Nolan vs Bruckheimer
July 19th 2010 05:31
Watching Pirates 1, after seeing Inception…so interesting. I still am loving every minute of Pirates, but recognizing the moments that, as an audience member, I over looked. The superfluous stunt men being thrown over balconies. It’s fine, because it worked for this film. But there’s not the artistry that Nolan has in his films. Nolan really gets every aspect. Story, production, talent…Bruckheimer gets a little bit of each element, but at the end of the day thinks that more bang will bring more buck. And will add bang, for the sake of buck. Nolan, has bang, and lots of it…but it all serves the story. Sometimes it’s a bit over the top, but it’s an artistic over the top, not a…the-producer-wants-another- explosion type of over the top. It’s like…a writer going overboard.
Bruckheimer got some amazing actors, who gave amazing performances (Depp, Rush)…but likewise, had some lackluster actors who were fine, because they really didn’t require much. And the movie didn’t suffer, because they were a body (Bloom, Knightley). It’s just an interesting comparison. Nolan gets real actor actors, and a great combination of amazing film actors (who are really theatre actors at heart – DiCaprio, Jackman, Bale, I could go on and on) and really good film actors – not “movie stars[ Click here to read more ]
Bruckheimer got some amazing actors, who gave amazing performances (Depp, Rush)…but likewise, had some lackluster actors who were fine, because they really didn’t require much. And the movie didn’t suffer, because they were a body (Bloom, Knightley). It’s just an interesting comparison. Nolan gets real actor actors, and a great combination of amazing film actors (who are really theatre actors at heart – DiCaprio, Jackman, Bale, I could go on and on) and really good film actors – not “movie stars
| 106 |
| Vote |


Read More
Add Comments
Comments (1)


