Recent Posts
Sometimes I wonder why we go and see horror movies. People often say that art is an escapist medium. Although the people who say this may not necessarily be artists themselves or even people who can lose themselves in appreciation of art, there is some truth to it. So what is it we are escaping from when we see horror movies? Maybe we are trying to see if there is something even more frightening than real life. Than reality itself. For what can be more frightening and horror inducing than the monotonous humdrum of daily life. Of routine. Of familiarity.
Yesterday I saw the movie 'Revolutionary Road'. And it scared me at more levels than I care to admit. For there was nothing make-believe in it at all. It was all very real. More than real. I could make deep connections with the theme of the movie and my personal life. And as many of you know, it is those kinds of art that appeal to you most - the ones that make a personal connection.
It is hard to judge as to who did better. Director Sam Mendes or the ever-vibrant Lenoardo DiCaprio or the almost ageless beauty Kate Winslet. Probably the highest praise I can offer to the movie is that I saw it as a vignette, a slice of real life. And the possibilities it broached were very real. So real that I fear that may come to pass.
The movie concerns itself with a young couple (with 2 young kids) who think that they are wonderful people, a bit better than the average individuals they see around them. But in reality they have the same job, the same privileges, the same small but neat home and the same week long struggle in a job that does not appeal to them. This is more true for the man in the movie - Leonardo. Kate Winslet strikes upon an idea to change things. To move to Europe - to Paris - where she would get a secretarial job and Lenoardo would get time to think about where really his passion lay and what he wanted to do with himself and his time. What happens after both of them agree to this plan is the movie.
On the face of it, there is nothing special about the theme. But so is real life. There is nothing special about it. I think this is where the director has outdone himself. In taking a commonplace subject and making it even more commonplace. So much so that viewers identify themselves in the movie stars, see them enacting scenes that they have experienced at home. In a word, it was a visceral experience. If I were to sum up the movie in a sentence - it portrays the epic struggle between romance and practicality at the micro level, with respect to a single couple, deeply in love with each other and their own ideals or what they believe as an ideal.
A must watch movie even if you are not a fan of slow moving romance movies. This will make my all time Top 10 movies. Dont ask me what the other movies are. I am still finding out. 
It was a lazy Thursday afternoon in Chennai and I was parked a few yards in front of Park Sheraton in Alwarpet - waiting. The late afternoon was lazy for me if not for the bustling Chennai crowd which was busy getting wherever it gets to amidst all the indescribably messy traffic. I had cut out a chunk of time to experience a Tube amplifier at Rajiv's place. In this I was not alone. Ramanujam who had dropped in here from Mumbai on a short visit also was joining me for an independent assessment of the Lyrita amplifier at Rajiv's place. He was also joined by his brother, Nikesh - a keen Carnatic music rasika.
Efforts towards this meeting were on much earlier in the week - with many quick PMs exchanged between Ramanujam, Rajiv and myself. The plan was to be at Rajiv's place around 4:30 pm and this was accomplished - more or less.
Before I get onto the listening experience as such, a word about the objectives of the members visiting Rajiv's place. I was looking forward to getting my first taste of a tube amplifier - being used only to solid state amplifiers till then. My listening material for the most part is vocal based. Carnatic music, Jazz, Blues mixed with the occassional Rock/Pop hit and the usual smidgen of film music is the full range. My objective was to check and verify if Lyrita's valve amplifier could give me a better musical experience than my present NAD C372. With an aim to cut out as many variables as possible, I had decided on taking my PC - which I was using as the source - along with my speakers (EPOS M12.2). So, effectively the only equipment that I should hear different from my NAD amp would be the tube amplifier. Along with the changed listening environment, of course.
From speaking with Ramanujam and with his brother Nikesh, it appeared that we shared quite a bit of common musical interest. Ramanujam had already listened to the Lyrita amps at Viren Bakshi's place in Delhi. His objective insofar as I understand was to check the range of the tube amplifier system in terms of driving different speaker loads. To that end, it worked out well with me bringing my EPOS speakers to the party. With its low sensitivity (87 db/w) it would be the perfect test for the valve amplifiers in terms of being a difficult load. Such was our thought.
