Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Creatine: It's Uses and Downfalls

January 25th 2011 21:21
Creatine is an interesting supplement. If you're a bodybuilder, or atleast work out frequently, and you don't know what creatine is or what it does, you're in for a treat. Creatine is one of the most frequently used supplements in the bodybuilding world, and for good reason. It's one of the few "legal" ergogenic aids on the market and it does it's job fairly well. However, creatine isn't limited to the bodybuilding world. It has a few more uses in the pharmocological world in the treatment of disease and disorders as well. So what is creatine exactly and what does it do?

Creatine, or creatine phosphate, occurs naturally in all vertebrates and helps to supply energy to all working cells in the body, primarily muscles, and increase performance of those cells and muscles. Creatine increases performance and energy by supplying extra ATP, or adenosine triphosphate, the main (and as far as anyone knows the only) energy source for all bodily functions. That little chemistry nugget was just for your reference, we're not going to get too far into the chemical reactions and metabolic pathways involved with this supplementation right now.

Creatines uses may seem obvious to some of us after the former reference. Bodybuilding is the act of building the muscles in the body. Creatine supplies extra energy to those muscles which allows for extra reps, sets, and altogether intensity for your workout. However, that isn't the limit of it's uses. Creatine is also used for neuromuscular disorders and neurodegenerative diseases such as; arthritis, Parkinson's disease, congestive heart failure, and muscular dystrophy. Though treatment with creatine is still in the larval stage, it's strength increasing properties are well known and as such would do well with these type of muscular disorders. However, don't take my word for it. In one study done in the scientific journal Neurobiology of Disease, creatine was actually twice as effective as the prescription drug riluzole in treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a neural disease similar to Parkinson's which effects control of voluntary muscle movement. According to the study, creating showed "substantial evidence for bioenergetic defects in Huntington's disease (HD). Creatine administration increases brain phosphocreatine levels and it stabilizes the mitochondrial permeability transition...Dietary supplementation of 2% creatine significantly improved survival, slowed the development of motor symptoms, and delayed the onset of weight loss" (Creatine increases survivial). That study gives us some good reason to believe that great leaps are being taken in what we can use to treat these debilitating disorders. However, for all the good creatine can do for us, there are certain side effects that balance it all out like everything else.

As with any other supplement out there, three quarters of the information is theoretical and a quarter is nonsense. Creatine really isn't any different in that sense. However, there are some credible health concerns for those of us who regularly supplement our daily routine with creatine. Three of the most common side effects are dehydration, altering of liver function, and kidney damage. Yet just as with the upsides of creatine supplementation, the downsides are largely unfounded. Other so called side effects are diarrhea, muscle cramping, and insulin alteration. Are these credible theories? Of course they are. However, even the experts lack any real evidence on these side effects. According to The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness "Most reports on side effects, such as muscle cramping, gastrointestinal symptoms, changes in renal and hepatic laboratory values, remain anecdotal because the case studies do not represent well-controlled trials, so no causal relationship between creatine supplementation and these side-effects has yet been established. The only documented side effect is an increase in body mass" (Bizzarini, De Angelis)

All in all, just as with anything scientific and especially in regards to supplementation, it's up to us to decide just what we believe. My opinion: creatine is one of the safest and most successful supplements on the market. Highly reccommended.

References:
Bizzarini, E., De Angelis L The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness (2004) "Is oral creatine supplementation safe?"

Andreassen OA, Dedeoglu A, Ferrante RJ Neurobiology of Disease (2001) "Creatine increases survival and delays motor symptoms"
29
Vote
   


Global Warming: Theory or Conspiracy?

January 23rd 2011 02:34
Global warming, as many of us may very well know by now, has become much more of a reality than we had ever dreamed of. However, this doesn’t mean we all know what global warming is exactly. Some of us may be asking what it does, while others may be asking what it is. Theories are often put forth to give you that insight into what it does and what it is. More often than not they confuse and irritate us, providing more frustration than insight, like the internal radiative forcing hypothesis. However, if we can look past the opinionated speculation, some of these theories like the greenhouse gas and solar variation theories, can provide us with that valuable insight.

