JakeDanger

Zhengzhou, CHINA


Joined October 16th 2006

Number of Posts:
5

Number of Comments:
18

Karma:
4



I'm wild.

About Me
Statistics are meaningless. Read by blog and find out!

Blogs

JakeDanger's Blogs

404 Vote(s)
11 Comment(s)
5 Post(s)

I mentor these bloggers

Learn more about the Orble Mentoring Program.


I do not mentor any bloggers.

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

Friends as Enemies

October 25th 2006 05:17
Society is prone to treat its greatest friends as its enemies. Where would the world be without Jesus, Socrates, Ghandi, Martin Luther King? But the lives of all four of these were cut short – two by judicial execution, two by assassin’s bullets. All four were considered enemies of the societies in which they lived.
65
Vote
   


Social Conditioning, Part 2

October 19th 2006 07:15
I am not an anarchist.

I'm not so concerned about society setting rules for us to follow (after all I'm a lawyer) as I am concerned about society trying to determine my identity as equivalent to my social roles, and teaching me to pretend that I'm who society expects me to be (whether I really am or not). We are taught from an early age to put up a socially acceptable facade and to pretend that it's not a facade; after long enough we begin to believe it's real.

So I would encourage people to make their own choices, but the choices we make are often defined by who we think we are - so if we allow society to tell us who we are, then we allow society to determine the choces we make. For example: I'm a lawyer, but then again I'm not. That's just one of the roles I play, not my identity. I find my peers all tend to think alike (they "think like lawyers" because they've been subtly taught that "what you do for a living" = "who you are". They all drive the same cars, live in the same neighborhoods, vote for the same candidates, etc. Off-duty conversation revolves around fascinating topics like furniture, dog food, and drywalling one's basement.

Ultimately, we made society; it didn't make us. Though we all have to follow certain rules in order to live together in peace, we should not treat society as if it were a god to whom we owe our identity. It's not either/or: it's just that the more we are conditioned to believe that we are nothing but a set of roles, the more we allow our roles to swallow us up, and the more plastic" and more dehumanized we become.

Conversely, the more we exercise the courage to think for ourselves and rely on our own perceptions, the more of our original humanity we recapture. That is what I'm trying to encourage people to do.

One of society's primary functions is to produce mediocrity. If one of its members slips from mediocity down into depravity (crime, mental illness, etc.), society will take corrective action - either to reform or treat the person, or to warehouse that person (as in a prison) so that he will no longer threaten others. Likewise, if a person tries to move up from mediocrity into greatness, society will move against him and attempt to either push him back down into mediocrity or get rid of him (or her). And by "greatness" I don't mean Bill Gates. I mean Jesus. I mean Nelson Mandela. I think that it's likely that more great men and women have been executed by society than have won Nobel prizes.

81
Vote
   


It starts when we’re small children, about the time we first develop self-awareness. Society steps in – first in the form of our parents, then out teachers, then the media, or bosses at work, our peers – and tries to tell us ‘who we are’. That’s when we begin creating the false self, the self that is a response to the demands of the society around us. We begin managing other people’s impressions of us, we begin to lie, we begin to act like a reflection of what we think the world expects us to be. Before too long we can no longer see ourselves in the mirror – we have stepped through the looking-glass. We forget that the false self is an artifice, and we begin to believe our own BS – we begin to believe that the false self is the real self, and thus submerge our real selves inside the tomb that we have created to encase it. Indeed, social conditioning is the most powerful of all mind-altering drugs.

But what happens if you suddenly wake up and remember who you are? What happens if you try to reclaim your real self? You will find yourself besieged on all sides, surrounded by a society full of other false selves who are utterly hostile to what you are doing. A counterfeit HATES the presence of the genuine article because it reveals his own ‘counterfeitness’ by comparison. Above all, it is the people closest to you – your family and your closest friends – who will oppose you the most vigorously, because they are the ones who have made the heaviest investment in thinking of you as you have always seemed to be. And once your true self comes out they will not recognize you, thus proving that they never knew you in the first place. They will, ironically, accuse you of having become phony because you won’t think what they tell you to think anymore or say what they tell you to say. And they will do anything, ANYTHING, to beat you back into your tomb. For most people, complete authenticity is ‘crazy’. But what is ‘crazy’, really? My personal definition is” “any way of being or thinking that is inconsistent with the prevailing 21st century insanity; i.e., being ‘normal’.

