Kris 1

Sydney, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA


Joined May 20th 2007

Number of Posts:
4

Number of Comments:
0

Karma:
3



Scents and sensibilities

Blogs

Kris 1's Blogs

326 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
4 Post(s)

Blogs I Follow

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

Bounce, transfer market, bounce!

June 9th 2007 00:37
Well, most of the European football leagues are into their end-of-season break. Actually, all. For them, a nice, relaxed, month-long break. Not devoid of excitement, though!

Why?

It's transfer time!

The English window opens in July and closes at the end of August, but the real excitement - for the managers - is now. We, the poor fans, are left biting our nails and hoping, just hoping, that good old Rafa manages to nail down... oh. Yes, yes, other clubs exist, but Liverpool is the most important, okay?

To be honest, I don't care much for the EPL. Sure, the best players, and all that... but La Liga is far, far better to watch. Take Atletico Madrid. Nobody's heard of people like Peter Luccin, Martin Petrov... but my goodness, Fernando Torres, as godlike as he is, isn't the only player make eyes bulge. Watch a Torres Youtube video. he doesn't dribble from the half-way line and score... oh no. The 25 yards between the halfway line and the point where Torres recieves the ball are a stage for some mazy one-touch passing, a sweet turn or two, then a little back-to-target overhead flick-pass. Only then does Torres get the ball, launch into a Ronaldinho-esque thingummyjiggy trick, then another, finally a feint before scooting between defenders A and B, then placing the ball in the far top corner as if shooting a moose with a cannon at a range of seven feet. Easy as frickin' pie.

The point here is that La Liga has better football, but the EPL transfer windows are like a blonde-of-the-week contest featuring Paris Hilton, Cristina Aguilera and Britney Spears, sponsored by Angelina Jolie's lips. It may be waaaay overdone, but all the money is -right there-.

And money makes for quality, right? Hmm... depends. In Chelski's case... that's an iffy question. Think about it... two big signings over last season, one for 46 million euros, the other a free transfer. Which player is younger (albeit not by much)/performed better in the EPL/is without doubt the world's best midfielder? The free transfer, Mister Michael Ballack.

*insert prayer to Stevie G for forgiveness at insinuating that there exists a midfielder on this planet better than he is. Sorry, mr Gerrard, but Ballack's a bit better. Just a bit!

Speaking of Chelsea, good old quilt-toes (long story) Mourinho has had just one big name signing thus far.. another free transfer from Bayern Munchen, Claudio Pizzaro. There are rumours about Valencia youngster and hot prospect David Silva, however, which ought to prove interesting. He's 21, if I'm not wrong, and a very good 'fancy' winger. A good buy, but not Roman-worthy, in my humble opinion. Fact of the matter is, Chelsea might see a big exit.. guess who? Sheva himself. A wasted year, methinks, unless he moves to another English club. Milan, though, are thought to be leading the hunt to get him back.

And the Rossoneri themselves seem to be having issues up front. A recent spat between Alberto Gilardino and Ancelotti might see Gilardino seek his fortunes elsewhere... and let me tell you, Gilardino moving is going to be a huge hole in Milan's front row, because despite claims otherwise, their strike force is as weak as anything. Okay, Inzaghi scored two in the UCL final, but... geez. One was off his arm, nee Pirlo, and the other was a through ball on the edge of the area. He didn't have to sprint even five yards... and pushing 34 now, he's no road runner. Ronaldo? Eff off, fatboy. I'm sorry... he may have been a good player and all, but he doesn't make the grade anymore. Unfit, toofat, and getting old. Don't expect him to even last in a top league until age 33, let alone 34 like Pippo. And Ricardo Oliveira? He can't settle, so they say. Uh-oh. Inzaghi and Ronaldo as your only forwards? Better start retraining Maldini as a striker, maybe he'll go out with a European Golden Boot and show those divers how its done.

