Both to be fair are supported by faith,

Fossils that have been dated using this method have been shown to have one age for the bones and one age for the skin of the animal.

carbon 14 dating on recently killed animals will give result of up tens of thousands of years old.

Biologists define evolution as a change in the gene pool of a population over time.

The origin of new species by evolution has also been observed, both in the laboratory and in the wild.

See, for example, (Weinberg, J.R., V.R. Starczak, and D. Jorg, 1992, "Evidence for rapid speciation following a founder event in the laboratory." Evolution 46: 1214-1220).

The worldwide scientific research community from over the past 140 years has discovered that no known hypothesis other than universal common descent can account scientifically for the unity, diversity, and patterns of terrestrial life.

This hypothesis has been verified and corroborated so extensively that it is currently accepted as fact by the overwhelming majority of professional researchers in the biological and geological sciences.

As of January, 1999, The oldest rocks found on earth are 4.031 ± 0.003 billion years old (meaning it has been that long since the molten rocks solidified and thus reset their internal clocks). This is reported in the paper Priscoan (4.00-4.03 Ga) orthogneisses from northwestern Canada by Samuel A. Bowring & Ian S. Williams; Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 134(1): 3-16, January 1999. The previous record was 3.96 billion years, set in 1989.

The putative age of the Earth, about 4,500,000,000 years is based on the radiometrically measured age of meteorites

The springs, from which the snails came, were fed by carbonate aquifers. As this water percolated through the enclosing carbonates, it dissolved limestone and dolomite hundreds of millions of years old. The dissolution of limestone and dolomite introduced considerable quantities of "dead carbon" into the groundwater.

The reservoir effect is well known by scientists, who work hard to understand the limitations of their tools. It is explained, for example, in Faure (1986) and Higham (n.d.). Contrary to creationist propaganda, limitations of a tool do not invalidate the tool.

“We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully ‘designed’ to have come into existance by chance. How, then, did they come into existance? The answer, Darwin’s answer, is by gradual, step-by-step transformation from simple beginnings, from primordial entities sufficiently simple to have come into existence by chance.”

In science "fact" can only mean "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional consent."

The statement that organisms have descended with modifications from common ancestors--the historical reality of evolution--is not a theory. It is a fact, as fully as the fact of the earth's revolution about the sun. Like the heliocentric solar system, evolution began as a hypothesis, and achieved "facthood" as the evidence in its favor became so strong that no knowledgeable and unbiased person could deny its reality. No biologist today would think of submitting a paper entitled "New evidence for evolution;" it simply has not been an issue for a century.

Please cite one reference where a person, doesn't need to be a scientist, has observed one kind of animal evolving into a different kind of animal. It's not there it requires faith. the faith that the best guess of scientist got it right.

scientists have observed evolution in animals with much shorter life cycles than our own (mostly insects), there is a huge amount of literature on speciation in Fruit Flies, House Flies, Apple Maggot Flies, Gall Former Flies, Worms, and Flour Beetles