Jim Stillman

Lutz (Tampa), Florida, UNITED STATES


Joined January 23rd 2007

Number of Posts:
153

Number of Comments:
357

Karma:
10



About Me
Retired after 25 years with the Florida Department of Revenue. I am also a retired New York attorney. I have a part-time job to keep busy and do a bit of free lance writing to keep my mind engaged. I consider myself a social Liberal with leanings to Libertarianism. My motto: ALWAYS POSITIVE, SOMETIMES RIGHT.
Other sites
http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/20932/jim_stillman.html

Tags & Posts

Bookmark Tags



Popular Tags

Popular Posts

Blogs

Jim Stillman's Blogs

2075 Vote(s)
126 Comment(s)
43 Post(s)
7979 Vote(s)
687 Comment(s)
116 Post(s)

I mentor these bloggers

Learn more about the Orble Mentoring Program.


I do not mentor any bloggers.

Recent Posts

Karl Rove did not invent the deceptive, untruthful and viscous political attack approach and advertisements, nastiness being present in American politics since the early days of the republic. Of course, then, the language was far more classical and lofty. This presents what a negative TV advertisement would have been in the John Adams – Thomas Jefferson 1800 election.



OK, that didn’t happen, but it could have! Personally, this one makes me want to rush to the polls two months early and get in line!



Earlier presidential campaigns have demonstrated nastiness: The 1884 election between James Blaine (“Blaine, Blaine, James G. Blaine, The Continental Liar from the State of Maine”) and Grover Cleveland (“Ma, Ma, Where’s my Pa, Gone to the White House, Ha, Ha, Ha”)
Of course, the language of earlier negative ads pale in comparison with the wit of Orble’s prominent vocabulary and intellectually challenged writer’s “Madeline Al(not too)bright”, “Barack Hussein Obama and Joe Obiden.” or “Cindy ban-Sheehan”, but one works with what he or she has.

But I digress. The point is that modern Republicans have made negative campaigns an art form, all the while claiming that those desperate, sneaky liberals are the practitioners of the dark arts. While negative ads have been produced by both parties, the GOP’s have been made with no regard to truth.

For example, in recent memory, there was the “Willie Horton” advertisement. Horton had been given a weekend prison furlough, as authorized under Massachusetts law in a program that had been successful. While on that weekend, he committed several serious crimes, was arrested and sentenced to prison; he remains at the Jessup (MD) Correctional Institution. The furlough program was not instituted under then Governor Michael Dukakis; it had been actually signed into law by Republican Governor Francis W. Sargent in 1972 under Governor Sargent but Horton’s crimes were blamed on the Democrat candidate. Roger Ailes GOP operative and now head of Fox News, created an advertisement showing a snarling Willie Horton, commenting, “"the only question is whether we depict Willie Horton with a knife in his hand or without it."

In 2004, GOP supporters engaged in a campaign, encouraged by the Bush campaign and not effectively challenged by the John Kerry people that diminished the latter’s status as a true hero of the Vietnam War. Wounded several times in battle and a recipient of three Purple Heart medals for his wounds, and a Bronze Star and Silver Star for bravery under fire, Senator Kerry’s achievements were mocked. At the GOP convention in 2004, the delegates were given purple Band-Aids as an indication of the mocking! Senator Kerry assumed that the American public would not be fooled into believing a recipient of the Bronze and Silver Stars was anything but a genuine hero, but, in fact the repetitious bashing by GOP operatives took its toll.


Now, in the present, the convention in St. Paul, Minnesota, turned into an anti-Obama hate-fest with a nearly all-white gathering laughing at and mocking the nation’s first African-American presidential nominee of a major party.

However, beyond the contempt visible on the faces of the GOP delegates, many of the nasty attacks on Obama – as well as the over-the-top praise for the Republican ticket – were false, as if testing the depths of American gullibility and bigotry.

In speech after speech, Republicans touted the alleged “maverick” of John McCain and Sarah Palin. The Associated Press was so taken by the spin, and the multiple distortions, that it produced a special fact-checking article describing how Republicans had “stretched the truth.”

Example? For instance, Governor Palin said about Senator Obama, “It's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform - not even in the state senate."

However, as the AP noted, Senator Obama “worked with Republicans to pass legislation that expanded efforts to intercept illegal shipments of weapons of mass destruction and to help destroy conventional weapons stockpiles. The legislation became law last year.”
The AP reported, “In Illinois, he was the leader on two big, contentious measures in Illinois: studying racial profiling by police and requiring recordings of interrogations in potential death penalty cases. He also successfully co-sponsored major ethics reform legislation.”