I thank God I’m crazy. If I wasn’t, I’d probably go insane.
84
Vote
   


The Abuse of Psychiatric Power

October 17th 2006 08:12
A lot of people's definition of "crazy" seems to be "not being what I want you to be and refusing to think what I tell you to think".

When you are a small child your parents are your gods, and they know it. It is a struggle for every parent to give up this godlike status as the child grows up, and often they will fight to keep this status even after their offspring reaches adulthood. The interactions of many families are based on irrational belief systems and systems of manipulation and intimidation that preserve the authority of the parents through subtle psychological means long after the parents should have voluntarily relinquished their authority over their offspring. Like petty dictators, some parents simply do not want to let go of power


[ Click here to read more ]
81
Vote
   


Introduction to the Matrix

October 17th 2006 07:42

This blog is called "The Matrix" after the film of the same name. In that film, the protagonist Neo discovers that everything around him is an illusion, and that he is really a prisoner of a system that has enslaved his mind. So are we. It's not the Agents we have to fear, it's the lies that float along the breeze everywhere we go, that show up in unbelievably subtle ways to brainwash us and prevent us from seeing things as they really are. I am trying to machete my way through this jungle of falsehood, and I submit this blog as a sort of progress report.

[ Click here to read more ]
73
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

Comment by JakeDanger
on Social Conditioning, Part 2

October 24th 2006 12:34
I saw that scene differently. Norton chose to define himself in terms of material objects. As a product
of society himself, he knew nothing better than to define himself in terms of other products. Our
factories pump out nearly identical plastic Barbie dolls by the millions, and our families and schools
pump out nearly identical plastic people by the millions; when they grow up we house them in nearly
identical prefabricated cookie-cutter homes and provide them with prefabricated opinions ("choose
from among Opinions A, B, or C"). Everyone asks and answers the question "who am I?" one way or the
other. Not to dwell on the question is simply to answer it answer it by default - to let society answer
it for us. If we want to make a real contribution to the world we must be real people, not cheap, plastic,
mass-produced products. Some would call that "selfish" (those who stand to gain from the docility of
the masses), but it's not - I'm not a Barbie doll, but then again neither is anyone else. You can't love
or value someone who for all you know is nothing but a piece of plastic.

I like the line in Pink Floyd's "The Wall":

There must be some mistake I didn't mean to let them take away my soul
am I too old is it too late?

Comment by JakeDanger
on 10 Inspiring Movie Quotes

October 19th 2006 08:12
"You heart is free - have the courage to follow it." - Braveheart

Comment by JakeDanger
on Are You Awake?

October 19th 2006 08:09
"My father says almost everybody is asleep all the time. Everybody you meet, everybody you've ever heard of. And those few people who are truly awake live in a state of constant, total amazement." - "Joe and the Volcano", staring Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan..

I would like to point out, though, that many geniuses are extremely absent-minded. I think that's because they put the little things on autopilot in order to free up their minds to concentrate on what matters most to them.

Comment by JakeDanger
on Bloggers under attack

October 19th 2006 07:57
The US government is using 9/11 to accomplish a de facto repeal of the First Amendment. If they succeed in doing so, the terrorists will have won their greatest victory.

I have a few comments:

1. In the original Hebrew, the word "day" is the Hebrew "yom", which could mean day, time, or epoch. So there's no neccesity to conclude that the Earth was created in seven 24-hour days in order to harmonize the Bible with the fossil record. A 4 billion year old Earth should be no threat to a Bible believer.

2. There seems to be a conflict between the idea of "evolution according to the laws of nature" and "intelligent design", meaning God violates his own laws of physics to create life through miracles. I think this is a false conflict. I see intelligent design in the content and arrangement of the laws of physics themselves - that is where the symmetry lies.

Atheist: Now that we know about the law of gravity, we know that God doesn't push the planets around the sun.

Theist: Yes he does, and scientists have described HOW he does it with admirable mathematical precision.