So, having established the fact that Gilardino moving away will be detrimetal to Milan... where might he be going? Juventus are said to be leading that one, back in the Serie A as they are. But don't Juve already have stackloads of quality up front? Well, yes. Palladino, Del Piero... Bojinov looks likely to return to Fiorentina, for reasons we'll come to in a sec, and Trezeguet might hoof it someplace else. Iaquinta has signed on for the Old Lady, though, so it looks like a quality four-man strike force either way, whether David T stays or leaves.

Back to the Viola, however, who ought to be recalling Bojinov.. they sold star frontman Luca Toni to Bayern Munchen, who have been one of the top movers thus far in a bid to revitalize themselves after a disappointing season. Losing Pizarro on a Bosman free, they've managed to sign a far better man up front, deadly poacher as well as strong target-man Toni - the only detriment to this move is Toni's age, 30. Which leaves him three or four years at most. Toni is joined by 25m euro signing from Marseille, France's rising star on the right wing, Franck Ribery. Mouthwatering prospect, this new Bayern lineup, also featuring Germany's number two left back Marcell Jansen, to join - guess who - Germany's number 1 in that position, Philip Lahm. Soliid tactical move though, because Bayern will line up very nicely - Kahn/Rensing in goal, Lahm, Van Buyten, Lucio, Sagnol, Schweinsteiger, Ribery, Van Bommel, Salihamidzic, Podolski, Toni. That'd be my first 11, of course, but look at the covering. Jansen covers Lahm and Schweini, Lahm covers Sagnol, Scweini covers Salihamidzic who covers Ribery who covers Schweini in turn. The flanks look -good- in rotation. Oh, and Santa Cruz covering Poldi and Toni, which should be a solid front attack. To be honest, I'm surprised Bayern have held onto their Transferrable Three, the world cup stars for Germany - Lahm, Schweini and Poldi. I thought the big money clubs would come beggin' for 'em. I have a couple of months to be proved wrong yet, though! My own estimations for potential moves would be - Lahm to Spain, possibly Real, Schweini as a second choice for Liverpool, Podolski to Chelsea, Liverpool, Man U or Barca.

The Gunners... how now, brown cow. They look very quiet, and the only transfer rumour (as always) is Thierriiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeee Henriiiiiiiiiieeeee. Ahem.

If. And that's a huge if. What the hell happens for Arsenal if they lose him? The bright thing is that most transfer possibilities for him seem to be part-exchange deals, so Arsene won't worry too much. Still. He's an incredibly big part of the Arsenal line-up, and will be for the next couple of years, until their unbelievable youth team comes into the fore. I, for one, can't wait to see Vela and Bendtner start up front and bang them in. Possible transfer for Henry right now is a cash Samuel Eto'o deal with Barca.

Speaking of Barca... the only likely mover is Eto'o, who is reportedly unsettled. They're apparently in talks for a left back, however, prime target being Frenchman Eric Abidal. That move is reputed not to be going to well.. might we see some interest in Philip Lahm? Let's wait and see.

And the one we've been waiting for... Liverpool!! In what direction is the Rafalution heading?

Gerrard, Carra and Xabi have all signed new deals to stay at Anfield... phew. That one's out of the way, then. Masch looks set, and set solidly. Finnan and Agger are on their game, Hyypia's staying, so too is Riise. Crouch has been assured of a place, and it looks like Kuyt, their away-kit posterboy, is good for a prolonged spell at Anfield as well. So, who's moving?

Craig Bellamy looks like he's off, for one. Momo Sissoko might be a target for Juventus. Zenden's being allowed to leave, Fowler's off, and Mark Gonzalez is recieving Real Betis interest. Harry Kewell? We don't know yet.

The areas to be looked at, however, are the left flank up the pitch, and the spearhead. Two strikers gone out of four, two left wingers going out of three, possibly all of them. And, perhaps, a lack of quality on the right - Finnan, Arbeloa and Pennant are workmen, not foremen.

In view of these positions, Rafa is said to be looking at a whole heap of strikers, as well as Florent Malouda for the left wing. Dani Alves remains a possibility, though Chelsea will be sure to be after him. Rafa happens to be Spanish, and praise be to Gerrard, the most transfer-eligible, quality players in the world right now happen to ply their trades in La Liga. Dani Alves of Sevilla plus three of Rafa's striking shortlist, for instance - Fernando Torres, David Villa and Samuel Eto'o. There was speculation regarding Amauri, but... Rafa old boy, if you want to sign a big name, sign a -big name-. kthxbye.

