Claude Stelco

AUSTRALIA


Joined April 21st 2008

Number of Posts:
5

Number of Comments:
0

Karma:
6



Blogs

Claude Stelco's Blogs

283 Vote(s)
2 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
128 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
2 Post(s)

I mentor these bloggers

Learn more about the Orble Mentoring Program.


I do not mentor any bloggers.

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

I wasn’t sure how my emotions would work during the tribute match last night but, I have to say, the heart was pumping on a number of occasions through-out. I found myself urging Fevola to take a pack mark, barracking for Adam Goodes to bust through stoppages, and cheering when Boomer Harvey kicked the sealer late in the fourth.

I really enjoyed the introduction of the players as they ran out onto the field. It gave an air of grandeur and set the atmosphere perfectly. It also gave the viewer a chance to assess the selections of the players, and I felt there were certainly a couple of question marks concerning the Victorian inclusions of Scott Pendlebury and Nathan Foley. Happy to say, Foley was a revelation – I know he’s produced some outstanding plays in home and away games but to see him do it against the best of the best was exciting to watch.
You couldn’t really argue with the Dream Team selections although I didn’t think Cam Mooney’s form this year had been anything to write home about, and he was comprehensively beaten by his Cats team mate, Matthew Scarlett.
However, I think I can safely state that the worst performer on the ground was Jarrod Waite. He’s got all the physical attributes of a top-liner, but had his pants pulled down by his Dream Team opponents. I’d equate his performance to an immature 3-year-old thoroughbred stepping up to Group 1 company for the first time and being beaten 12 lengths. Perhaps he’ll be better coming back next year in the Spring, after a spell in the paddock. I should mention, Ben Rutten wasn’t far behind in worst-on-ground votes.
Another disappointing display came from Geelong’s Joel Selwood. Although I firmly believe he deserved to be wearing the Big V, he let himself down with a couple of poor disposals. And in a game highlighted by supreme skills, mistakes stood out like a sore thumb.

On the flip-side, it has to be said that Buddy Franklin looks set to become the best player in the game since sliced bread……or Wayne Carey. He wasn’t at his flamboyant best last night, but still managed nine scoring shots, kicking 4.5. If he kicks 7.2 the Dream Team wins. And that’s his value. One of the few in footy who are legitimate game winners for their team. Without him, Hawthorn would not be considered serious contenders to Geelong’s throne.

Other notable Dream Team performances came from Peter Burgoyne, who racked up possessions like they were going out of style, and a surprise cameo from Collingwood’s Leon Davis who kicked three important goals.

From the Victorian side, Scarlett stood up and stood out. He beat any opponent he went to, and then broke the lines running through the centre corridor to set up fruitful forays forward (now that’s a tongue-twister!). Chris Judd was Judd-like, and the rucks, Simmonds and Fraser, performed admirably against Cox. But the player voted best on ground, and deserved Allen Aylett medalist, was Brendan Fevola. He took contested marks, chased hard, and claimed a tally of 6 goals 2 points. He showed genuine endeavour, passion, and excitement, and few would argue with the decision of awarding him B.O.G. I’m sure Rutten and Bok wouldn’t have argued.

I understand that the logistics of making Dream Team/State games an annual event is difficult but I would love to see match-ups like this at least every four years. As evidence from last night, a substantial break would build the anticipation and the public’s excitement (as it does for the Olympics and the Soccer World Cup), and the players would be instilled with ambition and desire to be a part of it.

But there are always the inevitable arguments over injuries. The fact of the matter is, injuries can occur at any time – during the regular season, pre-season, or off-season. Just ask Josh Gibson from North Melbourne. He hurt his brain taking a leak! I’ve heard some doosies in my time, but that takes the cake. I guess that doesn’t ease the pain for Collingwood fans that, if early reports are accurate, could be missing Josh Fraser anywhere from four to ten weeks.

Nevertheless, State games should be held in as high esteem as you see in Rugby League. That they are not is a travesty.