As luck would have it we could not have had a better host than Rajiv. A very warm and thoughtful man - he offered us refreshments and juice before our main course. Main course being the music of course. Rajiv is a big-time analog man. Tubes and LP's are his world. Not surprising considering a look around his home would get you glimpses of vintage speaker drivers, Luxman amplifiers even a Quad valve amp - which was his pride and joy. Although we did not listen to the Quad amp that day, Rajiv did mention that we could try listening to that amp maybe next week. And I for one sure do look forward to that!
Before the review proper, a word or two on how it is going to be structured. Many a time, listening to an audio setup it is not those carefully thought-out phrases that appear on your mind. Most of the time there are those one word expressions or single liners which the system and very rarely the music itself coaxes out of you. I think it is important to look at those expressions engendered in you by the system and look deeper to see what gave cause to them. Such would be the approach that would be attempted herein.
Rajiv's Audio setup:
Custom made, Altec Lansing driver based speakers with horn loaded tweeters,
Analog Turntable (will update with brand name)
Philips DVD player (used very occasionally)
Lyrita 2A3 valve amplifier (3.5 watts)
Lyrita matching phono stage
A pair of 45 tubes to mix and match (2 watts)
The listening environment was a 10X10 bedroom with minimal furniture and with the seating at around 7 feet from the speakers. The gap between the speakers on the X axis was about 4.5 to 5 feet. The EPOS speakers (when they were used) were slightly toed in towards the listener.
Rajiv had the 45 tubes on to start with as he preferred this tube over the 2A3 despite the drop in power. We started the audition off with a couple of Neil Diamond numbers as he happens to be Ramanujam's favourite artist. What we listened in those first few minutes was wholly analog. We listened to the LP fed via the phono stage to the imposing custom made speakers. Not being very familiar with Neil Diamond songs, I was not able to come to any conclusion. But I certainly enjoyed what I heard. Ramanujam appeared to be relishing the fare on offer. Still on analog we moved on to Dave Brubeck's classic - Take Five. In this case, the LP was older and there was the odd crack and pop sound and I was not too convinced with the detailing in the reproduction. However all of the music somehow sounded mellow and warm. Is it at the cost of detail? I will have to say yes. There was also not that ultimate bite in the saxophone and the ripe sounds produced at the ending notes or in a flourish piece were also not being reproduced with attack. Considering that Rajiv's custom made speakers are specified at 50 W for the low frequency, I thought they did a good job of reproducing the kick drums. The ultimate bit of impact was sacrificed for timing. But I could definitely live with what they had on offer.
Having had my first taste of analog I was eager to sample my 'digital' fare on offer. Rajiv was extremely kind to offer his Lenovo monitor to use with my PC and we hooked it all up quite quickly. Cooperation from Ramanunjam and his brother Nikesh, in this regard, must be made a specific mention of. We also unpacked the EPOS M12.2 speakers and hooked the whole system together. We fired the PC up and got the party truly going in impressive time!
All Lossless and FLAC files mentioned hitherto were played on cPLay (a software audio player) and the occasional MP3 (320Kbps rip) was played using Foobar with the Sox resampler. Almost all music was played right off the PC hard disc with only one or two numbers being played from the DVD drive.
The first voice to ring out of the system was Unni Krishnan's. His 'Nee Irangaayenil' rang out true and clear from the EPOS speakers. For a moment I think all of us were flabbergasted and I am sure all of us threw a glance at the volume knob. And yes, the knob was just between the 9 and 10 O' clock position. Remember the tubes we were using were the 2 Watt 45 and not even the 3.5 watt 2A3! To everybody believing that these valve powered systems cannot power conventional speakers I have a happy surprise coming. These valves are perfectly capable of driving even conventional speakers to decent levels provided your listening area is not huge. Granted - the kind of music we listened to was mostly vocal and instrumental and we never ever got near 90 db listening levels leave alone head-banging ones. But then according to most sources, the valve amplifiers may not be the perfect solution for such music anyway. Time for our first one liner.
