Doug Pollard

Melbourne, Victoria, AUSTRALIA


Joined June 13th 2008

Number of Posts:
254

Number of Comments:
126

Karma:
10



Tags & Posts

Bookmark Tags



Popular Tags

Blogs

Doug Pollard's Blogs

4896 Vote(s)
102 Comment(s)
71 Post(s)
13554 Vote(s)
333 Comment(s)
228 Post(s)

I mentor these bloggers

Learn more about the Orble Mentoring Program.


I do not mentor any bloggers.

Recent Posts

Gathering Stones

November 19th 2009 06:49


There will a brief interruption to the Rainbow Reporters normal service.

It’s that time of year again, when flowers burst into bloom, trees into leaf, birds into song, and my kidneys into stones.

Yes folk, those pesky little gravel quarries have been at it again, this time producing not one but three charming little buggers – sorry, calculi - around 8mm in diameter.

Three!! Enough for a set of earrings and a pendant!

But I’m a bit disappointed. Unfortunately the surgeons have decided that on this occasion they’ll leave the 2cm gallstone – which would have made a wonderful matching brooch – where it sits, growing slowly but inexorably larger.

I’ll have to think of something else for Mum’s Christmas present.

What? Well, she did once present me with her recently extracted gallstone – I thought I’d take it a stage further with mine.

“Don’t worry,” said the surgeon, “most people die WITH gallstones, not OF them. If it’s not bothering you, don’t bother it.”

“But I’d really rather get rid of the thing – can’t you just whip it out while you’re doing the other job? Can I get a bulk discount?”

“Weeeell, you see the trouble is, we’re very very careful people, surgeons, we have to be, ha ha, but even with the best will in the world sometimes things can go wrong – and if a gallstone op goes wrong, we’ve ruined the rest of your life. So I’d rather not. As I said. . . . “

“I know – if it’s not bothering me etc. etc.”

So – no brooch for Mum.

The next question is, exactly which op am I getting this time, please? The ultrasound treatment followed by a week peeing gravel, or the up-the-willy with a miniaturised excavator / handycam / lights / rubbish basket and haul the offenders out?

The latter. Do I want to stay awake and watch the procedure on the overhead telly? No I do not. Would I like the DVD afterwards? Er, maybe. . . . . .

Well you’ve all seen my dick from the outside folks, and it seemed to go down quite well, so here it is from the inside! Horny yet? No? Well, next, for all you golden shower queens, we’re heading into the bladder , before continuing on up to – oh look, quick, over there, isn’t that Raquel Welch in the white plastic bodysuit? Oh, sorry, wrong movie . . .

Maybe not the DVD.

Actually, the only thing is really want to know at this point is . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .when do I get the Oxycodone ?

So - into hossie tomorrow, out Saturday morning - then repeat next week. Fun eh? I'll keep you posted.
24
Vote
   


Freshly Doug Thursday November 19

November 18th 2009 09:13
Grey Gay
Let's grow old disgracefully!


Gaying the Gray


A slightly different kind of show for the first hour today, because instead of banging on about young queers as I usually do, this morning I’m looking at old dykes and poufs not unlike myself. We’re talking about being gay and grey.

With me in the studio I have two special guests - Deborah Peppard, who is hoping to build some GLBTI elder housing here in the city, or as near as she can get, and Dr Maree Farrow from Alzheimers Australia, which is today launching a paper on Alzheimers and the special needs of GLBTI sufferer.

Joining us on the line will be Adelaide Gerontologist Dr Jo Harrison, who is helping launch the paper, and advocates for mainstream aged-care services to become gay aware and gay friendly, and Dr Jude Comfort from Curtin University in WA, who is researching the treatment of GLBTI seniors in existing mainstream aged-care.

There are of course many possible options for when we get older, the main ones being: stay in our own homes as long as possible, with appropriate services to assist; move into a mainstream retirement living or care facility; or lastly, move into a retirement facility specifically set up for gays, lesbians and the rest of the alphabet.

Which would you choose? Do we need GLBTI specific places? Or is it better to put our efforts into educating the mainstream aged-care industry? SMS 0427 JOY 949 (0427 569 949) and let me know, to ask a question of my guests etc etc

As always between 10 and 11 I spend an hour with someone special. Today’s guest fits rather neatly with our theme. He recently retired, not that he seems to be any the less busy or active. Former gay and lesbian lobby co-convenor Ron Theile joins me at 10.

