Aaron 3

AUSTRALIA


Joined December 17th 2008

Number of Posts:
23

Number of Comments:
0

Karma:
7



Blogs

Aaron 3's Blogs

890 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
23 Post(s)

Blogs I Follow

Friends

I have no friends :(

Recent Posts

I made a solemn promise to myself as i told my friend after the credits of this hugely eventful and astonishing drama concluded before our very eyes that 'It was so good that I shall have to write a review without delay to this film.

I am talking about the latest touted much feared to be in anticipation of the film beginning yet ANOTHER gazillionth over bloated downtrodden depressing try-hard half baked and half- cocked Australian produced film effort. I am talking that, for over 2 decades at least that i was on death's doorstep (no joke) on the incresingly touching issue as an Australian of experiencing yet ANOTHER failed dismal pathetic weak and feebled excuse for an Australian written and produced motion picture 'feature film'.

But wow, almost with the potency of a 10- kilotonne mac-truck (if that ever exists) hitting a stationary person at high speed, or the feeling you get when you wake up after binging on way too much booze the day afrer that crazy night that was with a shock of a hangover- a complete contrast to the night before when you were partying getting blind drunk stupid (i hope not many people reading this do that awful habit!) from the opening scene of this film you are transported, speaking from one of the millions of disenchanted film goers who have fallen out of love with australian cinema due to it's impotence- at the local level who is witnessing with disbelief- history- at least locally being made- as the FIRST AT LEAST CREDIBLE IF NOT LANDMARK AUSTRALIAN FILM MADE IN 2 DECADES!

For Tomorrow I will reflect on what by far is since Crocodile Dundee- the last great relevant drama of THAT TIME that indeed what i witnessed is the australian drama that will come to define our generation.

I am of course talking about the faltless, epic and powerful TOMORROW WHEN THE WAR BEGAN - a story that if it weren;t for it's strong almost overpowering australian rural landscape and country town setting could be forgiven for witnessing a generic invasion by a generic enemy who wants to conquer our territory and take away our freedoms as civilians in their quest for conquest and domination to ensure our enemy has a future as their population spirals out of control. Think in general principle the impact of an occupying force, such as Americans in Vietnam, or more pointedly, Germans invading and spreading all over Europe.

For this film for all it's 'Aussieness' from the larriking stereotypes (of which the charactyers are defined as representing not just one part of Australia, but as much as possible, each individual character represents and invaluable part of our nation) has a very strong powerful and central theme of losing once innocence to the scourge and horror of an impending war to becoming warriors on their quest to seize back their homeland via their local objectives as part of the broader war- to take back their country town back to local hands- no different as any 'rebel force' broadly speaking in warfare would seek to do to protect their homes and their people from any occupying force.

This film structure of "Tomorrow when the War begun" is indeed a remarkable epic journey in the lives of eventually as the story pans out over the under ultra efficient 2-hr running time (i discovered after the film's credits that - and with deep regret i should add- as i have not read these epic surely award winning books of the 1990's) that indeed it is a 7 part book series and if you see the film you note that it is an ending to their first objective and a resolution of the changing circumstances and how they influence their intersocial dynamics- ie at the start of the film and as it is set you be forgiven for thinking this is a 'here we go again not another teen movie about teen problems' but from the moment these aquaintances, class mates and friends - which also include a lady from the city, most from the country where the setting of the impending and eventual War (a hypothetical and compelling, intriguing World War III!!) and one of asian (multicultural origin) you also have as part of these rag- tag (the premise starts off as an offer for the parents to lend their daughter a car for a holiday over the weekend provided she can get 7 people at least to come along- and desperate to take on their rare offer she offers an open invite to some people she does know, others she knows less of and some who are unnknown quanitties to each other, as well as those who derive from an ethically obligated religius background.

The writer of this masterpiece - bearing in mind this film is a screenplay adaptation- but boy what an original base story even if it from a novel adaptation. But unlike my criticisms on Hollywood's choice of adaptations it very much depends on a combination of the creative and visionary nature of the book, and therefore how fitting it is to have this films story being ingrained in the mind of one of Australia's most talented and awarded and invaliuable contributors to australian storytelling and literature a figure who has very much defined his interpretation of Australia at numerous levels in astonishing and seemingly endless manners of interpretation. John Marsden for all you international readers is his name and he, like Roald Dahl put great emhpasis in leading the way in showing the potential for creativity in the type of situations and boldness in vision to inspire future generation of readers with as i learnt from wathcing this film, not only films that stir the australian spirit in each of us but also key into a broader appeal to, a much bigger global audience.

And so if i were to do a search pf his novels and the awards Marsden has won, it would not surprise me at all that this film is his most acclaimed generation defining work for indeed it is.

But one last brief thing on the author for this is a FILM review not a novel review!
It is one thing to be creative and bold in your vision as a filmmaker/ writer it another entirely to bring that vision with a very authentic and believable substance.

But Marsden's understanding of Australian culture goes much deeper than his understanding of local national culture but as this film hints at as will no doubt be revealed in what i hope are equally impressive 6 installments to honour his epic 7 novel series total- thsi was (only!) part one! is that more than any other Australian novel i have read- espo what i read in high school back in the 1990's/ late 80's this is a film with an author and director who understand the wotrld stage and global circumstances with which Australia is positioned in its place not only unto itself but also in relation to our Aisan Neighbours.

Sure it is one thing to adapt a screenplay it another entirely to put your disgression and interpretation on written words entirely, and the bolder and more iamgniative the vision, the more risk there is of taking 'too much liberty' as was always a risk with the 'lord of the rings' franchise adaptation vs. playing it too 'conservatively' but the director Paul Beattie, clearly a filmmaker which i and nobody heard about but ought to after his first rate debut effort with this film, strikes the balance between authenticity and creativity and the msot 9improtant ingredient of all- drama. Beattie sensibly puts the focus on the interpersonal relationships as secondary to the few but all the more potent giving the timing in the story the events take place battle scenes, of whcih clearly it must be said the sound and lighiting department sought to put dramatic emphasis on each explosion as given their occassional but all the m,ore potent and emotionally gripping presence are in many ways more gripping thasn your run of the mill traditional action thriller. Sensibly and no doubt as to how Marsden would have liked it, "Tomorrow when the war began" is approached as an evolutionary structure and more important than the interpersonal semi- love / social connectrion stories between the characters is the manner in which their SOCIAL dynamic IN how they become acclimatised and accustomed to each other evolve with the timing fo events more broadly in this film.

By poting for the traditional evolutionary/ linear storyline- albeit with potent and powerful symoblic. dramatic twists interspersed throughout- such as the mysterious and sudden sound and revealing of the at the start of the movie generic military jetcraft as they fly ver lowly over the cliff ledge to which our then as the war beigns but they don't know and as the viewer we can only suspect innocent bystanders who at this point in time just care to enjoy themselves to make the most of the beauftiful view from the cliff ledge across the 'Copper;s Bay' bayside and port stretching in the distance and it must be said throught the cinematography is amongst the many consistently outstanding stadn out attirbutes that gives the film at the story and technical level it life, it's energy and it's drama- and it's twists.

I mean who can forget the imagery of the fleet of mysterious jetships flying overhead in a clear daylight sky as dawn drreaks over the bay.

Quite symbollicaly and one would be forgivne for thinking cyncically, the mountain the bystanders camp by for the weekend is called 'Mount Hell' all the more potent in its symbolism for this is the town where quite literally all the hell breaks loose and so the stage is set and behind the scenes, the 'battlelines' are drawn.

Yet this film gets away with what in any avergae australian film would rightfully be condemned with for the odd clunky dialogue or quiet uneventful moment for ultimately it is the first australian made local produced film with an entirely australian cast that i can recall in which CIRCUMSTANCE AND EVENTS ANF THE CHRONOLOGY OF HOW THEY UNFOLD AND THE POTENCY AND BRUTE FORCE WITH WHICH our bystanders discover their town is one of many rural port towns across Australia under siege by as the radio broadcast voice over states "is an invasion by foreign coalition forces" who have 'seized the towns of adjoining ports and airports across rural Australia" and the bystander's country town is more important to know by circumstance and setting rather than name just as it more improtant for us to engage as the filmmaker rightfully does no dobut true to the author's original inent not understanding " what the central characters do" but more so understanding their demographic bakcgorund as an australian citizen part of our broad multicutural/ multiracial / mluti religigous ctiizenship that shapes our Australia today, as it started to when immigration was big at the time post WWII and the first post baby boomer boom of population and immigrants in the 1990's which oincides with the ear of setting of the book,.

But this film deriving from the book's premise is just that- the role of everyday australian or geneally innocent civilians in their bid to fight for their right to survive and their right to live in freedom and not oppression- and the film's revelations come at the turning point as the cahracters change their attitudes to each other, as well as to their changing asituation one at times where you be forgiven that at the peak in which the enemy iof them and hence the nation is on their tail pans out moentarily into the type of reaction people get when beign stalked in slasher horror movies.