There was an 'immediacy of voice' which made the music sound lifelike and therefore near at hand.
I dont know if my limited experience of just listening to my first valve amplifier empowers me with the ability to do a blanket comparison between solid state and tubes. But my mind insists on doing so. In a mental A/B comparison, I believe that I heard more body in the voice through the valve than through my NAD. In that, I can sense that a flesh and blood person rather than a recording as the source. I have experienced such a feeling when I have moved up the solid state ladder as well. But not to this degree.
Anuradha Sairam's 'Theertha Vittala' - an Abhang rendition was supreme and overpowering in its emotional quantum. Ms. Sairam's is a strident voice which can quickly become piercing on bright systems. On the valve amplifier there was not a hint of shrillness or brightness. There was just music. And emotion. Lots of it. And music is nothing if not emotion.
The music that we heard was plainly more emotionally involving than on my solid state amplifier
Now for this I dont have a ready explanation. Save for again mentioning that the whole musical experience was euphonic. There were no harsh edges whatsoever. When there was a peak in the music you rose with it and then you plunged into the valleys and in general wallowed in music - rather than the equipment per se. For the keen audiophiles there is also a downside to it which I will come to.
After a couple of songs on the 45 tubes - which frankly nobody here gave any chance to play music through my low sensitivity EPOS speakers - I requested Rajiv to switch over to the 2A3 ones. He did mention that while those tubes added more power to the setup, he valued the 45 more for its detail and its sound characteristic.
With the 2A3 on, music was truly enveloping. From Balamuralikrishna to Dave Brubeck, all of it had more presence and lushness. Also there was a bit of extra sibilance that I heard - especially in Aruna Sairam's voice - with the 45's which was not there with the 2A3's. However it was not all positives. The 2A3 I felt did not have it in them to get that last iota of detail from the music as the 45's did. Let it be mentioned that even the 45s were not as detailed as the NAD in comparison.
With the valves music was more around you. The word 'lush' just pops into your mind almost immediately.
Now this I have thought about in depth, after the fact. The very fact that the music was more enveloping had something to say about the soundstaging and imaging capabilities that audiophiles are so much after. Yours truly not exempted! To sum it up, you could no longer have the luxury of a stage sitting before you and pinpoint performers. The tabla on the left and the tampura behind or the saxophone a few feet behind the microphone and so on. On the face of it this appears to be a limitation. But pray do consider - as I did - whether there is any limitation this imposes in our enjoyment of the music itself. For my ears, this actually helped in forgetting the equipment and joining hands (or ears as it may) with the music.
I like speakers which disappear. How nice then, to have the system disappear and to have been replaced by the performers themselves!
We moved on from there to a few extremely well recorded Charsur recordings. Notable being 'Maaya the Colour of Rain' featuring Sikkil Gurucharan and Anil Srinivasan - a Carnatic fusion album which is truly a treat to the ears. With the song 'Poonguyil Koovum' there was this acoustic quality to Gurucharan's voice which still sticks to the mind. Some skilful piano work from Srinivasan is also the highlight of this album.
O.S.Arun's Divine Classicals is an album I often use to check an audio system's reproduction of a male voice - bordering on being gruff, yet pleasing on the ear. It is not quite a baritone either. One has to listen to this artist to make sense of this description, I am afraid. The aforementioned acoustic quality imparted to the voice was a feature here as well. An observation follows.
Human voice takes on a beauty of its own. High pitches are not shrill as with reproduced music but is natural and hence mellower. There is a hard to describe acoustic quality as well to the human voice.
It took me a little bit of time to narrow down on this hard to describe phenomenon being observed with the human voice through the tubes. What it was was that the voices sounded more live. If the artist were to setup a microphone and sing for us in that room, that is how it would probably have sounded. With the echoes in the room and all. In audio as in life, somehow the most appealing presentation is somehow the most genuine one - even if
[BREAK=Lyrita tube amplifier - Page 2]
it be warts and all.
