Fernando Monteiro

Sydney, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA


Joined November 3rd 2006

Number of Posts:
141

Number of Comments:
1

Karma:
7



I have fun writing and publishing my stories. I wish they interest and entertain you too.

About Me
My life has been mostly tribulation. All through it, though, my passion for writing my thoughts has not changed. Be welcome to read my stories.

Tags & Posts

Bookmark Tags



Popular Tags

Popular Posts

Blogs

Fernando Monteiro's Blogs

419 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
7 Post(s)
2317 Vote(s)
6 Comment(s)
35 Post(s)
363 Vote(s)
2 Comment(s)
8 Post(s)
3139 Vote(s)
6 Comment(s)
51 Post(s)

I mentor these bloggers

Learn more about the Orble Mentoring Program.


I do not mentor any bloggers.

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

Looking into the Next 50 Years

February 5th 2010 02:05
Our world is changing fast and the assumptions of today may not be valid tomorrow. What sectors of the economy are changing; what will we be facing in the future? I approach below the topics on the ageing of the population and the growth of population, but also fossil fuels and renewable energies and the future of Asia. This is not an exhaustive list of future evolving events but just an appetiser to the topic.

In the next few decades, in areas such as Australia, the US/Canada and Europe, a large part of the population, the so called baby boom generation born after WWII, will increasingly be attaining old age status. If the reader considers that this generation could be around 40 per cent of the total population, it will be easy to understand that the impact in the society and the economy will be great. Great because their needs, as baby boomer elderly citizens, will be much different than the needs of the younger population.

Some of the needs of the ageing population are: more aged care housing and nursing homes, greater medical care, greater need to join like-minded people in clubs such as RSL clubs and other, a greater need to play physically softer activities such as soft-gymnastics, Yoga, Pilates, Tai Chi, dancing and so on. But not only this, elderly people in the baby boom category will increasingly need also expertise services in estate planing, in funeral planing and also in superannuation and government benefits planing.

With regards to retirement financing, in Australia we have superannuation which is a system by which employers pay 9 per cent of an employee’s salary into a super fund which is invested and the employee can access on retirement. Yet, and according to super industry sources, at current levels a large part of elderly people will have not enough super to retire on. This means that the government will have to pay pensions to a large part of the ageing population.

All the above brings up the question on where is the government going to find enough tax revenue to pay for such things as increase needs for health care and pensions. One of the ways to obviate this is by increasing the economy’s productivity and it can get inspiration on what was done in that area in Australia in the 80s and 90s when the banking sector was deregulated, the dollar was floated and micro-economic reform ensued.

The other way to increase tax revenue is by increasing the population base. This can be done in Australia in two ways: by increasing new births and by increasing migration. Either of these will require investments in infrastructure such as kindergartens, schools, but also new roads, water, electricity and so on. In any case the debate on whether the Australian land mass can cope with a much greater population will resurface.

After the above consideration it’s easy to see where the business opportunities will be in the future in this area.

Another interesting topic is the one of fossil fuels such as oil, petrol and natural gas which are on an extinction path. Oil and associated products are doomed: world deposits, even after the discovery of large deposits in Brazil, are decreasing and will be fully depleted in the not so distant future. From a speculative point of view, could it be said that oil/petrol/gas will increase in price given its progressive rarefaction and short supply?

Our economic health will depend, I suppose, on the evolution in the use of alternative energies such as biofuels, solar and wind energy, seawave energy, volcanic energy, but also nuclear energy and others. I think that if significant scientific/technical progress is achieved in these areas, they might sooner substitute for fossil fuels and so the overall costs of energy will be contained within certain limits.

When you look into the business landscape associated with the shift in energy source type, you know that electric/biofuel cars and industry are on the way up while large petrol engines are fated. This shift will affect also the transportation industry from trucking to aviation and it’s noticeable that Virgin Blue Europe is already using biofuel in its airplanes with success.

But, basically, the emergence of alternative energies will bring upon a new and large industry. Initially, technical development costs will be greater and risks higher and some new energy companies will fail and others will be gobbled up by existing utilities. But, eventually, once the economic need and demand is felt, much progress will be achieved in this area.

With the emergence of climate change and greenhouse effect many more storms, hurricanes, heavy rain, floods, bushfires and droughts, melting of the ice caps are on the way. There are also increasingly non-weather related events such as tsunamis and earthquakes. One can ask what kind of effect this could have on the economy. It certainly represents great losses in human lives and infrastructure costs. It always occurs to me to think when considering this that weather related insurance business is on the way up to lose a lot and increasing in claim payments.

The above events also mean that the needs for reconstruction are going to be greater and so it will boost business in the areas of civil construction and infrastructure construction.

Finally, consider Asia. In the next few decades the area of the globe that will grow the fastest will be Asia. Asia’s demand for infrastructure of all kinds, energy, transportation means, but also banking and insurance services and education together with tourism needs will be exponential. To this list should be added the needs for military equipment and communications.