But the relvance of this film and the shaping fo it's characters is defined by the JOURNEY they take from bystander to not so innocent to survivors to soldiers NOT by the outcome of their objectives and if anything, outcomes lead to further development of the process of the objectives which is why by the end of the film, is not an end unto itself but merely a resolve betwen our characters that by this stage have stood up to be heroes like otgher minority survivors not recruited in the enemy's priosner of war camps who want to fight for their freedom- and this principle woudl resonate with anyone who ahs a big picture view of history for for the countless ragtag civilains who donned arms to protect their town tot he last stabnd agianst teh Nazi's or curiously, event he reverse where the civialins of Vietnam joined the Viet-cong to repel the american invaders- its all a matetr of point of view- and clearly, Marsden as the filmaker has reciprocated, rightfully so, understands that this is about capturing the persepctive and point of view of the main characters- the traditional base ingredient for a film to have success but it the events that dfine the maturing the loss and innocence and the journey to a ragtag team of survivor- turned warriors not just for the cause of national freedom from the impedning doom and oppression fo the enemy of the country- thoguht it should be pointed out this 'coalition' provocatively and daringly and where its boldest oand most powerful of vision is at its most controversial but all the more justified, is becase, put simply, the enmy is someone who even todate by our contemporary standards as a nation, we embrace as allies, but this film and the timing of its release isall the more potent for it themese and an all too timely reminder that in the future, as the voice over states in literal and blunt terms itself, that indeed, 'these colaition forces from the asian continent and the archipelago islands before them beyond our shores have tunred aginst us as part of their resolution to be able to accomodate their growing population (let's remember in real life the muslim population accounts for a third to be the most populous relgiigon on this planet and conversely beingh coalition nations and the storng asian appearance of the enemy, it does storngly imply thought ti is wrong to conclude that part of the coalition could it be suggested as the filmamker asks us that the most populous/ overpopulated nation in Cihna has leant their imliatry might to the cause fo teh invasion in Ausdtralia- which ulitmately is the only 'cuacasian' and in its origins 'white/aboriginal' basciallty non asian nation in the broader south pacific and as the events pan out for those who know recent world politics and read the papers to a point too, and who have read contemporary espionage novels the concept of as military strategists like in australia the strategic policy insitute have wanred that 'a time will come in which we must not take our current asian 'friends' for granted for they have long had the capacity and ability to invade and where else will they turn in the future if they can't contain their burgoeuing population, but the kleast populated nation per capita and per head vs. per region in the south pacific and that is
Australia- all the more potewnt at a time when the integrity of border protection along geopgraphic and political lines is an issue at stake with the recent influx of asylum seekers and either way whether you agree or not with things that are of concern to certian policy insitutues, the reality is whetyher you are for or against asylum seekers in the end it is a hot bed issue as it has been quite ironically and a huige twist of timing of the release of this film- which if anything? might? speculate on teh conseuqence of more broadly spekaing weak leadership in general and the consequences of a 'soft border' policy cos couldn't one argue that if border protection is softened, would that weaken our defenses, making us more vulnerable to attack?

Now i am not sure and i should make clear for my part i MOST CERTAINLY UNEQUIVOCALLY BELIEVE GIVEN MY PAST GENRATIONS ESCAPE A RACIST REGIME WITH DISCIFRMNITORY DESIRES to seek peace as immigrants from foreign c9ountries into our country fo australia, it would be a crime for me to toe the 'we don't accept asians' line and on the contrary if i did, one of the most p0owerful charactes is the one who clearly being named 'li' is nevertheless of Aisan background but he is as much on the recieving end of the invasion as the australian born and raised survivors turned warriors. And this is a symbol as it is a relaity that our nation is as much a part of the world as it is it belogns to us and our ancestors and descendants. Far from implying a racist vision, Marsden and the filmmaker understand the implications of portraying the enemy that indeed they are as a 'coalition force' and importantly NOT an ASIAN force- lord forbid they put that misinterpretation forward.

But we understand as this film clearly is targeted thankfully at long last a film tyo the upper educated demographics of australia and identifies to the inteloligent/ mature audience demographic that has been so badly neglected- as well as it shoud be said the general blockbuster/ event film demographic- when was the last time a film of generational relvance and potency to us as a nation as part of this big, wonderfuol diverse milti cultural/ multi-racial world appealed to us as an austrlaian amde film about big picture global issues/ regional issues and that was also a blockbuster holy shit mate i just gapsing with utter disbelief!!!!! (jaw drops!)

Now i could analyse the awesome and potent action scenes with their brutal and powerful as they're occassional bursts of violence, desperation and the build up to tension as from the time in which in that powerful goes down as one of the most memorable cinema moments ever in which a 'coalition' force soldier from the asian nations shoots exectution style at the head at point blank range an innocent australian POW this film it should be said has all the more potency tio me personally for with a few specific differences to its circumstances, but the idea of the innocent beign imprisoned in POW'S is one of the stories that is most mspirational and sadly hardly heard of that for [people like me and people in my jewish communtiy i know and care about and am friendly with is hardly heard about too far and few between.

Taking into account whereas in this film's story and setting of circumstance that the POWS were the original inhabitants of the land invaded by the invading force and that in my true story my grandfather like a minority of a few thousand other's were immigrants who arrived under mistaken identity from the UK and Germany as immigrants who were mistkaenyl perceived and imprisoned as POWS for a lengthy period of timebut nevertheless generally the events depicted or circumstances from the pows perspective is vaguelg and generically similar as they were treated as POWS wghen they were innocent, just like my grandfather was when he was mistaken as A POw AS part of the HMS Dunera- one of a handful of refugees seeking immigration to settle to be part of what would start to be in wartime Australia post wwII the dawn of multicutluralism in Australia and i take great pride in my European heritage but more so that an invaluable part of that has thrived through my very6 existence thanx to the australian authorities who gave my gradnfather a chance to live a happy and peaceful life which lead to the birth of my fatyher as it conseuqently did myself and why? becauyse Australia is and as is represented so powerfully thorugh the multicultural make-up of our ragtag team of survivofr- turned warriors in this film just as accurate in its general portrfayal of where our nation started to be at it was thanx to our early settlers and immigrants that followed in the post war time years in our real hisotry that the inspiration was planted for Marsden's eclectic and intriguing mix of multicultural heroes- to be- reluctant heroes they are buyt ones that are on a mission to justa s it was in generic tgerms in my gradnfathers day to esnure freedom from oppression but the difference is huge and i must point out so as not to blend real life hisotricakl events with historical fiction albeit one woujld be forgiven for th9inking that if it eren't for the slightly overdone stereotypes in thsi film justified thoguth they may be, that certainly, this film would almost play out as a real life story of heorism, courage and determination to fight for ones rights against impossible odds.

But in my granfathers true story of the as they came to be reocgnied as they arrived on the HMS DUNERA the Dunera Boys- an invlauable legacy and part of our heritage and part of what gave several country town across rural NSW esp it existence and recpognition. but whereas my gradnfather's part ot play as a Dunera Boy indeed gave the country town a vital part of its identity, in Tomorrow when the War Began it is about more than anything A GROUP OF AUSTRALIANS and locals who are out to SAVE THEIR TOWN FROM CAPTURE OR OBLIVION AND HENCE TO SAVE IT'S IDENTITY RATHER TO THAN TO DISCOVER IT for ultimately that is the biggest picture thing that is at stake and between the yes at times cleched- but neverthekless there is effective cleche and their is weak cleche and the effective cleche is the one that comes secondary to the imminent big picture setting and issues at stake.

Ultimately this film is about survival it is a reminder of that we past look after all that is precious in our nation, from our insitutions to our wonderful enchanting magical uniquekly austrlaian landscapes to us people as being multicultrural- and our recent recognition of the rightful landowners of thr stolen generations only makes our impetus to procede with caution as well as optimism the relations we manage with our foregin neighbours that if indeed it is the right thign to do to strengthen our borders that it must be done to ensure displomacy between our nations is strengtehns whislt retaining a cuatious ap[rp0oach nevertheless to border security.

But most important of all and as the interpresonal maturing of the 2 ramatic and doubtless life changing days in the lives of these once innnocent aussie citizens demonstrate, that indeed, there are some things that are more important than our pet dog- which one of our characters trys to save does but just it should be pointed out, or worrying about our make up kit, or our posessions or even a leg wound ulimtately it is the bond that is our common cause and in any circumstance where any country's civilaians are at war with each other we must put aside all preconceptions aside no matter our differences, no matter our race, our colour, we must always if ever lord forbid there is a time of nationAl crisis of a waron our dorrstep put all differences aside to help each thorugh a comon cause and that is our right to live, to survive and to fight for ourselves and for each other that we hope and pray that our allies that are at present our enighbours will never betray our trust for there is one th9ing surely at heart our neighbours even if they may? in future have dark intentions to australia wnat that i hope as well do would untie the world in a common cause and that is our desire to coexist in peace and harmony,.