And so it is, that last night’s game has inspired me to create the following Top 20 List of Players I Most Like To Watch: (comments/criticism welcome)
1. Lance ‘Buddy’ Franklin
2. Chris Judd
3. Nick Riewoldt
4. Matthew Scarlett
5. Chad Cornes
6. Ryan Griffen
7. Luke Hodge
8. Brendan Fevola
9. Nathan Foley
10. Matthew Richardson
11. Joel Selwood
12. Max Hudgton
13. Robert Harvey
14. Dean Cox
15. Aaron Sandilands
16. Leon Davis
17. Brad Johnson
18. Steve Johnson
19. Cyril Rioli
20. Austin Wonaeamirri (after his action-packed performance to bring the Demons back from the brink of disaster, and I am a Melbourne supporter after all. Ssshhhh, don’t tell anyone!).
79
Vote
   


Kevin Barlett, the Damage Controller

April 28th 2008 02:18
In all sports around the world umpires and referees regularly implement common sense into their officiating. And I have never seen, or heard of, an official being castigated, lynched or “burnt at the stake” for doing so. In fact, more often than not, officials are appreciated and applauded by the majority when a fair and just outcome is decided.

Commentators like Kevin Bartlett preach that “we” should want games to be umpired to the letter of the law. But just because something is law, doesn’t make it right. For instance, there are many laws that govern our country which could easily be argued to be vastly out of synch of being fair and just. Unfortunately, too many instances are reported whereby abhorrent criminals are given soft sentences. And when there is strong community outcry, then the community would hope that the law-makers are making an effort to correct the balance of justice.
A case in point is speeding offences. Motorists are given a 3km lee-way to the speed limit. So if you are caught doing 52km in a 50km zone, you will not be fined. I think we can all agree that if you were fined for doing 1km over the speed, it would not be seen as being a fair and just punishment. A warning would suffice.

So in sport, situations consistently arise in that a rule or law has been broken but the umpire decides to use common sense, and only warn the player rather than penalize them. You’ll hear umpires say things like “don’t do that again or you’ll give away a free”, “That’s silly, next time I’ll pay a free” etc. etc.

Kevin Bartlett argues that the same rules should apply all over the ground. In actual fact, rules within football already set a precedent for not “being the same”. Just have a look at how drawn games are tackled. Within the regular season, a drawn game is the end of the game and points are shared. During the finals, if the scores are level at full-time then extra time is played. And a drawn Grand Final is replayed! And the rule related to kicks from marks is another example of “not being the same” around the ground. If a player marks within distance the umpire considers being a reasonable goal-kicking opportunity then he allows that player more time to kick than if that same player were to mark the ball around the ground. And let’s talk about standing the mark. In majority of play, the spot the ball is marked is the spot the opposing player can stand. However, if a player is kicking on the boundary, near the fence, the umpire calls for the player on the mark to move back from the actual marked spot. The final example I will make is the “play on” call. Within the boundary lines, if the umpire calls “play on” then the player with the ball becomes immediately “active” can be tackled. However, if that same player is taking his kick from outside the boundary line and the umpire calls “play on” he does not become immediately “active” because then it would obviously be considered out of bounds and thrown in.

Now let’s talk about the logic behind the “hands in the back” rule, the reasoning why the rule was brought in, and ask why something similar isn’t applied to over-exuberant taggers.
Rule-makers argue that the “hands in the back” rule is vital because players should be allowed to make a marking attempt without being unfairly impeded. Opposing players attempting to stop their opponent from marking should do so legitimately, in an effort to spoil the ball. To put it simply, go for the ball, not the man. Don’t touch his back, don’t touch his arms, don’t put your hand on his shoulder, and don’t tunnel. DON”T!

Using that logic – go the ball, not the man – why are taggers not treated with the same distain? Coaches appoint taggers with specific roles to impede a gun player from being able to play his natural game. Taggers regularly ignore the ball and concentrate on the man. Taggers scrag, elbow, push, block, hold, bump without being penalized. In fact, on many occasions the player being tagged is penalized because, out of frustration, he retaliates. Further restrictions need to be imposed on taggers, not just because it impedes a player but, more importantly, it denies the viewing public of seeing great players doing great things on the field. It denies us the excitement factor for which we pay good money to see.

So now we get to the current hot topic of the moment: Ray Chamberlain paying a free kick against Carlton’s Jarrod Waite for “time wasting” and thus gifting Adelaide a goal. Mr. Bartlett argues that umpires should not employ common sense - they should officiate to the letter of the law. And, in this case, that’s exactly what Ray did. The ball was in flight, over the line for a goal, when Jarrod Waite punched the ball away. Rather than warn the player, the umpire chose to follow the letter of the law. Commentators weren’t quite sure what was going on, and the crowd certainly had no idea. Only after a replay of the incident did Kevin Bartlett realize what had occurred, and then went into his usual damage control mode of defending the decision and the rule. But would Kevin have been so passionate to denounce the umpire if he had NOT penalized the player for time wasting? I doubt it. In fact, put it in the bank that he would not have ushered a whisper.
If this happened in a grand final and was directly responsible for a team losing, there would be uproar. No doubt about that, either. Kevin would be feeling like a very lonely man.