Andrew Potts has stories from the Sydney Star Observer - the world wide release of a roadmap for drug legalisation produced by the UK's Transform Drug Policy Foundation, which was sponsored here by the Australian Drug Law Reform Foundation and the release of the full results of the Thai HIV vaccine study

Cate the Green Renter returns to bring us up to date on how she’s doing with her 30-day vegan challenge, including a vegan dinner party, plus news of international buy nothing day and no spend Christmas, November planting & ethical gift giving.

Plus our regular look at the world of theatre with Will Conyers.

As always, feel free to join in, 0427 JOY 949. SMS 0427 569 949 . You can also Twitter @freshlydoug with any questions, comment about gray and gay, anytime during the show.
24
Vote
   


Where's MY apology?

November 18th 2009 02:05
sorry
Kevin Rudd, Cardinal Pell, Jim Wallace - please copy

While it’s very proper and appropriate that native Australians and now the forgotten Australians have received an apology, it’s time the gay community had a few, too.

Especially from the Catholic Church, which has been flooding the public arena with disinformation and propaganda on the issue.

For months the Pope and his minions have been insisting that the church doesn’t have an issue with paedophile priests, it’s all the fault of those goddamned homosexuals.

Well now they are hoist with their own petard, as their own research proves it just isn’t true, as reported by AAP and numerous papers yesterday Really Long Link. Apology, please.

At the recent Senate hearing into Marriage Equality, representatives of the church stated that children must have a mum and dad and same-sex parents are worse. Wrong, as a recent senior British government advisor has said Really Long Link lesbians (and gay men) make BETTER parents. As every previous credible peer-reviewed study has found. Apology please.

There is a fair amount of junk science – mostly emanating from one Dr Paul Cameron in the US – that purports to show that we die sooner, make lousy parents, and are more likely to be crooks.

All of that has been comprehensively shown to be twisted propaganda cobbled together without a skerrick of truth Really Long Link and Really Long Link for the US ‘pro-family’ right wing extremist pseudo-Christian movement, yet the church and the Australian Christian Lobby quote this as if it were gospel. Apology please.

Within living memory - my memory - gays and lesbians have been imprisoned, subjected to medical tortures, separated from their loved ones, denied families and children, simply for being gay. Apology please.

Mr Rudd is due to address the Australian Christian Lobby on Saturday – perhaps he would be so kind as to ask for their apologies on our behalf – and add his own. Please.
26
Vote
   


Catholic tastes

November 15th 2009 07:48

It never ceases to amaze me that while individual Catholics are decent, humane and tolerant people (as numerous opinion surveys have shown), their leaders are a bunch of fuckwits.

[ Click here to read more ]
46
Vote
   


Freshly Doug Thursday November 12

November 11th 2009 01:56
sex party
Fiona Patten - out to pinch Costello's seat


Well, Peter Costello has gone, Brendan Nelson has gone, there are byelections coming up in Bradfield and Higgins. The Labor Party aren’t standing in either because they are of course solid Liberal seats. But just how solid, I wonder


[ Click here to read more ]
28
Vote
   


Family Values

November 8th 2009 06:13
mypieceoftail
image: mypieceoftail

Well, after last week’s column I received a barrage of comment, for most of which, thanks. The rest – you know who you are.

[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


The Shoes, darling, The Shoes!

November 8th 2009 04:29
Cripple chic


Melbourne during the racing season. The Hats! The Frocks! The Shoes! Especially the Shoes! What the hell are these things women put on their feet


[ Click here to read more ]
25
Vote
   


SHAMESHAME TOP 25 Part II

November 1st 2009 09:05
Portia & Ellen
Ellen & Portia

It’s that time of year again, time to nominate the 25 allegedly most influential fags and dykes in Australia.

[ Click here to read more ]
37
Vote
   


Making Money Online

November 1st 2009 03:18
Show me the money!
Show me the money! (pic: Knox News)


Rupert Murdoch has been complaining of late that no-one will pay him for all the stuff he puts online. For once in my life, I sympathise with the Great Satan of Media. Three times in as many weeks I’ve been asked to work on websites, and none of them want to pay


[ Click here to read more ]
26
Vote
   


Freeloaders


Every Thursday I now present Freshly Doug on Joy 94.9 from Nine till Noon. And this week we got some lively responses from listeners when I posed the following question


[ Click here to read more ]
16
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

Comment by Doug Pollard
on SHAMESHAME TOP 25 Part II

November 6th 2009 06:26
Grumpy old pouf, certainly and proudly! And with good reason!
An Australian psychology expert who has been studying emotions has found being grumpy makes us think more clearly. . . . . miserable people are better at decision-making and less gullible . . . . gloominess breeds attentiveness and careful thinking, Professor Joe Forgas told Australian Science Magazine.
He says a grumpy person can cope with more demanding situations than a happy one,
outperform those who are jolly, make fewer mistakes and are better communicators.
Professor Forgas said: " negative moods trigger more attentive, careful thinking, paying greater attention to the external world."
His study also found they were better at stating their case through written arguments. Forgas said a "mildly negative mood may actually promote a more concrete, accommodative and ultimately more successful communication style".