Tomorrow 2when the war Began is a testament to such a vision and one that should not only go down as a touchstone moment in Australian cinema folklore but also one that is probably more relevant and important in it themes concernign regional circumstances today in real life now and into the future it is a warning as much as it is entertainmen t, a thriller, as much as it is part war drama, part semi romance as it is personal struggle as each individual must work together for the most important common cause of all in any war inflicted on any civilaian for ultimately what if us as Australians would one day exp[erience what Iraqi's and others in Afghanistan has if hypothetically in the future those we invaded (well? an invasion of North Korea is not impossible if one day they do launch an uclear warhead at a wester country) then we become the injnocent civilian at the victyim fo tjheir war machine? what woukld you do for your part? would you run ? or would you styand at fight for everything you believe in everyth8ing you live for?

this more than any philosophical question is the more broadly powerful and relevant an australian drama can pose and it a credit to the author and the filmmakers for making the vision a powerful testament to above all tjhe true poential of Australian Cinema, so it is with that i declare with great hope and optimism that:

TOMORROW I HOPE AND PRAY FROM THAT DAY FORTH A NEW DAWN HAS BEGUN IN MORE BOLDER, DARING BLOCKBUSTE EPIC AND INVENTIVE ORIGINAL CINEMA.

As an australian and cinema lover this is the country type epic set drama that i longed for in an australian rural setting. Now let's see some genuine bold original city- based visions please in australian cities the bar has been raised and so have my expectations as australians and film lovers let's hope that future aussie films do not prove to be half of wbhat this films is a national masterpiece for our generation just as Marsden's book was for it;'s time


68
Vote
   


Blood has been spilt and sadly, it is with great regret to report for and on behalf of a clear majority of the movie going public it was 'the hurt locker' that won last year.

Now I maintain 'the Hurt Locker' is one of the more worthy oscar winners BUT having said that it was CLEARLY AN OPPORTUNITY GONE BEGGING A CHANCE FOR THE OSCARS TO JUSTIFY THEIR RELEVANCE AS A PROP-PUBLIC INSTITUTION RATHER THAN AN ANTI-PUBLIC ANTI- CULTURAL INSITUTION THE OUT COME OF THE OSCARS WAS NOTHING SHORT OF A FARCE IN WHAT HAD TO BE ONE OF THE MOST DISGRACEFUL REASONS FOR SNUBBING THE CLEAR GAME CHANGER CINEMATIC WONDER THAT WAS AVATAR

It was farce because:

Sure it was fantastic to see oscar break their own self imposed mould and embrace the very talented Kathryn Bigelow, but it is in honesty worth pointing out that:

1. During the Oscar season, it was AVATAR that was the most talked about, AVATAR that since post oscar has set the trend and tone in redefining pop culture cinema bringing about the 3d revolution and as is proven as fact is the film that has inspired attempted 3d films but 3d nevertheless at least half a dozen times already!

2. I was really happy for Bigelow, but I like so many other disencyhanted oscar viewers completely disapproved of the academy's own blatant disregafd for their own rules. In what became the chain of events that saw AVATAR only win a measley 3 oscars for all it landmark talked about achievements, relegated to the place where the bloody conservative wanted AVATAR to be rather than WHERE IT CLEARLY DESERVED TO BE which film changed the medium of film making? which film examined the more contemporary and relevant global debate and hence had a bolder anti- hollywood pro- lateral thinking vision? Which film has delivered and shaped and redefinewd cinema in its medium in its art form and just simply swept the world off their feet, generated the type of enthusuiasm for film going that the captured the public's imagniation? I mean even the New York times, committed a very rare editorial whereby the new york times would onyl ever discuss the culturally defining moments in film AND AVATAR WAS IT

But I predicted it i had the ugly feeling that Oscar and indeed Hollywood would betray tjheir own core constituency, no different to a politician not representing the community interest, disgracefully deplorably the main and original intended role of AMPAS tyhat is THE MOTION PICTURE ARTS AND BLOODY SCIENCES
NOT THE MOTION PICTURE OF SYMPATHY AND SMEAR and let;s be clear here when the insecure slimy excuse for a producer in 'Charlie' sent a letter on behalf of all the producers pining for some desperate unjustified reason a deliberate letter exploiting their desperation to have 'the low budget film recognized over the big blockbuster' it was a decieptful desperate tactic THAT EFFECTIVELY unforgiveably snuffed otu avatars chances.

The academy got themselves in the same situation they always do most of the miserable years in recent times of their existence. They put a half hearted punishment in what was a black and white breaking of oscars most serious rule: NOT FOR OSCAR CONTENDER PRODUCERS TO INFLUENCE THE OSCAR MEMBERSHIPS DECISION MAKING ESP FOR BEST PICTURE OR THE PENALTY IS EXPULSION AND DISQUALIFICATION BUT DESPERATE TO PROPO UP THE AILING LOW BUDGET FILM COS IT LOW BUDGET AND EFFECTIVELY FALSIFYING AND DISMISSING AVATARS EXTAORDINARY ONCE IN A GENERATION FILM BENCHMARK AHCIEVEMENT THEY BETRAYED THEIR OWN RULES EXPELLED ONE PRODUCER AND STILL GAVE L;OCKER BEST PICTURE OUTRIGHT IN THE END

Make no mistake ladies and gentleman with every farce of a year oscar put themselves under greater and greater pressure to fight for relevance in the eyes of the film going public and to be absolutely clear the MAIN REASON THEY EXPANDED TO 10 NOMINEES WAS TO EMBRACE THE NEW GENERATION CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED BLOCKBUSTER how ironic then fthat for the director that made that case and made oscar feel guilty for snubibing one fo the most ceritically aclaimed blockbusters int he dark knight that this year the director has returned with a progressive revolutionary masterpiece so for oscar the nightmare in their mind lives on that indeed the conservative are clinging out of desperation, making excuses incl breaking their own rules to try to resist the progressive movement in cinema.

This year unlike the year the dakr knight made its cinematic landmark INCEPTION well let jsut say it prudent of oscar to embrace this film as the most nominated this year and the best of the uyeat and if they snub it ait is at their peril and the wrath of the film going public. If i were them the onyl way to make their relevance credible remotely with the pyblic is to treat the genre reovlutionary blockbuster as a winner and no less. theuy need it to save their apalling bloody reputation.

ith which you are repsonsible for embracing Sorry oscar you can't ignore the progressive boundary pushign of cinema it absolutely disgraceful and the public deserves to regard you as holding their choice in contempt your insitution will fail into obsucrity if you cannot change your attitude let alone abide by your own rule of law
72
Vote
   


Your text goes hereFor as long as film goers can remember, in our generation or the one prior, or even the best part of 15- 20 years, original cinema has been way too far and few between. For as long as i remember in my lifetime, the trend cinematically has been for adapted screenplays to flood our cinemas. In fact, whether based on a real person's life, a historic event or interpretation, and indeed above all else a adapted screenplay from a book- that is, both as fiction books and non- fiction, but the fact remains that oscar and beyond, hollywood has embraced overwhelmingly and alarmingly the exacerbated and overhyped screenplay adaptation which subsequently wins best picture.

Yes, let the record show that indeed, the 'Lord of the Rings' Trilogy is far and away the best film of our generation in my humble opinion, but that does not mean as far as TRULY ORIGINAL AND INVENTIVE CINEMA IN IT'S ORIGINS AND IN IT'S CONCEPT IS SOMETHING I LONG DESIRED AS HAVE NUMEROUS CINEMA GOERS OVER THE PAST DECADE AT LEASTSIZE]

And it stands to reason the closest thing to inventive and original stories and characters has been amongs a sparse minority of films, THE MATRIX indeed it's visual and cinematic depiction of challenging what is possible with the latest in effects and technology was out there as was the concept but ultimately the story itself without putting it depth and breadth of cinematic achievments as a landmark moment for the science fiction genre specifcally, and through this for film, was sadly derivative a concept that clearly borrowed from prior established films.

In much the same way that voters at elections tire of the same old Government and feel like a change, so too do film goers after putting up with hollywood's obsession of adapted screenplays and concepts greatly desire a change of approach by our filmmakers the ultimate screen and cultural entertainers in our society behind the scenes to concoct and renew the truly dated attitude of 'let's to an adaptation as it is less risk' But there is reward for RISK in the film buisness and ultimately, those who take the GAMBLE AND TAKE THE RISK REAP THE REWARDS especially if they are in control of their film medium and and they combine this with their experience, their ambition, and their desire to TAKE ENTERTAINMENT TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL TO RAISE THE BAR TO GIVE AUDIENCES AFTER A DECADE OR TWO AT LAST WHAT THEY ALWAYS WANTED: GENUINE, ORIGINAL INVENTIVE CONCEPTS, STORY AND CHARACTERS IN CINEMA

I AM THEREFORE DELIGHTED TO REPORT THAT THE REVOLUTION IS UPON US AND ITS POTENTIAL IS FULLY REALIZED A DECADE AFTER THE MATRIX PUSHED THE BOUNDARIES, CHRISTOPHER NOLAN'S LATEST EXTRAORDINARY AND LANDMARK CINEMAITC ACHIEVEMENT IN "INCEPTION" HAS TRANSFORMED THE FACE OF ORIGINAL CINEMA, REVITALISED IT AND ULTIMATELY RESURRECTED IT FROM WHAT WE KNEW IT TO BE TO SOMETHING THAT ENSURES INCEPTION IS THE WATERSHED MOMENT AND TURNING POINT AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES 21ST CENTURY ORIGINAL CINEMA.

