whose importance in the region, and as a key supplier of oil, made it of considerable geopolitical importance. During a speech in a special joint session of the U.S. Congress given on 11 September 1990, U.S. President George H.W. Bush summed up the reasons with the following remarks: "Within three days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. It was then that I decided to act to check that aggression."

The Pentagon claimed that satellite photos showing a buildup of Iraqi forces along the border were the source of this information, but this was later shown to be false. A reporter for the Saint Petersburg Times acquired commercial satellite images made at the time in question, which showed nothing but empty desert, another historical "False flag Operation" to convince the American public of the need to go to war and justify the loss of life of it's children when in reality the war was all about oil and the protection of the State of Israel as demanded by "that special interest Group" that rules the United States government from behind the scenes.

The present conflict with Iraq

to be continued

Tony More

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Why is the U.S. at War? PART 5

March 14th 2010 19:38

Escalation of the Vietnam War

Escalation of the war officially started on the morning of 31 January 1965, when orders were cut and issued to mobilize the 18th Tactical Fighter Wing from Okinawa to Da Nang Air Force Base (AFB). A red alert alarm to scramble was sounded at Kadena AFB at 3:00 a.m. F-105s, pilots, and support were deployed from Okinawa and landed in Vietnam that afternoon to join up with other smaller units who had already arrived weeks earlier. Preparations were under way for the first step of Operation Flaming Dart. The mission of Operation Flaming Dart, to cross the Seventeenth Parallel into North Vietnam, had already been planned and was in place before the NLF attack on Pleiku airbase on 6 February.[citation needed] On 7 February, 49 F-105 Thunderchiefs flew out of Danang AFB to targets located in North Vietnam. From this day forward the war was no longer confined to South Vietnam. It took almost an hour to get all of the F-105's in the air. On that morning, the continuous loud roar of the F-105 engines going down the runway, one following another, was described by the ground crew as a "rolling thunder

[ Click here to read more ]

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Why is the U.S. at War? PART 4

March 5th 2010 17:23

The Vietnam War;

Various names have been applied to the conflict. Vietnam War is the most commonly used name in English. It has also been called the Second Indochina War, and the Vietnam Conflict, in Vietnamese, the war is known as Chiến tranh Việt Nam (The Vietnam War), or as Kháng chiến chống Mỹ (Resistance War Against America), loosely translated as the American War

[ Click here to read more ]

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Why is the U.S. at War? PART 3

February 25th 2010 19:11

The Korean War, "A Police Action"

The war was a result of the political division of Korea by agreement of the victorious Allies at the conclusion of the Pacific War. The Korean peninsula had been ruled by Japan prior to the end of the war; in 1945 following the surrender of Japan, the peninsula was divided by American administrators along the 38th parallel, with United States troops occupying the southern part and Soviet troops occupying the northern part.[31] The decision to divide the peninsula in this fashion was made without consulting the Korean people, which would later contribute to social and political unrest in the southern part ruled by the American forces. The failure to hold free elections throughout the Korean Peninsula in 1948 deepened the division between the two sides, and the 38th Parallel increasingly became a political border between the two Koreas

[ Click here to read more ]

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Why is the U.S. at War? PART 2

February 20th 2010 19:30

World War Two

The directives of the special interest group worldwide establish a boycott against German goods and services creating a domestic crisis in Germany

[ Click here to read more ]

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Why is the U.S. at War?

February 19th 2010 19:32

The United States loves to be at war, why? because it's profitable to special interest groups that have control of the government.
We have had a long history of going to war even though there has never been a direct attack to U.S. soil.{excluding Pearl Harbor} and we have always adhered to the policy that " In order to make an omelet, you have to break a few eggs" even if it means to sacrifice the lives of U.S citizens.

[ Click here to read more ]

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

Medical terrorism

February 13th 2010 18:22

Terrorism is defined as the use of threats to intimidate or coerce an individual or individuals to do something.

Every day the people in the U.S.A are constantly being terrorized by the medical conglomerates, the drug companies use the media to peddle their drugs to the general public just like any street corner or back alley pusher, the medical associations "discover" new deceases or viruses every other week like the H1N1 flu, or tell us that old deceases like Lupus are making a come back, all this to keep the general public terrorized so they spend lots more money in health care and medicines, all this reminds me of the snake oil peddlers of the old west

[ Click here to read more ]

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

What you need to know, but no one tells you.

February 11th 2010 21:10

Welcome!
This blog is dedicated to inform those people who live with their eyes veiled by the media, governmental agencies, religious entities, medical institutions and the governing establishment in general who constantly misinform the public.

[ Click here to read more ]

Vote

Add Comments

[ Link ]

Posted By: Antonio Morejon - Category: No Category

Email this Post to a Friend

1 Posts

4 Posts

5 Posts