Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Review--The Spirit

January 6th 2009 17:06


This movie, based on the comic book of the same name by Will Eisner, is a bizarre and ludicrous real-time crash course through the comic, which was already very strange in the first place.

Directed by Frank Miller and featuring a well-known cast, I went into this movie expecting another blood-drenched, testosterone-dripping gorefest like 300, but as usual, the trailers and TV spots had misled me. There wasn't a whole lot of blood--though there was a lot of (rather comical) punching and shooting.


Instead of the serious action/drama advertised on TV, this movie was really a silly and playful comic book adaptation. I thought the cinematography was quite unique; it really looked like a comic book come to life. The dark, sepia colors reminded me of old noir films. I really appreciated the innovativeness of the use of colors and camera angles.

Even though I'd never read the comics, I could tell that this was an attempt to replicate the comic and its nuances on film, rather than attempting to make a completely new version for the big screen. I think they did a good job in this aspect--I just wish they'd picked a less bizarre and surreal comic series to replicate.

I felt left out of the loop throughout most of the movie. Since I hadn't read the comics, I had no idea why certain characters were named like they were, and a lot of the background information was muddled; what little information I did receive came from flashbacks in monologue style from The Spirit himself. This was one aspect that I did not appreciate: in movies especially, the literary concept of "show, don't tell" is extremely important. All this telling of backstory started to bore me a little.


I'm not going to claim that this was a good movie or a bad movie: it depends on your perspective. I found it enjoyable, laughing at its silly dialogue and unrealistic combat and marveling at its daring filming style. Knowing it was based on a comic book, and a fairly obscure one at that, I didn't go in expecting a top-rate drama or action flick. I thought of what this film was trying to accomplish, and I thought that its mission was achieved.

However, if the producers didn't intend for the movie to be silly and bizarre, then something obviously went terribly wrong. If they did intend these things, then kudos to them. I would have understood more if I'd read the comics, but if the movie was faithful to the source material, then perhaps I would never want to read the comics, anyway. The characters are bizarre, their dialogue is silly and unrealistic, and the whole premise is kind of tired and confused. A fun little flick to watch once just for the sake of making fun of it, but in the end it's easily forgettable.

Cinemuscle score: 2.5/5
23
Vote
   


What this is (will be) all about

January 2nd 2009 18:49
In this blog I'll be looking at/reviewing/critiquing/ranti ng about movies that I deem to be "good." My definition of a good movie is one with muscle...and that includes the brain. I'm not going to talk about any one specific film genre, though a lot of the movies I'll be talking about will be ones that never garnered much attention or praise; not because they were/are bad, but just because they were so small or obscure that no one really knew about them or cared about them.

What is a good movie with muscle? Well, to me, they are movies in which no shot or camera angle is done "just because." Every moment is dense with purpose, and the plotlines are fresh and original, or they take a cliche or generic plot and go at it from a different (and convincing) angle. Excellently written and acted characters with their own idiosyncrasies that separate them from the cardboard character pile that Hollywood movies so often recycle and chew up because they know as long as they put some cool explosions or spicy sex scenes in their movies that the public will eat them up. Insightful use of audio and music to complement the action on screen. Skilled use of images, symbols, and colors to add subtle dramatic power to the film. Fearless questioning of the vicissitudes of life, and the willingness to accept the fact that not all questions have definite answers, or any answers. Invitations to the viewer to experience the film's themes and become a part of the lives of its characters. Any action or special effects or sex all add something to the plot or are directly related to the message of the movie; no sex just because the actors are attractive, and no explosions just to make people go "ooh" and "aah."

Once a week I will look at a movie like this, whether it's fantasy, comedy, horror, or one of those "undefinable" films. I'll start next week with my anatomy of the sinews and tendons of cinemuscle. Until then, live well and enjoy your movies.
23
Vote
   


More Posts
2 Posts
2 Posts dating from January 2009
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Andrew Kerstetter's Blogs

2128 Vote(s)
9 Comment(s)
40 Post(s)
791 Vote(s)
14 Comment(s)
21 Post(s)
Moderated by Andrew Kerstetter
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]