How and why? and who is Christopher Nolan? Well, as hard as it is to believe, he oversaw the most critically acclaimed and influential modern day superhero graphic novel adaptation in a 'little' otherwise humongously known film as the powerful "The Dark Knight" Only achieving the best reviews of the year of its release, with impeccable and most generous but well deserved praise, it was only the first blockbuster film to as staging it main action sequences, integrate the latest IMAX technology in a mainstream blockbuster film. It was a mere superhero film at one level, but at another one entirely, "The Dark Knight" was the film that proved that blockbusters featuring superheros can go so much deeper, and so much richer in the characters and events and consequences of events than just the 'good guy vs. bad guy'.

In order to understand how it was concievably possible to surpass the critical and commercial but moreover cinematic landmark heights of "The Dark Knight" let's look at Christopher Nolan's very brief but extraordinarily consistently and deservedly lauded filmography. He recieved a equivalent of a 'rising star' award for 'best newcomer director' in the year he surprised with his little to be big known hit 'memento'. From there he turned the screws on your 'serial killer thriller' working with some seriously top heavy cast in Robin Williams and the masterful Al Pacino in Insomnia. Muc h like 'Memento', 'Insomnia' was Nolan's second successive original work and much like 'Memento' it became clear that Nolan wanted to introduce audiences to a more psychological approach to the action thriller genre. Beyond this, 'Insomnia' fascinated me and critics alike with sharp writing, and seemingly effortlessly executed 'never see it coming' twists and turns' not a bad effort for a director who was regarded as a 'Hollywood Newcomer' Right? Yes, this is true, but nothing could prepare me or the world for what would be to come.

Sure enough, as a reward rightfully so for pushing and challenging conventional construction of stories and storytelling in cinema, he would tackle 'Batman Begins' proving in that film that he can handle a much anticipated remake and effectively be one of the few directors to redefine and reinvent the legend that everyone knew and loved at the time when Keaton and Burton brought their vision to life. Nolan added depth, intrigue and drama he added 'layers' in addition to \retaining the story of how Batman became Batman, but Nolan, being Nolan, seemed to many and critics alike as an emerging exceptional filmmaker- exceptional cos Nolan, like one other in the early stage of his career to have such a sudden huge impact on the cultural trends of cinema in his time (and still goign strong) A little known soon to be big known director on his debut blockbuster in JAWS (Steven Spielberg, who else) and much like Spielberg (im being mindful here that Spileberg launched the blockbuster in it current form in any way today the biggest modern dayb revolution of cinema that has not been topped, who pioneered popular engaging engrossing original filmmaking for the masses and to satsify critics too for the record- this is relevant cos b the time 'Batman Begins' came around, critics were astounded by the depth, breadth and layers and literal vision of Gotham City. His recreation from the influences of 'Bladerunner' with the visual palette and meshing of old and decayed vs. new was just as impressive for it visual and architectural langauge to critics as it's narritive structure was. But for Nolan, much like Spielberg to a point, it was not good enough clearly fro himself, his ambitions and the audiences.

So Nolan created probably his lesser but still \impressive entirely original 'prestige; blending illusions and magic and tricks on the mind and sure enough, combining rich and detailed artistically merticulosly set designed visions with equally deep characters and meaningful events , sought to redefine the adaptation at its core by taking "The Dark Knight" as not a sequel but another story in the batman saga bearing in mind he was working off a prequel 'batman begins' to an already made sequel this was truly uncharted waters. For
Nolan, he treated it as a film in its own right with some obvious references to 'Batman Begins'. Nevertheless, Nolan proved the impossible as far as adaptations go and combined with casting, and evolving and effectively building literally on the architecture of Gotham from 'Begins' as well as building on the layers of already known characters in 'The Dark Knights' predecessor, as well as introudcing new characters- one imparticular whereby Nolan as he does has faith that the4 actors can find themselves in their character in the film and bring a dimension fo realism in drama, and darkness and acting and liveliness and action all blended into one and in effect, 'The Dark Knight' was deconstructed film and one that proved to critics that film noir and dark drama can resonate in fictitious stories, that are based on the often glossed over superhero saga. Nolan went against type but still was constrained through not fault of his own with adapted material- he had license to go darker and bleaker than trasditional superhero adaptations, as he was building up the events that shape the 'dark knight' but beyond this, Nolan, did something else that Spielberg did in his early years, he put actors newcomers on the big stage, he did so with Christian Bale in 'Batman Begins' and he took that to another level by effectively giving the sadly late Heath Ledger the landmark role of his career, a supporting actor oscar win for the most recotgnizable and distinguishable 'most sinsiter memorable and infamous villain made in cinema whom critics said through Nolan's own casting ' was up there with the landmark anthony perkins role of 'psycho'.

Buit it went further then what Nolan expected with 'the dark knight' by now, Nolan was on the map, and more so than 'batman begins' he was playing to the world stage 'the dark knight smashed all box office records esp in the us it was so higly critically acclaimed, critics support put heat on oscar for first time ever to consider a superghero movie as a legitimate drama,

It has to be said very few directors, if any have breathed such dramatic depth and power and inspiration out of a comic book character or novel based character. Yet somehow, through Nolan's genius and cunning he proved doubeters wrong and delivered not just Critics wrong in relation to the superhero genre but he put a respecte australian actor at the status of a landmark role in the 'joker', delivered layers of twists and turns and as critics said in unison one of the most unforgiving dark dramas and acclaimewd dramas in recent cinema.

So, what do you do when you broken box office records, challenged ridiculously successfully conventional wisdom that 'rules are made to be broken and brake them in an adaptatioon?

The answer is "Inception" or, to be more precise, YOU NOT ONLY PRESENT A FILM ENTIRELY ORIGINAL IN STORY AND CONCEPT BUT YOU ALSO CHALLENGE THE CONVENTIONAL STRUCTURE AND NARRATIVE OF FILM EFFECTIVELY BREAKING AND REDEFINING THE RULES WITH WHICH ARE USED TO CONSTRUCT CINEMA

This is what makes 'Inception' a one of a kind event movie- not only is it a non- sequel its an extraordinary achievement that if anything, only VERY LIGHTLY borrows from stylistic portrayals toa very limited extent thankfully of the MATRIX hence why i raised it. But if 'The Matrix' is a styock standed bigger picture concept about a machine you get plugged into to aLLOW YOU TO bend the rules then in inception in it very concept as it is Nolan's cinematic goal to break all conventional wisdom and rules of what makes cinema successful, indeed, inception in it's very concept is about breaking the rules AS THE FILM ITSELF BREAKS ALL CONSERVATIVE CINEMATIC PRINCIPLES and yes it does it with being the first film to be dominated by the same versatile imax/ normal cinema viewing experience thanx to the cameras that Nolan sdaid in the datrk knight he wanted to use as a dominant emdium in the film. and all this in 'ionception' with out the need to hope onto cinema's other more medium based reovlution in 'avatar'AND IT 3D revolution.

But Inception demands to be seen at a deeper level, and deserves to atfer all, as my reference to 'layers' indicates in constructing this film, Nolan as ingeniously and for the first time ever in a film dvised a deviously ingenious concept whereby the story itself and subp[lots are constructed by a complex and yet well explained detailed assembly of ordered ' and disordered 'layers' and incidentally film itself, for those like me who have done media studies turly is a construction of layers, Film in essence as all film directors would attest to needs in this order: concept, setting, story, characters, events in films. But unlike any other film in my memory an im sure many others, 'Inception' takes the construction of film as 'layers' and uses this 'layer' principle to construct it actual narrative in addition to having the above film elements lead and connect to each other- in other words, 'Inception' follows at one level your character development, your set, your story, your setting, except for one devlishly and fatal poversight- to do a credible review at the very least of this film, there are MULTIPLE CHARACTERISATIONS IN THE ONE CHARACTER, MUTIPLE EVENTS IN THE ONE EVENT, MULTIPLE SETTINGS IN THE ONE SET SO YOU EB FORGIVEN FOR ASKING HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? THE ANSWER IS "INCEPTION" AND CHRISTOPHER NOLAN AND A EXTRAORDINARILY CONSISTENT WELL JUDGED CASTING AS WELL.

In order to understand how it possible to have multiple of anything in the one element Nolan obviously has done his film homework precedent and how past directors- like Spielberg, liker Kubrisk, and like James Cameron and Ridley Scott came to break new ground in a genre. He while not openly acknowledging it would surely6 have taken that to break new ground, you need a new concept yyou need a new setting but a new APPROACH AND CONCEPT TO STORYTELLING and unquestionably it is this one element that unites Nolan's countless layers in styorytelling, subplots and charcaterisations and events and why? cos simply, the veyr generic and fitting setting and the driver of the concept of the film (how often do we come across a film where the setting is itys concepot, where the events are driven and defined by the coneptualisation in it origins of a film? the answer is seldom, if ever, perhaps one and that could be 2001 a space oddysey it concept bein space in the new era but with a non specifgic date, time and place.