The AP’s fact-checking article noted, too, that former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee’s hit at Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden – that Sarah Palin "got more votes running for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, than Joe Biden got running for president of the United States" – was a “whopper.”

The AP wrote that “Palin got 616 votes in the 1996 mayor's election, and got 909 in her 1999 re-election race, for a total of 1,525. Biden dropped out of the race after the Iowa caucuses, but he still got 76,165 votes in 23 states and the District of Columbia where he was on the ballot during the 2008 presidential primaries.”


The Republican National Convention also acted as if the Republicans had not controlled the White House for the past eight years and the Congress for most of that time. I called this the ultimate chutzpah in a prior post.

"We need change, all right,” said former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. Change from a liberal Washington to a conservative Washington! We have a prescription for every American who wants change in Washington - throw out the big-government liberals, and elect John McCain and Sarah Palin." Excuse me? Hiding Messrs Bush and Chaney won’t change the facts.

What is frightening about this type of campaign and the GOP tactics is that perhaps the United States has crossed over into a post-rational society that cares little about facts and reality or serious policy ideas and respectful debate, but rather is a nation moved by anger and ridicule, fear and nationalism.

42
Vote
Shared on
   


Chutzpah and the McCain-Palin campaign

September 5th 2008 23:51
The Yiddish word “chutzpah” has entered into the English language; it has a meaning not that well expressed in other words. It means gall, nerve, all to an extreme degree. It is often illustrated thusly: A child murders his parents and then pleads for mercy on the grounds that he is an orphan.

Senator McCain’s speech at the GOP convention and his latest political advertisement is unique in that it required a total loss of memory and a total suspension of belief.

'We need to change the way government does almost everything: from the way we protect our security to the way we compete in the world economy; from the way we respond to disasters to the way we fuel our transportation network; from the way we train our workers to the way we educate our children.'

And then there is the latest GOP ad warning that an Obama administration will result in “years of deficits” and “billions in spending” and “no balanced budgets”



Chutzpah.

Has Senator McCain and his party forgotten that, as to the first quoted statement, that the administration was Republican, George Bush was and is president, and that for nearly all of the eight years, Republicans controlled the Congress and, even in the last year when Democrats were in nominal control, Republicans were able to have an obstruction role and exercised it? Senator McCain urges us to allow him to “change the way the government does almost everything”, the GOP-run government, headed by President Bush with whom the Senator agreed 90% of the time.

Chutzpah.

As to the second position displayed in the advertisement, that a Democratic victory will result in deficits, years of spending and a lack of a balanced budget.
Amazing! When George Bush became president, President Clinton left him a balanced budget, a budgetary surplus and reduced levels of spending; we were living within our means.

As reported by Roger Runningen on Bloomberg.com,

The U.S. budget deficit will widen to a record of about $490 billion next year, an administration official said, leaving a deep budget hole that will constrain the next president's tax and spending plans.

The projected deficit for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1 is higher than the $407 billion forecast by President George W. Bush in February. The bigger shortfall reflects dwindling tax receipts because of the U.S. economic slowdown, the cost of a $168 billion economic stimulus package and spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"We've already seen a pretty sharp cooling in tax receipts, and it's just going to continue into next fiscal year," Stephen Stanley, chief economist at RBS Capital Markets, said in a telephone interview.

The deficit projection will burden both Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama, the presumptive presidential nominees of the major political parties, with a constricted budget that has little room for cutting taxes or increasing spending. The next president also will inherit the deepest housing recession in a generation, fears of a crisis in the banking industry, a falling dollar and high energy prices.

Chutzpah.

The Republicans are counting on the voters’ suspension of rational thought. They believe that sarcasm, mean and cruel name calling will carry the day. I will give examples of this in a later post, including examples from GOP politicians, media sympathizers and, even, one language and vocabulary-challenged Orble writer.

Don’t let them get away with it!

33
Vote
Shared on
   


I am about to befuddle many of the readers (and scorners) of these scribbles to suggest that, while I have usually felt Fox News to be irresponsible and out of line, the Roger Ailes’ weapon of choice in fibbing about Democrats and those he perceives to be too progressive, those whose political views have natured beyond the eighteenth century, I had the opinion that the other news outlets were reasonably fair. While I still believe that the major news companies are owned and controlled by Republican-sympathetic corporations, I acknowledge that most of the analysts come to their jobs with a progressive slant, much as they try to be, truly, “fair and balanced”. I still am of that opinion, but in recent days, the media, and many bloggers, have gone to excess and totally out of bounds. To a lesser degree, so have some Democratic supporters.

