A Freaky Singularity
August 29th 2010 08:06
Scientists are supposed to be perfectly rational beings that can explain the most intricate phenomena of any scientific realm with total rationality and clear thinking. When it comes to the Universe’s origin, surprisingly, they seem to hide behind something intractable.
Physicist’s who defend the Big Bang theory proclaim that, in the beginning, all matter and energy, all time and space, were contained into something the size of a tennis ball and that there the commonly known laws of Physics did not apply. That phenomenon was called a “singularity”.
So, our meaningful, purposeful, orderly, progressive and logical Universe was born of something which does not share in its nature, more precisely a singularity, since this one rejects the laws of Physics. Does this, dear reader, seem to offend your intelligence as much as it offends mine?
Let’s look into reason: Jesus long time ago proclaimed that “you know a tree by its fruit.” and that “a bad tree does not give good fruits.” If the singularity that preceded the Big Bang had no relationship with the laws of Physics, how can the then generated universe be ruled by the laws of Physics? How can a freak produce order and purpose? It does not make sense to me.
On the other hand, if the singularity does not have a relationship with the laws of Physics, our then generated universe must also share in that nature and have no bearing in the laws of Physics. This is only logical, even though false.
So, why did scientists came up with such an idea as a “singularity”? Because, the truth is, scientists are agog to understand the nature and origin of our universe which seems to elude their imagination. The idea of a singularity conveniently hides their ignorance while they tell everyone to stop thinking and, blindfolded believe in them. But that’s the same medieval witches used to do. The difference is that these used to be burned at the stake.
More than likely, the whole energy of the universe is already there, fully, but in different expressions. When the universe explodes (Big Bang) as well as when it crunches (Big Crunch), this energy merely reshapes and channels itself.
But in total it’s the same. No such thing as one nature – the singularity un-ruled by Physics – producing an unrelated nature – our universe ruled by the laws of Physics. The universe probably is just a re-composition of this original energy into different shapes and forms in continuous manifestation.
Fernando Monteiro
Sunday, 29 August 2010
Physicist’s who defend the Big Bang theory proclaim that, in the beginning, all matter and energy, all time and space, were contained into something the size of a tennis ball and that there the commonly known laws of Physics did not apply. That phenomenon was called a “singularity”.
So, our meaningful, purposeful, orderly, progressive and logical Universe was born of something which does not share in its nature, more precisely a singularity, since this one rejects the laws of Physics. Does this, dear reader, seem to offend your intelligence as much as it offends mine?
Let’s look into reason: Jesus long time ago proclaimed that “you know a tree by its fruit.” and that “a bad tree does not give good fruits.” If the singularity that preceded the Big Bang had no relationship with the laws of Physics, how can the then generated universe be ruled by the laws of Physics? How can a freak produce order and purpose? It does not make sense to me.
On the other hand, if the singularity does not have a relationship with the laws of Physics, our then generated universe must also share in that nature and have no bearing in the laws of Physics. This is only logical, even though false.
So, why did scientists came up with such an idea as a “singularity”? Because, the truth is, scientists are agog to understand the nature and origin of our universe which seems to elude their imagination. The idea of a singularity conveniently hides their ignorance while they tell everyone to stop thinking and, blindfolded believe in them. But that’s the same medieval witches used to do. The difference is that these used to be burned at the stake.
More than likely, the whole energy of the universe is already there, fully, but in different expressions. When the universe explodes (Big Bang) as well as when it crunches (Big Crunch), this energy merely reshapes and channels itself.
But in total it’s the same. No such thing as one nature – the singularity un-ruled by Physics – producing an unrelated nature – our universe ruled by the laws of Physics. The universe probably is just a re-composition of this original energy into different shapes and forms in continuous manifestation.
Fernando Monteiro
Sunday, 29 August 2010
| 73 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