Inception is like that in principle, HOWEVER IT PHENOMENALLY HAS MULTIPLE PLACES AND MUTIPLE GENER8IC =-SPECIFIC SETTINGS WITHOUT DEFINING ONE SINGLE CNETRAL SPECIFIC SETTING THAT NORMALLY IS THE TRADITIONAL BACKDROP TO STORYTELLING BUT NOT WITH INCEPTION IN THIS WAY ABOVE ALL, IS HOW INCEPTION CHALLENGES THE CONCEPT OF THE 'CONVENTIONAL APPROACH' TO CINEMA AND YET WITHOUT SCRAPPING IT CONVENTIONS IT HAS CHARACTER, IT HAS SETS IT HAS A MAIN STORY BUT IT DRIVER IS PURELY CONCEPTUAL AND OUT OF THE CONCEPT GENUINE DEEP AND INSPIRING COMPELLING AND INTRIGUING STORY DEVEOPS WHICH IS MUTIPLE STORY ARCS IN THER ONE CONCEPTY OR IDEA.

IN FACT, PERHAPS WE SHOULD EXPLAIND WHAT THIS BIG WATERSHED MOEMNNT IN CINEMA IS IN IT CONCEPT OR I LOSE YOU THE READER. HOW DID NOLAN COME TO REVOLUTIONISE AND BRIGN ABOUT THE BIGGEST GAMNE CHANGER IN ORIGINAL FICTITIOUS CINEMA? IN OUR TIME, AND IN THE TIME PRIOR AND BEFORE THAT? THE ANSWER IS 'INCEPTION' It is also one of the few films where it film title dictates the story in its entirety and in it deconstructed forms where all it story arcs ultimately bracnh off and converge by the end of the film into one.

Inception in it concept is something few have heard about or understand and hence in it concept Nolan is introducing us to new terminaolgoy and definitions within cinema itself and educating the audience about the little known definition which is the idea of 'hacking a persons mind' to as 'Cobb' played by the underrated but one gets the feeling oscar winner to be in Leonardo Dicraprio, an actor who has progressively but in recent rimes come in leaps and bounds as the most revamped actor making the trasntiion form every girls fantasy boy next door titanic boy to the adult mature drama ucvh as 'departed' to the complex and challenging in 'aviator, catch me if ypou can, shutter island to his most perplexing role as cobb.

Cobb is in partnership with 'Arthur' in a fitting physical and yet understated but solid performance by Joseph Gordon Levitt, who effectively invented and supervisors the operation where the two work together, with Dicaprio's Cobb being trained as no.1 renowned mind hacker as the 'extractor' and his objective with those cluients that want [iece of mind esp corporate ones such as Ken Watanabe's client to Dicrapio's 'inception' project (and arthurs) but the idea is not to steal information but to confuse the person who;s mind is targeting to change the 'idea' subtly yet profoundly to alter the future course of real events to ensure, in the case of wantanabe's character, that indeed in real time, that his energy rich assets are still having a monopoly on the nergy sector so as a greedy corporataion (only what is very unique is wheresas most films are critical of this, the film focuses on wantanabe's client as a good samaritan despite the corporate greed factor referenced when he says 'he wants to ensure that fisher's (a rival energy philanthroper/ corporate entity does not get a share in the enertgy market and its profits but Nolan wants the focus to ratrher have us focus on the good deed that Wantanabe wants to do for Dicaprio's 'cobb'. By doing this we are thrust in the middle of an event at the start of the film, which ahs dicaprio washed up lookign ragged and worn out but we don't know why and we don't know what his purpose is.

Nolan's vision ultimately at yhr main level as a charactersed 'objeective' common in film is that, suspicious and discouraged intially by Wantanabe's character's scope of ambitious proposal (to hack his corporte energy pioneeer rival's mind to manipulate his 'secrets' so that Fisher cannot promote them to buisness investors and public given the idea planted deep in his mind in it original concept of his plans to have a stake in wantanabes energy 'monopoly' has changed and hence his thoguhts would betray themselves, effectively shutting down his confidence and know how as as it is reffered to in the film this 'secret' plan of his is a 'written idea' in a safe.

In talking of the 'written' and ;symbolic' Nolan is venturing into unchartered cinematic waters here. Indeed, starting the film is nothing new when it starts in the middle, but certainly not fully grapsing or understanding the magnitude of the characters task ior what it is or what the setting is is near on unheard of. And its risky too- often, filmmakers that have experimented with ambiguity and symbolism and 'written' representations and the 'visual' confuse their mediums, and the film beocmes too abstracted to be credbile, too confusing and disengaging. Indeedm Nolan is working with 'polar opposties here' symbolism is used to represent a characters actions por what too happen, or what to be careful of or a warning, it is seldom if ever used as effectively a 'frotune telling device' and what is intriguing about this is the different dymbols for different characters- inception going back to its complex yet as seldom if any filmmakers in recent times are able to do find a simple way to explain to the audience so they DONT become disengaged with the mere surface level of symbolism, written references, numbers and codes and the fact he can in the most unconventiona way si a testament to nolan and his teams astonishingly detialed intricately articulate well thought out vision.

Dicaprio agrees when an offer is made to carry out his prspective client's m,ission. But there is a twist, for the reward is not money, but the right to 'find his way home' through conditon if he carries out the mission for his client that indeed his can get access to immigration forms tyo return home and as we discover escape his own mental burdens.

Faced with this Offer, Cobb and Arthur take on there riskiest mission yet. Further to this, no film in living memory for me and many others has had the start of a film take place in the characters persons OWN MIND AND HENCE, OWN DREAMS!!!

This is truly groundbreaking and this is just the beginning as concept to have a film set in that characters usbconciounce and then DARE barrely ten minutes in to bring us into their 'reality' through the concept of the 'kick' (a device which ensures that the person comes out fo their dream state and into reality. And what is remarkable about the 'kick' again, a new concpet (EVERY SMALLER CONCEPT AND IDEA TO PUT THIS FILM TOGETHER, TO MAKE IT WELL SO FLAWLESSLY WELL IS INVENTED OR AT LEAST REIVNVENTED IN SOME WAY)

The concept is that the kick disrupts the stabiility of the person's 'dream state' so the world they in meets the external enviornment around them in this way the deopth and breadth and defintion of 'drfiting to and from' the psychological state is represented in real and believable fashion (for such a potentially unbelievable concept it a lot to comprehend) but Nolan does have form with the psychological.

AS stated earlier, he has clearly shown an itnerest in the concept of the mind, the psychology, the fear. the paranoia, the pain and aguish the tortured mind, the peace of mind. The conflicted mind, the insane mind. He started this with the paranoia thirller Insombnia it started to take shape with the concept of a story being told in flasdhback memories in memento (some debut!) in batman begins, Nolan explores thehuman psych of fear and what causes fear and how to confront fear and make consturctive use of it in your subconsionce to make real changes in your life for the better. or for the more constructive (in batman begins) in prestige, he rolls with the concept of magic and illussions as tricks on the mind and in 'the dark knight' it is all out mind games and psychologhical turned real chaos in the form of the ultimate text of resolve- pr the pushing of one person'
s resolve to solve a problem without resorting to beocming a monster like their adversary.

But in 'Inception' Nolan brings together the psychological turned literal, the imaginative turned realistic amnd believabler and the subconcious or thoughts in people's ,ominds and their 'projections' (people who are imagined by the thinker and based on what the person is thinking determines whether they a threat to them or not).

The film far from relies from symbolism and infact, Nolan frecoghnized that to represent a threat there had to be dramatic tensdion but how do you brign dramatic tension when the entire film for the first time like ever in a blockbuster film or credbile drama when the entire film is just about played in the person's mind? what they imagine is the bulk of the story the objective is real; but it takes place in the mind. As the concept goes, because the idea the actual person whi's mind is infiltrated by the 'inception' team, is their authetnic orignal idea, it exists,. but as ideas do they exist in the person's ,omdf BEFORE they are put to paper. THIS INGENIUS CONCEPT THAT NOLn has devised means that he is transposing in effect how the understanding of the cinematic artist as idea exists in a persons mind BEFORE it brought to life as a presentation to audiences or as film itself!!!

Nolan did not base this on any piece of fiction and he used his own imagination, but only a director in touch with reality in their own life can surely bring such a far out idea to be as believable and real as possible. or as the impossible but he makes it happen. Almost effortlessly thouyhg he did spend a decade trying to sought out the idea of the 'idea' within his incpetion vision in his mind. There are ideas in ideas, spaces within spaces and people and personalities within personalities.

The risks for Cobb are huge but they are far larger and more sinister than he or his team could possibly expect.

For two reasons first, Nolan being Nolan the as i now call 'mind bender filmmaker' figured it isn't enough to hack a corporate perosn's mind but what about hacking someone very heavily guarded and well respected in the pbulic eye and doing it without getting found out- what if the person had their own defenses in their mind or 'projections' and what if these 'projections' were effectively highly skilled guards and military personnel cos let not forget 'Fisher;' who mind is to be infiltrated is as shrewd or nearly as shrewd and cunning as Wantanabe's character- and clearly as the film demonstrates even when infiltratign a person's mind, you effectively can't take for granted that they have let down their guard.