Oh dear Penny Mathew Greg Anonymous, you really don't have a sense of humour, do you? I do my job as journalist, opinionator, commentator, activist, whatever - which involves among many other things putting a rocket up the arse of pollies - and they do theirs. I have no ambitions to sell out like Peter Garrett and BECOME one of them.
Except on very generous terms (joke).

Much food for thought here. Thank you all.
Re Anton Enus - he did speak at the Outgames Melbourne Conference (as well as take part in the tennis), so he's not entirely silent on gay matters.
Re VGLRL, they seem to have fallen asleep rather since Relationship Recognition was achieved, but their spin-offs - Love Makes a Family and Equal Love - are travelling well. Maybe their role is now as an incubator for issue-based pressure groups, rather than as a grab bag for all GLBTIQ issues.
Though personally I do wish people would not waste time on hate-speech and hate-crime legislation - Orwellian thoughtcrime notions. A crime isn't any worse for being motivated by dumbass opinions, and doesn't deserve differential punishment.
Re VAC - no doubt a very worthy organisation but in need of root-and-branch overhaul imho, perhaps a transformation into an advocacy body for all GBLTI health concerns, which are sadly neglected, underfunded and underserved in all other areas except HIV
Re going into politics, I have already offered myself to any party that will parachute me into a nice safe Senate seat, as I could do with a lucrative profession and large pension in my declining years, but sadly, to date there have been no takers! Perhaps my suggestion that I could be a sort-of socialist Barnaby Joyce puts them off.

Comment by Doug Pollard
on SHAMESHAME TOP 25 Part II

November 1st 2009 11:09
I entirely agree that coming out and living your life openly is the single most powerful thing any of can do for yourself and the rest of the community, and it's great that you live that way.
And for most of us, that's all that's necessary. But I think that for as long as we are still treated legally and socially as second-class citizens, people who have a public position have an obligation to use that to help change that situation.
And, for the record, I haven't 'made a career out of being gay'.
I spent a few short years after uni in gay media, but most of my career was in mainstream advertising, PR and technical and commercial authoring (with a sideline in gay retail), which lasted until 15 years ago when I moved to Australia and effectively retired.
Not because I wanted to, but because it proved impossible to get a worthwhile mainstream job, given my age.
Plus I didn't need to. But I found out I'm not cut out to be just a househusband, so I decided to capitalise on my skills and experience and do something useful, and got involved in gay media again, volunteering at Joy, and briefly editing Melbourne Star.
All my current work at Joy and the RJM Trust is voluntary. Only the column is paid work. That's hardly what I would call 'a career'!

Comment by Doug Pollard
on What a show - Sunday Night Extravaganza!

October 30th 2009 06:35
UPDATE

Thanks to everyone who turned out - we had a great night and raised over $1100 for Joy.

A very special thanks to all the artists who performed for free, including four who flew interstate at their own expense.