After a deluge of Carnatic vocals we again stepped back into the fold of Jazz with Dave Brubeck in Take 5. This time with the digital source. Most of the observations made earlier generally held good this time as well. The bass was there, but just not tight enough. And the saxophone could use more bite and rasp. And the ripe notes at the end were still missing. Marantz is the one amplifier I have heard shine intuitively with Jazz. Saxophone on the Marantz is an unabashed treat to the ears.
When it comes to Fusion, 'This is Fusion' from Music Today (various artists) is a personal favourite. 'Sea Breeze' by Pandit Chaurasia has a transporting quality - reminding you of windswept beaches and the gentle breaking of waves upon the shore. It was all there with the valve amplifier. Sand particles in our hair was the only thing we were missing after hearing this piece!
'Adbhuth' from the same CD is a blazing fast violin number from the Ganesh Kumaresh brothers which can again get quite strident with bright systems. A difficult to tame piece, in my opinion. The recording too does not help. Here, it has to be said that stringed instruments, the violin in particular did not get more life like than with the valve amplifier. The effort of the artist came through but without the attendant strain upon your ears. Just music. That is all that came out. And that was impressive. Some more on this all-taming quality of the valves to come later.
This same quality was also observed with the outstanding CD where L.Subramaniam combines with Yehudi Menuhin. Haunting melodies which remained haunting through the valves. Lest this be considered a simple feat, I must hasten to assure to the contrary. Violins can easily expose bright systems setup for impressive first listening. A bit of treble excess or any problem with the tweeters and the violins will let you know.
And so on we went merrily totally unmindful of the time - feasting on Rajiv's hospitality. After playing a lot many similar songs, we went onto more practical listening - read film songs.
'Kholo Kholo' from Taare Zameen Par was impressively rendered. The base guitar was again warm and lush with the voice coming out soothingly. However, the bass attacks were lacking. The bass was all there - but it was not tight and harnessed and therefore not impressive. I know that the EPOS does a better job of it with the NAD.
For a bright recording you cannot look past 'Rang De Basanti' from the movie of the same name by Daler Mehndi. The general cacophony of instruments in the song failed to faze our ears - even after all the soothing violins it had been listening to all this while. That is a plus, right? I would be tempted to answer in the affirmative. But then as somebody put it so evocatively, some music is meant to rouse you up and make you pick up a butcher knife and go about running or do some such violent thing (hopefully less so). I do not see this valve based system rousing anybody in that fashion.
As far as bass is concerned, my impressions remain the same. It is all there but it is not tight as I like it to be. There is slight overhang of string as well as percussion bass, which Rajiv mentioned could be changed by using different tube varieties among other things.
Presenting music euphonically I guess is a double edged sword. It makes for long range listening with minimal, if any, ear strain. But then even if you were in the mood for some music which could savage you, you are out of luck. As the system is going to absorb most of the venom and only let its warmth soothe you. What if you dont need soothing at that time? I think that is a question prospective valve amplifier buyers might need to reflect about.
So at the end of it all - was I impressed with the valve amplifer?
Absolutely. It was everything and more than what I had expected. I had definitely not expected even the 1.5 watt 45's to drive my fairly less sensitive speakers to an enjoyable level. For the record we were able to achieve a perfectly decent 88 db listening level with the 2A3 powered valve. The volume knob at this point was at the 11 O' clock position.
Most of all consider this. Four of us with fairly diverse music tastes were able to spend an enjoyable time in one room for four hours. That in itself speaks volumes about the audio system.
What was different about the valves?
That is difficult to say. I guess that is one of the reasons why this review has gone on for quite a bit. The valve amplifiers offer an immediacy of sound and an intimacy which is not there in a solid state amplifier. They do this at the cost of a few things such as detailing and sound staging. The imaging too is not as good as high quality solid state amplifiers. Seen bit by bit like that this may not sound a strength at all. But then maybe we ought not to see these bit by bit. Just as we do not hear music bit by bit. On the whole, with the valves I was able to forget for a period of time about the performers and focus on what they presented as music.