As Dicaprio's 'Cobb' says before accepting Wantanabe's proposal, 'this is more than just corporate espionage your asking me to take great risks in something with someone who is very high up and very well sponsored in the co4rporate world someone who would not let down their guard. Yes, they expected hostile projections but clearly the consequences are laid bare for underestimatring our own and others psychological defenses in their mind. For Fisher came prepared the assassi\n warriors were well trained targeted to protect fisher and execute infiltrators in his mind,

But let take a step back,. Most films characterise their characters depth at the personal level we learn about the characters history and yes more often than not supprting cast, especially ones where they work as a team as the sotry requires, but few films dare to overlook the character depth and trasnpose this in defining depth through the charcters occupation in other wordfs, the occupation IS THE CHATRACTERS definition in the story. And Nolan is throwing out the old rule book of conventional and standard characterisations and writesa new one! as he does with each concept we breakl down to understand this phenomenal watershed rule breaker game changer fo a film.

In order to achieve this level of extensively complex and dangerous mind infiltration into Fisher's mind, it is important Cobb assembles an extensive tram of experts, not just Cobb and Arthur, but a Forger, and Architect, and a Chemist. But dare to be different, Nolan further confounds the conservatives in Hollywood by daring to recast the concept of their namesake occuypations. Depth and intrigue in characterisations has never been portrayed to the extent it has as the driver of the characters motives and purpose for existign inthe film btu that is all that matters and why not? Nolan grears everything in this film to the ultimate objective- TO CHANGE THE CORE IDEA IN EFFECT OF THE STORY ITSELF TO CHANGE THE OUJTCOME OF THE IDEA AND THE FILM ITSELF!!!??

So beyond this Nolan has the astounding gall to recast the 'conventional' role of an architect, the role of a forger the role of an extractor (well i dont think such a role exists in 'conventional terms') and the inventor/ guardina/ partner and the chemist.

An Architect by nature designs buildings, but must normally operate in the confines of rules and standard conventions. but in 'Inception' the archtiect has little to no limits save to mainipulate what is alteady existing and to fundamentally alter the physical enviornment around them without being bound by regulation and rules, except for a few they must not 'introduce' in anothe persons minds memories that will remind other team memebers of 'inception;' to esnure no distractions or compromises with the resurfacing of comprmisng meories of the people on the 'team' lest the projections threaten to derail and 'interfere' with their main objective in this case, to infiltrate Fisher's mind. The scenes it must be said with the architect at the start are amongst my favourite and in mainpulating physical environements (which range from the deconstruction in astonishing slo-mo of existing ordered renauisasance style architecture to the 'peeling over and 'doubling up' of the landscape so that breathatkingly and unbelevably yet believably so in an amazingly inpsiring way, the road on the ground, becomes the road on the top or in effect subtutes the sky- effectively the archtiecdt manipulates the existign envirnment, redefining the existing space using existign elemtns to construct something new!!! YEt few filmmakers if i recall have the audacity or darign to so freely yet so amazingly systematically and conversely chaorically trandofrm teh existing enviornemnt so profoundly yet without fundamentally altering the entire enivornment. The Archiect played so exceedingly well to a tea and convincingly by the dleightuflyl ambiguous and decideely sensistive player in the 'team' has a fascination of wokrign with existing shapes and forms to sonctruct new spacews, using the eixting 'rules' of the enviornment.

For instance, and in addition to the stacked 'mirrored' renaisance apartments where the road and landscape and streetscape peekls pver the existing build to create an symetrical streetscape mirror stack of buildings, twice in height and tyet retaining the same spaces, that e4ntire sequence is one of the most jaw dropiing you ever experience in film at least since 2001 a space oddysey and most memorable. On a par with this but with even greater subtlety is the use of optical iklussions belnded with physcial manipulation, to transform a seemingly two sided classical dome spae into an alleyway of endless domes across a river to link the town in effect, as real architects do, they picture in their midn what the 'client' wnats except in tbhis case the picture is borught to life instanteously transposed from thoguth imediately into realtiy cos don;'t forget, this takes palce in the 'dream world' and hence in the scene leading to the breathtaking and equally memorable yet more profoundly powerful mianpuilative scene in which the 'architect' manipulates the existing 'negative space' between the arch and what we see as a reflection of that doem, after she effectively p[ulls the mirrors otu from the engative space like too giant mirrored doors aainst each other, she effectively mainpulates the reflection of the dome into a speftacualrly powerful and architectura,lly profuond linear array of column with the touch of a finger as the glass shatters, this awe sinpiring, cinematic defining monent in film hostyr is revealed. It is amazing cos Nolan dfeels no compulsion to make this fulm limited to the rules of the real world and in effect as 'Cobb; explains, these world imagined byt he 'architect' (so their role is to create a 'maze' relevant to the setting ijn 'fishers dream' or mind so tjat there are safeguards and insurance and protection for other team emembers from threats of their own and as it runs out fishers own projections. The more complex the maze, the more chance of survival and success in the mission, for reaosn of security, the more secret the vision is by teh architect from toher members the less risk of the operation beign compromised at least where if a mevber gets caufght by their rivals porjections, that they would not know the layoutr of the city and in effect the archtiect is the guardian of this knowledge who will onyl share with the team whilst on the mission in the mind, how awesome a concept is that?

But I have to say in all my time watching film never have i experienced anything like this film at all. For there are contradtictions within and paradoxes intentional and unintentiuonal for instance the concept of manipu.lating the physical neivornment without fundamentally trasnforming the appearance, looka dn feel is a parado x you are adding to the world, and changing thigns withn an existing framework but without birngin evolution which is onyl natural when you add new thigns into the equation. Did Nolan study archuitecture prior to shooting this? you betcha only a director with such asutte knowledge who clearly did their reasearch would have been able to do the peepling and stacked mirrored streetscape moment or the sequential bridge rising, collunade type pre bridge befor ethe mirrored image mainpulated corridor arrayed collunade arhcway witht eh precision it did and i know as a epxerience archtiect myself that these are the rules base dona rchitectural hisotry. Yet Nolan has condensed hat could risk beindg a lecture in architectural rules into pure entertainment. Not afraid to epxlore new concpets at risk of his film mentors if he has any that is who give a clip aorund the ears, for darignt o do this

But he can cos majority of the film takes place in the mind and whatever you think of, whatever memories there are, determines what the limtis are and true what we imagine what we think in our subconcious is far less limited than what it is in real life. Nolan understyand this and has form with understanding the human psych and indeed mind and psychology as his filmography suggests and combined with that and pxlaining what the rules are in the mind he convinces audiences to a tea that cinema can work just as successfuly as per if it were to be as a story and cocnept and chaercter and set and events bound by conservative rules.

It is very much out with the old and in with the new with 'inception'. I touched on the symbolism and it should be pounted otu seldom have objects transcended symbolism inf ilms to represent goals. There are too 'Tropeds' which effectively are a protective device to help you keep your sanity in track that you take with you from reality in your dream. the word itself derives from 'trope' which means symbolism that ahs cultrual relevance. In tghe film, these objects not only represent a sense of identity something the characters can realte to in the real world even when they in the dream world (paradox 2) incidentally yet it somehow works throug noans understanding of his own cinematic rules he set up here) For Cobb, it a spinning top - it represents discontinuity and a desire for continuity beign circular as object it represents the intednede continuity for which Cobb greatly desires and is hence aprt and parcel of his objective to 'return home' for the 'architect' she crafts a chess piece architectural yes, but very stable, does not generate motion yet as by its very shape, has a feminien 'soft' touch efectively a 'pawn' from a improvised chess piece and beign a shiny gold, she represents and eventually aims to be a light and a source to help otehr mebers like Cobb retain a sense of persepctive on mission and a source of stabiltiy to ensure that Cobb does not let his memories interfere in their teams goals and to bring peace of mind the womans touch the soft touch the understanding and compassionate touch in an otherwise cold world where sentimentality must be left beghind in the real world lest it means the ikssion canno succeed. Clearly Nolan here is highlighting lessons surely from his own expeirence and one we can allr elate to in our sturggle at some poin t in our lives i know i have in our battle to overcome our inner demons. And sometimes our abiltiy to focus on what our true goals are are obscured and obstructed by our fears or in Cobb's case our worst memories.

'Ma' as is so aptly named is one such memory and looms as the emerging shdow and greater threat to their mission and Dicaprio's right to get home through achieving the mission. In effect 'Ma' is a character who put the entire teams mission and their sense of self at risk. Not wanting to make this a team issue, he tries to contain his past memories of a person who once existed but who onyl exists in his memories. This is perhaps the point where Nolan sticks with conventional wisdom you need dramatic human events even if it plauys out in memories else the film is too abstracted, too ambiguous. Nolan in this, brings a sense of haunting and irony in the concepy in the form of Cobbs former love.

In seeing it a second time it is no surprise ias writer/ director/ producer but esp as writer the one with the chess piece totem the symbol fo stability provides compassion support and humility and counsel to the increasignyl conflicted Cobb and as the mission to get deeper to the source of altering Fisher's 'idea' indeed 'Ma' emerges as closer toa greater and greater threat to their current mission in Fisher's mind.