If we look at all the different theories out there for global warming, we may quickly feel overwhelmed by all the information. Yet, there are a few reasonable theories, backed by years of research, which stand out and seem to make more sense than the others. For instance the greenhouse gas theory which according to the United States National Academy of Sciences (USAS) "Was observed to increase temperature since the middle of the 20th century and has been caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, which result from human activity such as the burning of fossil fuel and deforestation… Most scientists agree that the warming in recent decades has been caused primarily by human activities that have increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere"(USAS). This could be the most reasonable, easily explainable, and believable theory out there. As we read in the quote, temperature increase has been observed since the 20th century. This was a time in which we began developing a great many different tools in order to make life easier such as air conditioning, nuclear technologies, automobiles, and spacecraft. All of which, according to theory, produce emissions that promote the greenhouse effect. Another theory known as the solar variation theory states that variations in the suns solar output has been the cause of past climate changes, providing reason to believe that it’s simply happening again. According to the National Research Council (NRC) "Changes in insolation on a variety of time scales have been suggested as causes of known climate change, from the orbital cycles of thousands of years, to the decadal-to-century scale fluctuations typified by the Little Ice Age… Observations of total solar irradiance by spacecraft
radiometers have now detected decadal variations on the order of 0.1 percent in apparent association with the Sun's 11-year activity cycle" (NRC, USAS).
With these two theories, we seem to be provided with reason to believe that these could be why our climate grows warmer as the years go by. However, even though these theories may provide factual evidence, the more abstract and controversial explanations like the internal radiative forcing hypothesis may also give us their own two cents as to why this may be happening, in turn providing us with more possible insights.

Unlike the two previous theories, the internal radiative forcing hypothesis, proposed by Roy Spencer, isn’t backed by facts through scientific research. Instead, Roy Spencer hypothesized that natural occurring phenomenon like precipitation can cause small changes to the world’s climate which in turn eventually have larger changes. “Because small, chaotic fluctuations in atmospheric and oceanic circulation systems can cause small changes in global average cloudiness, this is all that is necessary to cause climate change. You don’t need the sun or any other ‘external’ influence” (Spencer). This gives us reason to believe that we may have no hand in the global climate change, instead giving us the idea that it’s simply a natural occurrence that happens over and over again, not unlike solar variation. However, because the hypothesis isn’t backed by clear cut, solid evidence, it has yet to become a part of popular opinion.

After looking at all of these proposed theories and explanations, it’s really only up to us what we believe and discard as nonsense. The facts backing the greenhouse gas and solar variation theories make them very credible, especially in the eyes of those of us who demand true evidence in order to believe in something. However, the internal radiative forcing hypothesis is nonetheless believable, if only simply because it provides a different perspective on the situation. Whether it’s the facts that pull us in the direction of the greenhouse gas and solar variation theories or the will to stray away from popular belief brings us to the internal radiative forcing hypothesis, it’s only up to us what we believe.


References: United States Academy of Sciences (2008)
National Research Council (1994)
Spencer, Roy PhD (2011). Global Warming: Natural or Manmade? Global Warming. Retrieved from: http://www.drroyspencer.com/
11
Vote
   


The idea of science being a popular subject may be poppycock (for lack of a better word) to some of us. However, whether we know it or not, science has pervaded some of the most popular mags and websites. Topics like global warming, stem cell research, nanotechnology, and many many other topics fill the information super highway. This is my opportunity to show you guys some popular, not so popular, and altogether interesting popular science topics.
11
Vote
   


More Posts
3 Posts
3 Posts dating from January 2011
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

livehealthy's Blogs

180 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
6 Post(s)
80 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
Moderated by livehealthy
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]