John McCain, for obvious and pandering reasons, chose a totally unqualified, inexperienced person to join his ticket. The reasons are manifest: Governor Palin will energize and solidify the far Right wing of his party, social conservatives who have had doubts about Senator bona fides. She professes to be, and is, on the far right fringe of the Right;, anti-abortion to the extent of believing it should be illegal even in the cases of rape, incest or where the health of the mother is threatened. She favors unrestricted oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, doubts any human impact or causation to global warming, would limit sex-education in schools to that preaching abstinence, decries any gun control measures, would deny homosexuals the right to enter into legal relationships short of marriage that would allow medical access, inheritance rights and adoption. She has, even, advocated Alaskan secession from the United States – take THAT, party of Abraham Lincoln!

Each and every one of these core principles is inconsistent with the previously expressed views of Senator McCain and, for that matter, the vast majority of the American people.
Each and every one of these principles would be and should be the basis for opposition to the candidacy of Governor Palin.

It would be fair to ridicule the support of Mrs. McCain to the effect that the Governor has foreign policy experience and judgment because of Alaskan proximity to the former Soviet Union. It is certainly fair to challenge the Governor’s experience – just as the Republicans held Democrats to a similar standard.

But there are some aspects of the Alaska Governor’s family and background that should be off limits, both because, except in rare instances where the candidate has placed her family and background in play. This is true even if the Governor has uttered irrelevant and gratuitous insults about Senator Obama and sarcastic and pointless comments in her speech at the GOP convention.

Senator McCain’s cruelty at a 1998 GOP fundraiser: "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because Janet Reno is her father.", notwithstanding, Democrats should not return in kind. Rush, a Right wing favorite, also picked on Chelsea: “Everyone knows the Clintons have a cat. Socks is the White House cat. But did you know there is a White House dog?" He put up a picture of 13 year old Chelsea Clinton.

In fact, the McCain-Palin team has placed their personal behavior and their respective families’ values in issue. (In her acceptance speech at the GOP Governor Palin made a point of stating that her sons will be deployed to Iraq to demonstrate her family’s patriotism; Senator McCain has made his experience as a prisoner of war as evidence of presidential worthiness.) But as I pointed out in a previous post, any attempt to criticize either candidate’s family is ill advised and counterproductive.

Democrats cannot control the excesses of supporters and their blogs; Democrats cannot control the excesses of radio and television talk show hosts or participants. Democrats can, however, that office holders make darn certain that they avoid sarcastic, insulting or disparaging remarks about the children of either Senator McCain or Governor Palin.

Mark Penn, Chief political advisor to both President Clinton and Senator Clinton, writing in the New York Times:

Having been through the partisan wars over impeachment in 1998 as an adviser to Bill Clinton, I have a pretty good idea about how politics and personal lives can get tangled up. And the personal lives of potential presidents, especially when running for the first term, are important factors along with their experience, ideas, vision and values. But the personal lives of their underage children? That is a bridge too far.

When people raised personal questions in 2000 about Hillary Clinton, many of her advisers urged her to bring out Chelsea to show what a great child she had raised. Before this year when Chelsea made the decision as an adult to go out on the campaign trail, Mrs. Clinton steadfastly refused to put her daughter in the limelight. She was perhaps one of the few who understood that when you thrust your children front and center one day, reporters will start interviewing their kindergarten teachers the next. That’s just not fair for the children (who never choose a political life) or their teachers. Unfortunately, not enough people appreciate the fact that when a reporter asks questions about an underage child, there is only one answer: it’s a private matter between her and her parents.

There are many legitimate questions surrounding Sarah Palin and her experience and qualifications — and it’s only natural that the press would be tracking down her story. But making Ms. Palin’s daughter the most famous child in the history of a vice presidential nominee is just plain wrong.

Senator Obama has been clear and unambiguous. "I think people's families are off limits and people's children are especially off limits". He has emphasized that his campaign was not in any way responsible for the spreading of any of the internet rumors surrounding Governor Palin and her daughter. He continued, “If I ever thought that there was somebody in my campaign that was involved in something like that, they'd be fired.”

As Mark Penn noted,

There are some big issues in this election, from war and peace to the deficit and finding enough energy for our economy. Maybe it’s time to talk less about the personal lives of the children of the candidates and more about the future of our children.