This by the way is the one 'constant' linear narrative but it is not the main one rather it is in essence on equal footing as a subplot yet for somethng as a concept for a mian chraacter, it hard to know when and if this has been explored before in this way through memories rather than reality but in effect there is a displacement of time- a concept to touch on towards the end of tjhios review. What this means is that if in our mind our worst emmories we think abotu more and more and don't open up to someon about (as the architect becomes for cobb) then it obstructs our abiltiy to carry out our task indeed our mind makes thes eprjections a reality wihtin our own mind to the point where we believe it so real and we fear it cos it a negative it threatens our current line of thought.

By daring to be the first filmmaker in modenr hisotry if not ever to represent a charcetrs thoguth as a relaity in a nother persons thought is more than just the work of a cinematic genius, btu a very gifted writer and a dman talneted artsist.

IT does get to a point where in order to get 'home' Cobb' must confrotn the reality within his memory and the memory of ma's and does it with the architedt in tow in effect the architect is more than an architect but as architects have to or should have a sense of compassion in their aproahc in how building engage with people extensively so, Nolan, takes this concept to another level exposing through thism the archtec sheer depth of cahracter.

And it is a credit to Elen page as the 'architect' and Dicaprio and Mario Collitard as 'ma' that such a dramatic weight is leant to somethign so heavily coneptuasl and astonishignly inspirign as a film.

But let talk about a few more elements here to do full justice to this truly landmark watershed cul classic of a film.

The forger is not your average forger most forgers forge dpocuments, btu this one through processing physcial references in the real world and even as we discover within a dream within a dream within a dream OMG how complex and darign can a filmmaker get well epxland on this soon!

effectgively adapt this physcial representation fo in this case fishers memory to be a person from their past in real physcial form. It about knowledge and understanding from the physical document and hisotry and understanding how to impersonate the person to the point you imagine it so relaistically you beocm ethat person!!! that is the role of the forger and only adds furthe weight to ar this point a detialed concept and in characterisation. Nolan can be forgiven for taking this for granted the idea trhatw e dont have to know all the characters main perosnal background cos the conept is so new audiences are jsut in awe and appreciAtion for it as it is portraye din the film!!

The 'Chemist' is effectively the closest thing you get to the mroe conventional to reality except his expertise specificaly si unlike many or any medicines aroubd today, but rather, specialisign is an unique aneasthesia more like sedative putting the tema in a deep sleep which ensures that somehow dont ask me or nolan how perhaps one fo a veyr few almost unrecognizable array of flaws that the sedative cannot wake you until music is played and hence when normaly in a very tdeep sleep or trasnsant state you cant hear anything but this sedative allows you to? but it oen of a minority of 'flaws' if you can call it that in a film tjhat clearly is as flawless as an ambitious endlessly inventive film can get nowadats, and hence can easily be overlooked in the gradn scope of things.

What dioes confound the viewer and indeed myself is that for teh forger and both the chemist, and th architect what makes thigns really extraoridnary is how theya re able to prctice esp witht eh forger and sedative within the dream so they fgo in an intiial dream state and in that drema ahave th spychnolgical aspect fo their skill to either sedaTE OR FORGER other identities or potions etc? how it possible>? well t not really except we got to remember we delaing with anew film idea at its core and till future films adapt Nolans gorudnbreaking cinema 'rules' it impossible to judge how flawd his concepts are taking them as tyhey are evne if flawed in time they will prove to be really extrmely influential and why not? they shuld be for clearly 'Inception is the lpong verdue antidote itself that filmgoers have longed for and critics for that matter.

In effect Nolan epxlains everything as characters go in and out of 'dream states; but then you have th e most astonishing phenomenal comncept of all a 'dream within a dream' and a dream withinsomeone elses dream within the dream that is within the dream!!!?? HOW ON EARTH YOU MAY ASK> HOW CAN THIS BE TRASNLATED IN A SENSIBLE AND LOGICAL IF YOU CAN CALL TI THAT WAY BOVIUSLY NOLAN KNEW OF THE RISK, WHICH IS WHY HE TIED IT INTO THE CENTRAL OBJECTIVE FOR COBB AND CO TO REITRIEVE THE CODE But as Nolan poves with what is as many as 6 subplots going at one time in the film!!!! yes a feat never been done before in itself! that objective does not have to holey define storey and in essence the charcetrs roles are defined through the various dream states which double wait for it as subpltos and strands of subplots where each dream has a different objective and a different plot to achiev the overall objective each dream also has their own threats and threats at different levels. Are you confused yet? well you owuld be if Nolan didn't provide the ncessary exposition to ge thte setting fo the concept correct so teh audience can understand but epxosition ehre is not just executed through epxlanarotry terms but it visual,it symbolic and its characterised and driven by events!

So, in effect Nolan is reconstructing excisting film elements and conservative concepts to reconstruct the art and function of plto in cinema for the first time ever the overall story thread is a piecemeal but order one at that of at least half a dozen subplots- the key ingredient at its core core an inventive film even if it not whilly original but by marrying dreams to represent different subplots you are getting a amazing consistently against all odds betwen concept, plto, characetr, role and event.

The layers are as followsL

The 'primary layer' is the point of dream state entry derives from in its entirety, the plane where they 'sedate' fisher and they enter city central in the dream, now at the frist level, their first objective is to 'make contact' with fisher and effectgively kidnap him. From there they must try to exrct the code from his mind in a abandoned factory. (the code is the key to access the 'idea' that is fisher's key to gettign a share in the stake in wantanbes eeegy market)

In effect upon retireving the code, it important to point out that indeed, the next 'dream state' is ainititated leading to the second subplot and th next phase pof the objective note how concepot, objective, and subplot narrative strand complement each pother so in effect no 2 is the van and thrugh the van they enter the second dream state, which is in a croproate classy hotel where fisher is staying and as each level goes deper now at this point they are all infiltratign fihser's mind and hence it fisher's hotel The intriguing thing is that it a case of 2 objectives and sub sub pltos in the one strand- and that is that whilst cobb poses as a double agent that right offers to be an extrator for fisher while playing him for a fool in the mind, in a dream within a dream!!! and on the other, Arthur must rendevou with the rest of the team, incl fisher and dicaprio later to enter level 3 dream state so by this poitn where a dream withn a dream within a dream and it comes with the first major twist/ conundrum or rather seocnd so yes nolan puts complexity withint complexity yet makes it so understandable and accesible for viewers in itself a ffeat rarely achived with ambitous films and it is worth pointing out level 3 dream state or layer is in efect the 1st mindset dream state of fisher's trusted or once trusted colleauge who it tursn tou si guarding fisher's idea in a ehavily fortified compouind that ahrd to believe as it is, is the real guardian fo fihsers idea and it not an idea that fisher in contrl of h8imself.

So they must go on an all out combat mission to take3 out fhishers ex trusted colleagues 'miders' and penetrate the mind and theb this leads up to the biggest biggest picture theme of all the big broad picture cocnepts thsi film brigns to cinema itself, which is TIME

For given that all these vents happen under tyhe one time but eyt at different places and different settings, everythign must be coordinated. Because and here wis wher ethe pricnoles of the 'kick' come togehter, in effect. every kick means a coordinated approach so that each objective is achieved almost like a traditonal squadron of soliders in a war campaign ahcieving mutiple objectives to fulfill the same goal.

Arthur is left behind as the 'minder' in level 2 while in level 3 Cobb and the rest of the gang incl fisher and the client, must infiltrate and destroy any and all military resistance to access the safe to access the 'idea' and s8ubeqeunetly change it. But the 'kick' comes from the plunging of the van back in level 1 and thsi where the concpet of time can get cofnusing apparently in the mind, time is twice as long in the first level, double in teh sconed, and triple in teh third in an incredible and truly landmark omntage moment which defines the culmination of everything cpoming togethe in event, sotry character and objectivbe, Arthur, in level 2, the sedatist in level 1 and the remainder in level 3 musty all coordinate at once in order to 'return to reality. AS a requirement and this is where Nolan's genius is evident, Arthur in order to 'wake up at the van muyst 'eject' (ecept due to the impact fo the kick effecting the dream turns the hotel rom upside down conseuqnetly as the van is floating before hittign teh water gravity is moemntarily lost in the fisher hotel.

Even then he has a conundrum which is simply Nolans genius playign wiht our mind ' needing to eject the personnel out of the buidlignt ot eh groudn floor (except remember down is uo and up is down due to the position fo the van in teh backward vertical position in evlel 1 so in effect, he asks himsefl (how do i get to the ground floor without any gravitty?) the answer TO GO UPWARDS but cooridnation is everything and it is in the latetr levle 3 state (which is elvel 1 of fihers treacherous colleague) (meanig in theory 4 mental states 3 from one eprson, one form one and then, to further compound this, the need as is ensured given the comrppomise threat when 'ma' appears in level three form cobb's memor8ies, a 4th level state mhich links cobs flashbacks earleir on to current events and has Cobb and the 'architect' entering cobbs mind so in effect you have as many as three different individuals thoguth p[atterns, 5 different levle and 3 levles of the same objective all interconneceted with everyones fate interconneceted.