Also in the mix is Juve's David Trezeguet, who might get a choice between Barca and the Reds, unless another club comes knocking.. would Chelsea spring for him? After all, they have only Drogba up front, and could very well shop for a star striker if Sheva leaves. Perhaps with Gilardino unsettled, there might be a chance of Rafa thinking about him? We'll have to see, although his temperament may not be good enough.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Star Buys! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sheva himself is also a reported target for the Reds.. a difficult one to confirm, though. Let me break down the possibilities below, and add a couple of my own suggestions...

Sheva (Chelsea) - ST - 31 - Fast, mobile striker... high priced, two or three more years at best. Worth the while, now that he should have adapted to EPL, but not a bargain in the long run. [6/10]

David Trezeguet (Juve) - ST - 29 - Clinical finisher, powerful aerial threat. Would provide excellent touch inside the box, and would suit the Reds' wing style play, providing a great target for crosses with Peter Crouch. Great buy, unsettled, should be reasonable. [9/10]

David Villa (Valencia) - ST - 26 - Another clinical finisher, but not an aerial threat. Pacy, uses channels, would provide good fodder for Peter Crouch. [8/10]

Fernando Torres (Atletico) - ST - 24 - Young, highly explosive, bags of skill and flair as well as huge temperament. Hunger for goals, great work rate, super team player. Used to pressure and limelight.. all round, the best buy. Rafa, get him, please!! [10/10]*****

Samuel Eto'o (Barca) - ST - 26? - World class striker, but perhaps lacking in determination and required influence. Last choice out of those provided, because he might not be able to cope in Liverpool system. Risky, but a gamble that could pay off. Unsettled, may be affordable. [5/10]

~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now, a couple of my own additions... Liverpool might need a fourth striker, to provide cover. A youngster would be best off in this role, potentially one who has the determination and quality to smash his way into the starting lineup and hold his place, thereby increasing yield of all four men.

Lukas Podolski (Bayern) - ST - 22 - Needs no introduction, rising star of German football, one of the hottest properties around. Temperament ought to be a good match, bags of skill. Rivals Riise for 'Best left boot' award? [9/10]

Sergio Aguero (Atletico) - ST - 18 - Tender years, but astonishing quality. Highly determined, hard working, exceptionally quick youngster who eats goalkeepers for hsi midday snack. With Torres, would be an ideal, if expensive, double capture. [9/10]

Rafael Sobis (Betis) - ST - 21 - Young Brazilian, excellent technical skills. Small but wiry and blessed with an eye for goal. Good backup striker for any top side. [7/10]

And, if the Malouda signing doesn't come off.. or, actually, in preference thanks to a far better finishing capability --

Bastian Schweinsteiger (Bayern) - LWM/AMC - 22 - Please visit Amazon dot com to purchase DVD of world cup third place playoff game, and watch Schweini play the game of his life. Classy winger, and his shooting prowess will give Gerrard, Riise and Alonso a run for their cybernetic-enhanced feet.


And that's all for now, lest the writer's curse may travel to Rafa's shortlist. Adieu!

73
Vote
   


Bouncing into Athens

May 23rd 2007 05:30
Ah, Athens. The home of Olympia, city of such history upon this (im)modest planet. Venue to sporting contests of such great repute, for millenia.. but later today, there will be no Greek involvement in the contest of physique, strategy and skill on display for Europe and the world.

The UEFA Champions League Final, 2007, featuring AC Milan and Liverpool FC. A repetition in terms of names, of the epic in 2005 played in Istanbul, where Liverpool triumphed on penalties after an amazing six-minute second half comeback from 3-0 down. And mouths water, fans everywhere relishing a repeat. A chance for Milan to load game, and for Liverpool to prove that wins like that are not flukes.

