Alex McLean

AUSTRALIA


Joined December 7th 2008

Number of Posts:
3

Number of Comments:
0

Karma:
6



Blogs

Alex McLean's Blogs

167 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)

Blogs I Follow

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

Milk review

December 18th 2008 00:23
Milk, a movie about the first openly gay elected public official in America, is the best film its director, Gus Van Sant, has ever made.

Milk’s best feature is a cast that all manage to completely disappear inside their respective roles. Sean Penn and Josh Brolin, who play the titular character and his assassin respectively, both bring a humanity and understanding to their characters. You really get a feel for the former’s charisma and you don’t demonise the latter despite his terrible deeds. Not to mention Emile Hirsh, James Franco and Diego Luna who all put in terrific performances.

The statement that I made in the first sentence of this review is based mainly on this cast, which gives this film a substance that films like Elephant and Last Days sometimes lacked. Don’t get me wrong, his other films are all terrific (with the exception of his pointless remake of Psycho) but they often had very little to them. Emptiness was a major theme of the films in Van Sant’s “death trilogy” (Gerry, Elephant and Last Days) so it makes sense that they would seem a little light on substance. However, they also often revolved around the singular performances of very lonely actors. Which sometimes felt like you ordered a three-course meal and when it arrived all of the three courses were steak. I like steak, but that’s too much.

Despite the attention he’ll almost definitely receive from the Academy, Milk is much more than Penn’s performance. Everyone in it is fantastic, the direction is inspired and the use of archived news footage is seamlessly edited into the style of the film.

Biopics often seem so unnatural in the way they cut through years of a person’s life to get to the important events. Milk does these jumps with such gymnastic skill it would have no trouble making its way into the Russian Olympic team. With the flow of the film working so perfectly, it allows us to concentrate on the characters, and be deeply moved and angered by their struggle. This is a truly powerful film, and I fully believe that if it were released earlier in the year it would have had a huge effect on the outcome of the Proposition 8 vote, which moved to ban gay marriage.

My mark for this film: I haven’t yet figured out an interesting marking system, so I will give Milk two thumbs up, five stars, ten out of ten, an emoticon smiley face and recommendation that you see it in the cinema when it finally arrives in Australia on January 29.
42
Vote
   


They're Making a Sequel to That?!?

December 15th 2008 13:35
When I walked out of the cinema two years ago after having sat through the Da Vinci Code I was a satisfied man.

Not because I had just seen a good film. It was terrible.

I was happy for two reasons.

Firstly, Ron Howard is a great director. He makes fantastic films. However, the quality of his output could be accurately described as “bipolar”. For every Beautiful Mind he puts out a few pieces of trash like Edtv or How the Grinch Stole Christmas.

I choose to see the positive side of Ron Howard’s bad films.

Every time he releases something as poorly put together and god-awful as Da Vinci Code it just means we’re one step closer to one of his gems. If we’re lucky enough it may even be as kick-arse as Willow (Who am I kidding? No film will ever again reach such great heights).

Secondly, it seemed to spell the death knell for the possibility of a sequel from any of Dan Brown’s other books. I naively thought that when a movie so utterly failed as a cohesive whole as this one did that any plans of continuing the franchise would be immediately dropped.
I have a deep hatred of Dan Brown. Dan Brown doesn’t write books, he writes extended car chases and bookends them with semi-interesting plot points that he steals (allegedly) from other, more talented people. Dan Brown sucks, and I like the thought of him never again being able to profit from his Robert Langdon (*chough* Indiana Jones *chough*) series.

I walked out of that cinema with a skip in my step, knowing that the world of the future would be a wonderful one.

Then a few weeks ago my bubble burst. The trailer for Angels & Demons was released. Way to ruin everything Ron Howard.

If anyone is wondering what this film will be like, here is a step-by step instruction guide to creating an exact replica of the story:

1. Take the plot of the Da Vinci Code.
2. Keep all the car chase sequences.
3. Replace Audrey Tautou with someone who looks exactly the same if you kind of squint.
4. Replace the “WTF Jesus made babies with Mary Magdeline” moments with “WTF the Illuminati exists, with upside-down tattoos and everything” moments.
5. Give Tom Hanks an even worse wig.

This movie is going to suck. What’s even worse is that Howard is in the process of releasing Frost/Nixon, a film that has the potential to be truly great, and now it’s just going to be overshadowed by this puffed up blockbuster.

I guess my main reason for posting this is just to exclaim, with confusion: “they’re making a sequel to that?!?” (ok ok, it’s a prequel but whatever)

Why?????!?! Why waste the time? This movie will be just as bad as the first one. Even if it isn’t, surely there are a lot of people who won’t go anywhere near it because of the massive stinker that came before it.

I certainly won’t.
42
Vote
   



This saying rings with the same “do as you’re told” banality of most adages. It carries with it a moral wrapped in a simple watered down version of reality: “don’t you criticise anyone or you’ll be criticised yourself”.

Here’s my point: Screw That.

The Internet is all about providing a place where angry nerds can fling spiteful tirades at whoever they please and happily expect no response in return. Except for maybe the angry agreement of other nerds.

This is why I have called my blog “Stones from Underground”. If I can’t throw stones from inside my glass house, then I’m just going to have to throw them from a place no one can see.

Throwing stones from underground is what blogging is.

In this world of political turmoil, international grief, economic downturn, what do I choose to blog about? Movies.

Why?
Because they are important.

They don’t have the same tangible effect on people’s lives as losing your job or having a bomb dropped on your head.

Their importance is larger than individual happenings.

Films tell us about the world we live in, culturally and politically. The fact that Hollywood is producing action films like the Bourne Identity these days as opposed to the Stallone/Schwarzenegger kill fests of the Reagan-omic eighties tells us something about how America has changed. They tell us about how our world has changed.

Films affect the world we live in. Let’s throw stones at them.
65
Vote
   


 

Recent Comments

I've not commented on anything yet :(