Time is well understood and manipulated wher ein effect, Nolan understands to get out of a deepest dream state ypu need to coordinatye with the kick formthe p-rior dream state and this cootridnation in tiem adn timing must be precise lest anyoen get left in limbo so, when cobb confronts at long klast the truth that 'ma' is onyl a apst emmory and isn't real, he must naviaget seperately from the architect who is sperate formt eh 3 embers in dream state level 3 ad they can only get to level 3 as the architect does by the desturction fo military seuyrity compouind in level tghree so that at the exact timing of the explosion at level 3 after the idea is ingeniusoyl altered ad this small alteration has a funadmental imapct on fishers own reoclleciton fo hi sioriginal idea hence mision accomplished but nto quite tio ensure the whole team incl fisher and everyoner else comes otu all there levels. so as is the ingenius concept when traditional msuic overlayign cotneporary settings ait has to be said givng a curous but workable post modern taste to porceedings plays it an idnciationt eh enxt kick takes place

it goes liek this every kcijk is a linking mecghanism in storyline connecting one even to another events are drivent by one action rather than a chaacers decision anda s suhc goign backwards, coob and archtiect seperately need to get back t their orignal state with everyone else but as cobb leaves fter the archtiet, the archtietc return to elvel 3 adn justa s she does eeyone else wakes up as they do the epxlosion trgigers off the lift liftign it up (to go down wow! your head spinning mine is!) and at the impact fo that kick in level 3 sorry there are 4 ain lvel, and hence tehy return to the van level 2 from theere when they wake up they find theselves at level oen teh plane

Whatw e have us a complete backlward action of activities as a requirment for eveoyenr to come back into reality.

The films ideas are huge and on a apr with 2001 a space oddysey and as one would hope and forgive nolan for doing to put at the end of all tehd rama, revelatioans and twists and subplots a more conservative ending and indeed ihe does a happikly ever after with a charming heartening twist cobb gets home and is troped is still spionning cintiutiy has reutrned in his life as he makes it home as everyoen else does seperately thejob over, missio accomplished. happliy ever after and why not?

The film SHOULD BE contradtictions shoudl eb a mess shoudl ebc fonusing yet nolan has nto not only shown an asuttue understanding of his material but in crafting this landmark watershed of a masterpiece in redefing the rules of cinema and what can wok in cinemas now and for all time, at least for the foreseeable future, understand what it takes to break gorund int eh cocncept of orignality in cinema. Abnd in much teh way that with a touch of a finger the 'architect' shatters the glass 'barrier' to reveal a cotnuous epic corridor so too has Nolan shattered forever the notion that 'film is boudn by precdent and has IN EFFECT SHATTERED THE GLASS MIRROR AND CEILING THAT WAS THE LIMITATION IN WHAT IS POSSIBLE IN FILM, SHATTEING ALL PREOCNCPETIONS TO BREAK NEW GROUND
43
Vote
   


Today, my dad saw the tremendously entertaining 'District 9'. When he saw it i asked him a question: "if there were Humans instead of Aliens to shape the story of 'District 9' would you like it a lot more?" his response "YES" that is: Y-E-S!

AND AS WILL BE REVEALED THIS IS THE PRECISE MENTALITY OF THE CONSERVATIVES IN HOLLYWOOD AND EXACTLY WHY SCIENCE FICTION WILL BE UNJUSTLY SNUBBED AT THIS YEARS OSCARS! TO THE SOULD DESTROYING CREDBILITY OF WHAT AMPAS IS ORIGINALLY ALL ABOUT ANSWER- MOTION PICTURE SCIENCES NOT POLITICALLY DRIVEN DECISIONS AND CERTAINLY NOT REJECTING SCIENCE FICTION ON THE GROUNDS THE GROUNDBREAKING NATURE OF BOTH SCIENCE FICTION GENRE AND THEMED CONTENDERS AS BEING PERCEIVED AS A 'THREAT' TO THE OLD GUARD AND OUTDATED GAURD ESTABLISHMENT OF TRADITIONAL ACTORS VS. DIGITISED ACTORS, OF TRADITONAL FILM MEDIUM VS REVOLUTIONARY DOCU STYLE ('D9') OR GROUNDBREAKING PHOTOREALISTIC CINEMA REDEFINING 3D ('AVATAR')
[ Click here to read more ]
41
Vote
   


IMPORTANT NOTE AND DISCLAIMER AHEAD OF THIS REVIEW:- IN LIGHT OF THE OSCAR AND IMMINENT AWARDS BUZZ THAT THIS FILM HAS AND WILL SURELY RECIEVE BY THE ACADEMY, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT OUT OF RESPECT OR SEEING EACH FILM IN ITS OWN MERIT THAT AWARDS AND CRITICAL ACCLAIM, ACCOLADES AND OTHER HOLLYWOOD JOURNALIST'S AND POLITICAL OPINION ARE SIDELINED IN FAVOUR OF A REVIEW THAT DOES FULL JUSTICE TO THE MERITS OF THE INTEGRITY THAT EACH FILM HAS IN ITSELF- FURTHERMORE THIS FILM ESPECIALLY HAS BEEN UNJUSTLY SLAMMED IN THE MEDIA DUE TO UNDERSELLING ITSELF TO THE PUBLIC- A FILMS ARTISTIC MERITS SHOULD NEVER BE ASSESSED BY IT FLAWED MARKETING HOWEVER FLAWED INDEED IT WAS BY THE DISTRIBUTORS AND STUDIO INVOLVED IN THIS FILM

"War is a drug" is the message at the very opening sequence of the film "The Hurt Locker". There is no doubt this is very true and is indeed applicable to every war film made. It is a broad statement about wars past and present- from world war 1 to world war 2 and beyond, and yes obviously including conflitcts that are happening as we speak- such as the one that this film concerns itself about and that is Iraq


[ Click here to read more ]
38
Vote
   


Well. well..with awards season ONLY a third of the way...but nevertheless the third it time to further delve deeper into the key principles that will ineivtably lead to a massive rift between the conservatives and progressives....

And it seems nothing is what it seems in hollywood and culturally driven sentiment could make hollywood fall into line decades and decades after it should have much earlier in the academy's existence


[ Click here to read more ]
37
Vote
   


The Guilds have been announced for the Producers, Directors and Writers guilds of america. Inconsequential of how the remainder of awards season pans out..much like every other past awards season, it doesn't matter who wins and who doesn't what always matters to me is the film i enjoyed the most. What i believe to be the best known film...

HOWEVER LADIES AND GENTLEMAN HERE IS THE CATCH: THE FLOODGATES THAT STARTED TO BE OPENED AT LONG LAST FOR ALTERNATIVE CINEMA- PROGRESSIVE, VISIONARY AND ORIGINAL WERE ONCE OPENED IN THE UNFORGETTABLE MOMENTOUS CINEMATIC YEARS OF 2001, 2002 AND 2003 WITH THE LORD OF THE RINGS TRILOGY HAS AT LONG LAST AFTER YEARS OF NEGLECT AND REJECTION TO GENRES ONCE DEAMED AS TOO 'UNCONVENTIONAL' FOR THE HOLLYWOOD ESTABLISHMENT ARE FINALLY AT THE VERY LEAST GETTING THE DUE RECOGNITION IN THE FORM OF A FAIR COMPETITIVE CHANCE WITH THE CONSERVATIVE CULTURED CINEMA SINCE ITS INTRODUCTION 40-50 YEARS AGO, THE GENRES THAT WERE ONCE NOT TAKEN SERIOUSLY, NOR REVERED IN HOLLWOODS EYES AS MUCH AS THE TRADITIONAL EPICS OR THE BIOPICS OR THE MUSICALS ARE FINALLY, FINALLY BEING TAKEN SERIOUSLY AS SERIOUS AWARDS CONTENDERS BUT MUCH MORE THAN THIS, HOLLYWOOD HAS ALREADY SHOWN IT PREPAREDNESS TO LET SCIENCE FICTION/ FANTASY HAVE RECOGNITION AND COMMENDATIONS ON THE SCALE OF SOME OF THE BIGGER YEARS IN CINEMA HISTORY. AND NOW, 45 YEARS LATER THE FLOODGATES ARE TRULY OPENING MUCH WIDER THAN EVER BEFORE AS HOLLYWOOD RIDES THE INSPIRATION AND POWER OF ORIGINAL, INVENTIVE CINEMA
[ Click here to read more ]
30
Vote
   


First to all of you I wish you all a very happy new year and that may all you hope for come true in 2010.

But when it comes to cinema, it is fitting perhaps, that in opening my writing account for new years, at the height of a decade of interesting, diverse, bold filmmaking we begin with the review of the film that has redefined the parameters of what constitutes cinema- hence, I can think of not greater way to kick of the dawn of a new decade by reviewing the film that indeed is paving the way to the biggest revolution in multiple decades. I am, of course talking of none other than James Cameron's AVATAR


[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


I know I have condemned the hyperbollic speculative nature of journalists in entertainment, however, not all articles have been far off the mark. But once again these articles refer to hardly cover the big big picture context of speculaion surrounding certain specific movies.

Here at Reichdome Insights, we excel in giving you the micro AND macro view on all things cinematic and with that the culture,politics and informative depth in not only understanding one film's didectomy but also a film's influences, cultural/ social circumstances with which movies derive from, and historical context and defining the very nature of the concept of genre film making, understanding Hollywood's attitudes and how they influence the Academy


[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
   


MATURE CONTENT
   


 

Recent Comments

I've not commented on anything yet :(