Kit
Milan were designated by UEFA as the home team, but have chosen to wear white, their away jersies, in which they have had Champions League success before. This means that Liverpool wear their own favoured red strips, in which they have won all their five previous ECL finals.

Speculative Lineups

Liverpool FC
Milan AC

GK Reina
GK Dida
RB Finnan
RB Oddo
CB Carragher
CB Nesta
CB Agger
CB Simic
LB Riise
LB Maldini
DM Mascherano
DM Gattuso
LM Gonzalez
LM Jankulovski
CM Alonso
CM Pirlo
RM Pennant
AM Seedorf
AM Gerrard
AMR Kaka
CF Crouch
CF Inzaghi

S1 GK Dudek
S1 GK Kalac
S2 CF Kuyt
S2 CF Gilardino
S3 RB Arbeloa
S3 LB Kaladze
S4 CB Paletta
S4 CB Bonera
S5 CF Bellamy
S5 AM Gourcuff
S6 LB/LM Aurelio
S6 DM Ambrosini
S7 DM/CM Sissoko
S7 RB Cafu

Tactical

As outlined in the lineups, both teams are likely to play non-standard 4-5-1 formations - Milan will play more centrally, while Liverpool will look to spread play wide.

AC Milan
Liverpool are highly unlikely to allow Milan's fullbacks the space to make forward runs as they did against Milan, therefore it is likely that Kaka will play as a more right-oriented attacking midfielder while Seedorf will be slightly left of centre. Pirlo will, as always, command the midfield while Gattuso will play a holding role in the middle, rather than on the wings. Jankulovski will function as a winger, wider than Kaka, while Maldini (or Kaladze if Maldini is declared unfit) makes limited supporting runs. Up front, Inzaghi is likely to start on the basis of form and experience, although Gilardino is arguably a far superior striker in terms of pure quality, and also supporting ability.

Liverpool FC
With Milan not playing a right winger, and Gattuso playing centrally with left bias, John Arne Riise and Mark Gonzalez (alternately Aurelio or Zenden) will look to use space and cause problems on the left flank, as well as limit Oddo's forward movement. Kaka, as well, will be partly Riise's responsibility on defense. Mascherano will play the holding role in the middle, partnering playmaker Xabi Alonso whose responsibility will be spreading the ball. Gerrard up front playing in the hole will be a major threat to Milan, as will the pace and skill of Pennant that needs watching. Peter Crouch will play as the lone target man up front, looking to get in the box and recieve service from the wide men either side.

Key Matchups

Gerrard vs Gattuso - Gattuso shut down Cristiano Ronaldo in the semi, and will be entrusted to do the same to Steven Gerrard here... still, Gerrard is far more a physical player, and Gattuso will have the unenviably responsibility of being the first man in the way of those 110mph thunderbolts from Gerrard's right boot.

Kaka vs Mascherano - Regarded as one of the most skilled holding men around (Gattuso can claim the same), Javier Mascherano could have a big job on his hands. There are no higher rated attacking midfielders around than Kaka, Steven Gerrard being a possible exception.

Xabi Alonso vs Pirlo - This will not be a battle of marking or head-to-head drama, but one of intelligence and creativity. Both men have reputations of being top quality playmakers, although Pirlo possibly edges it in the set piece department. Watch these two, and don't blink.

Carragher Agger vs Inzaghi - Jamie Carragher has been a star for Liverpool this season, as has Daniel Agger. Both solid physical players, they lack nothing in terms of heart - and Agger even manages to get up the other end and score vital goals. Inzaghi, however, is a sly competitor. Ref, watch the dives!

Reina vs Dida - Two of the best, easily. Reina is possibly Spain's third choice, but few better stoppers of spot-kicks play the game today, as witnessed by Chelski in the semis. Dida can never be underestimated, however, and he is one of Brazil's finest in recent years.

Predictions

Being a Liverpool fan, it is hard to predict a loss for the Merseyside Reds. However, the game has potential to be every bit as mouthwatering as the previous one in 2005, and these are two teams that will be amazing to watch against each other. Their players match off perfectly, and both are tactically, as well as technically very sound. Do. Not. Blink.