Good advice


54
Vote
Shared on
   


More shame on Joe Lieberman

September 3rd 2008 20:54
Some months ago, I submitted an article Really Long Link expressing my extreme displeasure and disgust of Senator Joseph Lieberman’s turning his back on many core principles that brought him prominence in American politics. The incident that made me most upset was his decision to appear before John Hagee’s church and give the keynote speech at the latter’s forum.

Last evening I watched Senator Lieberman address the GOP convention and my revulsion increased! I might have understood, sort of, if Senator Lieberman had merely said that he was a friend of John McCain that he was willing to cross party lines to get things done, but he also gratuitously criticized Barack Obama as being unqualified, cheered Sarah Palin’s political positions and was a strong GOP advocate


[ Click here to read more ]
41
Vote
Shared on
   


A nation must do whatever is in its own national interest, regardless of world opinion, although the latter is part of the formula for determining the former. The issue posed by the Bush (43) administration is whether the United States foreign policy has been kidnapped by a group of neo-conservatives which is determined to flex our military muscle even if (1) the military has been so spread that it’s muscle is limited; (2) the United States threatens relations with allies whose support is necessary in combating world-wide terrorism and in other endeavors; and (3) we resume the era of the Soviet-U.S. “cold war” which we had won over 25 years ago. Added to this mix is a president willing to acquiesce, determined to be more of a warrior than his father and intellectually incapable to recognize that he is being manipulated.

Russia had used naked aggression against Georgia, an independent free sovereign country formerly a part of the U.S.S.R. The reason for the entry into Georgia was a dispute over two small areas in which the majority was ethnic Russians. The incursion was wrong and was condemned by most of the world, including the United States, and, in fact, the Russian troops have withdrawn or will have withdrawn


[ Click here to read more ]
49
Vote
Shared on
   


Well worth reading -- Check them out!

September 1st 2008 19:37
Over the past year or so, I wrote several articles complaining that the GOP had lost its way, that it was important that a vibrant Republican party that served as a brake against extreme progressive-liberal positions, thus keeping American policies firmly in the moderate center.

Really Long Link
[ Click here to read more ]
33
Vote
Shared on
   


John McCain has made a surprising choice for his running mate; in so doing he eliminated one of his primary arguments against the Democrats, has managed to lose any chance of picking up votes from disappointed Hillary Clinton supporters and may well have eliminated his chances to be the 44th president of the United States. It has been a test of the greatest creativity among the GOP stalwarts to dream up reasons why the Alaska Governor should be taken seriously.

In the face of all that, Democrats should simply shut up and allow the absurdity of Governor Palin as a serious “next in line to be president” after a cancer survivor in his 70’s sink in


[ Click here to read more ]
74
Vote
Shared on
   


I have been in touch with Tyler Mills, a thoughtful and excellent writer on another site. Tyler, a friend of Randy Inman, a contributor to this blog as well as his own, identifies himself as leaning to the Left (although he doesn’t “lean” as far as I am apt to do. Tyler has tried to register with Orble and has suggested that he post on this blog; I have told him that this blog will welcome people of all political viewpoints, provided that they will accept criticism in good spirits! I understand that Orble has the registration, my invitation to join this blog and so forth. Tyler will, I am certain, be a great asset to these pages.

In the meantime, Tyler is chomping at the bit, as it were. What follows is his initial post’

[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
Shared on
   


I have been exchanging comments on Steven Barrett’s blog with a lady who is quite forthright in her condemnation of liberals in general and me in particular. She, at one point, remarked that

I don't usually touch anything by Jim Stillman. He said to Youranter and to me once that he had handled cases for the ACLU. He's an ultra-lib and for some unimaginable reason, proud of it.

[ Click here to read more ]
45
Vote
Shared on
   


I was reading the post by Howard (posted three times!) on being concerned to have Iran retaliate if Messrs. Bush, Chaney and their buddies decide, in the words of the Beach Boys and John McCain, to “bomb, bomb, bomb Iran”.

Really Long Link
[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
Shared on
   


 

Recent Comments

Comment by Jim Stillman
on POLITICS OF PERSONAL DESTRUCTION:ALWAYS IN VOGUE

September 7th 2008 10:59
Would you consider this a mark of respect?

Madeline Al(not too)bright”, “Barack Hussein Obama and Joe Obiden.” or “Cindy ban-Sheehan”,


Comment by Jim Stillman
on When the going gets tough…lie, smear and insult.