Point: The "laws" of physics are descriptions of observed regularities in nature, not causes in and of themselves. The law of gravitation does not "cause" an apple to fall from a tree to the ground, it's just a description of how the apple falls.

3. I was always suspicious of the idea of "survival of the fittest". How do we determine what "the fittest" is? We check and see whether it survived or not. For example, we know that a giraffe's long neck rendered it the "fittest" because we know that it has survived for such a long time. If it hadn't survived, we would have concluded that a long neck must not render a species fit. So "survival of the fittest" reduces to "survival of that which survives" which says absolutely nothing - it's circular reasoning.

I'm not so concerned about society setting rules for us to follow (after all I'm a lawyer) as I am concerned about society trying to determine my identity as equivalent to my social roles and teaching me to pretend that I'm who society expects me to be (whether I really am or not). We are taught from an early age to put up a socially acceptable facade and to pretend that it's not a facade; after long enough we begin to believe it's real.

So I would encourage people to make their own choices, but the choices we make are often defined by who we think we are - so if we allow society to tell us who we are, then we allow society to determine the choces we make. For example: I'm a lawyer, but then again I'm not. That's just one of the roles I play, not my identity. I find my peers all tend to think alike (they "think like lawyers" because they've been subtly taught that "what you do for a living" = "who you are". They all drive the same cars, live in the same neighborhoods, vote for the same candidates, etc. Off-duty conversation revolves around fascinating topics like furniture, dog food, and drywalling one's basement.

Ultimately, we made society; it didn't make us. Though we all have to follow certain rules in order to live together in peace, we should not treat society as if it were a god to whom we owe our identity. It's not either/or: it's just that the more we are conditioned to believe that we are nothing but a set of roles, the more we allow our roles to swallow us up, and the more plastic" and more dehumanized we become.

Conversely, the more we exercise the courage to think for ourselves and rely on our own perceptions, the more of our original humanity we recapture. That is what I'm trying to encourage people to do.

Society's function is to produce mediocrity. If one of its members slips from mediocity down into depravity (crime, mental illness, etc.), society will take corrective action - either to reform or treat the person, or to warehouse that person (as in a prison) so that he will no longer threaten others. Likewise, if a person tries to move up from mediocrity into greatness, society will move against him and attempt to either push him back down into mediocrity or get rid of him (or her). And by "greatness" I don't mean Bill Gates. I mean Jesus. I mean Nelson Mandela. I think that it's likely that more great men and women have been executed by society than have won Nobel prizes.

Comment by JakeDanger
on What is the most erotic text you have ever read?

October 18th 2006 05:24
Yeah, it is from "Song of Solomon"...the funny thing is, if you read that passage in front of some of the Christian fundamentalist churches and they didn't recognize it was from the Bible, they'd throw you out on your ear for reading such "filth"...that's how far some of the churches have fallen )-:

Comment by JakeDanger
on Should we shag our friends?

October 18th 2006 03:51
I would guess that men can much more easily maintain a sexual but non-romantic friendship than women can. We're just wired differently.

When a woman says (when breaking up with a man), "let's just be friends", she really means: "You can still take me out, but don't touch me..."

When I man says "let's just be friends" he really means: "Well, I'm not gonna take you out anymore, but I wouldn't mind sleeping with you once in a while..."

Comment by JakeDanger
on What is the most erotic text you have ever read?

October 18th 2006 03:35
I like this one:

"How beautiful and how pleasant you are, love, for delights!

This, your stature, is like a palm tree, your breasts like its fruit.

I said, "I will climb up into the palm tree. I will take hold of its fruit." Let your breasts be like clusters of the vine, the smell of your breath like apples,

Your mouth like the best wine, that goes down smoothly for my beloved, gliding through the lips of those who are asleep."

Challenge: See if you can guess who wrote it... (surprise, surprise, surprise....!)


Comment by JakeDanger
on PUGNACITY

October 18th 2006 01:41
North Korea picking a fight with the US is like a toy poodle attacking a St. Bernard...the similarities between what you can see in a zoo and what you see on the news is depressing yet hilarious (life is a tragedy for those who feel, a comedy for those who think...")