Not that I was not able to do exactly this with my NAD. Just that doing that was easier with the valves. Effortless, to be exact.
Will I go for a valve based system?
Short answer - Yes.
There are a few caveats, as always. At the beginning I had mentioned that apart from the different amplifier I was hearing the only variable factor was the room. And that was no small factor either. This was a smaller room than mine and consequently I understand that it could have been easier for the amps to drive the speakers to our satisfaction. There is still a question as to how it would perform in a slightly larger room. Mine is about 11X14 feet.
Rajiv just uses 2 pairs of tubes - the 2A3's and the 45's. That is because he has, with his wealth of experience, narrowed these down as catering to his taste - which is mostly Western music of the Jazz/Blues kind, from what I understood from our brief meeting. Now to find out which set of tubes would be right down my alley, I think I need to expand my understanding of the whole tube technology and how to personalize the whole system
The whole concept of being able tweak and tinker appeals to the computer-man in me! For those people set in their ways, this need not be a concern. You could just let the system be, and I am sure it will return the favour!
There has hardly been anybody who has failed to say anything but the nicest things about Viren. That is something which is of great importance to me. An understanding dealer willing to listen to what his customers really want and help them get there is worth his weight in gold. I am impressed.
So, in conclusion, a tube amplifier worth around Rs. 30,000 successfully competes with a decent integrated amplifier such as the NAD C372. If this were a boxing match, one would have to say that it was a tie. A close one, but nevertheless a tie. The NAD punched harder. But the Lyrita moved lithely and with greater grace. It caught your eye (or ears) and never let you take them off it. There was an economy to its performance which appealed. Ultimately a few judges would vote this way and a few that. Whether you stand for the ultimate impacting punch or for euphonic presentation, you will have to determine. And it is an easy decision if you clearly lean on either side of the spectrum. Or if you need something of both, like me, then I guess it is time to do some more homework on tubes!
[This review would never have been possible but for Rajiv's hospitality and immense patience in putting up with our intrusion. Hearty thanks also go out to Ramanujam and Nikesh for all their legwork in helping me get the PC and speakers into and out of Rajiv's apartment. You saved me some serious backache. In retrospect thanks also goes to Suprateep in prodding my curiosity with the Miniwatt review as also other esteemed forum members who gently prodded me in the valve direction.A big thanks also to Viren Bakshi for hooking me up with Rajiv to get my first valve listening experience]
Great stories are defined by poignant single moments. The greatest of the monuments depend on simple, individual bricks. As simple and universal as these statements may be, nobody resonates with them quite as much as Roddick probably does right now. What decided this Wimbledon contest? A single break of serve. And it was the only break of serve for Roddick in this 4 hours and 15 minute match. That right there was the defining moment.
Unstinting Challenge
Its easy to write about the champion. Its even more easy to spare a word or a thought or two to the challenger who stretched the Swiss genius to 16-14 in the 5th set and then move on. But in a way a contest becomes a spectacle not because of the victor. The quality of the contest, the guts-and-glory aspect of it - that is decided by the challenger. How much does the victor stretch? Just enough to outreach the challenger. So what decides how nice it is to watch such a contest? Obviously the level and intensity of the challenger's game. On that count, Roddick comes through in more than flying colours. He goes back without any need to bow his head. Nobody could have predicted that he could have ran Federer this close for this long. Yours truly had this chalked down to a walk in the park for Federer. How much more wrong could I have been? And how happy I am to be proven wrong ultimately! It is the toughest of the victories that you savour. And Federer will savour this as he has never done any other. And not just because he has finally gone where no man has. The quality and intensity of the contest was such that even if this were not the match which took Federer to 15 Grand Slam victories, it would still have appealed to the competitor in him. In any sportsman or woman.