The reader could invest in the upcoming Asian wealth and needs by associating with businesses that have a presence there. An example is ANZ Banking which aims at creating a “super-regional” presence in Asia.

Together with Asia, the Middle-East is also an area for future growth, especially in construction and infrastructure.
9
Vote
   


Capital Gains and Housing Speculation

January 26th 2010 14:26
Housing booms excite people to borrow money and buy houses in the hope of selling them for a higher price in the short term. Yet, our latest housing boom had the impractical effect of denying most young adults the possibility of buying their first house, just because their prices went so high.

There is something pernicious about buying a house with an intention to make a capital gain on sale. As Warren Buffett put it in his latest annual report, houses are to house people and to give them some enjoyment – not to give them capital gains. In the US it was this capital gain greed that led to the subprime mortgage debacle with all its effects on the economy and the financial system.

In Australia house prices have reached so high levels that, I would easily guess, they will fall substantially before we embark on a new housing boom. Besides than this, the Reserve Bank has been increasing interest rates and is expected to continue with that policy, which goes in the same direction of reducing demand for first homes.

If a capital gain is the goal of the investor, why not then sticking to your guns and investing in the stock market, which is the proper place for speculation? The stock market has numerous practical advantages over the housing market. Moreover, in any 10 year period the stock market always outperforms the housing market.

Let’s consider some advantages of share investing as opposed to house investing:

• You can buy shares from something like $500 and you can also make small increments. You cannot buy a house with less than $450,000.

• You can buy shares with your own savings or use some little credit in the form of a margin loan. You must borrow heavily if you want to buy a house, being a mortgage typically 80 to 90 per cent of the house value.

• The costs of buying a lot of shares (brokers’ fees) are around $15. The costs, legal and processing, of buying a house are in the order of the thousands, besides the interest you will pay on the mortgage loan.

• Most shares are extremely liquid and can readily be sold in the stock market. You can recover their value in two to three days. If you have to pay capital gains tax you can do it at the end of the financial year on your tax return. Selling a house is a lot of trouble: you must use the services of a real estate agent, you must allow inspections to the property, you might have to go through an auction and you run the risk of not getting as much money as you think you deserve for it. Moreover, you might have to pay other associated legal costs.

• You can sell parts only of your share portfolio very conveniently, but you cannot sell a part of your house.

• If you receive dividends from companies that earn their income in Australia, you are given franking credits and do not pay income tax on those dividends. If you put your house for rent, you pay income tax on it.

• If your share investment goes sour, all you lose is the value represented by them, no more. If you cannot repay your mortgage, you may lose a lot more and become indebted or get bankrupted.

• If you buy shares you can also indirectly invest in property. Consider commercial property through buying Westfield’s shares. You can also buy other diverse business, but if you invest in your house, you’re stuck with one type of investment only.

Indeed, there are many advantages of investing in the share market over investing in a house. May the investor consider it.
23
Vote
   


Brokers think differently than long-term investors, which is no surprise if we think that brokers do substantially different activities than investors. Find out more below.

Investors are interested in buying companies that have good business/earnings prospects and generally think of associating with them for a substantial amount of time. They reap capital gains and dividends and generally only sell if they think that their companies have become lacklustre or too overvalued.

Brokers though, are there for something substantially different: basically, they are there to buy and sell shares for investors that place orders with them. In principle this would be all that brokers should be doing. But they then, and keeping with the truth, to fill up free time and free money, play some games with the stock market. And not all are recommendable.

For example, in order to lower the purchase price for some stock they want to buy, they might first sell in order to lower the market price for the security and then buy. Do you, dear reader, get the feeling that this is likeable to passing the cards under the table? They call this operation and its converse “smoothing the price”.

Another example of brokers’ activities is short-selling. Short-selling is a despicable practice for it downgrades companies’ market values for no good reason and the only person that profits from it is the broker. The broker “borrows” a number of shares from one of its client, often without permission, and sells them into a falling market. He then buys the same number of shares back at a much lower price and pockets the difference.

This practice has aberrant consequences: (a) in the stock market we buy or sell shares – nobody really borrows them. What brokers do then is illegitimate. (b) short-selling depresses prices abnormally. When in mid 2008 Macquarie Group was short-sold its price fell from the highs of $91 to a ridiculous $15, much below its then value and much to the dismay of its shareholders. (c) short-selling has this additional bizarre characteristic: you sell a company but do not mean to leave it behind. When the regular investor is done with a company he sells its shares and that’s it. When the short-selling broker sells its shares he means to continue to affect the company’s share price. How fair is this?

To give way to their trigger-happy tendencies brokers in their free time practice games of speculation. They basically shoot at anything that goes up, going long, in order to pocket a small difference in price. They might not be buying for any client, but just making a few bucks here and there. This has interesting consequences in terms of what the thinking of a broker is and what the thinking of a long-term investor is.

One example of this is how Price to Earnings (P/E) is understood by these two different types of stock market people. P/E is share price divided by earnings per share and expressed in times. For the long-term investor, at buying time it’s important that, once the company under analysis is seen to have some value, that its stock price be as low as possible. This means that P/E must be low, as low as possible and certainly below 15 times. This is sensical.

