Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

THE EXPENDABLES

August 12th 2010 12:42
Let me start off by getting one thing clear - I love action films. I love action films so much that I have seen 90% of the Action section in my local video store and more straight-to-dvd films than I care to admit. Let me get another thing clear. I love Stallone, Statham and Li. In fact, I’ve seen most of their films, and loved every second of ass-kicking action that they’ve served up to me. So I’m finally sitting through the previews, and the thought suddenly occurs to me, “How in the hell is this film going to live up to the ridiculous hype that’s been building in my head for the last few years?” The panic quickly subsided, as I knew I was being ridiculous. I knew exactly how it would live up to it… by putting the great man himself, Sly Stallone at the helm.

THE EXPENDABLES was never going to win Oscars, but why does that define what is good and what is bad? I’m so sick of pretentious twats turning their noses up at me, the film student who includes DIE HARD as one of her top 5 favourite films, because the films I like aren’t full of long glorious scenery shots or moving screaming matches during a dramatic climax. I like it when shit blows up. I like people being blown up, I like buildings blowing up, boats, cars, you name it, if it blows up, I get a kick out of it. But so often a film can fall in to the tired trap of been there, done that - different actor. THE EXPENDABLES wasn’t made to rake in the dollars at the mid-year box office boom (well, mostly), and it wasn’t made to win Oscars. It was made for the fans for die-hard lovers of action films. And the beauty of it is that the reason it is so great is because it’s made BY lovers of action films.

Perhaps the mercenary angle is not particularly inventive, and there are a lot of characters, so my only disappointment is simply that there is not enough screentime to enjoy all of them. I don’t feel like any part of the film was cheapened, there's plenty of action but enough storyline, and anything that feels slightly tawdry feels more like an inside joke that everyone who knows the players is in on. For example, the bit with Willis and Schwarzenegger (when I was desperately hoping that no one caught the dorky grin on my face) is glorious for anyone who loves them, but possibly pointless to those who don't. Statham and Li each hold their own, unsuprisingly since they're probably the only two real bad-asses of this generations. Austin and Couture prove they belong equally in the world of film, Lundgren reminds you why he’s a legend and Crews has you questioning why he isn’t. Carpenter and Itie don’t make you want to punch yourself in the face with their sublte portrayals of the traditional damsel-in-distress, and to be honest, that’s all I really ever ask for from the non-combat females in my action films. Roberts is such a great son-of-a-bitch and I tip my hat to Rourke, who I’ve never been a big fan of but pulled off one of my favourite moments in the film.

And Mr. Stallone? Well. He is a god of the cinema, so often mistaken for mere muscle. Writer, Producer, Actor, Director, Father, Painter, Artist. And he has a love for his work that I only wish I saw more often in Hollywood. It’s beautiful, admirable and seriously kick-ass. If I had a couple tonnes of gold, I’d carve a statue of him, stick it in my front garden and start a fucking church to honour him.

Verdict? There is no word that can describe how totally completely utterly awesome it truly is. THE EXPENDABLES redefines awesome. If you don’t like it, I don’t want to be your friend.
63
Vote
   


WOLFMAN

March 14th 2010 07:56
Following the recent global obsession with Vampires that has spawned such films as CIRQUE DU FREAK: VAMPIRES ASSISTANT and made my life impossible to go shopping without some pasty solemn looking teenager staring at me from a book or a poster or even the Barbie section at Toys'R'Us, I was a little reluctant to see WOLFMAN. My first thought was 'Oh god, this could be made for the new wave of emo kids, not for me'. My other thought was, 'I hope the CGI isn't rubbish', pretty much my standard second thought for cinema-going these days.

WOLFMAN is by no means a let-down. I don't think our generation (I’m mid-twenties but shutup I still get asked for ID) has been treated to 'Monster movies'. We’ve had the action-heroes, we've had horror films and we've definitely had vampires but no old-school-cool Monster flicks. The Bela Lugosi's and Boris Karloff's of time ago evolved to the masked unknown of Jason or Freddy and then horror pushed the boundaries even further and morphed into pure gore. The chills remain but the charm is long gone.

Firstly, the casting is spot on. I do love films based in other worlds, so the fact that it is set back in the time of candles and fireplaces instead of plasmas really worked for me. No offence, TEEN WOLF, you will always have a place in our hearts. Benicio del Toro and Emily Blunt seem an odd pairing, but I think they made it work. I struggle to watch Sir Anthony Hopkins because I can't help see a glint of that 'fava beans' menace in his eye but he played the role of the father well, a charming gentleman but a cold and distant father who did nothing to warm the eerie atmosphere of the mansion setting. I was kind of expecting Hugo Weaving to accidently call del Toro's character 'Mr. Anderson' most the time he was on screen, but he may have been underused as the police inspector.

The CGI is not amazing in the London-town scenes, but the werewolf stuff is awesome. Didn't roll my eyes once. I really liked it, had a really enjoyable night but I didn't LOVE it and usually that's when the score is a bit off. I'd need a second viewing to confirm, but I think with a period film like this its a great opportunity to use a traditional score. Ears are as important as eyes, you will hear me say it time and time again, and it's easy for us to pick a bad performance or crappy dialogue but rarely do we go 'yeah they could have done more with the score'. Of course, it could just be I don't know how to get involved with a Monster Movie?

Verdict? Great fun movie that will scare you without making you want to vomit. At around $20 a ticket these days, I'm happy to wait for video for the modern day set rom-coms or dramas (yeah, truth is I say that, but what I really mean is I don't bother with them. personal taste. you get my point...) but this is a charming film to see on the big screen. Treat your imagination to a night out.
25
Vote
   


INTRODUCTION TO JAMIE'S FILM REVIEW

March 14th 2010 07:19

Welcome to my new blog...

Jamie's Film Review - "Blah" free.

To elaborate, film reviews on all sorts of film without me overusing the word "metaphor" or laying into any film that doesnt look like it will make next years Oscars. Just a movie-lovers guide to if and why you might or might not like what's playing at your local cinema tonight or what you should grab from your local weekly section at the video shop.

Ja'mie

27
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts dating from March 2010
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Jamie 9's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Jamie 9
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]