Doug

Comment by Doug Pollard
on A Whole of Government Initiative

August 23rd 2009 21:17
Altogether now "We are one, but we are many..." Yes, we are all Australian, but we are all also members of minorities - it all depends on how you look at it.
But you can't run with the hare and hunt with the hounds. I'm all for everyone being viewed as same-same but different, but the govt. has adopted this Social Inclusion concept.
The concept of social inclusion views society as consisting of one dominant majority/mainstream with a number of other groups detached or semi-detached from it.
It was originally devised as a way of describing and dealing with second and third generation disaffected French youths of North African origin who were on the one hand constantly told 'you are French, not Algerian', while at the same time being discriminated against for being 'not really French', i.e., non-white.
A bit like the joke about the boy of Vietnamese ancestry in Glen Waverley being told to 'go back where you came from', answering, 'but I don't like Frankston.'
Since then, as Wikipedia points out, Social Inclusion is like Humpty Dumpty language in 'Alice' - it means pretty much whatever the person using wants it to mean.
This government has adopted social inclusion as an overarching narrative binding together all its activities, it says, so we have to engage them on that ground. Their choice, not mine.
Their particular meaning of the term is not immediately clear - the field suffers from an excess of flowery jargon, perhaps reflecting its French origins, more likely the usual bureaucratic act of making it sound as though a lot is actually being done when in fact there is little, the kind of dead language that conceals rather than communicates - but I have been offered a rather cynical alternative view by a jaded Labor insider, who didn't want to be identified. It went something like this:
"Doug mate, if you think you poofter boys are going to get a sniff of SI, you can think again. SI is about tipping money to the god boys, buying them back from the oppo, keeping them on the team. So we can't let you lot in or the blokes in the red frocks'll run screaming back to the Libs. Doesn't hurt that it buys a lot of feel good, help the downtrodden stuff, on the cheap - all those volunteers, eh?"
I think there is at least an element of truth in this, though probably overstated.
The trouble with adopting the 'we are one, I'm not in a minority' attitude is that people who ARE excluded and do have specific needs related to their gender, sexuality etc., just disappear.
E.g., if we don't appear in the census, in the stats, then government does not see a problem and does not take action.
For example, from another arena entirely: because a lot of homophobic crime isn't reported, or recorded as such, the stats don't show it as a problem, and police command are reluctant to fund fulltime GLLOs.
BTW I asked GLHV about stats re GLBTIQ homelessness, self-harm etc. (at all ages) and was told, with a sigh, that this is one of those catch-22s, there's lots of good anecdotal evidence but a lack of good empirical data, without which it's impossible to attract funding which could be used to look for that empirical data.
That's the excuse beyondblue have been using to ignore us for so long.
If you want to post links to appropriate material online, please go ahead - love to see it.

Comment by Doug Pollard
on You Can't Always Get What You Want

August 16th 2009 07:55
1) This IS humour -sorry if that wasn't clear
2) They're not 'my' Greens, or 'my' AME, my 'Equal Love, 'my' ACE or 'my' anyone
3) The suggestion re the great hall of parliament is serious although presented lightly - and Rainbow Labor ought to be the lead organisers
4) If you all want to know what everyone else is doing, ask them, not me
5) If you want to pull everyone together, feel free, no-one's stopping you
6) The goal is not, and has never been, marriage per se. It is equality. If you know a way to achieve that equality in fact, symbol and social status without including marriage, I'd love to hear it, but I don't believe it can be done
7) I agree that marriage is a roadblock: therefore we should all put aside our misgivings and doubts about marriage, get that done, and then look at a more comprehensive overhaul of relationship recognition for all. It cannot be done the other way round. The recognition that same-sex couples are equals to married couples must be acknowledged and enacted first.. The momentum is there.
8) I am, and will remain, non-aligned to any group. I'm an independent writer and will remain so.

Comment by Doug Pollard
on We're so grateful - not!

August 4th 2009 19:34
Cath Pope will be on Kim and David (Ch 10) on Thursday participating in a debate on same sex marraige agaisnt Lyle Shelton, National Chief of staff from the Australian Christian Lobby.

Comment by Doug Pollard
on We're so grateful - not!

August 4th 2009 06:38
To a little hyperbole, I plead guilty - his exact words are quoted at the beginning on the piece.
But it still sticks in my craw that these people should be thanked in any way shape or form.
Down the years, all the while they were - and this is not hyperbole - persecuting us, we were doctoring and nursing them,entertaining and sustaining them, even marrying, christening and burying them, despite their appalling behaviour towards us.
That's a damn sight more 'Christian' than any of this bunch will ever be.

Comment by Doug Pollard
on Is homosexuality a choice?

July 17th 2009 04:40
Alex, Samantha and other Christians. I know the bible always come up in these discussions. My point is, it shouldn't. We don't live in a Christian country (whether in the US or in Oz) we live in a multifaith, multicultural and I suppose one might argue, post-Christian country.
As such the Bible (Koran, or any other idolised book) may have had relevance historically, but can have none going forward.
Faith and politics are two separate spheres and should not be mixed. It's like everyone in North Korea having to be Communist - the fact of the matter is that no matter how much pressure is applied, not everyone is, and to force them to behave as if they were is a dictatorship of unreason.
I have no objection to you applying Christian (Koranic etc. according to faith ) principles to your own lives, but you have no right whatsoever to advocate for the imposition of your faiths laws on anyone of another faith or none.