So, ladies and gentlemen, lets not be shy in putting our hands together for somebody who throughout this tournament has been known as the "other" Andy. For let it be known that he controlled the play. He might be the challenger facing up against a great champion but he was the one who always forged ahead forcing Federer to dig deep to close ranks with this opponent time and again. Ultimately the first time he lost serve resulted in him losing the contest. But let us not forget that he sailed through unbroken right through the 4 hours and 15 minutes barring the 30th game of the 5th set! Andy came in unfancied. The only facet of his game that the press, the experts and the other players seemed to really take a notice of was his serve. With good reason. Right through the contest, Roddick was able to maintain an unbelievable service speed along with stunning accuracy with a mindblowing first serve percentage of 70%! Lets forget for the moment that Roger Federer thoroughly out-aced his American opponent - firing in a round 50 unreturnable thunderbolts to Roddick's 27. But really that was supposed to be Roddick's only real weapon. But here Roddick was - cranking the occasional winners off forehand and backhand and generally being able to hold off Federer from running away even from the back court. In the semifinal and today in the final what was generally seen was a tendency of the opponents (Murray day before yesterday and Federer today) to try and float the ball back across the court and let Roddick try and generate all the pace and thereby make an error. But Roddick has added facets to his game. He defied Murray day before yesterday and today he almost muscled Federer out of his date with destiny. But almost's are a professional sportsman's worst nightmare. An 'almost' tells you that you have had an opportunity and let that go. 'Almosts' are the ones that pose the worst questions in the night - thinking about what if that one point had gone your way or about whether Hawkeye really does have an eye. But with time and with even more unstinting effort 'almosts' can be made the most of - so to speak. In the fullness of time, Roddick surely will hold the golden trophy in the pristine lawns of Wimbledon, if he keeps on playing this way.
Swiss conqueror
For Roger Federer, winning a Grand Slam is nothing new. But today he was not just playing an opponent playing as if possessed. He was playing the occasion. At many points in the match, he was seemingly a bit tight with his play and waiting for the opponent to make the mistake. In that he was not successful and Roddick had two sets to show for it. But champions do not get to be champions for nothing. They get there by doing the hard yards. They get there not just by winning when they are having great days or when they are in that fabled "zone". They get there by winning even when they are not at their best. By lying in wait, by being humble and accepting the loss of a point or two, even a set or two and then make the best of what comes their way. Federer, as the inimitable Pete Sampras echoes, is a credit to the game. No one man can make shots and retrieves look so easy as he when they come off. Precisely this feature in Federer can be very frustrating to understand when he seemingly misses easy shots. But what looks easy is never all that easy. To that his opponents over the years can and will attest. Poise alone does not make a champion. But when genius and poise combine they have the potential to create an epoch-changing personality. One who can tower over the game. And Roger Federer today towers over the game - genially of course. The affable Swiss knows nothing else as evidence points. Always gracious and polite - not to mention his knack of learning various languages!
Today's victory confirmed for statisticians what was common knowledge to many who have closely followed tennis for generations. Federer is the greatest player ever to grace the game. At 2-6 down in the tiebreak not many would have given him a chance to wrest the second set from the rampant Roddick. But wrest he did - by playing havoc with the American's judgment and nerves. An example being the beautifully executed backhand cross court which would have probably sailed over the baseline but one which tempted Roddick to intercept with the racquet and send it wide. From there, Federer had the set covered. That little moment in the 2nd set ensured that Federer got a toe in to stop the fast closing window of this match. And as they say what happened after that is history.
Its easy to write about a champion's game. For there is a lot to write about. An impeccable forehand, a truly orgasmic single handed backhand, a pulsating, rhythmic machine of a serve and court covering skills to rival the best. All this without ever looking flustered. One wonders whether he would have a hair out of place playing as he does - even without the headband holding it in place. But its not volume that matters. The little things do. Against one of the greatest servers in the modern game, Federer easily came out on top in the battle of the aces. A staggering 50 aces to Roddick's 27. It is perhaps no coincidence that the greatest of the players have always been players who have a way to win the tie-breakers. And if you want to win tie-breakers then the service is your friend. But the greatest of them had variety at their command. Federer epitomizes those qualities - which is what helped him triumph today.