Goals

First Half -
1. Inzaghi dives just outside the area, Reina gets fingertips to Pirlo's free-kick but can't keep it out.
2. Riise cuts inside on a run, Gonzales squares it, and the Norwegian nets top corner from 25 yards.

Second Half -
3. Crouch acrobatically puts a Pennant cross onto the crossbar, but Gerrand smashes it home from just outside the box.
4. Kuyt on in the last few minutes, beats Nesta on the turn and scores one-on-one with Dida.
5. Gilardino heads home off a Seedorf cross, but it's too little, too late.

Liverpool lift the cup!!
75
Vote
   


Vicious cycle, indeed!

May 21st 2007 10:56
Voila! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both the victim and villain by the viccisitudes of fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity,

"I bloody well hope not..."

is a vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished. However, this valoruous visitation of a bygone vexation stands vivied,

"... thank god for that..."

and has vowed to anguish these venal and virulent vermin

"...are they ugly too?"

vanguarding the vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition. The only verdict is vengeance;

"Oh, shit."

a vendetta held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose,

"...you can say that again. On second thought, don't."

so let me simply add that it's my very good honour to meet you, and you may call me V.

Among film moments, that sequence of dialogue presented by Agent Smith... errr... Hugo Weaving, remains a favourite. Watching the film in the cinema with two friends, I vividly remember cheering along with the two of them, at the end of it. For language, dear Sirs and Madams, has in this modern age seemed to have forsaken us. A prime example of the fact is one other of my own favourite moments in film, when in Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring, Aragon uses his sword to execute a perfect back-foot pull stroke upon an incoming cross-bow bolt.
<pause>
A back-foot pull stroke, to those not in the know, is a cricket stroke. I suppose a baseball equivalent would be a swat over left field. I watched the movie for the first time in a cinema, in a very unlikely country called Sri Lanka - which also happens to be cricket mad. That little incident on the screen brought raucous applause to all in attendance, along with much commenting later about the solidity of Aragorn's batting technique. Go the Gorn!
<ahem>
Point being, this second favourite of mine is not a twinkling turn of phrase, or a masterful monologue, or a spontaneous foray into the realms of utter genius by some underrated scriptwriter; but an off-balance thwap of metal upon metal.

It also has to be noted that after the V monologue, it was just myself and my two amigos who cheered. Whereas in the second instance, circumstances notwithstanding, the whole crowd went up. So. Appreciation for a vivacious tilt of the tongue, or a rugged swordsman thumping a bolt away with a resounding 'clunk'?

"I dunno man, but I'll take the action, y'know, man?"

<pause>
All right, I'll stop italicizing every word I write that begins with a 'V'. Promise!
<ahem>

Genius is a word that can be used to describe many men in history, including the writer of that great work, the Lord of thr Rings (and many others); and the man who brought it to us in film, Ivan Petrovich Jackson. Err... Peter Jackson. One created, the other adapted. Yet, many take offence to that very adaptation, claiming errors and inaccuracies, and vast fabrications. However, was it not one of the best, if not the best trilogies ever made? The third film, Return of the King, netted 11 Oscars, or some ridiculous number like that. Not that an Oscar is a perfect measure, thanks to certain matters of influence, but still. Half-decent effort, one has to admit.

Automatically, then, one picks up the tome in one hand, and the DVD Collector's Edition in the other; and wonders, "Which did I like more?" Tough one, bub. Personally, I read the book in PDF form (on the computer, for the ungeekish), after watching movie numero uno. and loved it to pieces. Bought myself a copy a year later, and re-read it till I could consider myself a LoTR scholar. I even, and I blush to say this, played a LoTR oriented MUD (Multi-user dungeon/dimension/game described by a D-word) for a couple of years. I've always been a bit of an admirer of the Fantasy genre, and things like books, games and films of that ilk always arouse my interest.

Back to the point, however - which did I like more? Which did you like more?