September 7th 2008 10:17
The problem, as I see it, with your observation is that I was writing about campaign issued or financed dirty advertising. Michael Moore may be, to you, less than objective, but he is a private individual. I was, also, not referring to slanting the facts in a campaign ad to show the candidate in the best light, nor, I suppose, slanting the other guy in an unfavorable one. One example of the negative slant was the, less than fair, Goldwater “daisy” ad from 1964 – used by the Democrats.

I’m referring to outright lies, as in the Swift Boat ads as Governor Palin’s whoppers quoted in the post.

Comment by Jim Stillman
on The media and the bloggers are out of order.

September 6th 2008 12:43
Lester, I'm glad to see you back -- and in fine mettle as usual. Welcome, my friend. At least you're not afraid to read my product and to directly engage me.

From my point of view, the reason why Democrats should not attack Governor Palin is that such an approach would be counter-productive and gain her sympathy.

As far as Fox being "fair and balanced", our opinions are not the same. But that's OK.

Again, I am happy for your opinions, as usual.

Comment by Jim Stillman
on Crazy Quote Of The Week

September 6th 2008 10:15
You are being very unfair to Governor Palin and not giving her credit for her bravery and military skills. Ask yourself this: In the two years she's been in charge of the Alaska National Guard, has there been an invasion of the U.S. by Russian troops? No. Just having her stand on the edge of the sea, shotgun in hand, has made foreigners and moose quake.

Comment by Jim Stillman
on Ah, The Old Experience Tactic

September 5th 2008 21:36
couldn't tell the dangerous bad guys from the blow hards.

Oh, it's not that difficult;even I, a loon y liberal, can tell the difference.

You
, SL, are a "blow hard".

Comment by Jim Stillman
on How Long Can McCain Play the P.O.W Card?

September 5th 2008 18:00
I don’t believe anyone is disputing that John McCain went through Hell at the hands of his captors which he suffered greatly. The question is whether his experience as a prisoner of war is a satisfactory response to any policy question posed to him or whether being a POW is, of and by itself, a qualification for being president.

This excellent post raises these issues – exceedingly well, I might add.

Comment by Jim Stillman
on A Brief Summary of the RNC

September 5th 2008 10:20
And I'm much older! I remember 1968 well, although not 1860! The values of the modern GOP have no similarity with the ideals of Lincoln's party. Both Jess and you, in my opinion, are right on.

Comment by Jim Stillman
on Palin will draw the stay at home voters

September 3rd 2008 10:46
Actually, I feel that I may have been unfair to Governor Palin’s accomplishments. As has been pointed out by many supporters, she has been commander-in-chief of the Alaska National Guard, a force of about 4000 men and women and, as Cindy McCain pointed out,

"Alaska is the closest part of our continent to Russia. So, it's not as if she doesn't understand what's at stake here."

Even though Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell, adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard, has said that he and Sarah Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard, the fact remains that in the years that Governor Palin has been in office, the Russians have not invaded the United States or even seriously threatened an invasion.

So give her credit where it’s due.

Comment by Jim Stillman
on I Am Royalty!

September 2nd 2008 11:58
At your royal convenience, would you please find time to make me a knight of the realm?

If my mother were still here, she'd be so proud.

Respectfully,

Your subject,

Jim

Comment by Jim Stillman
on Sarah Palin- Alaska's Elite or Trailer trash?

September 1st 2008 19:49
Point well taken, Howard.

I am in the process of writing an article on our agreement with Poland setting up missiles in that country, thereby increasing US-Russian tensions without reason. My first paragraph, which I will now modify, points out


A nation must do whatever is in its own national interest, regardless of world opinion, although the latter is part of the formula for determining the former. The issue posed by the Bush (43) administration is whether the United States foreign policy has been kidnapped by a group of neo-conservatives which is determined to flex our military muscle even if (1) the military has been so spread that it’s muscle is limited; (2) the United States threatens relations with allies whose support is necessary in combating world-wide terrorism and in other endeavors; and (3) we resume the era of the Soviet-U.S. “cold war” which we had won over 25 years ago. Added to this mix is a president willing to acquiesce, determined to be more of a warrior than his father and intellectually incapable to recognize that he is being manipulated.

No, Howard, I do not trust either Senator McCain who no longer has the facilities he once had or Governor Palin whose lack of any meaningful history is manifest to steer this country to prosperity and peace.