No Red Indian or a nonchalant cowboy has ever swung a lassoo with quite the grace of Federer whipping a forehand past his opponent - for one fleeting moment fooling him as if it was going out, but curving back at the last moment to kiss the line. Many have been the voices of experts and onlookers alike against the single handed backhand of the champion. It was touted to be the "weak link" in his game. And this not even considering the fact that Federer's nemesis Nadal was a left hander and this probably was why the battle appeared a little unequal. A left hander's forehand against a right hander's backhand. Today it was all out there in evidence. Backhand down the line, stinging cross court, slippery and smooth as silk slice, drop volleys, smashes - you name it.
If at all there could have been a small sour note in all this, it could have been the absence of the tireless Rafael Nadal. But then there was nothing much Federer himself could have done about it. And it would be immensely presumptuous of us not to mention more than a little unfair to think that the other players in the draw would not have challenged Nadal and that Nadal would have made it to the final if he were here - notwithstanding his No. 1 ranking. One other possible complaint from the Federer faithfuls out there would be the sheer abundance of the mishits from the Swiss' racquets and possibly a tendency to start slowly off the blocks nowadays. The champion rarely seems to make his presence felt in the first set nowadays - preferring to prime himself and conserve himself before racing off. Maybe that is why he was able to serve game after game comfortably well past 28 games in the 5th set. Or maybe not. But victory is a hard thing to argue against!
But then do you know what the best moment of the day was? It was, predictably when Federer celebrated victory, trophy held aloft in his hands - all smiles and nary a tear in sight. The champion is but human as has been seen from his copious tears on several occasions. But to be human is to probably defy stereotype and escape easy definition. And Federer proved that yet again - by smiling beatifically with no signs of tears when he ascended the highest of the mounts having completed his journey to reach where no man has ever gone in the tennis realm.
The IPL is the jewel in the crown of the BCCI, is it not? And why not? It has successfully propagated and adapted an idea (even if it was not completely original) and taken cricket to the masses. Cricket followers have had their fill of cricket during the IPL and the game has taken on a new dimension with various people wondering as to how Test cricket can be made as interesting as these T20 games.
[ Click here to read more ]
I watched this movie yesterday. It is an example of how slick, razor sharp and tight editing and screenplay can elevate an ordinary movie into a very good one.
[ Click here to read more ]
Say what you want. Rajasthan Royals deserved to lose. Shane Warne deserved to lose. And no, I am not your blind Mumbai supporter even though I have towering respect for one Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar.
[ Click here to read more ]
For people who do not know me, I am besotted with the game cricket. Have been so for as long as I can remember. That goes for watching or playing the game or ruminating on it or discussing it.
[ Click here to read more ]
Folks - I was at Madurai, Tamil Nadu a couple of days back. Been here for the past couple of days - at my in-law's place. Well, day before yesterday there was this gentleman dressed in white and white coming upto us with a conciliatory smile handing over three envelopes each for the voters in this house.
[ Click here to read more ]
I must confess I am not a great T20 fan. Lets just say I think cricket can also be a bowlers' game. It need not be a slugfest filled with boundaries and sixes with the bowlers chipping in just for relief or even for some sort of comic act. So you get no extra points for guessing that the IPL was not the top item on my cricket programs to watch list. When I say I am not a great fan, it is not that I do not watch the games. Any form of cricket has my attention - the game's got me by the throat! It is just that I believe Test matches showcase the game and the players' skill quotient far better - yeah, even the skills of the long suffering bowlers.
[ Click here to read more ]
|
|
|
Comments (2)
Add Comments
Read More
Comment by Balachandhran S
on Revolutionary Road
Tricolour Prism
Hello Raji,
Thanks for stopping by. I believe this movie is based on the novel of the same name by Richard Yates. Typically I have never found myself recommending a movie over its source book. But in this case, I find myself thinking that if the movie is this good, then the novel has to be a few cuts above!
I would pick this movie in my top 10 all time favourites. Whether you like it or not, you may share it right here after you watch it.