I still can't answer that question. While I'd have preferred to see Glorfindel in all his glory in the film, and other little things Petey changed, I think the movies were fab. And, I purchased all the extended editions, which had stuff like Gandalf speaking in Black, Saruman dying, extra battles, yada yada. Still... the book was, purely and quite simply, amazing. Tolkien was a professer at whatsit in wheresit University, and he damn well proved it. Plus, the conception of not just one, but two elvish languages, with construction and grammar rules, and everything. Good Lord.

Thing is, not as many people have read the book. Pictures are better than a thousand words, right? Right?? No, you idiot, use your imagination a little more.

The art in writing comes from the ability, or the skill, to paint a picture in the reader's mind. To utilize the reader's own faculties, to stimulate, to caress, to nudge the imagination towards the visualization of the picture you wish to create. And in doing so, creating an even more dynamic work that is subtly different in the mind's eye of John Smith as it is in that of Alicia McNaught. Our imaginations don't work the same way, do they? While I may read a passage and visualize it in the present, in a battlefield, with screams and blood and clashing metal; I have the ability, the freedom if you will, to paint the sundry details in just the way I want to. Or, the way my mind wants to. Aragorn might strike his sword through an orc, but beside him, there may be another warrior of the Dunedain -who looks suspiciously like me - parrying blows with an Uruk of the white hand. See my point? Writing doesn't limit your faculties, it merely aids in focusing them. And therein lies the joy of it all, of words, of the imagination, of the sense of contribution the reader gives to the work as a whole. Good writing doesn't only make you see and hear a scene. it makes you smell it, it makes you feel it.. it makes you part of it.

I grew up around books, despite being a sports nut. I played four or five sports for school, from football (don't you dare call it soccer) and cricket to table tennis and chess - oh, heck, might as well name the other one, too, t'was golf - but this active stimulation of the body never denied my mind time for exercise of its own. I was reading (abridged) Shakespeare at the age of five, and there developed this interest in imagination-stimulating writing. Which, for some reason, never wanted to even touch poetry. I disliked it always, and still do. Prose is my thing.

All this makes me wonder. Just to sit back, feel the wind blow my hair across my face, and wonder. Is fiction really richer than fact? Do we listen to music, watch movies, read books, follow sports, you name it; because we have these ideals that we either know to be unattainable, or lack the skill and drive for? Do we love to watch Liverpool rip their way through Europe because we wish we could thunder strikes from 35 yards into the top corner like Steven Gerrard? Do we watch Return of the King and smile to ourselves, wishing that we, too, were a rugged blue-blood in exile? Do we watch Luke Skywalker battle Vader and wonder if there really was a way to zap annoying Perkins in the Accounts department with finger-tip induced lightning? Do we wish that we could run through castle Wolfenstein like Agent Blazkowicz and single-handedly destroy the Third Reich and change the course of history with an array of guns and grenades? Do we?!

I do, I think. Life is hardly as remarkable for most people as it is to novel and film protagonists. Call my life dull if you will, call me lacking in ambition, call me a dreamer. Maybe you're right. Maybe I do wish I was beside Jack Ryan on his adventure aboard the Red October. Maybe I do wish I was Ruud van Nistelrooy, and not just a random who people think looks like him. There's a lot of maybes floating around, and there always will be. Still, whatever happens, even if I realise that supporting Liverpool is silly and I should simply trek out to England and register for the club, I'll still be with the boys, on a table piled with beer, watching as the Reds demolish Milan on the 23rd. Back to reality, huh.

I can't help but come back to another V quote.

Beneath this mask, there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask, Mr. Creedy, is an idea, and ideas are bulletproof.

Which is why fiction is so much richer than fact. Fiction is creativity, is a spawn of imagination and ideas - and so, can never be destroyed. I hope.
74
Vote
   


An orbulent investigation

May 20th 2007 07:00
Orbulent.

Schools of thought, in my experience, are divided as to the validity of such a word. If, as some argue, it is indeed a word. Common sense directs any competitor in such debates towards the Oxford dictionary, or towards a certain website called dictionary.com
[ Click here to read more ]
92
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

I've not commented on anything yet :(