A broker though, has a perverted thinking about this: he thinks that the highest the P/E the better. The reason is that very high P/Es are associated with companies that present some prospects for speculation and whose price is volatile, therefore allowing brokers to play their conjecture and rumour games.

Much more could be said about the perversity of stock brokers’ thinking but this should suffice to open the appetite to find out more.
17
Vote
   


The Business of Insurance

October 29th 2009 14:12
Did you ever want to know all about the insurance business but were afraid to ask? Well, in this condensed article I present all the most relevant aspects of insurance in a made easy format, just for you.

Your first question might be just what is insurance? Insurance is about sharing risks. Insurance companies insure a large number of people, from whom they receive premiums, while only few make claims. This way insurance is about the many sharing the risk of the few


[ Click here to read more ]
25
Vote
   


Bricks and Mortar and Paper Money

September 19th 2009 11:35
The expression “paper money” is everywhere when stock prices change abruptly. Values, as so often happen in the stock market, go up and down suddenly, which to the common mortal implies that nothing is secure and from where the expression paper money. Funnily enough, real money, except for coins, is printed on paper.

Bricks and mortar appeal to values associated with houses and their social role to house and protect people from the elements, from where the expression “safe as houses”. But are they really safe? Truly, the so said safety of houses depends totally in the breadwinner being able to earn an income and pay the mortgage loan. In times of recession as now, many can’t do so and will lose their safe houses


[ Click here to read more ]
30
Vote
   


Myer is Listing in the ASX

September 13th 2009 11:54
Last Friday Jennifer Hawkins, Miss Universe 2004 and Myer’s face, and Bernie Brookes CEO joined forces to promote the new listing of Myer in the Australian stock exchange. Myer came off a period of three years of delisting and turnaround, the question to be asked being: will it now be the big bet everybody wants it to be?

Myer opened for trading in 1899 in Bendigo offering attractive merchandise and competitive prices to serve the well off as well as the common shopper. In 1911 The Myer Emporium in Melbourne opened for trade. Women loved Myer it for its product and for its marketing and promotions. The man behind it was Sidney Myer, a Russian migrant and a man reputed not only for his at the time futuristic business practices, but also for his many charitable activities


[ Click here to read more ]
31
Vote
   


ANZ Bank and Asia’s Growth

September 4th 2009 12:07
Of all the four major Australian banks, ANZ is the one who has for many decades to now been seeking the gold that is in Asia’s growth. As a matter of fact, ANZ aims at becoming a “super regional bank” in Asia, a bank whose operations spread through the whole of Asia, and to sourcing 20 per cent of its net profit from Asia by 2012.

In this line of action, ANZ just last June purchased from retiring Royal Bank of Scotland its Asian operations for US$850 million. Reflecting on the opportunity, Mike Smith, ANZ’s CEO, said it was a “once in a lifetime opportunity”. It’s interesting to notice that, at ANZ, every incoming CEO has to accept and promote the Asian ambition and policy of action


[ Click here to read more ]
32
Vote
   


David Jones (DJS) sells upmarket products, shoes, frocks, hand bags and cosmetics priced dearly and makes a fortune doing so. Its 2008 net profit was $147 million on revenues of more than $2 billion. What’s David Jones secret?

In part the answer is that the Australian public is greatly affluent, commands large disposable incomes, and likes buying from distinct places such as David Jones. In part the answer for its success is that David Jones knows how to create a buying experience that will both delight and distinguish the upmarket customer


[ Click here to read more ]
32
Vote
   


It’s not too often that you hear of a business that returns 48 per cent on equity. Just think how much your money in the bank is earning. Well, The Reject Shop (TRS) just posted a net profit of $19 million for 2008-09, an increase of 14 per cent on the previous year which, you will agree, in current times is a feat.

According to the SMH last Thursday, 20 August 2009, the “the trend has improved” and The Reject Shop plans to open 22 new stores to a total 171 by year end. The shop appeals to customers who look for value and, not surprisingly, opens for trade in typically labour suburbs. What they sell? The shop sells general merchandise, from laundry powder to Pepsi Max to baby food to almost anything, cheap


[ Click here to read more ]
33
Vote
   


BHP Billiton has been hit hard by the current recession and its net profit has fallen by 62 per cent to US$5.88 billion, this way ending a seven year cycle of increasing profits. Is mining not attractive anymore? Stay with me.

Mining is a simple economic activity: basically, you prospect an area, when you hit on something you get a licence to mine and you then transport your product to somewhere your customer requires


[ Click here to read more ]
32
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

Comment by Fernando Monteiro
on Will Qantas be Sold?

December 9th 2006 08:22
Hi,

If Qantas can keep the attributes that made it successfull, such as service and safety, then appart from onership nothing should change. Notice that Qantas management, including its MD, will take a part of it (up to $100 million).

I just wonder whether the bid will be acceptable given the restrictions on foreign ownershipt of Qantas.

Bye,
FM