And such ridiculous imbalances – that the punishment does not fit the crime - is the reason why laws and rules need to evolve, alter, change; to be corrected appropriately so that they are within the boundaries of being “fair and just”.

Those who defend decisions because “it is law” only serve to make the problem worse. When a rule is blatantly wrong, obviously unfair, then rule makers should work towards improving the rules. Kevin Bartlett, that is all we ask.
What most of us want is for the laws of the game to be governed with diligence as well as common sense.
It’s not rocket surgery.

112
Vote
   


Apache Cat Carves Up Track and Field

April 27th 2008 05:43
Apache Cat has earned himself the title of the People’s Horse in recent times, and on Saturday in the Group 1 TJ Smith Stakes over 1200m at Randwick, he proved why.

The most recognizable horse in Australia was one of a small field of eight, but included real quality opponents like international super star Takeover Target, John O’shea’s Reigning To Win, and the always-consistent Magnus.

Apache Cat went out the short-priced favourite but in fields like this, there’s never such thing as a sure thing – especially with the track being rated Heavy, and coming up against horses who have proven themselves on the track in similar conditions.

Takeover Target jumped brilliantly and led, before Magnus quickly pushed up on the inside. These two led to the turn, with Apache Cat and Reigning to Win close up behind, and near enough if good enough.

As they rounded the right-hand turn, Takeover took over and kicked away by a couple of lengths. Apache Cat quickly passed Magnus with Reigning To Win in hot pursuit.
At the top of the straight, Takeover Target looked in control and Apache Cat appeared to be struggling in the heavy ground. In fact, all four front-runners, for a few seconds, seemed to labour in the mud and not really make any ground on each other. But once Corey Brown got Apache Cat balanced, he kicked into full throttle and bounded up and away to win by 2-3/4 lengths from Reigning To Win who just nosed Takeover on the line. Magnus finished fourth.

The baldy-faced chestnut had just given trainer Greg Eurell a third Group One victory in a row. And more Group success looms as the five-year-old will now head to Brisbane to run in the BTC Cup in a fortnight and the Doomben 10,000 a fortnight after that.

Can’t wait.

In my humble opinion, Apache Cat and Weekend Hussler, are the most exciting draw cards in racing. We’ve seen what they can produce at their best, and it’s always nail-baiting during the run waiting, hoping that they can do it again. Bring on Brisbane for Apache cat. Bring on Melbourne’s spring for Weekend Hussler.

Can’t wait.
69
Vote
   


Freo Fail, Champion Cats Continue

April 27th 2008 05:03
In the lead-up, no one gave Fremantle a sniff against the Cats. The bookies were having none, and the experts were already talking about Geelong’s opponents next week, and could they go the whole season undefeated? All in sundry blatantly dismissive of any possible challenge from the desperately disappointing Dockers.
With 10 minutes to go until half-time, Fremantle led by 38 points and were completely dominating Geelong. You would have been forgiven for thinking that the Dockers were the reigning premiers and undefeated for the season, and that the Cats were sitting on zero wins, four losses.
Fremantle were winning in every department; Sandilands fed the ball out from almost every ruck contest, and the midfielders battled to win majority of clearances. The Dockers showed clean hands and supremely accurate disposals, while Geelong appeared well off their game as they consistently fumbled and missed targets with kicks and hand balls


[ Click here to read more ]
74
Vote
   


Getting Hussled...And Loving It.

April 21st 2008 14:01
Weekend Hussler. What a name. What a horse. What a win. On Saturday, the 3-year-old gelding blitzed the field in the 1500m Group 1 George Ryder Stakes at Rosehill.
The so-called experts had been in a quandry. Apparently, there were reasons to doubt. It was his first go at weight-for-age, going the Sydney way, on wet ground, against older, seasoned, proven competition. It seemed clear to the experts that Racing To Win would do the business. But no one told the trainer, Ross Mcdonald. And no one told the jockey, Brad Rawiller. Most importantly, no one told Weekend Hussler.
He jumped well, and then sat comfortably just off the speed. As they neared the turn, it seemed that the Hussler lost a bit of ground but as they rounded the turn, he rounded them up. He went past the two leaders without too much fuss, and kicked on. Racing To Win followed. The only question remained - coudl this young upstart hang on against a proven champion? Like the horse himself, the answer came quickly. Very quickly


[ Click here to read more ]
47
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

I've not commented on anything yet :(